Abstract
Increasing access to and usage of Internet-networked tools around the world continue to shape and change literacy practices within social and educational contexts. It is these evolving literacies, rather than the tools themselves, that ground and motivate our discussion in this chapter. We highlight historical innovations in Internet technologies and outline major contributions foundational to understanding the changing nature of literacy: multimodality, sociality, and critical digital literacies. Next, we explore the concepts of transnational identities, literacy ecologies, and gaming as fields in progress within the increasingly mobile and interconnected world. We then turn to critical social issues, including the digital divide and the ways in which the Internet continues to drive and problematize the definitions and boundaries of education, communication, and literacy. Finally, we consider future directions for the field, including emerging implications for research, definitions of literacy, conceptions of teaching in its relation to learning, new applications/practices, statistical images of Internet access, and celebrated projects and research studies, all of which illustrate the contemporary wired literacy landscapes of the world.
“What I hope for you … [is] that you think of technology as a verb, not a noun; that poetry drives you, not hardware.” – Red Burns
References
Ávilia, J., & Zacher Pandya, J. (Eds.). (2012). Critical digital literacies as social praxis: Intersections and challenges. New York: Peter Lang.
Baker, S. (2013). Conceptualizing the use of Facebook in ethnographic research: As tool, as data and as context. Ethnography and Education, 8(2), 131–145.
Barron, B., Gomez, K., Pinkard, N., & Martin, C. K. (2014). The digital youth network: Cultivating digital media citizenship in urban communities. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Beneito-Montagut, R. (2011). Ethnography goes online: Towards a user-centered methodology to research interpersonal communication on the Internet. Qualitative Research, 11(6), 716–735.
Berry, P. W., & Cavallaro, A. J. (2014). Sustaining narratives of hope: Literacy, multimodality, and the Dr. Pedro Albizu Campos High School. English Education, 46(4), 279–299.
Bolter, J., & Grusin, R. (2000). Remediation: Understanding new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Burka, L. P. (1995). The MUDline. http://www.linnaean.org/$lpb/muddex/mudline.html. Accessed 30 Oct 2006.
Burnett, C., & Merchant, G. (2014). Points of view: Reconceptualising literacies through an exploration of adult and child interactions in a virtual world. Journal of Research in Reading, 37, 36–50.
Chandler-Olcott, K. (2009). A tale of two tasks: Editing in the era of digital literacies. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 53(1), 71–74. doi: 10.1598/JAAL.53.1.7.
Coiro, J. (2012). Future directions for research and practice in the new literacies of online reading comprehension. The Educational Forum, 76(4), 412–417.
Coiro, J., & Castek, J. (2010). Assessing the teaching and learning of language arts in a digital age. In D. Lapp & D. Fisher (Eds.), The handbook of research on teaching the English language arts (3rd ed., pp. 314–321). New York: Routledge. International Reading Association and The National Council of Teachers of English.
Colao, J. J. (2014). The inside story of Snapchat: The world’s hottest app or a $3 billion disappearing act? Forbes magazine. Retrieved December 3, from http://www.forbes.com/sites/jjcolao/2014/01/06/the-inside-story-of-snapchat-the-worlds-hottest-app-or-a-3-billion-disappearing-act/
Dahlberg, G. M., & Bagga-Gupta, S. (2014). Understanding glocal learning spaces: An empirical study of languaging and transmigrant positions in the virtual classroom. Learning, Media and Technology, 39, 468–487.
de Haan, M., Leander, K., Ünlüsoy, A., & Prinsen, F. (2014). Challenging ideals of connected learning: The networked configurations for learning of migrant youth in the Netherlands. Learning, Media and Technology, 39, 507–535.
Dixon-Román, E., & Gomez, W. (2012). Cuban youth culture and receding futures: Hip hop, reggaetón, and pedagogías marginal. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 7(4), 364–379.
Dunleavy, M., Dede, C., & Mitchell, R. (2009). Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(1), 7–22.
Ellsworth, E. (2004). Places of learning: Media, architecture, and pedagogy. New York: Routledge.
Gee, J. P. (2002). Millennials and Bobos, Blue’s Clues and Sesame street: A story for our times. In D. E. Alvermann (Ed.), Adolescents and literacies in a digital world (pp. 51–67). New York: Peter Lang.
Gee, J. P. (2003, 2005). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Guihot, P. (1989). Using Teletel for learning. In R. Mason & A. Kaye (Eds.), Mindweave: Communication, computers and distance education (pp. 192–195). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Hagood, M. C. (2012). So now you know. What are you going to do about it? In J. Ávila & P. Zacher (Eds.), Critical digital literacies as social praxis: Intersections and challenges (pp. 219–224). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice (3rd ed.). Padstow: TJ International.
Herring, S. (2004). Slouching toward the ordinary. New Media and Society, 6, 26–36.
Hine, C. (2000). Virtual ethnography. London: SAGE Publications.
Hull, G. A., & Stornaiuolo, A. (2010). Literate arts in a global world: Reframing social networking as cosmopolitan practice. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 54(2), 84–96.
Ito, M., Baumer, S., Bittanti, M., Boyd, D., Cody, R., Herr-Stephenson, B., Horst, H. A., Lange, P. G., Mahendran, D., Martinez, K. Z., Pascoe, C. J., Perkel, D., Robinson, L., Sims, C., & Tripp, L. (2010). Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out: Kids living and learning with new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ito, M., Gutiérrez, K., Livingstone, S., Penuel, B., Rhodes, J., Salen, K., Schor, J., Sefton-Green, J., & Watkins, S. C. (2013). Connected learning: An agenda for research and design. Irvine: Digital Media and Learning Research Hub.
Jenkins, H. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jocson, K. M. (2012). Introduction to focus issue: Youth and pedagogies of possibility. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 7(4), 295–297.
Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2014). NMC Horizon Report: 2014 K-12 Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
Jones, R. H. (2005). Sites of engagement as sites of attention: Time, space and culture in electronic discourse. In S. Norris & R. Jones (Eds.), Discourse in action: Introducing mediated discourse analysis (pp. 141–154). London: Routledge.
Kafai, Y. B. & Peppler, K. A. (2011). Youth, technology, and DIY: Developing participatory competencies in creative media production. Review of Research in Education, 35(1), 89–119.
Klopfer, E., & Squire, K. (2008). Environmental detectives – the development of an augmented reality platform for environmental simulations. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(2), 203–228.
Knobel, M., & Lankshear, C. (2007). Sampling “the new” in new literacies. In M. Knobel & C. Lankshear (Eds.), A new literacies sampler (pp. 1–24). New York: Peter Lang.
Kozinets, R. V. (2009). Netnography: Doing ethnographic research online. London: Sage.
Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. New York: Routledge.
Kress, G., & Jewitt, C. (2003). Introduction. In C. Jewitt & G. Kress (Eds.), Multimodal literacy: New literacies and digital epistemologies (Multimodal literacy, Vol. 4, pp. 1–18). New York: Peter Lang.
Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Edward Arnold.
Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition. (1982). Microcomputer communication networks for education. The Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 4, 32–34.
Lam, W. S. E. (2014). Literacy and capital in immigrant youths’ online networks across countries. Learning, Media and Technology, 39, 488–506.
Lam, W. S. E., & Warriner, D. S. (2012). Transnationalism and literacy: Investigating the mobility of people, languages, texts, and practices in contexts of migration. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(2), 191–215.
Landri, P. (2013). Mobilising ethnographers investigating technologised learning. Ethnography and Education, 8(2), 239–254.
Leander, K. M., & Hollett, T. (2013). Designing new spaces for literacy learning. In 62nd yearbook of the literacy research association. Oak Creek: Literacy Research Association.
Leander, K. M., & McKim, K. (2003). Tracing the everyday “sitings” of adolescents on the Internet: A strategic adaptation of ethnography across online and offline spaces. Education, Communication, & Information, 3, 211–240.
Lemke, J. (2015). Feeling and meaning: A unitary bio-semiotic account. In P. Trifonas (Ed.), International handbook of semiotics. New York: Springer.
Leu, D. J. (2000). Literacy and technology: Deictic consequences for literacy education in an information age. In M. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. III, pp. 743–770). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Leu, D. J., Jr., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J., Castek, J., & Henry, L. A. (2013). New literacies: A dual-level theory of the changing nature of literacy, instruction, and assessment. In R. B. Ruddell & D. Alvermann (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (6th ed., pp. 1150–1181). Newark: IRA.
Levy, F., & Murnane, R. J. (2004). The new division of labor: How computers are creating the next job market. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Lewis, C., & Fabos, B. (2005). Instant messaging, literacies, and social identities. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 470–501.
McClean, C. A. (2010). A space called home: An immigrant adolescent's digital literacy practices. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 54(1), 13–22. doi: 10.1598/JAAL.54.1.
New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 60–92.
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books.
Peppler, K. (2013). New opportunities for interest-driving arts learning in a digital age. New York, NY: The Wallace Foundation.
Purcell, K., Buchanan, J., & Friedrich, L. (2013). The impact of digital tools on student writing and how writing it taught in schools. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. http://www.pewinternet.org/files/old-media//Files/Reports/2013/PIP_NWP%20Writing%20and%20Tech.pdf. Accessed 2 Dec.
Rainie, L., Anderson, J., & Connolly, J. (2014). Digital life in 2025: Killer apps in the gigabit age. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. http://www.pewinternet.org/files/2014/10/PIP_KillerAppsinGigabitAge_100914.pdf. Accessed 2 Dec.
Rowsell, J. (2013). Working with multimodality: Rethinking literacy in a digital age. London: Routledge.
Scharber, C. (2014). The iPad invasion. Minnesota English Journal. Minnesota Council of Teachers of English. Retrieved from https://minnesotaenglishjournalonline.org/2014/03/30/opinion-1-the-ipad-invasion/
Sefton-Green, J. (2012). Learning at not-school: A review of study, theory, and advocacy for education in non-formal settings. In The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur foundation reports on digital media and learning. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Shernoff, D. J. (2013). Optimal learning environments to promote student engagement. New York: Springer.
Soep, E. (2014). Participatory politics: Next-generation tactics to remake public spheres. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Soep, E., & Chávez, V. (2010). Drop that knowledge: Youth radio stories. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Spence, L. D. (2001). The case against teaching. Change, 33, 11–19.
Steinkuehler, C., Squire, K., & Barab, S. (Eds.). (2012). Games, learning, and society: Learning and meaning in the digital age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stornaiuolo, A., & Hall, M. (2014). Tracing resonance: Qualitative research in a networked world. In G. B. Gudmundsdottir & K. B. Vasbø (Eds.), Methodological challenges when exploring digital learning spaces in education (pp. 29–44). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
U.S. Department of Commerce. (2014). Exploring the digital nation: Embracing the mobile Internet. Washington, DC: National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA).
Unsworth, L., & Thomas, A. (Eds.). (2014). English teaching & new literacies pedagogy: Interpreting and authoring digital multimedia narratives. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
Warschauer, M. (2002). Languages.com: The Internet and linguistic pluralism. In I. Snyder (Ed.), Silicon literacies: Communication, innovation and education in the electronic age (pp. 62–74). New York: Routledge.
Warschauer, M., & Matuchniak, T. (2010). New technology and digital worlds: Analyzing evidence of equity in access, use and outcomes. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 179–225.
Wohlwend, K., & Lewis, C. (2011). Critical literacy, critical engagement, digital technology: Convergence and embodiment in glocal spheres. In D. Lapp & D. Fisher (Eds.), The handbook on teaching English and language arts (3rd ed.). New York: Taylor & Francis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Leander, K.M., Scharber, C., Lewis, C. (2017). Literacy and Internet Technologies. In: Street, B., May, S. (eds) Literacies and Language Education. Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02252-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02252-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02251-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02252-9
eBook Packages: EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education