Skip to main content

What Is Called “Process Thought”: A Transdisciplinary Process Ontology for Psychosocial Studies

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Psychosocial Studies
  • 82 Accesses

Abstract

Transdisciplinary in nature, psychosocial work has drawn on a range of theoretical inspirations. This contribution builds on prior theoretical work to make the case that “process thought” is a good candidate for inspiring the sort of “metatheory” that is not only helpful to researchers concerned with the psychosocial relation, but also for integrating different research traditions. “Process thought” is here used to name a tradition of thinking, like the expression “continental thought.” The purpose is to give content to what is called “process thought” and to show its relevance to the psychosocial domain. The event-centered relational ontology of process thought is outlined, along with its epistemology of “deep empiricism.” Process thought is presented as a “tradition” of thought for which a history of the present is directly relevant, and A.N. Whitehead’s work is discussed as an exemplar. The sources of process thought are traced philosophically in the tension between endurance and flux and an account is given of the adventures of “substance thought” from Greek philosophy to modern scientific materialism. The explicit emergence of process thought in the West is traced to the nineteenth century, and its entanglements with the emergence of modern psychology (including that of Freud) in Europe and North America are highlighted, along with its attack by new forms of substance thought in the early twentieth century.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, K. (2017). Navigating intimacy with ecstasy: The emotional, spatial and boundaried dynamics of couples’ MDMA experiences. PhD Thesis, London South Bank University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreouli, E., Kaposi, D., & Stenner, P. (2019). Brexit and emergent politics: In search of a social psychology. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 29(1), 18–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Basile, J. (2019). Life/force: Novelty and new materialism in Jane Bennett’s Vibrant Matter. SubStance, 48(2), 3–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, V. (2012). Declining performativity: Butler, Whitehead and ecologies of concern. Theory, Culture and Society, 29, 107–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bergson, H. (1946). Creative mind. Wisdom Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertalanffy, L. (1973). General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. George Braziller.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D. (1995). Wholeness and the implicate order. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bösel, B., & Wiemer, S. (Eds.). (2020). Affective transformations: Politics, algorithms, media. Meson Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, J. (1994). Transcendentalism and speculative realism in Whitehead. Process Studies, 23(3/4), 155–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R. (2011). Feminist philosophy revised. In Nomadic Theory. The Portable Rosi Braidotti. Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R. (2013). The Posthuman. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S., & Stenner, P. (2009). Psychology without foundations: History, philosophy and psychosocial theory. SAGE.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cabra, M. (2021). Liminality in play: The role of materiality and patterns. In B. Wagoner & T. Zittoun (Eds.), Experience on the edge: Theorising liminality (pp. 107–120). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Curt, B. (1994). Textuality and tectonics: Troubling social and psychological science. Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R. (1935). The logical syntax of language. Trubner & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, J. B. (2011). The process perspective II. Chalice Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Despret, V. (2008). The becomings of subjectivity in animal worlds. Subjectivity, 23(2008), 123–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (1993). The fold: Leibniz and the baroque. University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (2007). Lecture on Whitehead. Available via https://deleuze.cla.purdue.edu/sites/default/files/pdf/lectures/en/12a-GD-Leibniz10March1987Translation-FINAL-NOTES.pdf

  • Dibben, M., & Kelly, T. (2013). Applied process thought: Initial explorations in theory and research. De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels, F. (1880/2012). Socialism, utopian and scientific. Project Guttenberg, EBook #39257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epperson, M. (2012). Quantum mechanics and the philosophy of Alfred North Whitehead. Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faber, R., Halewood, M., & Lin, D. (2012). Butler and Whithead: On the occasion. Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1912). A note on the unconscious in psychoanalysis. In: S. Freud (1964) On metapsychology (pp. 45–58). Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greco, M. (2019). On illness and value: Biopolitics, psychosomatics, participating bodies. Medical Humanities, 45(2), 107–115.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, D. R. (1998). Unsnarling the world knot: Consciousness, freedom and the mind-body problem. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halewood, M. (2013). A.N. Whitehead and social theory: Tracing a culture of thought. Anthem Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasty, C. (2020). Time. In T. McAuley, N. Nielsen, & J. Levinson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of western music and philosophy. Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isin, E., & Saward, M. (Eds.). (2013). Enacting European citizenship. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1890/1950). Principles of psychology (Vol. 1). Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, E. (1788/2015). Critique of practical reason. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, C., & Daniell, A. (Eds.). (2002). Process and difference: Between cosmological and poststructuralist postmodernisms. University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, A. (2018). Merleau-Ponty’s reading of Whitehead: A romantic and invisible influence. Process Studies, 47(1–2), 62–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, S. K. (1953). Feeling and form: A theory of art. Charles Scribner’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2007). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor network theory. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leclerc, I. (Ed.). (1961/2014). The relevance of Whitehead: Philosophical essays in commemoration of the centenary of the birth of Alfred North Whitehead. Routledge, .

    Google Scholar 

  • Leclerc I (1961/2014) Form and actuality. In: I. Leclerc (Ed) The relevance of Whitehead: Philosophical essays in commemoration of the centenary of the birth of Alfred North Whitehead. Routledge, p 169-192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lestienne, R. (2018). Whitehead and Roger Sperry. The negation of the instant and the free will problem. In P. Stenner & M. Weber (Eds.), Orpheus’ glance. Selected papers on process psychology: The Fontarèches meetings, 2002–2017. Les Editions Chromatika.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lury, C., & Wakeford, N. (Eds.). (2012). Inventive methods: The happening of the social. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motzkau, J. F. (2009). Exploring the transdisciplinary trajectory of suggestibility. Subjectivity, 27, 172–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motzkau, J. F. (2011). Around the day in eighty worlds: Deleuze, suggestibility and researching practice as process. In P. Stenner, J. Cromby, J. Motzkau, & J. Yen (Eds.), Theoretical psychology: Global transformations and challenges (pp. 58–71). Captus Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichterlein, M., & Morss, J. (2017). Deleuze and psychology: Philosophical provocations and psychological practices. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice. University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pred, R. (2005). Onflow: Dynamics of consciousness and experience. MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2014). Matters of care. Speculative ethics in more than human worlds. University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reavey, P. (2021). (ed) a handbook of visual methods in psychology. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher, N. (1996). Process metaphysics: An introduction to process philosophy. State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigo, P. (2018). What is called “feeling”? Lure and certainty in Whitehead and Descartes. In P. Stenner & M. Weber (Eds.), Orpheus’ glance. Selected papers on process psychology: The Fontarèches meetings, 2002–2017 (pp. 205–212). Les Editions Chromatika.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savransky, M. (2012). Worlds in the making: Social sciences and the ontopolitics of knowledge. Postcolonial Studies, 15(3), 351–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savransky, M. (2021). Around the day in eighty worlds: Politics of the pluriverse. Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sehgal, M. (2014). Diffractive propositions: Reading Alfred North Whitehead with Donna Haraway and Karen Barad. Parallax, 20(3), 188–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simondon, G. (2020a). Individuation in light of notions of form and information (Vol. I). University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simondon, G. (2020b). Individuation in light of notions of form and information (Vol. II). University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stengers, I. (1990). The deceptions of power: Psychoanalysis and hypnosis. SubStance, 19(62/63), 81–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stengers, I. (2000). The invention of modern science. University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stengers, I. (2009). A constructivist reading of process and reality. Theory, Culture & Society, 25(4), 91–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stengers, I. (2012). Thinking with Whitehead. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenner, P. (2007). Non-foundational criticality? On the need for a process ontology of the psychosocial. Critical Social Studies: Outlines, 9(2), 44–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenner, P. (2008). A.N. Whitehead and subjectivity. Subjectivity, 22(1), 90–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stenner, P. (2009a). On the actualities and possibilities of constructionism: Towards deep empiricism. Human Affairs, 19, 194–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stenner, P. (2009b). Q as a constructivist methodology. Operant Subjectivity, 32, 46–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stenner, P. (2011). Psychology in the key of life: Deep empiricism and process ontology. In P. Stenner, J. Cromby, J. Motzkau, & J. Yen (Eds.), Theoretical psychology: Global transformations and challenges. Captus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenner, P. (2013). Human rights between brute fact and articulated aspiration. In M. R. Madsen & G. Verschraegen (Eds.), Making human rights intelligible: Towards a sociology of human rights. Oñati International Series in Law and Society (1) (pp. 105–125). Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenner, P. (2014). Transdisciplinarity. In T. Teo (Ed.), Encyclopedia of critical psychology (pp. 1987–1993). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stenner, P. (2015). A transdisciplinary psychosocial approach. In K. Slaney, J. Martin, & J. Sugarman (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of theoretical and philosophical psychology: Methods, approaches and new directions for social science. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenner, P. (2017). Liminality and experience: A transdisciplinary approach to the psychosocial. Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stenner, P., & Weber, M. (Eds.). (2018). Orpheus’ glance. Selected papers on process psychology: The Fontarèches meetings, 2002–2017. Les Editions Chromatika.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenner, P., McFarquhar, T., & Bowling, A. (2011). Older people and ‘active ageing’: Subjective aspects of ageing actively and becoming old. Journal of Health Psychology, 16(3), 467–477.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Szakolczai, A. (1998). Max Weber and Michel Foucault: Parallel life-works. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrift, N. (2008). Non-representational theory: Space, politics, affect. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Toscano, A. (2006). The theatre of production: Philosophy and individuation between Kant and Deleuze. Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wagoner, B., & Zittoun, T. (Eds.). (2021). Experience on the edge: Theorising liminality. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M., & Desmond, W. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of Whiteheadian process thought. Ontos Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M., & Weekes, A. (Eds.). (2009). Process approaches to consciousness in psychology, neuroscience, and philosophy of mind. State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A. N. (1898). Treatise of universal algebra. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A. N. (1906). The axioms of projective geometry. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A. N. (1907). The axioms of descriptive geometry. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A. N. (1917/1962). The organisation of thought. In A.N. Whitehead (1962) The aims of education. Ernest Benn Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A. N. (1919). Enquiry into the principles of natural knowledge. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A. N. (1920). The concept of nature. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A. N. (1922). The principle of relativity. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A. N. (1925/1985). Science and the modern world. Free Association Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A. N. (1929/1985). Process and reality. The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A. N. (1933/1967). Adventures of ideas. Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A. N. (1938/1966). Modes of thought. The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wightman W (1961/2014) Whitehead’s empiricism. In: I. Leclerc (ed) The relevance of Whitehead: Philosophical essays in commemoration of the centenary of the birth of Alfred North Whitehead. Routledge, , p. 335-352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrbouschek, M., & Slunecko, T. (2021a). Liminal moods and sense-making under conditions of uncertainty. International Review of Theoretical Psychologies, 1(1), 142–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrbouschek, M., & Slunecko, T. (2021b). Tensed toward the collective: A Simondonian perspective on human experience in context. Theory and Psychology, 31(1), 43–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zittoun, T. (2021). From liminalities to limbo: Thinking through semiotic elaboration. In B. Wagoner & T. Zittoun (Eds.), Experience on the edge: Theorising liminality. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zittoun, T., & Stenner, P. (2021). Vygotsky’s tragedy: Hamlet and the psychology of art. Review of General Psychology, 25(3), 223–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Stenner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Stenner, P. (2024). What Is Called “Process Thought”: A Transdisciplinary Process Ontology for Psychosocial Studies. In: Frosh, S., Vyrgioti, M., Walsh, J. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Psychosocial Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30366-1_43

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics