Abstract
The Good Place was a historical landmark in the field of pop culture as philosophy, as it was the first mainstream sitcom to explicitly tackle the works of philosophers in its content. In addition to exposing its viewers to the works of famous philosophers, The Good Place makes its own philosophical arguments. The show is ultimately about the concept of the afterlife – what it might look like, how it would operate, and if it is even desirable. The show also explores the relationship between morality and the afterlife. Essentially, The Good Place explores three focal questions: (1) Are there reasons to be morally good, irrespective of how that plays out in an afterlife? (2) What would a fair system for gaining admission to a merit-based afterlife look like? And (3) is an eternal afterlife even desirable? Ultimately the show argues that yes, virtue is worthwhile for virtue’s own sake, irrespective of the consequences in an afterlife. Second, it argues that a fair merit-based system would allow people the chance to improve and get better, given the right circumstances. Third, it argues that an eternal afterlife, in which you maintain your identity and live forever, is not desirable.
References
Aristotle. 1999. Nicomachean Ethics, 2nd edition. Trans. Terrence Irwin. Indianapolis: Hackett.
De Beauvoir, Simone. 1980. The Ethics of Ambiguity. Trans. Bernard Frechtman. Secaucus: Citadel Press.
Engels, Kimberly, ed. 2021. The Good Place and Philosophy: Everything is Forking Fine! Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons.
Hieronymi, Pamela, and Todd May. 2021. Introduction. In The Good Place and Philosophy: Everything is Forking Fine! ed. Kimberly S. Engels, xxii–xxvii. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons.
Johnson, David. 2021. Why it wouldn’t be rational to believe you’re in the good place (and why you wouldn’t want to be anyway). In The Good Place and Philosophy: Everything is Forking Fine! ed. Kimberly S. Engels, 270–282. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons.
Kant, Immanuel. 1997. Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals. Trans., and ed. Mary Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ma’Sumian, Farnaz. 1995. Life after Death: A Study of the Afterlife in World Religions. Los Angeles: Kalimat Press.
McGowan, Michael. 2021. Conceptions of the Afterlife: The Good Place and Religious Tradition. In The Good Place and Philosophy: Everything is Forking Fine! ed. Kimberly S. Engels, 189–201. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons.
Plato. 2007. Euthyphro. Trans. Cathal Woods and Ryan Pack. San Francisco: Creative Commons.
Rachels, James. 2011. The Elements of Moral Philosophy. Boston: McGraw Hill.
Rawls, John. 1999. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University.
Williams, Bernard. 1973. The Makropulos case: Reflections on the tedium of immortality. In Problems of the self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Engels, K.S. (2024). The Good Place as Philosophy: Moral Adventures in the Afterlife. In: Kowalski, D.A., Lay, C., S. Engels, K. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Popular Culture as Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24685-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24685-2_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-24684-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-24685-2
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities