Advertisement

Ecologies of Digital Literacies: Implications for Education

Living reference work entry
Part of the Encyclopedia of Language and Education book series (ELE)

Abstract

This article outlines research on digital literacies which takes a social practice perspective, approaching digital literacies in real-life contexts as part of ecologies of communicative practices, and draws out the implications of this work for education. Early contributions are summarized, including analyses of hypertext and multimodality and debates around the extent to which language online changed from more speech-like to more writing-like forms. Major contributions are then described. These include work on young people’s everyday literacy practices, showing how these can transform established understandings of social status and expertise, work which focuses on literacies for informal learning in online settings and in video gaming, the nature of learning in communities in online communicative contexts, and challenges to dominant discourses and moral panics. Current areas of work in progress are identified including gaming and virtual worlds, curation, multilingual digital literacies, and language learning online. Challenges include clashes between the understandings generated by this research and drawn on in some policies and the powerful accountability regimes based on pen-and-paper testing which still frame many educational systems, the need to develop appropriate research methods and ethical challenges in this area, and the imperative of continuing to ensure a diversity of research sites to avoid focusing only on the practices of the privileged. Future directions for research are briefly addressed including the role of digital literacies in social movements and the need for more research in coding literacies.

Keywords

Digital literacies Multimodality Information and communication technologies New Literacy Studies Digital pedagogies 

References

  1. Alvermann, D. E. (Ed.). (2002). Adolescents and literacies in a digital world. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  2. Androutsopoulos, J. (2008). Potentials and limitations of discourse-centred online ethnography. Language@Internet, 5. http://www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2008/1610
  3. Baron, N. S. (1998). Letters by phone or speech by other means: The linguistics of email. Language & Communication, 18(2), 133–170. doi:10.1016/S0271-5309(98)00005-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barton, D. (2007). Literacy: An introduction to the ecology of written language (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  5. Barton, D. (2012). Participation , deliberate learning and discourses of learning online. Language and Education, 26(2), 139–150. doi:10.1080/09500782.2011.642880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barton, D., & Lee, C. (2013). Language online: Investigating digital texts and practices. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Beavis, C., & Charles, C. (2005). Challenging notions of gendered game play: Teenagers playing The Sims. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 26(3), 355–367.Google Scholar
  8. Bigum, C. (2002). Design sensibilities, schools and the new computing and communication technologies. In I. Snyder (Ed.), Silicon literacies: Communication, innovation and education in the electronic age (pp. 130–140). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Black, R. W. (2006). Language, culture, and identity in online fanfiction. e-Learning, 3(2), 170–184. doi:10.2304/elea.2006.3.2.170.Google Scholar
  10. Bulfin, S., & North, S. (2007). Negotiating digital literacy practices across school and home: Case studies of young people in Australia. Language and Education, 21(3), 247–263. doi:10.2167/le750.0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burnett, C. (2010). Technology and literacy in early childhood educational settings: A review of research. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 10(3), 247–270. doi:10.1177/1468798410372154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burnett, C., & Merchant, G. (2011). Is there a space for critical literacy in the context of social media? English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 10(1), 41–57.Google Scholar
  13. Burnett, C., Davies, J., Merchant, G., & Rowsell, J. (Eds.). (2014). New literacies around the globe: Policy and pedagogy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Carrington, V. (2005a). Txting: The end of civilization (again)? Cambridge Journal of Education, 35(2), 161–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carrington, V. (2005b). New textual landscapes, information and early literacy. In J. Marsh (Ed.), Popular culture, new media and digital literacy in early childhood (pp. 13–27). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carrington, V., & Marsh, J. (2005). Digital childhood and youth: New texts, new literacies. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 26(3), 279–285.Google Scholar
  17. Cohen, S. (1972). Folk devils and moral panics. London: MacGibbon and Kee.Google Scholar
  18. Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (Eds.). (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Crystal, D. (2006). Language and the Internet (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Davies, J. (2006). Affinities and beyond!! Developing ways of seeing in online spaces. E-Learning and Digital Media, 3(2), 217–234. doi:10.2304/elea.2006.3.2.217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Davies, J., & Merchant, G. (2007). Looking from the inside out: Academic blogging as new literacy. In C. Lankshear & M. Knobel (Eds.), A new literacies sampler (pp. 167–198). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  22. Dezuanni, M., O’Mara, J., & Beavis, C. (2015). “Redstone is like electricity”: Children’s performative representations in and around Minecraft. E-Learning and Digital Media, 12(2), 147–163. doi:10.1177/2042753014568176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Freebody, P. (2001). Theorising new literacies in and out of school. Language and Education, 15(2), 105–116. doi:10.1080/09500780108666804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  25. Gee, J. P. (2005). Semiotic social spaces and affinity spaces: From the Age of Mythology to today’s schools. In D. Barton & K. Tusting (Eds.), Beyond communities of practice: Language, power and social context (pp. 214–232). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gillen, J. (2014). Digital literacies. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  27. Gleason, B. (2013). #Occupy Wall Street: Exploring informal learning about a social movement on Twitter. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(7), 966–982. doi:10.1177/0002764213479372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Greenhow, C., & Gleason, B. (2012). Twitteracy: Tweeting as a new literacy practice. The Educational Forum, 76(4), 464–478. doi:10.1080/00131725.2012.709032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Greenhow, C., & Robelia, B. (2009). Informal learning and identity formation in online social networks. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 119–140. doi:10.1080/17439880902923580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Herring, S. C. (2004). Computer-mediated discourse analysis: An approach to researching online behavior. In Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning (pp. 338–376). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ito, M., Baumer, S., Bittanti, M., Boyd, D., et al. (2010). Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out: Kids living and learning with new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01154_5.x.Google Scholar
  32. Jenkins, H. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  33. Jewitt, C. (2005). Multimodality, ‘reading’ and ‘writing’ for the 21st century. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 26(3), 315–331.Google Scholar
  34. Jones, R. H. (2004). The problem of context in computer mediated communication. In P. LeVine & R. Scollon (Eds.), Discourse and technology: Multimodal discourse analysis (pp. 20–33). Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Jones, R. H., & Hafner, C. A. (2012). Understanding digital literacies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Kaplan, N. (1995). E-literacies: Politics, hypertext, and other cultural formations in the age of print. Computer-Mediated Communication Magazine, 2(3), 3.Google Scholar
  37. Kress, G. (2000). Multimodality. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 182–202). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the New Media Age. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2011). New literacies: Changing knowledge and classroom learning (3rd ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Lee, C. (2007). Linguistic features of email and ICQ instant messaging in Hong Kong. In B. Danet & S. C. Herring (Eds.), The multilingual Internet: Language, culture and communication online (pp. 185–208). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Luke, A. (2002). What happens to literacies old and new when they’re turned into policy. In D. E. Alvermann (Ed.), Adolescents and literacies in a digital world (pp. 186–204). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  42. Markham, A., & Buchanan, E. (2012). Ethical decision-making and Internet research: Recommendations from the AoIR ethics working committee (Version 2.0). Retrieved from http://www.aoir.org/reports/ethics2.pdf
  43. Marsh, J. (2004). The techno-literacy practices of young children. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 2(1), 51–66. doi:10.1177/1476718X0421003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Marsh, J. (2012). Countering chaos in Club Penguin: Young children’s literacy practices in a virtual world. In G. Merchant, J. Gillen, J. Marsh, & J. Davies (Eds.), Virtual literacies: Interactive spaces for children and young people (pp. 75–88). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Merchant, G., Gillen, J., Marsh, J., & Davies, J. (Eds.). (2013). Virtual literacies: Interactive spaces for children and young people. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Meyers, E. M., Erickson, I., & Small, R. V. (2013). Digital literacy and informal learning environments: An introduction. Learning, Media and Technology, 38(4), 355–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mills, K. A. (2010). A review of the “digital turn” in the New Literacy Studies. Review of Educational Research, 80(2), 246–271. doi:10.3102/0034654310364401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2013). The skills needed for the 21st century. Skills Outlook 2013. http://skills.oecd.org/skillsoutlook.html .
  49. Page, R., Barton, D., Unger, J. W., & Zappavigna, M. (2014). Researching language and social media: A student guide. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  50. Potter, J., & Gilje, O. (2015). Curation as a new literacy practice. E-Learning and Digital Media, 12(2), 123–127. doi:10.1177/2042753014568150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Prinsloo, M., & Rowsell, J. (2012). Digital literacies as placed resources in the globalised periphery. Language and Education, 26(4), 271–277. doi:0.1080/09500782.2012.691511
  52. Reinking, D., McKenna, M. C., Labbo, L. D., & Kiefer, R. D. (Eds.). (1998). Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  53. Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  54. Santo, R. (2011). Hacker literacies: Synthesizing critical and participatory media literacy frameworks. International Journal of Learning and Media, 3(3), 1–5. doi:10.1162/IJLM_a_00075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Snyder, I. (Ed.). (1998). Page to screen: Taking literacy into the electronic era. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  56. Snyder, I. (Ed.). (2002). Silicon literacies: Communication, innovation and education in the electronic age. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  57. Snyder, I., & Beavis, C. (Eds.). (2004). Doing literacy online: Teaching, learning and playing in an electronic world. Cresskill: Hampton Press, Inc..Google Scholar
  58. Steinkuehler, C. A. (2007). Massively multiplayer online gaming as a constellation of literacy practices. e-Learning, 4(3), 297–318. doi:10.2304/elea.2007.4.3.297.Google Scholar
  59. Thomas, A. (2005). Children online: Learning in a virtual community of practice. e-Learning, 2(1), 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Thorne, S. L., Black, R. W., & Sykes, J. M. (2009). Second language use, socialization, and learning in Internet interest communities and online gaming. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 802–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Thorne, S. L., Sauro, S., & Smith, B. (2015). Technologies, identities, and expressive activity. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 215–233. doi:10.1017/S0267190514000257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Thurlow, C. (2006). From statistical panic to moral panic: The metadiscursive construction and popular exaggeration of new media language in the print media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 667–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Literacy Research Centre, Department of LinguisticsLancaster UniversityLancasterUK

Personalised recommendations