Skip to main content

Social Unconscious Theory: Contributions of Group Analysis to Psychosocial Studies

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Psychosocial Studies
  • 44 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter introduces the theory of the social unconscious from its roots in the work of S.H. Foulkes in the 1920s and 1930s in Germany to the most recent theoretical developments in contemporary group analysis, explored by Earl Hopper, Haim Weinberg, and their collaborators. From the mid-1940s onward, Foulkes’s ground-breaking work replaced the traditional dichotomies between individual and society with a framework that confers value on their interdependencies – as discussed by Norbert Elias – based on the intrinsic relationality of human beings. In this respect, the psychoanalytical, sociological, philosophical, and political dimensions in the study of social unconscious theory require a postmodern thinking akin to the trans-disciplinarity and criticality of psychosocial studies. Therefore, building on investigations of the social unconscious in persons, groups, and societies and using the concept of tripartite matrices as a benchmark, this chapter unveils affinities between group analytic epistemology and psychosocial studies. It also introduces Latin American psychoanalytic field theory, especially through Pichon-Rivière’s concept of dialectic spiral and its importance in the exploration of the multidimensionality of socially unconscious processes. For Pichon-Rivière, individual and society form a unity, a single dynamic field where a spiral dialectic process occurs between the internal and external worlds, creating a fluid interchange of continuities and discontinuities between them. This Latin American perspective, not very well known in English-speaking psychoanalytical and group analytical circles, underpins a new contribution to the development of psychosocial studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Althusser, L. (1969). For Marx. New Left.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altman, N. (2010). The analyst in the inner city: Race, class, and culture through psychoanalytic lens. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Association for Psychosocial Studies. (n.d.) About us. http://www.psychosocial-studiesassociation.org/about/. Accessed 20 Nov 2021.

  • Baranger, W. (2009). Spiral process and the dynamic field. In M. Baranger & W. Baranger (Eds.), The work of confluence. Listening and interpreting in the psychoanalytic field (pp. 45–62). Karnac.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baranger, W., & Baranger, M. (2008). The analytic situation as a dynamic field. International Journal of Psycho-analysis, 89, 795–836. (originally published in 1961–62).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bleger, J. (2013). Symbiosis and ambiguity. A psychoanalytic study. Karnac. Karnac (originally published in 1967).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalal, F. (1998). Taking the group seriously: Towards a post-Foulkesian group analytic theory. Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalal, F. (2011). The social unconscious and ideology: In clinical theory and practice. In E. Hopper & H. Weinberg (Eds.), The social unconscious in persons, groups, and societies (Mainly theory) (Vol. 1, pp. 243–263). Karnac.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1895). The rules of sociological method. Free Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N. (1939). The civilizing process. Blackwell, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N. (1984). What is sociology? Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N. (2001). The society of individuals. Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellenberger, H. F. (1970). The discovery of the unconscious: The history and the evolution of dynamic psychiatry. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ffytche, M. (2012). The foundations of the unconscious: Schelling, Freud and the birth of modern psyche. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1972). Archaeology of knowledge. Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foulkes, S. H. (1948). Introduction to group-analytic psychotherapy. Karnac.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foulkes, S. H. (1964). Therapeutic group analysis. Karnac.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foulkes, S. H. (1975). Group analytic psychotherapy: Methods and principles. Karnac.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foulkes, E. (Ed.). (1990). S. H. Foulkes: Selected papers: Psychoanalysis and group analysis. Karnac.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foulkes, S. H., & Anthony, E. J. (1957). Group psychotherapy: The psychoanalytical approach. Karnac.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1913). Totem and taboo. S.E., 13:1–164. Hogarth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1921). Group psychology and the analysis of the ego. S.E., 18:67–143. Hogarth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1923). The ego and the id. S.E., 19:3–66. Hogarth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1930). Civilization and its discontents. S.E., 21:64–145. Hogarth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1933). The question of a Weltanschauung. New introductory lectures on psycho-analysis, S.E., 22:195–225. Hogarth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1937). Constructions in analysis. S.E., 23:255–270. Hogarth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1938). Shorter writings. Findings, ideas, and problems. July 20th. S.E, 23:299–300. Hogarth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1939). Moses and Monotheism. S.E., 23:3–140. Hogarth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromm, E. (1932). Psychoanalytic characterology and its relevance for social psychology. In E. Fromm (Ed.), The crisis of psychoanalysis (pp. 164–187). Fawcett, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromm, E. (1936). Studies on authority and the family. Sociopsychological dimensions. Available. https://www.fromm-gesellschaft.eu/images/pdf-Dateien/1936a-eng.pdf. Accessed 10 Oct 2021.

  • Fromm, E. (1962). The social unconscious. In Beyond the chains of illusion: My encounter with Marx and Freud. Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromm, E. (1963). The revolutionary character. In The dogma of Christ (pp. 122–139). Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frosh, S. (2013a). Hauntings: Psychoanalysis and ghostly transmissions. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frosh, S. (2013b). Transdisciplinary tensions and psychosocial studies. Enquire, 6(1), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frosh, S. (2019a). Those who come after: Postmemory, acknowledgement and forgiveness. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frosh, S. (2019b). Introduction. In S. Frosh (Ed.), New voices in psychosocial studies (pp. 1–22). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Frosh, S., & Baraitser, L. (2008). Psychoanalysis and psychosocial studies. Psychoanalysis, Culture and Society, 13, 346–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herron, W. G. (1995). Development of ethnic unconscious. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 72, 521–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinshelwood, R. (2018). John Rickman behind the scenes: The influence of Lewin’s field theory on practice, countertransference, and W.R. Bion. International Journal of Psycho-analysis, 99(6), 1409–1423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopper, E. (1981). Social mobility: A study of social control and insatiability. Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopper, E. (2003a). Social unconscious: Selected papers. Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopper, E. (2003b). Traumatic experience in the unconscious life of groups: The fourth basic assumption: Incohesion: Aggregation/Massification or (ba) I:A/M. Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopper, E. (2018). “Notes” on the concept of the social unconscious in group analysis. Group, 42(2), 99–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopper, E., & Weinberg, H. (2011). The social unconscious in persons, groups and societies (Mainly theory) (Vol. 1). Karnac.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopper, E., & Weinberg, H. (2016). The social unconscious in persons, groups and societies (Foundation matrices) (Vol. 2). Karnac.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopper, E., & Weinberg, H. (2017). The social unconscious in persons, groups and societies (The foundation matrices extended and reconfigured) (Vol. 3). Karnac.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopper, E., & Weinberg, H. (2022). The social unconscious in persons, groups and societies (Clinical implications) (Vol. 4). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horney, K. (1937). The neurotic personality of our time. W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacan, J. (2007). Écrits. W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1947). Field theory in social sciences. Harper and Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leyton, L., & Leavy-Sperounis, M. (2020). Toward a social psychoanalysis: Culture, character, and normative unconscious processes. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Losso, R., de Setton, L., & Scharff, D. (Eds.). (2017). The linked self in psychoanalysis. The Pionnering work of Enrique Pichon Rivière. Karnac.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Phenomenology of perception. Routledge, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montana Katz, S., Cassorla, R., & Civitarese, G. (Eds.). (2017). Advances in contemporary psychoanalytic field theory. Concept and future development. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nitzgen, D. (2011). The concept of the social unconscious in the work of S. H. Foulkes. In E. Hopper & H. Weinberg (Eds.), The social unconscious in persons, groups and societies (Mainly theory) (Vol. 1, pp. 3–21). Karnac.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nitzgen, D., & Hopper, E. (2017). The concepts on the social unconscious and of the matrix in the work of Foulkes. In E. Hopper & H. Weinberg (Eds.), The social unconscious in persons, groups and societies (The foundation matrices extended and reconfigured) (Vol. 3). Karnac.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penna, C. (2016). Reflections upon Brazilian social unconscious. In E. Hopper & H. Weinberg (Eds.), The social unconscious in persons, groups, and societies (Mainly foundation matrices) (Vol. 2, pp. 139–158). Karnac.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penna, C. (2022). From crowd psychology to the dynamics of large groups: Historical, theoretical and practical considerations. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pertegato, E., & Pertegato, G. (2013). From psychoanalysis to group analysis: The pioneering work of Trigant Burrow. Karnac.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pichon-Rivière, E. (1979). Teoría del vínculo [Theory of the link]. Nueva Visión.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pichon-Rivière, E. (1980). O processo grupal. [The group process]. Martins Fontes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Racker, H. (1960). Transference and counter-transference. Karnac, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tubert Oklander, J. (2017). Field theories and process theories. In K. Montana, R. Cassorla, & G. Civitarese (Eds.), Advances in contemporary psychoanalytic field theory. Concept and future development (pp. 191–200). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tubert-Oklander, J. (2011). Enrique Pichon-Rivière: The social unconscious in the Latin American tradition in group analysis. In E. Hopper & H. Weinberg (Eds.), The social unconscious in persons, groups and societies (Mainly theory) (Vol. 1, pp. 45–70). Karnac.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tubert-Oklander, J., & Hernández de Tubert, R. (2004). Operative groups: The Latin-American approach to group analysis. Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D. (1971). Playing and reality. Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Penna, C. (2024). Social Unconscious Theory: Contributions of Group Analysis to Psychosocial Studies. In: Frosh, S., Vyrgioti, M., Walsh, J. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Psychosocial Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30366-1_50

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics