Skip to main content

Coping with Complexity: Designing Homes and Facilities for Frail and Dependent Elderly in a Changing Society

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Smart Homes, Health Care and Well-Being
  • 3122 Accesses

Abstract

Demographic changes, technological innovations, and plurality in values place architects and consulting engineers for large challenges. This chapter unravels the different types of complexity that play a role in designing homes for frail elderly and facilities for adults with dementia. Five types of complexity are identified as follows: aspectual complexity, contextual complexity, stakeholder-related complexity, value-based complexity, and technological complexity. It is shown that this model guides architects and consulting engineers in analyzing and designing complex homes and facilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alzheimer Nederland (2013) Prognose dementie. Amersfoort, http://www.alzheimer-nederland.nl/media/14752/Factsheet%20dementie%20prognose%20-%20publieksversie%2023-01-2013.pdf

  • Brand S (1994) How buildings learn – what happens after they’re built. Viking-Penguin, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dooyeweerd H (1969) A new critique of theoretical thought. The Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing Company

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferry L (2010) Learning to live. A user’s manual. Canongate, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman RE (2001) The stakeholder theory of the modern corporation. In: Beauchamp TL, Bowie NE (eds) Ethical theory and business, 6th edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, pp 56–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoogland J, Jochemsen H (2000) Professional autonomy and the normative structure of medical practice. Theor Med Bioeth 12:457–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huisman ERCM, Morales E, Van Hoof J, Kort HSM (2012) Healing environments: a systematic review. Build Environ 58:70–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jochemsen H (2006) Normative practices as an intermediate between theoretical ethics and morality. Philosophia Reformata 71:96–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jochemsen H, Glas G (1997) Responsible medical care (in Dutch). Buijten & Schipperheijn, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre AC (1981) After virtue. A study in moral theory. Duckworth, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouw RJ, Griffioen S (1993) Pluralisms and horizons. An essay in Christian public philosophy. W.B. Eerdmans, Grand Rapids

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro PF, Polinder H, Verkerk MJ (2012) Planning and designing smart grids: philosophical considerations. IEEE Technol Soc 31(3):34–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss DFM (2009) Philosophy. Discipline of the disciplines. Paideia Press, Grand Rapids

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich RS, Zimring C, Barch XZ, Dubose J, Seo H-B, Choi Y-S, Quan X, Joseph A (2008) A review of the research literature on evidence-based healthcare design. Health Environ Res Design J 1(3):61–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Duin C, Stoeldraijer L (2012) Bevolkingsprognose 2012–2060. Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • van Duin C, Stoeldraijer L, Garssen J (2013) Huishoudingsprognose 2013–2060. Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • van Hoof J (2010) Aging-in-place. The integrated design of housing facilities for people with dementia. PhD thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • van Hoof J, Verkerk MJ (2013) Developing an integrated design model incorporating technology philosophy for the design of healthcare environments: a case analysis of facilities for psychogeriatric and psychiatric care in The Netherlands. Technol Soc 35(1):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verkerk MJ (2014) The dual challenge of Christian philosophy. How to make philosophical ideas and concepts available for engineers? Koers. Bulletin for Christian Scholarship, http://www.koers.co.za/afrikaans.html

  • Verkerk MJ, Hoogland J, van der Stoep J, de Vries MJ (2007) Thinking, designing, making. philosophy of technology (in Dutch). Boom, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maarten J. Verkerk .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this entry

Cite this entry

Verkerk, M.J. (2017). Coping with Complexity: Designing Homes and Facilities for Frail and Dependent Elderly in a Changing Society. In: van Hoof, J., Demiris, G., Wouters, E. (eds) Handbook of Smart Homes, Health Care and Well-Being. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01583-5_49

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics