Skip to main content

Democratizing Leadership-Followership: Restorative Practices in the Age of Disruption

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Global Leadership and Followership

Abstract

Working in tandem, growing social complexity and demands for more democratic processes are guiding leaders in the social service sector to explore the power of followership. Followership, the individuals who accept and enable organizational leaders, includes employees, volunteers, and clients coordinating activities to achieve societal compliance. Recognizing role fluidity could create more reciprocal and resilient relationships in the age of disruption, leaders turn to engage in partnership and collaboration with followership. Professionals who work in social services have found some success employing restorative practices, specifically the use of circles, in their work. Just as social media has democratized the public space – introducing more voice and participation – restorative circles provide a social medium democratizing social services. This is evident in social service organizations operating in the VUCA world based in the Global North and Global South. This chapter highlights examples and impediments shared by practitioners from the social service organizations based in Nicaragua, Singapore, Belgium, the Netherlands, and the United States. The chapter focuses on how practitioners employed restorative circles with staff and constituencies to manage conflict, build relationships, exchange feedback, and make decisions amid volatile and uncertain conditions such as during the global COVID-19 pandemic. From those examples, this chapter concludes by highlighting the connection between practitioner values, facilitation processes, and its contribution to the development of fluid leadership-followership relationships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdul Rahim, R. (2015). Business ethics and prospects for restorative justice in selected commercial organisations based in Singapore. PhD thesis, Monash University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B. J., Luthans, F., & Walumba, F. O. (2004). Authentic leadership: Theory building for veritable sustained performance (Working Paper). Gallup Leadership Institute, University of Nebraska-Lincoln.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, H. F. (1992). Developing strategic leadership: The US Army War College experience. Journal of Management Development, 11(6), 4–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhandari, A. (2018). Restorative practice: Developing a community of storytellers. Teaching Artist Journal, 16(3), 100–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D. (2008). On dialogue (L. Nichol, Ed.). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J. (1999). Restorative justice: Assessing optimistic and pessimistic accounts. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 25, 1–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J. (2017). Democracy, community and problem solving. In Family group conferencing (pp. 31–39). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaleff, I. (2009). The courageous follower: Standing up to & for our leaders (3rd ed.). Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheshin, A. (2020). The Impact of non-normative displays of emotion in the workplace: How inappropriateness shapes the interpersonal outcomes of emotional displays. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00006

  • Cook, I. (2021, September 15). Who is driving the great resignation? Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2021/09/who-is-driving-the-great-resignation

  • Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 869–884. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2007.26279183

  • Eisenberg, D. T. (2016). The restorative workplace: An organizational learning approach to discrimination. University of Richmond Law Review, 50, 487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erkutlu, H., & Chafra, J. (2013). Effects of trust and psychological contract violation on authentic leadership and organizational deviance. Management Research Review, 36(9), 828–848. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-06-2012-0136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ernest, K. (2019). Is restorative justice effective in the US? Evaluating program methods and findings using meta-analysis (Publication No. 54883). Doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University. ASU Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, M., Ford, B. Q., & Flynn, F. J. (2020). Rethinking reappraisal: The double-edged sword of regulating negative emotions in the workplace. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.03.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fluker, W. E. (2009). Ethical leadership: The quest for character, civility, and community. Fortress Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, W. L., Avolio, B. J., Luthans, F., May, D. R., & Walumbwa, F. (2005). Can you see the real me? A selfbased model of authentic leader and follower development. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 343–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.003

  • Gilstrap, C. A., & Morris, A. (2015). Role fluidity and emergent followership: How nonprofit leaders communicate their relationship as/to followers. Journal of Nonprofit Education and Leadership, 5(3), 153–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golightley, M., & Holloway, M. (2020). Social Work in the time of the COVID-19 pandemic: All in this together? British Journal of Social Work, 50(3), 637–641. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcaa036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, S., Johnstone, G., & Lambert, C. (2015). Reshaping the field: Building restorative capital. Restorative Justice, 2(1), 43–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., Agrawal, S., Blue, A., Plowman, S. K., Josh, P., & Asplund, J. (2020). The relationship between engagement at work and organizational outcomes (Gallup Q12 Meta-analysis) (10th ed., p. 44). Gallup. https://www.gallup.com/workplace/321725/gallup-q12-meta-analysis-report.aspx

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewlin, P. F., & Broomes, A.-M. (2019). Authenticity in the workplace. In A. J. Mayo & D. A. Thomas (Eds.), Race, work, and leadership: New perspectives on the Black experience (pp. 135–149). Harvard Business Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, B. (2015). From restorative justice to restorative culture. Social Work Review, 14(4), 19–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurwitz, M., & Hurwitz, S. (2015). Leadership is half the story: A fresh look at followership, leadership, and collaboration. University of Toronto Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Itzchakov, G., & Kluger, A. N. (2017). Can holding a stick improve listening at work? The effect of Listening Circles on employees’ emotions and cognitions. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26(5), 663–676. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2017.1351429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, G. (2013). Restorative justice: Ideas, values, debates. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kellerman, B. (2008). Followership: How followers are creating change and changing leaders. Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellerman, B. (2012). The end of leadership. HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, S., Abdullah, S., Busari, A., Mubushar, M., & Khan, I. U. (2019). Reversing the lens: The role of followership dimensions in shaping transformational leadership behaviour; mediating role of trust in leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 41. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-03-2019-0100

  • Kim, C., & Mauborgne, R. (1997). Fair process: Managing in the knowledge economy. Harvard Business Review, 75(4), 65–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kligman, L. (2020). Widening circles: A grounded theory study of workplace leadership. Dissertation, Union Institute & University. https://pqdtopen.proquest.com/pubnum/28289264.html

  • Kubin, E., & von Sikorski, C. (2021). The role of (social) media in political polarization: A systematic review. Annals of the International Communication Association, 45(3), 188–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2021.1976070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, M. D. (2013). Social: Why our brains are wired to connect. Broadway Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luedtke, D. (2014). Progression in the age of recession: Restorative justice and white-collar crime in post-recession America. Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law, 9(1), 311–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maroosis, J. (2008). Leadership: A partnership in reciprocal following. In R. E. Riggio, I. Chaleff, & J. Lipman-Blumen (Eds.), The art of followership: How great followers create great leaders and organizations (pp. 17–24). Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattaini, M., & Holtschneider, C. (2017). Collective leadership and circles: Not invented here. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 37(2), 126–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McManus, R. M., & Perruci, G. (2015). Understanding leadership: An arts and humanities perspective. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nedelko, Z., & Potocan, V. (2021). Sustainability of organizations: The contribution of personal values to democratic leadership behavior focused on the sustainability of organizations. Sustainability, 13(8), 4207. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opie, T., & Roberts, L. M. (2017). Do black lives really matter in the workplace? Restorative justice as a means to reclaim humanity. Equality, Diversity & Inclusion, 36(8), 707–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page, S. E. (2017). The diversity bonus: How great teams pay off in the knowledge economy. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, G. D., & Borton, I. M. (2017). Toward a communication perspective of restorative justice: Implications for research, facilitation, and assessment. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 3, 199–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H., & Schein, P. (2017). Organizational culture and leadership (5th ed.). Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1996). Value priorities and behavior: Applying a theory of integrated value systems. In C. Seligman, J. M. Olson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The psychology of values: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 8, pp. 1–24). Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. Atria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, D., & Tifft, L. (2008). Handbook of restorative justice: A global perspective. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (n.d.). Refugee data finder. https://www.unhcr.org/refugee-statistics/

  • United Nations Office on Drug (UNODC)s and Crime. (2020). Handbook on restorative justice programmes (2nd ed.). United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaandering, D. (2014). Relational restorative justice pedagogy in educator professional development. Curriculum Inquiry, 44(4), 508–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vigoda-Gadot, E., & Talmud, I. (2010). Organizational politics and job outcomes: The moderating effect of trust and social support. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(11), 2829–2861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wachtel, T. (2013). Defining restorative (p. 12). International Institute for Restorative Practices. https://www.iirp.edu/restorative-practices/defining-restorative/

    Google Scholar 

  • Walumbwa, F. O., Lawler, J. J., & Avolio, B. J. (2007). Leadership, individual differences, and work-related attitudes: A cross-culture investigation. Applied Psychology, 56, 212–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2006.00241.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zehr, H. (2015). Changing lenses: Restorative justice for our times (25th Anniversary ed.). Herald Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda Kligman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Kligman, L., Abdul Rahim, R.B. (2023). Democratizing Leadership-Followership: Restorative Practices in the Age of Disruption. In: Marques, J.F., Schmieder-Ramirez, J., Malakyan, P.G. (eds) Handbook of Global Leadership and Followership. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21544-5_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics