Abstract
This chapter introduces the theory of the social unconscious from its roots in the work of S.H. Foulkes in the 1920s and 1930s in Germany to the most recent theoretical developments in contemporary group analysis, explored by Earl Hopper, Haim Weinberg, and their collaborators. From the mid-1940s onward, Foulkes’s ground-breaking work replaced the traditional dichotomies between individual and society with a framework that confers value on their interdependencies – as discussed by Norbert Elias – based on the intrinsic relationality of human beings. In this respect, the psychoanalytical, sociological, philosophical, and political dimensions in the study of social unconscious theory require a postmodern thinking akin to the trans-disciplinarity and criticality of psychosocial studies. Therefore, building on investigations of the social unconscious in persons, groups, and societies and using the concept of tripartite matrices as a benchmark, this chapter unveils affinities between group analytic epistemology and psychosocial studies. It also introduces Latin American psychoanalytic field theory, especially through Pichon-Rivière’s concept of dialectic spiral and its importance in the exploration of the multidimensionality of socially unconscious processes. For Pichon-Rivière, individual and society form a unity, a single dynamic field where a spiral dialectic process occurs between the internal and external worlds, creating a fluid interchange of continuities and discontinuities between them. This Latin American perspective, not very well known in English-speaking psychoanalytical and group analytical circles, underpins a new contribution to the development of psychosocial studies.
References
Althusser, L. (1969). For Marx. New Left.
Altman, N. (2010). The analyst in the inner city: Race, class, and culture through psychoanalytic lens. Routledge.
Association for Psychosocial Studies. (n.d.) About us. http://www.psychosocial-studiesassociation.org/about/. Accessed 20 Nov 2021.
Baranger, W. (2009). Spiral process and the dynamic field. In M. Baranger & W. Baranger (Eds.), The work of confluence. Listening and interpreting in the psychoanalytic field (pp. 45–62). Karnac.
Baranger, W., & Baranger, M. (2008). The analytic situation as a dynamic field. International Journal of Psycho-analysis, 89, 795–836. (originally published in 1961–62).
Bleger, J. (2013). Symbiosis and ambiguity. A psychoanalytic study. Karnac. Karnac (originally published in 1967).
Bourdieu, P. (1986). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Routledge.
Dalal, F. (1998). Taking the group seriously: Towards a post-Foulkesian group analytic theory. Jessica Kingsley.
Dalal, F. (2011). The social unconscious and ideology: In clinical theory and practice. In E. Hopper & H. Weinberg (Eds.), The social unconscious in persons, groups, and societies (Mainly theory) (Vol. 1, pp. 243–263). Karnac.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. University of Minnesota Press.
Durkheim, E. (1895). The rules of sociological method. Free Press, 1982.
Elias, N. (1939). The civilizing process. Blackwell, 2000.
Elias, N. (1984). What is sociology? Columbia University Press.
Elias, N. (2001). The society of individuals. Continuum.
Ellenberger, H. F. (1970). The discovery of the unconscious: The history and the evolution of dynamic psychiatry. Basic Books.
ffytche, M. (2012). The foundations of the unconscious: Schelling, Freud and the birth of modern psyche. Cambridge University Press.
Foucault, M. (1972). Archaeology of knowledge. Pantheon.
Foulkes, S. H. (1948). Introduction to group-analytic psychotherapy. Karnac.
Foulkes, S. H. (1964). Therapeutic group analysis. Karnac.
Foulkes, S. H. (1975). Group analytic psychotherapy: Methods and principles. Karnac.
Foulkes, E. (Ed.). (1990). S. H. Foulkes: Selected papers: Psychoanalysis and group analysis. Karnac.
Foulkes, S. H., & Anthony, E. J. (1957). Group psychotherapy: The psychoanalytical approach. Karnac.
Freud, S. (1913). Totem and taboo. S.E., 13:1–164. Hogarth.
Freud, S. (1921). Group psychology and the analysis of the ego. S.E., 18:67–143. Hogarth.
Freud, S. (1923). The ego and the id. S.E., 19:3–66. Hogarth.
Freud, S. (1930). Civilization and its discontents. S.E., 21:64–145. Hogarth.
Freud, S. (1933). The question of a Weltanschauung. New introductory lectures on psycho-analysis, S.E., 22:195–225. Hogarth.
Freud, S. (1937). Constructions in analysis. S.E., 23:255–270. Hogarth.
Freud, S. (1938). Shorter writings. Findings, ideas, and problems. July 20th. S.E, 23:299–300. Hogarth.
Freud, S. (1939). Moses and Monotheism. S.E., 23:3–140. Hogarth.
Fromm, E. (1932). Psychoanalytic characterology and its relevance for social psychology. In E. Fromm (Ed.), The crisis of psychoanalysis (pp. 164–187). Fawcett, 1971.
Fromm, E. (1936). Studies on authority and the family. Sociopsychological dimensions. Available. https://www.fromm-gesellschaft.eu/images/pdf-Dateien/1936a-eng.pdf. Accessed 10 Oct 2021.
Fromm, E. (1962). The social unconscious. In Beyond the chains of illusion: My encounter with Marx and Freud. Continuum.
Fromm, E. (1963). The revolutionary character. In The dogma of Christ (pp. 122–139). Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Frosh, S. (2013a). Hauntings: Psychoanalysis and ghostly transmissions. Palgrave Macmillan.
Frosh, S. (2013b). Transdisciplinary tensions and psychosocial studies. Enquire, 6(1), 1–15.
Frosh, S. (2019a). Those who come after: Postmemory, acknowledgement and forgiveness. Palgrave Macmillan.
Frosh, S. (2019b). Introduction. In S. Frosh (Ed.), New voices in psychosocial studies (pp. 1–22). Palgrave Macmillan.
Frosh, S., & Baraitser, L. (2008). Psychoanalysis and psychosocial studies. Psychoanalysis, Culture and Society, 13, 346–365.
Herron, W. G. (1995). Development of ethnic unconscious. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 72, 521–532.
Hinshelwood, R. (2018). John Rickman behind the scenes: The influence of Lewin’s field theory on practice, countertransference, and W.R. Bion. International Journal of Psycho-analysis, 99(6), 1409–1423.
Hopper, E. (1981). Social mobility: A study of social control and insatiability. Blackwell.
Hopper, E. (2003a). Social unconscious: Selected papers. Jessica Kingsley.
Hopper, E. (2003b). Traumatic experience in the unconscious life of groups: The fourth basic assumption: Incohesion: Aggregation/Massification or (ba) I:A/M. Jessica Kingsley.
Hopper, E. (2018). “Notes” on the concept of the social unconscious in group analysis. Group, 42(2), 99–118.
Hopper, E., & Weinberg, H. (2011). The social unconscious in persons, groups and societies (Mainly theory) (Vol. 1). Karnac.
Hopper, E., & Weinberg, H. (2016). The social unconscious in persons, groups and societies (Foundation matrices) (Vol. 2). Karnac.
Hopper, E., & Weinberg, H. (2017). The social unconscious in persons, groups and societies (The foundation matrices extended and reconfigured) (Vol. 3). Karnac.
Hopper, E., & Weinberg, H. (2022). The social unconscious in persons, groups and societies (Clinical implications) (Vol. 4). Routledge.
Horney, K. (1937). The neurotic personality of our time. W.W. Norton.
Lacan, J. (2007). Écrits. W.W. Norton.
Lewin, K. (1947). Field theory in social sciences. Harper and Brothers.
Leyton, L., & Leavy-Sperounis, M. (2020). Toward a social psychoanalysis: Culture, character, and normative unconscious processes. Routledge.
Losso, R., de Setton, L., & Scharff, D. (Eds.). (2017). The linked self in psychoanalysis. The Pionnering work of Enrique Pichon Rivière. Karnac.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Phenomenology of perception. Routledge, 2002.
Montana Katz, S., Cassorla, R., & Civitarese, G. (Eds.). (2017). Advances in contemporary psychoanalytic field theory. Concept and future development. Routledge.
Nitzgen, D. (2011). The concept of the social unconscious in the work of S. H. Foulkes. In E. Hopper & H. Weinberg (Eds.), The social unconscious in persons, groups and societies (Mainly theory) (Vol. 1, pp. 3–21). Karnac.
Nitzgen, D., & Hopper, E. (2017). The concepts on the social unconscious and of the matrix in the work of Foulkes. In E. Hopper & H. Weinberg (Eds.), The social unconscious in persons, groups and societies (The foundation matrices extended and reconfigured) (Vol. 3). Karnac.
Penna, C. (2016). Reflections upon Brazilian social unconscious. In E. Hopper & H. Weinberg (Eds.), The social unconscious in persons, groups, and societies (Mainly foundation matrices) (Vol. 2, pp. 139–158). Karnac.
Penna, C. (2022). From crowd psychology to the dynamics of large groups: Historical, theoretical and practical considerations. Routledge.
Pertegato, E., & Pertegato, G. (2013). From psychoanalysis to group analysis: The pioneering work of Trigant Burrow. Karnac.
Pichon-Rivière, E. (1979). Teoría del vínculo [Theory of the link]. Nueva Visión.
Pichon-Rivière, E. (1980). O processo grupal. [The group process]. Martins Fontes.
Racker, H. (1960). Transference and counter-transference. Karnac, 1982.
Tubert Oklander, J. (2017). Field theories and process theories. In K. Montana, R. Cassorla, & G. Civitarese (Eds.), Advances in contemporary psychoanalytic field theory. Concept and future development (pp. 191–200). Routledge.
Tubert-Oklander, J. (2011). Enrique Pichon-Rivière: The social unconscious in the Latin American tradition in group analysis. In E. Hopper & H. Weinberg (Eds.), The social unconscious in persons, groups and societies (Mainly theory) (Vol. 1, pp. 45–70). Karnac.
Tubert-Oklander, J., & Hernández de Tubert, R. (2004). Operative groups: The Latin-American approach to group analysis. Jessica Kingsley.
Winnicott, D. (1971). Playing and reality. Tavistock.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Penna, C. (2024). Social Unconscious Theory: Contributions of Group Analysis to Psychosocial Studies. In: Frosh, S., Vyrgioti, M., Walsh, J. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Psychosocial Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30366-1_50
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30366-1_50
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-30365-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-30366-1
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences