Advertisement

Critical-Literacy Education: “The Supremely Educational Event”

  • Peter Freebody
Living reference work entry
Part of the Encyclopedia of Language and Education book series (ELE)

Abstract

This chapter outlines how historians, linguists, anthropologists, sociologists, and educators have contributed in various ways to the study and practice of “critical-literacy education” (CLE). CLE is a project aimed at integrating knowledge about literacy into an analysis of power-in-action and knowledge about power into an analysis of texts-in-action. Summarized here are CLE efforts to have individuals and communities understand more fully their current contexts, their histories, and how they, particularly those traditionally not well served by current ways of teaching literacy in school, may take more productive part in enhancing their societies. One conclusion is that these goals are best pursued through deeper understandings of texts, the social practices they help to shape, and the social relations those practices build and sustain.

Keywords

critical literacy anthropology applied linguistics psychology sociology power relations 

References

  1. Albright, J., & Luke, A. (Eds.). (2013). Pierre Bourdieu and literacy education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Bernstein, B. (1971). Class, codes and control, Volume 1: Theoretical studies toward a sociology of education. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bruns, G. (1992). Hermeneutics, ancient and modern. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Burnett, C., & Merchant, G. (2011). Is there a space for critical literacy in the context of social media? English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 10(1), 41–57.Google Scholar
  5. Computing Research Association. (2015). Data-intensive research in education: Current work and nest steps. Report on two National Science Foundation-sponsored Computing Research Education workshops. http://cra.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/CRA Education Report 2015.pdf. Retrieved 23 May 2016.
  6. Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2013). ‘Multiliteracies’: New literacies, new learning. In M. R. Hawkins (Ed.), Framing languages and literacies: Socially situated views and perspectives (pp. 105–135). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Eisenstein, E. L. (2012). The printing revolution in early modern Europe (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ellsworth, E. (1989). Why doesn’t this feel empowering? Working through the repressive myths of critical pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review, 59(3), 297–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Fraatz, J. M. (1987). The politics of reading: Power, opportunity, and prospects for change in America’s public schools. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  11. Freebody, P., & Freiberg, J. (2011). Teaching and learning critical literacy: Beyond the ‘show of wisdom’. In M. Kamil, P. D. Pearson, E. B. Moje, & P. Afflerbach (Eds.), International handbook of reading research (Vol. 4, pp. 432–452). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Seabury.Google Scholar
  13. Graff, H. J. (2001). Literacy’s myths and legacies: From lessons from the history of literacy, to the question of critical literacy. In P. Freebody, S. Muspratt, & B. Dwyer (Eds.), Difference, silence, and textual practice: Studies in critical literacy (pp. 1–30). Cresskill: Hampton.Google Scholar
  14. Janks, H. (2010). Literacy and power. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Kellner, D., & Share, J. (2007). Critical media is not an option. Learning Inquiry, 1(1), 59–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Keynes, S. (2003). The power of the written word: Alfredian England 871–899. In T. Reuter (Ed.), Alfred the Great (pp. 175–198). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  17. Knobel, M., & Lankshear, C. (2008). Digital literacies and participation in online social networking spaces. In C. Lankshear & M. Knobel (Eds.), Digital literacies: Concepts, policies and practices (pp. 249–278). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.Google Scholar
  18. Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Lewis, C. (2014). Affective and global ecologies: New directions for critical literacy. In J. Zacher Pandya & J. Avila (Eds.), Moving critical literacies forward: A new look at praxis across contexts (pp. 187–193). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Luke, A. (1988). Literacy, textbooks and ideology: Postwar literacy and the mythology of Dick and Jane. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  21. Luke, A. (2010). Documenting reproduction and inequality: Revisiting Jean Anyon’s “Social class and school knowledge”. Curriculum Inquiry, 40(1), 167–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. MacLaren, P. (2000). Paulo Freire’s pedagogy of possibility. In S. Steiner, H. Krank, P. McLaren, & R. Bahruth (Eds.), Freirean pedagogy, praxis and possibilities: Projects for the new millennium (pp. 1–22). London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  23. Martin, J. R. (1999). Mentoring semiogenesis: ‘genre-based’ literacy pedagogy. In F. Christie (Ed.), Pedagogy and the shaping of consciousness: Linguistic and social processes (pp. 123–155). London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  24. Pahl, K. (2008). The ecology of literacy and language: Discourses, identities, and practices in homes, schools, and communities. In A. Creese, P. Martin, & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (2nd ed., Vol. 9, pp. 305–315). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  25. Prinsloo, M., & Stroud, C. (2014). Educating for language and literacy diversity: Mobile selves. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Richardson, E. (2007). “She was workin like foreal”: Critical literacy and discourse practices of African American females in the age of hip hop. Discourse and Society, 18(6), 789–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rose, D., & Martin, J. R. (2012). Learning to write, reading to learn: Genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney School. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
  28. Street, B. (2001). Literacy events and literacy practices. In K. Jones & M. Martin-Jones (Eds.), Multilingual literacies: Comparative perspectives on research and practice. Amsterdam: John Benjamin’s.Google Scholar
  29. Street, B. V. (2011). Literacy inequalities in theory and practice: The power to name and define. International Journal of Educational Development, 31(6), 580–586.Google Scholar
  30. Thomas, R. (2009). Writing, reading public and private ‘literacies’: Functional literacy and democratic literacy in Greece. In W. A. Johnson & H. N. Parker (Eds.), Ancient literacies: The culture of reading in Greece and Rome (pp. 13–45). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Willinsky, J. (2007). Of critical theory and critical literacy. Available at www.http://pkp.sfu.ca/files/CriticalLiteracy.pdf. Accessed 2 Jan 2015.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Education and Social WorkThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations