Skip to main content
Book cover

Literacies and Language Education pp 1–21Cite as

Community Literacy Practices and Education: Australia

  • 139 Accesses

Part of the Encyclopedia of Language and Education book series (ELE)

Abstract

It is a truism to state that literacy is important to life; it is impossible escape it. In an age where literacy - even just as written text - is delivered via media as diverse as clothing, signs, bodies, music, rap, screens and paper, it cannot be missed. But it is still common when we speak of literacy to assume that we are thinking simply of words in a limited range of contexts and genres. As well, when we investigate it as a practice, we often do so simply in formal and institutional contexts. It is obvious that literacy is embedded in all of life, and that institutional and formal literacy can never be truly separated from the literacy practices of the world beyond school. This is not a new idea, but in the last 20 years, we have developed a richer understanding of what this might mean for the literacy practices sanctioned, supported, and used within schooling. Earlier discussions of the importance of community literacy by administrators, schools, and teachers, were generally framed by a recognition that the literacy experiences of home and community have a significant impact on literacy success at school. But much of this interest has been in how families and their literacy practices serve school agendas, with interest driven by limited definitions of literacy and at times deficit views of learning. This restricted view of the relationship between literacy practices in and out of school, has constrained attempts to build stronger relationships between schools and their communities. As Schultz and Hull state (see Schultz and Hull 2015, “Literacies in and Out of School in the United States,” Volume 2), our students are never simply in school or out of school, for their identities move with them, and their practices are carried with them across contexts. And yet, we still know far less than we need to know about the way literacy touches lives in surprising contexts and in varied forms. There is so much more to know, and hence we require need new ways to help us understand literacy’s varied forms, purposes and uses. And we need to widen our contexts and arenas for exploration.

Keywords

  • Community Literacy
  • Family literacy
  • Literacy

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    Green (1988) discusses what he terms a 3D model of literacy. As a sociocultural practice, literacy requires operational skills that are always situated in a cultural context. The learning of the skills of literacy should always recognize the relationship of language to cultural meaning and the distribution of power. Literacy is always selective and embedded and hence requires interpretation and critique.

  2. 2.

    This concern was primarily with how environmental print has an impact on early literacy development.

  3. 3.

    There are numerous researchers whose work has contributed to the growing understanding of literacy diversity and its complex relationship to culture, ethnicity, and class. See, for example, Halliday (1975), Street (1984), and Lareau (1989).

  4. 4.

    The Karen people are a Sino-Tibetan language group who came primarily from the state of Karen in Myanmar (formerly Burma). A large number of these people migrated to Thailand and from there have migrated to various countries around the world.

  5. 5.

    I have written about some of the ways we witness this increased multimodality in my blog “Literacy, Families and Learning” for a general audience. These posts describe some of the forms this takes – http://trevorcairney.blogspot.com.au/search?q=multimodal.

  6. 6.

    This review does not attempt to address the significant work done in relation to adult literacy and workplace literacy. While each body of work is significant in understanding broader community literacy practices, a full discussion of each is outside the scope of this chapter that focuses primarily on the literacy worlds of children.

  7. 7.

    See Cairney (2000) for a more detailed review of this early work.

  8. 8.

    Clay (1966), Halliday (1975), and Vygotsky (1978)

  9. 9.

    Hall (1987) provided one of the earliest syntheses of the emergent literacy research and did much to translate this work into a form that could inform early childhood practice. However, this new view of preschool literacy had its roots in the work of many researchers including Clay (1966), Wells (1982, 1986), Harste et al. (1984), Mason and Allen (1986), and Teale and Sulzby (1986).

  10. 10.

    There are many key studies and publications including the critical work of Bloome (1987), Cazden (1988), Cook-Gumperz (1986), Street (1984), and Wells (1986).

  11. 11.

    The term “local literacies” has been used by Barton and others (see for example, Barton and Hamilton 1998) to describe the literacy of everyday life. They observed that in everyday lives, people inhabit a textually mediated social world, bringing reading and writing into most activities.

  12. 12.

    See, for example, Harste et al. (1984), Clay (1966), and Wells (1986).

  13. 13.

    One of the seminal works on this topic is the work of Lareau (1989).

References

  • Auerbach, E. (1989). Toward a social-contextual approach to family literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 59, 165–181.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Auerbach, E. (1995). Which way for family literacy: Intervention or empowerment? In L. M. Morrow (Ed.), Family literacy: Connections in schools and communities. Newark: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER). (2010). OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA Australia). Melbourne: ACER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1935/81). The dialogic imagination: Four essays (ed: Holquist, M.; trans: Emerson, C., & Holquist, M.). Austin: University of Texas Press (TX).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M. (1929/1973). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics (trans: Rotsel, R.W., 1973). Ann Arbor: Ardis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, D., & Hamilton, M. (1998). Local literacies: Reading and writing in one community. London: Routledge.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, D. (1994). Literacy: An introduction to the ecology of written language. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloome, D. (1987). Literacy and schooling. Norwood: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breen, M. P., Louden, W., Barrat-Pugh, C., Rivalland, J., Rohl, M., Rhydwen, M., Lloyd, S., & Carr, T. (1994). Literacy in its place: Literacy practices in urban and rural communities (Vol. 1 & 2). Canberra: DEET.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (1983). Child’s talk: Learning to use language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairney, T. H. (2003). Literacy in family life. In N. Hall, J. Larson, & J. Marsh (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood literacy (pp. 85–98). London: SAGE.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cairney, T. H. (2000). Beyond the classroom walls: The rediscovery of the family and community as partners in education. Educational Review, 52(2), 163–174.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cairney, T. H., & Ruge, J. (1998). Community literacy practices and schooling: Towards effective support for students. Sydney: DEETYA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairney, T. H., Ruge, J., Buchanan, J., Lowe, K., & Munsie, L. (1995). Developing partnerships: The home, school and community interface (Vol. 1–3). Canberra: DEET.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cazden, C. (1988). Classroom discourse. Portsmouth: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clammer, J. (1976). Literacy and social change: A case study of Fiji. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clay, M. (1966). Emergent reading behaviour. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Auckland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook-Gumperz, J. (1986). The social construction of literacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (Eds.). (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. Melbourne: Macmillan Publishers Australia Pty.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, J. (1986). Empowering minority students: A framework for intervention. Harvard Educational Review, 56, 18–36.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education and Science. (1967). Children and heir primary schools: A report of the Central Advisory Council for Education (England) Vol. 1: Report & Vol 2: Research and surveys (Plowden Report). London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deyhle, D., & LeCompte, M. (1994). Cultural differences in child development: Navajo adolescents in middle schools. Theory Into Practice, 33(3), 156–166.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Dickie, J. (2011). Samoan students documenting their out-of-school literacies: An insider view of conflicting values. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 34(3), 247–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duranti, A., & Ochs, E. (1986). Literacy instruction in a Samoan village. In B. Schieffelin & P. Gilmore (Eds.), The acquisition of literacy: Ethnographic perspectives (Vol. 21, pp. 213–232). Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, M. (1992). Sociolinguistics and the African-American community: Implications for literacy. Theory Into Practice, 31(4), p303E.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Freebody, P. (2008). Critical literacy education: On living with “innocent language”. In B. V. Street & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education, 2nd Ed, Literacy Volume 2. Philadelphia: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freebody, P., Ludwig, C., & Gunn, S. (1995). Everyday literacy practices in and out of schools in low socio-economic status urban communities: A descriptive and interpretive research program. Canberra: DEETYA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P., & Macedo, D. (1987). Literacy: Reading the word and the world. South Hadley: Bergin & Garvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. (1990). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. (2008). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, B. (1988). Subject-specific literacy and school learning: A focus on writing. Australian Journal of Education, 32(2), 156–179.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, N. (1987). The emergence of literacy. London: Hodder & Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. A. K. (1975). Learning how to mean: Explorations in the development of language. London: Edward Arnold.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, S. (1984). Aboriginal learning styles and formal schooling. Aboriginal Child at School, 12(4), 3–22.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Harste, J., Woodward, V., & Burke, C. (1984). Language stories and literacy lessons. Portsmouth: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life and work in community and classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, S., Comber, B., Louden, W., Rivalland, J., & Reid, J. (1998). 100 children go to school, Vol. 2. Canberra: Department of Employment, Education, Training & Youth Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse. London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lareau, A. (1989). Home advantage: Social class and parental intervention in elementary education. London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, J. (2002). Travels in hypermodality. Visual Communication, 1(3), 229–325.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Li, G. (Ed.). (2009). Multicultural families, home literacies, and mainstream schooling. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locust, C. (1989). Wounding the spirit: Discrimination and traditional American belief systems. Harvard Educational Review, 55(3), 315–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louden, W., & Rivalland, J. (1995). Literacy at a distance. Canberra: Department of Education Training & Employment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malin, M. (1990). The visibility and invisibility of Aboriginal students in an urban classroom. Australian Journal of Education, 34(3), 312–329.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J. M., & Allen, J. (1986). A review of emergent literacy with implications for research and practice in reading. Champaign: Center for the Study of Reading. Technical Report No. 379.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton, S. (1995). Patterns of emergent literacy. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moll, L., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31(2), 132–141.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Moll, L. (1993). Community-mediated educational practices. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munns, G., Simpson, L., Connelly, J., & Townsend, T. (1999). “Baiyai ‘… meeting place of two parties …’ “(Wiradjuri)’: The pedagogical literacy relationship. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 22(2), 147–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickse, R. (1993). A typology of family and intergenerational literacy programmes; Implications for evaluation. Viewpoints, 15, 34–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahl, K., & Khan, A. (2015). Artifacts of resilience: Enduring narratives, texts, practices across three generations. In J. Sefton-Green & J. Rowsell (Eds.), Learning and literacy over time: Longitudinal perspectives (pp. 116–133). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyes, L. V., & Torres, M. N. (2007). Decolonizing family literacy in a culture circle: Reinventing the family literacy educator’s role. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 7, 73–94.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, D., & Fain, J. F. (2013). The family backpack project: Responding to dual-language texts through family journals. Language Arts, 90, 402–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, K., & Hull, G. (2015). Literacies in and out of school in the United States. In B. V. Street & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education, 3rd Ed, Literacy Volume 2. Philadelphia: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scribner, S., & Cole, M. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Solsken, J. W. (1993). Literacy, gender and work: In families and in schools. Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Street, B. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Street, B. (Ed.). (1993). Cross-cultural approaches to literacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Street, B. (1995). Social literacies: Critical approaches to literacy development, ethnography and education. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Street, B., Baker, D., & Tomlin, A. (2005). Navigating numeracies: Home/school numeracy practices. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, D. (1983). Family literacy: Young children learning to read and write. Portsmouth: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, D., & Dorsey-Gaines, C. (1988). Growing up literate: Learning from inner city families. Portsmouth: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teale, W., & Sulzby, E. (1986). Emergent literacy: Writing and reading. Norwood: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tizard, J., Schofield, W., & Hewison, J. (1982). Collaboration between teachers and parents in assisting children’s reading. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 52, 1–15.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, P. G., Razee, H., & Richters, J. (2012). I’m telling you…the language barrier is the most, the biggest challenge. Australian Journal of Education, 56(2), 126–141.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, C. G. (1982). Some antecedents of early educational attainment. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 2, 181–200.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G. (1986). The meaning makers. Portsmouth: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, A. I. (1995). Reading the world of school literacy: Contextualising the experience of a young African American male. Harvard Educational Review, 65(1), 30–48.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Education, University of New South Wales, NSW 2052, Sydney, Australia

    Trevor H. Cairney

Authors
  1. Trevor H. Cairney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Trevor H. Cairney .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Professional Development, King's College Dept. Continuing Education &, London, United Kingdom

    Brian V. Street

  2. University of Auckland, Auckland, Australia

    Stephen May

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Cairney, T.H. (2016). Community Literacy Practices and Education: Australia. In: Street, B., May, S. (eds) Literacies and Language Education. Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02321-2_18-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02321-2_18-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02321-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social Sciences