Abstract
This chapter aims to think with and through abortions as phenomena that are deeply entangled with experiences of vulnerability and dependency. It will argue that in order for abortions to be understood and as such accepted as part of human life, a pro-abortions politics is needed that does not require a further strengthening of the idea of the sovereign subject but rather an acknowledgement of its precarious existence. Abortions are a justified and often existential necessity to preserve the subject, yet paradoxically culminate in experiences of the subject’s limits and undoing.
In a second step, the chapter further shows that as events, which sit at the intersection of life and death, abortions require and produce different epistemological conditions, or different ways of knowing and thinking. To be understood and to have an effect on how communal life is regulated, experiences of abortions, I argue, require a psychosocial lens, which pays close attention to the aesthetic and conceptual convolutions of particular experiences and which draws on artistic and trans-disciplinary tools to unpack their meaning in the context of specific sites and times. I therefore examine the experience of abortions along with Tracey Emin’s artwork How it Feels (1996). I read images and thoughts produced by this artwork in relation to personal and conceptual accounts of so-called entangled organisms, and demonstrate how the experiential structure characterizing abortions is akin to artistic events and an artistic form of knowledge, which I call the knowledge of enigma.
Notes
- 1.
Criteria such as physiological dependency, metabolic and functional integrity, topological continuity and immunological tolerance.
- 2.
Similar to the undoing of selfhood experienced by the pregnant woman, neither foetus nor infant have the psychic ability to experience the world and themselves along such structures. This cognitive ability is gradually gained with the ability to distinguish self from other, which is entangled with the ability to speak and to think through abstractions, with the acquisition of language.
- 3.
Bracha Ettinger describes this state as being close to the archaic m/Other which is neither repressed or eliminated, but ‘abpresence’ (Ettinger, 2020, p. 343).
References
Adorno, T. W. (2011). Aesthetic theory. Continuum.
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
Barad, K., & Gandorfer, D. (2021). Political desirings: Yearnings for mattering (,) differently. Theory & Event, 24, 14–66.
Emin, T. (1996). How it feels. Tracey Emin Museum, London.
Emin, T. (2006). Strangeland. Sceptre.
Ettinger, B. (2006). The Matrixial Borderspace. University of Minnesota Press.
Ettinger, B. (2020). Matrixial subjectivity, aesthetics, ethics, Volume 1, 1990–2000. Palgrave.
Jones, J. (2019). Break on through. In H. Weller (Ed.), Tracey Emin. A fortnight of tears. White Cube.
Kingma, E. (2019). Were you a part of your mother? Mind, 128, 609–646.
Kingma, E. (2020). Biological individuality, pregnancy and (mammalian) reproduction. Philosophy of Science, 87, 1037–1048. https://doi.org/10.1086/710612
Kristeva, J. (1980). Desire in language: A semiotic approach to literature and art. Columbia University Press.
Pollock, G. (2020). Liquid culture, the art of life and dancing with Tracey Emin: A feminist art historian/cultural analyst’s perspective on Bauman’s missing cultural hermeneutics. Thesis Eleven, 156, 10–26.
Rose, J. (2022). Prejudice rules. LRB contributors on the overturning of Roe v. Wade. London Review of Books 44.
Schmukalla, M. (2021). Communist Ghosts. London: Palgrave.
Schmukalla, M. (2022). Memory as a wound in words: on trans-generational trauma, ethical memory and artistic speech. Feminist Theory, 1–19.
Srinivasan, A. (2022). Prejudice rules. LRB contributors on the overturning of Roe v. Wade. London Review of Books 44.
Wendt, A. (2015). Quantum mind and social science. Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Schmukalla, M. (2024). Living Prior Being. In: Frosh, S., Vyrgioti, M., Walsh, J. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Psychosocial Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30366-1_54
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30366-1_54
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-30365-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-30366-1
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences