Abstract
Literacy Myth refers to the belief, articulated in educational, civic, religious, and other settings, contemporary and historical, that the acquisition of literacy is a necessary precursor to and invariably results in economic development, democratic practice, and upward social mobility. These stand among many qualities with which literacy has been invested. Taken together, these attitudes constitute “the Literacy Myth.”
References
Akinasso, F. N. (1981). The consequences of literacy in pragmatic and theoretical perspectives. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 12, 163–200.
Arnove, R., & Graff, H. (Eds.). (1987). National literacy campaigns in historical and comparative perspective. New York: Plenum.
Brandt, D. (2001). Literacy in American lives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Collins, J., & Blot, R. (2003). Literacy and literacies: Texts, power, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Duffy, J. (2000). Never hold a pencil: Rhetoric and relations in the concept of ‘preliteracy’. Written Communication, 17(2), 224–257.
Farr, M. (1993). Essayist literacy and other verbal performances. Written Communication, 10(1), 4–38.
Finnegan, R. (1973). Literacy versus non‐literacy: The great divide. In R. Horton & R. Finnegan (Eds.), Modes of thought. London: Faber and Faber.
Finnegan, R. (1988). Literacy and orality. Oxford: Blackwell.
Finnegan, R. (1994). Literacy as mythical charter. In D. Keller‐Cohen (Ed.), Literacy: Interdisciplinary conversations. Creskill: Hampton Press.
Furet, F., & Ozouf, J. (1983). Reading and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gelb, I. J. (1963). A study of writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Goody, J. (1986). The logic of writing and the organization of society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goody, J. (1987). The interface between the written and the oral. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goody, J., & Watt, I. (1968). The consequences of literacy. In J. Goody (Ed.), Literacy in traditional societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Originally published in 1963.)
Gough, K. (1968). Implications of literacy in traditional China and India. In J. Goody (Ed.), Literacy in traditional societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Graff, H. J. (1979). The literacy myth: Literacy and social structure in the nineteenth century city. New York/London: Academic Press (Reprinted with a new introduction. New Brunswick: Transaction Press 1991.)
Graff, H. J. (1987). The legacies of literacy: Continuities and contradictions in western culture and society. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Graff, H. J. (1995a). The labyrinths of literacy: Reflections on literacy past and present, revised and expanded edition. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Graff, H. J. (1995b). Assessing the history of literacy in the 1990s: Themes and questions. In A. Petrucci & M. G. Blay (Eds.), Escribir y leer en Occidente. Valencia: Universitat de Valencia.
Graff, H. J., & Street, B. (1997). A response to Stan Jones, “Ending the myth of the ‘literacy myth’: A response to critiques”. Literacy Across the Curriculum, Centre for Literacy, Montreal, 13, 4–6.
Harris, W. V. (1989). Ancient literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Havelock, E. (1963). Preface to Plato. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Havelock, E. (1976). Origins of western literacy. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
Havelock, E. (1986). The literate revolution in Greece and its cultural consequences. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Inkeles, A., & Smith, D. (1974). Becoming modern: Individual change in six developing countries. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Levine, D. (1980). Illiteracy and family life during the first industrial revolution. Journal of Social History, 14, 25–44.
Levine, K. (1986). The social context of literacy. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
McQuillan, J. (1998). Seven myths about literacy in the United States, practical assessment, research and evaluation. 6(1). Retrieved January 9, 2006, from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=6andn=1
National Endowment for the Arts. (2004). Reading at risk: A survey of literary reading in America. Research Division Report #46, June.
Olson, D. R. (1977). From utterance to text: The bias of language in speech and writing. Harvard Educational Review, 47(3), 257–281.
Olson, D. R. (1994). The world on paper: The conceptual and cognitive implications of writing and reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ong, W. (1967). The presence of the word. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Ong, W. (1977). Interface of the word. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Ong, W. (1982). Orality and literacy. London: Methuen.
Pattison, R. (1984). On literacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Resnick, D., & Resnick, L. (1977). The nature of literacy: A historical exploration. Harvard Educational Review, 47, 370–385.
Schofield, R. (1973). Dimensions of illiteracy, 1750–1850. Explorations in Economic History, 10, 437–454.
Scribner, S. (1984). Literacy in three metaphors. American Journal of Education, 93, 6–21.
St. Clair, R., & Sadlin, J. (2004). Incompetence and intrusion: On the metaphorical use of illiteracy in U.S. political discourse. Adult Basic Education, 14, 45–59.
Street, B. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Street, B. (1995). Social literacies: Critical approaches to literacy in development, ethnography and education. London: Longman.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Graff, H.J., Duffy, J. (2017). Literacy Myths. In: Street, B., May, S. (eds) Literacies and Language Education. Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02252-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02252-9_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02251-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02252-9
eBook Packages: EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education