Skip to main content

Literacy and Internet Technologies

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Literacies and Language Education

Abstract

Increasing access to and usage of Internet-networked tools around the world continue to shape and change literacy practices within social and educational contexts. It is these evolving literacies, rather than the tools themselves, that ground and motivate our discussion in this chapter. We highlight historical innovations in Internet technologies and outline major contributions foundational to understanding the changing nature of literacy: multimodality, sociality, and critical digital literacies. Next, we explore the concepts of transnational identities, literacy ecologies, and gaming as fields in progress within the increasingly mobile and interconnected world. We then turn to critical social issues, including the digital divide and the ways in which the Internet continues to drive and problematize the definitions and boundaries of education, communication, and literacy. Finally, we consider future directions for the field, including emerging implications for research, definitions of literacy, conceptions of teaching in its relation to learning, new applications/practices, statistical images of Internet access, and celebrated projects and research studies, all of which illustrate the contemporary wired literacy landscapes of the world.

What I hope for you … [is] that you think of technology as a verb, not a noun; that poetry drives you, not hardware.” – Red Burns

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ávilia, J., & Zacher Pandya, J. (Eds.). (2012). Critical digital literacies as social praxis: Intersections and challenges. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, S. (2013). Conceptualizing the use of Facebook in ethnographic research: As tool, as data and as context. Ethnography and Education, 8(2), 131–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barron, B., Gomez, K., Pinkard, N., & Martin, C. K. (2014). The digital youth network: Cultivating digital media citizenship in urban communities. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beneito-Montagut, R. (2011). Ethnography goes online: Towards a user-centered methodology to research interpersonal communication on the Internet. Qualitative Research, 11(6), 716–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, P. W., & Cavallaro, A. J. (2014). Sustaining narratives of hope: Literacy, multimodality, and the Dr. Pedro Albizu Campos High School. English Education, 46(4), 279–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolter, J., & Grusin, R. (2000). Remediation: Understanding new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burka, L. P. (1995). The MUDline. http://www.linnaean.org/$lpb/muddex/mudline.html. Accessed 30 Oct 2006.

  • Burnett, C., & Merchant, G. (2014). Points of view: Reconceptualising literacies through an exploration of adult and child interactions in a virtual world. Journal of Research in Reading, 37, 36–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler-Olcott, K. (2009). A tale of two tasks: Editing in the era of digital literacies. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 53(1), 71–74. doi: 10.1598/JAAL.53.1.7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coiro, J. (2012). Future directions for research and practice in the new literacies of online reading comprehension. The Educational Forum, 76(4), 412–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coiro, J., & Castek, J. (2010). Assessing the teaching and learning of language arts in a digital age. In D. Lapp & D. Fisher (Eds.), The handbook of research on teaching the English language arts (3rd ed., pp. 314–321). New York: Routledge. International Reading Association and The National Council of Teachers of English.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colao, J. J. (2014). The inside story of Snapchat: The world’s hottest app or a $3 billion disappearing act? Forbes magazine. Retrieved December 3, from http://www.forbes.com/sites/jjcolao/2014/01/06/the-inside-story-of-snapchat-the-worlds-hottest-app-or-a-3-billion-disappearing-act/

  • Dahlberg, G. M., & Bagga-Gupta, S. (2014). Understanding glocal learning spaces: An empirical study of languaging and transmigrant positions in the virtual classroom. Learning, Media and Technology, 39, 468–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Haan, M., Leander, K., Ünlüsoy, A., & Prinsen, F. (2014). Challenging ideals of connected learning: The networked configurations for learning of migrant youth in the Netherlands. Learning, Media and Technology, 39, 507–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon-Román, E., & Gomez, W. (2012). Cuban youth culture and receding futures: Hip hop, reggaetón, and pedagogías marginal. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 7(4), 364–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunleavy, M., Dede, C., & Mitchell, R. (2009). Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(1), 7–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellsworth, E. (2004). Places of learning: Media, architecture, and pedagogy. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (2002). Millennials and Bobos, Blue’s Clues and Sesame street: A story for our times. In D. E. Alvermann (Ed.), Adolescents and literacies in a digital world (pp. 51–67). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (2003, 2005). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guihot, P. (1989). Using Teletel for learning. In R. Mason & A. Kaye (Eds.), Mindweave: Communication, computers and distance education (pp. 192–195). Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagood, M. C. (2012). So now you know. What are you going to do about it? In J. Ávila & P. Zacher (Eds.), Critical digital literacies as social praxis: Intersections and challenges (pp. 219–224). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice (3rd ed.). Padstow: TJ International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herring, S. (2004). Slouching toward the ordinary. New Media and Society, 6, 26–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hine, C. (2000). Virtual ethnography. London: SAGE Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hull, G. A., & Stornaiuolo, A. (2010). Literate arts in a global world: Reframing social networking as cosmopolitan practice. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 54(2), 84–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ito, M., Baumer, S., Bittanti, M., Boyd, D., Cody, R., Herr-Stephenson, B., Horst, H. A., Lange, P. G., Mahendran, D., Martinez, K. Z., Pascoe, C. J., Perkel, D., Robinson, L., Sims, C., & Tripp, L. (2010). Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out: Kids living and learning with new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ito, M., Gutiérrez, K., Livingstone, S., Penuel, B., Rhodes, J., Salen, K., Schor, J., Sefton-Green, J., & Watkins, S. C. (2013). Connected learning: An agenda for research and design. Irvine: Digital Media and Learning Research Hub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jocson, K. M. (2012). Introduction to focus issue: Youth and pedagogies of possibility. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 7(4), 295–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2014). NMC Horizon Report: 2014 K-12 Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. H. (2005). Sites of engagement as sites of attention: Time, space and culture in electronic discourse. In S. Norris & R. Jones (Eds.), Discourse in action: Introducing mediated discourse analysis (pp. 141–154). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kafai, Y. B. & Peppler, K. A. (2011). Youth, technology, and DIY: Developing participatory competencies in creative media production. Review of Research in Education, 35(1), 89–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klopfer, E., & Squire, K. (2008). Environmental detectives – the development of an augmented reality platform for environmental simulations. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(2), 203–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knobel, M., & Lankshear, C. (2007). Sampling “the new” in new literacies. In M. Knobel & C. Lankshear (Eds.), A new literacies sampler (pp. 1–24). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozinets, R. V. (2009). Netnography: Doing ethnographic research online. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G., & Jewitt, C. (2003). Introduction. In C. Jewitt & G. Kress (Eds.), Multimodal literacy: New literacies and digital epistemologies (Multimodal literacy, Vol. 4, pp. 1–18). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition. (1982). Microcomputer communication networks for education. The Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 4, 32–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, W. S. E. (2014). Literacy and capital in immigrant youths’ online networks across countries. Learning, Media and Technology, 39, 488–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, W. S. E., & Warriner, D. S. (2012). Transnationalism and literacy: Investigating the mobility of people, languages, texts, and practices in contexts of migration. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(2), 191–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landri, P. (2013). Mobilising ethnographers investigating technologised learning. Ethnography and Education, 8(2), 239–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leander, K. M., & Hollett, T. (2013). Designing new spaces for literacy learning. In 62nd yearbook of the literacy research association. Oak Creek: Literacy Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leander, K. M., & McKim, K. (2003). Tracing the everyday “sitings” of adolescents on the Internet: A strategic adaptation of ethnography across online and offline spaces. Education, Communication, & Information, 3, 211–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, J. (2015). Feeling and meaning: A unitary bio-semiotic account. In P. Trifonas (Ed.), International handbook of semiotics. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leu, D. J. (2000). Literacy and technology: Deictic consequences for literacy education in an information age. In M. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. III, pp. 743–770). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leu, D. J., Jr., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J., Castek, J., & Henry, L. A. (2013). New literacies: A dual-level theory of the changing nature of literacy, instruction, and assessment. In R. B. Ruddell & D. Alvermann (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (6th ed., pp. 1150–1181). Newark: IRA.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, F., & Murnane, R. J. (2004). The new division of labor: How computers are creating the next job market. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C., & Fabos, B. (2005). Instant messaging, literacies, and social identities. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 470–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClean, C. A. (2010). A space called home: An immigrant adolescent's digital literacy practices. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 54(1), 13–22. doi: 10.1598/JAAL.54.1.

    Google Scholar 

  • New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 60–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peppler, K. (2013). New opportunities for interest-driving arts learning in a digital age. New York, NY: The Wallace Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purcell, K., Buchanan, J., & Friedrich, L. (2013). The impact of digital tools on student writing and how writing it taught in schools. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. http://www.pewinternet.org/files/old-media//Files/Reports/2013/PIP_NWP%20Writing%20and%20Tech.pdf. Accessed 2 Dec.

  • Rainie, L., Anderson, J., & Connolly, J. (2014). Digital life in 2025: Killer apps in the gigabit age. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. http://www.pewinternet.org/files/2014/10/PIP_KillerAppsinGigabitAge_100914.pdf. Accessed 2 Dec.

  • Rowsell, J. (2013). Working with multimodality: Rethinking literacy in a digital age. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharber, C. (2014). The iPad invasion. Minnesota English Journal. Minnesota Council of Teachers of English. Retrieved from https://minnesotaenglishjournalonline.org/2014/03/30/opinion-1-the-ipad-invasion/

  • Sefton-Green, J. (2012). Learning at not-school: A review of study, theory, and advocacy for education in non-formal settings. In The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur foundation reports on digital media and learning. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shernoff, D. J. (2013). Optimal learning environments to promote student engagement. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Soep, E. (2014). Participatory politics: Next-generation tactics to remake public spheres. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soep, E., & Chávez, V. (2010). Drop that knowledge: Youth radio stories. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, L. D. (2001). The case against teaching. Change, 33, 11–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinkuehler, C., Squire, K., & Barab, S. (Eds.). (2012). Games, learning, and society: Learning and meaning in the digital age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stornaiuolo, A., & Hall, M. (2014). Tracing resonance: Qualitative research in a networked world. In G. B. Gudmundsdottir & K. B. Vasbø (Eds.), Methodological challenges when exploring digital learning spaces in education (pp. 29–44). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Commerce. (2014). Exploring the digital nation: Embracing the mobile Internet. Washington, DC: National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Unsworth, L., & Thomas, A. (Eds.). (2014). English teaching & new literacies pedagogy: Interpreting and authoring digital multimedia narratives. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warschauer, M. (2002). Languages.com: The Internet and linguistic pluralism. In I. Snyder (Ed.), Silicon literacies: Communication, innovation and education in the electronic age (pp. 62–74). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warschauer, M., & Matuchniak, T. (2010). New technology and digital worlds: Analyzing evidence of equity in access, use and outcomes. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 179–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wohlwend, K., & Lewis, C. (2011). Critical literacy, critical engagement, digital technology: Convergence and embodiment in glocal spheres. In D. Lapp & D. Fisher (Eds.), The handbook on teaching English and language arts (3rd ed.). New York: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Kevin M. Leander , Cassandra Scharber or Cynthia Lewis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Leander, K.M., Scharber, C., Lewis, C. (2017). Literacy and Internet Technologies. In: Street, B., May, S. (eds) Literacies and Language Education. Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02252-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics