Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Still Striving, and for What? Centering Equity in the Study of Prestige Seeking in Higher Education

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research

Part of the book series: Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research ((HATR,volume 38))

Abstract

As policymakers, administrators, and researchers, we give attention to identifying and addressing the deeply ingrained and often-overlooked aspects of work in higher education that is complicit in producing inequity. One significant area where these critical approaches can be better extended is in the work around prestige in higher education. Importantly, the pursuit of prestige has been noted to have problematic implications for equity, including diminished access for marginalized students, minimizing voices of faculty in the academy, and an overall weakening of the public good of the university. This chapter seeks to deepen our understanding of prestige and its role in creating, shaping, and perpetuating inequity within higher education. The purpose of this chapter is to demonstrate how an equity focus can be more strongly centered in research on prestige in higher education through the expansion of foci in studies on striving and the diversification of paradigms, theoretical lenses, methods, and institutional contexts. In so doing, this work aims to contribute to the body of research on prestige and offer further direction for researchers, institutional leaders, and policymakers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, M. (2007). Pedagogical frameworks for social justice education. In M. Adams, L. A. Bell, & P. Griffin (Eds.), Teaching for diversity and social justice (pp. 15–33). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Aguilar-Smith, S. (2021). Seeking to serve or $erve? Hispanic-serving institutions’ race-evasive pursuit of racialized funding. AERA Open, 7(1), 233285842110570. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584211057097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arellano, L. (2022). Questioning the science: How quantitative methodologies perpetuate inequity in higher education. Education Sciences, 12(2), 116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ásta. (2018). Categories we live by: The construction of sex, gender, race, and other social categories. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baez, B. (2007). Thinking critically about the “critical”: Quantitative research as social critique. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2007(133), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.201

  • Bastedo M. N., & Bowman N. A. (2011). College rankings as an interorganizational dependency: Establishing the foundation for strategic and institutional accounts. Research in Higher Education, 52, 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastedo M. N., & Gumport P. J. (2003). Access to what? Mission differentiation and academic stratification in U.S. public higher education. Higher Education, 46, 341–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, L. A. (2007). Theoretical foundations for social justice education. In M. Adams, L. A. Bell, & P. Griffin (Eds.), Teaching for diversity and social justice. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bensimon, E. M. (2007). The underestimated significance of practitioner knowledge in the scholarship on student success. The Review of Higher Education, 30(4), 441–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bensimon, E. M. (2018). Reclaiming racial justice in equity. Change, 50(3–4), 95–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bensimon, E. M., & Malcom, L. (2012). Confronting equity issues on campus: Implementing the equity scorecard in theory and practice. Stylus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernal, D. D. (2002). Critical Race Theory, Latino Critical Theory, and Critical Raced-Gendered Epistemologies: Recognizing Students of Color as Holders and Creators of Knowledge. Qualitative Inquiry, 8(1), 105–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780040200800107

  • Bernal, D. D., & Villalpando, O. (2002). An Apartheid of Knowledge in Academia: The Struggle Over the “Legitimate” Knowledge of Faculty of Color. Equity & Excellence in Education, 35(2), 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/713845282

  • Bernstein, A. R. (2014). Funding the future: Philanthropy’s influence on American higher education. Rowman & Littlefield Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, R. (1983). Maintaining institutional diversity in higher education. Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, D. E., Hartley, M., & Rosovsky, H. (2007). Beyond private gain: The public benefits of higher education. In J. J. F. Forest & P. G. Altbach (Eds.), International handbook of higher education. Part one: Global themes and contemporary challenges (Vol. 18, pp. 293–308). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4012-2_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bonilla-Silva, E., & Peoples, C. E. (2022). Historically white colleges and universities: The unbearable whiteness of (most) colleges and universities in America. American Behavioral Scientist, 66, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, H. R. (1980). The Costs of Higher Education: How Much Do Colleges and Universities Spend per Student and How Much Should They Spend? Jossey-Bass Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, W. G., & Breneman, D. W. (1993). Student Aid: Price Discount or Educational Investment? Trusteeship, 1(3), 11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransberger, P., Falkenstern, C., & Lane, P. (2020). Knocking at the college door: Projections of high school graduates. Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breault, D. A., & Callejo Perez, D. M. (2012). The Red Light in the Ivory Tower: Contexts and Implications of Entrepreneurial Education. Counterpoints: Studies in the Postmodern Theory of Education. Volume 401. In Peter Lang New York. Peter Lang New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenna, J., & Naidoo, R. (2008). Higher education and the achievement (and/or prevention) of equity and social justice. Higher Education, 56, 287–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, D. J., Gates, S. M., & Goldman, C. A. (2001). In pursuit of prestige: Strategy and competition in U.S. higher education. Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. (2022, February). The missing Hispanic students: Higher ed’s future, and the economy, depends on their coming back to college. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/the-missing-hispanic-students?cid2=gen_login_refresh&cid=gen_sign_in

  • Budd, J. M. (2009). Higher education’s purpose: Intellectual and social progress. University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrd, W. C., Luney, L. T., Marie, J., & Sanders, K. N. (2021). Demanding attention: An exploration of institutional characteristics of recent student demands. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 14(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera, N. L., Franklin, J. D., & Watson, J. S. (2017). Whiteness in higher education: The invisible missing link in diversity and racial analyses (Association for the Study of Higher Education monograph series). Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnegie Commission on Higher Education. (1973). Priorities for action: Final report of the Carnegie Commission on Higher Education. McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, J. (2005). The special role of higher education in society. In A. J. Kezar, A. C. Chambers, & J. Burkhardt (Eds.), Higher education for the public good: Emerging voices from a national movement. Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherwitz, R. A. (2005). A new social compact demands real change: Connecting the university to the community. Change, 37, 48–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, K. S. (2018). The perception of progress: Conceptualizing institutional response to student protests and activism. Thought & Action, 34, 81–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, R. M., & Heinecke, W. F. (2020). Higher education after neoliberalism: Student activism as a guiding light. Policy Futures in Education, 18(1), 90–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, F. L., & Park, G.-S. (2016). Ranking and the multiplication of reputation: Reflections from the frontier of globalizing higher education. Higher Education, 72, 115–129.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9941-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crisp, G., Horn, C., Dizzino, G., & Wang, D. (2010). Modeling the racial and ethnic implications of admissions policy changes in the pursuit of tier one status. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 3(2), 71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, S. W., Putnam, H. M., Ainsworth, T., Baum, J. K., Bove, C. B., Crosby, S. C., et al. (2021). Promoting inclusive metrics of success and impact to dismantle a discriminatory reward system in science. PLoS Biology, 19(6), e3001282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K. (2017). Critical qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(1), 8–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K. (2019). The Death of Data in Neoliberal Times. Qualitative Inquiry, 25(8), 721–724. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800419847501

  • Dill, D. D. (2003). Allowing the Market to Rule: The Case of the United States. Higher Education Quarterly, 57(2), 136–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2273.00239

  • Dill, D. D. (2006). Convergence and diversity: The role and influence of university rankings. Keynote address presented at the Consortium of Higher Education Researcher 19th annual research conference. Retrieved from http://www.unc.edu/ppaq/docs/Kassel_Paper_Final_US.pdf

  • DiMaggio, P. (1988) Interest and Agent in Institutional Theory. Institutional Patterns and Organizations, Cambridge University Press, 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doran, E. E. (2015). Negotiating access and tier one aspirations: The historical evolution of a striving Hispanic-Serving Institution. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 14(4), 343–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty, K., & Reddy, V. (2013). Performance Funding for Higher Education: What Are the Mechanisms? What Are the Impacts? ASHE Higher Education Report, 39 (2). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty, K. J., & Natow, R. S. (2015). The politics of performance funding for higher education: Origins, discontinuations, and transformations. Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty K. J., Natow R. S., Vega B. E. (2012). Popular but unstable: Explaining why state performance funding systems in the United States often do not persist. Teachers College Record, 114(3), 1–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty, K. J., Jones, S. M., Lahr, H., Natow, R. S., Pheatt, L., & Reddy, V. (2014). Performance Funding for Higher Education: Forms, Origins, Impacts, and Futures. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716214541042

  • Dougherty, K. J., Jones, S. M., Lahr, H., Natow, R. S., Pheatt, L., & Reddy, V. (2016). Looking Inside the Black Box of Performance Funding for Higher Education: Policy Instruments, Organizational Obstacles, and Intended and Unintended Impacts. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 2(1), 147–173. https://doi.org/10.7758/rsf.2016.2.1.07

  • Douglas-Gabriel, D., Natanson, H., & Harden, J. D. (2021, January). A steady stream of Latino students was arriving on college campuses. Then the pandemic hit. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2021/01/31/latino-college-enrollment-pandemic/

  • Dowd, A. C., & Bensimon, E. M. (2015). Engaging the “race question”: Accountability and equity in U.S. higher education. Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagan, K., Stolzenberg, B., Bates, A., Aragon, M., Suchard, M., & Rios-Aguilar, C. (2015). The American freshman: National norms Fall 2015. Cooperative Institutional Research Program at UCLA. Available at: http://www.heri.ucla.edu/monographs/TheAmericanFreshman2015.pdf

  • Eckel, P. (2008). Mission diversity and the tension between prestige and effectiveness: An overview of U.S. higher education. Higher Education Policy, 21, 175–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg, R. G. (2003). Reaching for the Brass Ring: The “U.S. News & World Report” Rankings and Competition. Review of Higher Education, 26(2), 145–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espeland, W. N., & Sauder, M. (2007). Rankings and Reactivity: How Public Measures Recreate Social Worlds. American Journal of Sociology, 113(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1086/517897

  • Espenshade, T. J. (2009). No longer separate, not yet equal: Race and class in elite college admission and campus life /. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ewell, P. T. (2015). Transforming institutional accreditation in U.S. higher education. National Center for Higher Education Management Systems. Retrieved from http://nchems.org/documents/GatesAccreditationWhitePaper.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Excelencia in Education. (2022). Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSIs): 2020–21. Excelencia in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrugia, C. A., & Lane, J. E. (2013). Legitimacy in cross-border higher education: Identifying stakeholders in international branch campuses. Journal of Studies in International Education, 17(4), 414–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faulkner, L. (2008). The social compact of higher education and its public. In R. N. Katz (Ed.), The tower and the cloud: Higher education in the age of cloud computing (pp. 90–98). Educause.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, M. J. (1984). The American academic profession: A synthesis of social scientific inquiry since World War II. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnegan, D. E., & Gamson, Z. F. (1996). Disciplinary adaptation to research culture in comprehensive institutions. Review of Higher Education, 19(2), 141–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, B. (2009). Athletics success and institutional rankings. New Directions for Higher Education, 148, 45–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1985). The use of pleasure: History of sexuality (Vol. 2). Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandara, D., Rippner, J., & Ness, E. (2017). Exploring the “how” in policy diffusion: National intermediary organizations’ roles in facilitating the spread of performance-based funding policies in the states. Journal of Higher Education, 88(5), 701–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gándara, D. & Rutherford, A. (2017). Mitigating unintended impacts? The effects of premiums for underserved populations in performance-funding policies for higher education. Research in Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, G. A. (2018). Decolonizing Hispanic-serving institutions: A framework for organizing. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 17(2), 132–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, N. M., López, N., & Vélez, V. N. (2018). QuantCrit: Rectifying quantitative methods through critical race theory. Race Ethnicity and Education, 21(2), 149–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, S. (2010). Keeping Up with the Joneses: Socialization and Culture in Doctoral Education at One Striving Institution. The Journal of Higher Education, 81, 728–749. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2010.0013

  • Gardner, S. K. (2013). Women faculty departures from a striving institution: Between a rock and a hard place. Review of Higher Education, 36, 349–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, R. L. (2004). Knowledge and money: Research universities and the paradox of the marketplace. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gillborn, D., Warmington, P., & Demack, S. (2018). QuantCrit: Education, policy, ‘Big Data’ and principles for a critical race theory of statistics. Race Ethnicity and Education, 21(2), 158–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2017.1377417

  • Giroux, H. A. (n.d.). Neoliberalism’s War on Higher Education. Haymarketbooks.Org. Retrieved November 25, 2022, from https://www.haymarketbooks.org/books/1386-neoliberalism-s-war-on-higher-education

  • Gonzales, L. D. (2012). Responding to mission creep: Faculty members as cosmopolitan agents. Higher Education, 64(3), 337–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzales, L. D. (2013). Faculty sensemaking and mission creep: Interrogating institutionalized ways of knowing and doing legitimacy. The Review of Higher Education, 36(2), 179–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzales, L. D. (2014). Framing faculty agency inside striving universities: An application of Bourdieu’s theory of practice. The Journal of Higher Education, 85(2), 193–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzales, L.D. & Pacheco, A. (2012). Leading change with slogans: Border University in transition. Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership, 15(1), 50–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzales, L. D., Martinez, E., & Ordu, C. (2014). Exploring faculty experiences in a striving university through the lens of academic capitalism. Studies in Higher Education, 39(7), 1097–1115. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.777401

  • Gonzales, L. D., Kanhai, D., & Hall, K. (2018). Reimagining organizational theory for the critical study of higher education. In M. Paulsen (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 33). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72490-4_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Grawe, N. D. (2018). Demographics and the demand for higher education. John Hopkins University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grawe, N. D. (2021). The agile college: How institutions successfully navigate demographic changes. John Hopkins University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin-Andersson, K. and Suddaby, R. (2008). The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. London: SAGE Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gumport, P.J. & Sporn, B. (1999). Institutional Adaptation: Demands for Management Reform and University Administration. In J. Smart (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research (Vol. XIV). New York: Agathon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haddad, N. (2021). Philanthropic Foundations and Higher Education: The Politics of Intermediary Organizations. Journal of Higher Education, 92(6), 897–926. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2021.1888635

  • Haddad, N., & Reckhow, S. (2018). The shifting role of higher education philanthropy: A network analysis of philanthropic policy strategies. Philanthropy & Education, 2(1), 25–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagood, L. P. (2019). The Financial Benefits and Burdens of Performance Funding in Higher Education. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.3102/0162373719837318

  • Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1977). The Population Ecology of Organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 929–964. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2777807

  • Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1984). Structural Inertia and Organizational Change. American Sociological Review, 49(2), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095567

  • Harper, S. R. (2009). N—s no more: A critical race counternarrative on Black male student achievement at predominantly white colleges and universities. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 22(6), 697–712.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, S. R., Patton, L. D., & Wooden, O. S. (2009). Access and Equity for African American Students in Higher Education: A Critical Race Historical Analysis of Policy Efforts. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M. S., & Ellis, M. K. (2020). Measuring changes in institutional diversity: The US context. The International Journal of Higher Education Research, 79(2), 345–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazelkorn, E. (2012). Everyone wants to be like Harvard or do they?: Cherishing all missions equally. In A. Curaj et al. (Eds.), European higher education at the crossroads: Between the Bologna process and national reforms. Part 1. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazelkorn, E. (2015). Rankings and the Reshaping of Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137446671

  • Hillman, N. W. (2016, May). Why Performance-Based College Funding Doesn’t Work. https://tcf.org/content/report/why-performance-based-college-funding-doesnt-work/

  • Hillman, N., & Corral, D. (2017). The Equity Implications of Paying for Performance in Higher Education. American Behavioral Scientist, 61(14), 1757–1772. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764217744834

  • Hoffman, G. D., & Mitchell, T. D. (2016). Making diversity “everyone’s business”: A discourse analysis of institutional responses to student activism for equity and inclusion. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 9(3), 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hossler, D. (2000). The Role of Financial Aid in Enrollment Management. New Directions for Student Services, 2000(89), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/ss.8906

  • Hossler, D., & Kalsbeek, D. (2009). Admissions Testing & Institutional Admissions Processes. College and University, 84(4), 2–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Immerwahr, J. (2003). Public attitudes on higher education: A trend analysis. National Center for Higher Education Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaquette, O., Curs, B. R., & Posselt, J. R. (2016). Tuition rich, mission poor: Nonresident enrollment growth and the socioeconomic and racial composition of public research universities. Journal of Higher Education, 87(5), 635–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaschik, S. (2006, May 26). Momentum for Going SAT-Optional. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2006/05/26/momentum-going-sat-optional

  • Jencks, C., & Riesman, D. (1967). The American Negro college. Harvard Educational Review, 37(3), 451–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jencks, C., & Riesman, D. (1968). The academic revolution. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones T. (2016). A historical mission in the accountability era: A public HBCU and state performance funding. Educational Policy, 30(7), 999–1041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones T., Jones S., Elliott K., Owens L., Assalone A., Gándara D. (2017). Outcomes based funding and race in higher education. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelchen, R. (2018). Higher Education Accountability. In Johns Hopkins University Press. Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kezar, A. (2005). Challenges for higher education in serving the public good. In A. J. Kezar, A. C. Chambers, & J. Burkhardt (Eds.), Higher education for the public good: Emerging voices from a national movement. Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kezar, A., & Dee, J. R. (2011). Conducting multi-paradigm inquiry in the study of higher education organization and governance: Transforming research perspectives on colleges and universities. In J. Smart & M. Paulsen (Eds.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, 26 (pp. 265-315). New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kezar, A., & Posselt, J. (2019). Higher Education Administration for Social Justice and Equity: Critica. https://www.routledge.com/Higher-Education-Administration-for-Social-Justice-and-Equity-Critical/Kezar-Posselt/p/book/9781138351684

  • Kezar, A., & Sam, C. (2013). Institutionalizing Equitable Policies and Practices for Contingent Faculty. Journal of Higher Education, 84(1), 56–87. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2013.0002

  • Kezar, A., Chambers, T., & Burkhardt, J. (Eds.). (2005). Higher education for the public good: Emerging voices from a national movement. Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kezar, A., Lester, J., Glenn, W., & Nokamato, J. (2008). Examining organizational contextual features that affect implementation of equity initiatives. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(2), 125–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2008.11772089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kincheloe, J. L., & McLaren, P. L. (1994). Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research. In Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 138–157). Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. (2018). The Functions and Dysfunctions of College Rankings: An Analysis of Institutional Expenditure. Research in Higher Education, 59(1), 54–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-017-9455-1

  • Kraatz, M. S., & Zajac, E. J. (1996). Exploring the limits of the new institutionalism: The causes and consequences of illegitimate organizational change. American Sociological Review, 61(5), 812–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladson-Billings, G. (2013). Critical race theory—What it is not! In M. Lynn & A. D. Dixson (Eds.), Handbook of critical race theory in education (pp. 34–47). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladson-Billings, G., & Tate, W. F. (1995). Toward a Critical Race Theory of Education. Teachers College Record, 97(1), 47–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146819509700104

  • Lafuente-Ruiz-de-Sabando, A., Zorrila, P., & Forcada, J. (2018). A review of higher education image and reputation literature: Knowledge gaps and a research agenda. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 24(1), 8–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerma, V., Hamilton, L. T., & Nielsen, K. (2020). Racialized equity labor, university appropriation and student resistance. Social Problems, 67(2), 286–303. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spz011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, A. Y., Gándara, D., & Assalone, A. (2018). Equity or Disparity: Do Performance Funding Policies Disadvantage 2-Year Minority-Serving Institutions? Community College Review, 46(3), 288–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091552118778776

  • Longanecker D.A. (2008). Missions differentiation vs missions creep: Higher education battle between creation and evolution. National Conference of State Legislatures. The forum for America’s ideas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez, E. (2019). “The Rules Change”: Exploring Faculty Experiences and Work Expectations Within a Drifting Community College Context. Community College Review, 47(2), 111–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091552119835022

  • Martinez, M., & Henkle, J. (n.d.). University presidents as policy entrepreneurs: Evidence from U.S. universities engaged in prestige behaviour. Higher Education Quarterly, n/a(n/a). https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12395

  • Mason, R. (2021). Social kinds are essentially mind-dependent. Philosophical Studies, 178(12), 3975–3994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massy, W. F., & Zemsky, R. (1994). Faculty Discretionary Time. The Journal of Higher Education, 65(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1994.11778471

  • McClure, K. R., & Titus, M. A. (2018). Spending Up the Ranks? The Relationship Between Striving for Prestige and Administrative Expenditures at U.S. Public Research Universities. The Journal of Higher Education, 89(6), 961–987. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2018.1449079

  • McCormick, A. C., & Zhao, C. (2005). Rethinking and reframing the Carnegie Classification. Change, 37, 51–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKeown-Moak, M. P. (2013). The “New” Performance Funding in Higher Education. Educational Considerations, 40(2), 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., & Scott, W. R. (1983). Centralization and the legitimacy problems of local government. In J. W. Meyer & W. R. Scott (Eds.), Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality (pp. 199–215). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyers, L., & Robe, J. (2009). College rankings: History, criticism and reform. Center for College Affordability and Productivity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, T. (2016). Higher education outcomes-based funding models and academic quality (p. 18). Lumina Foundation for Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. N. S., & Morphew, C. C. (2017). Merchants of optimism: Agenda-setting organizations and the framing of performance-based funding for higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 88(5), 754–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miotto, G., Del-Castillo-Feito, C., & Blanco-Gonzalez, A. (2020). Reputation and legitimacy: Key factors for higher education institutions’ sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Business Research, 112, 342–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morphew, C. C. (2000). Institutional diversity, program acquisition and faculty members: Examining academic drift at a new level. Higher Education Policy, 13, 55–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morphew, C. C. (2002). A rose by any other name: Which colleges became universities. The Review of Higher Education, 25(2), 207–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morphew, C. (2009). Conceptualizing change in the institutional diversity of U.S. colleges and universities. Journal of Higher Education, 80(3), 243–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morphew, C. C., & Jenniskens, C. G. M. (1999). Assessing institutional change at the level of the faculty: Examining faculty motivators and new degree programs. In B. Jong, P. Bloed, P. Maassen, & G. Neave (Eds.), From the eye of the storm: Higher education’s changing institution (pp. 95–120). Dordrecht, Holland: Kluwer

    Google Scholar 

  • Morphew, C. C., & Baker, B. D. (2004). The cost of prestige: Do new research one universities incur increased administrative costs? Review of Higher Education, 27(3), 365–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morphew, C. C., & Huisman, J. (2002). Using institutional theory to reframe research on academic drift. Higher Education in Europe, 27(4), 491–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Museus, S. D., & LePeau, L. A. (2019). Navigating neoliberal organizational cultures: Implications for higher education leaders advancing social justice agendas. In A. Kezar & J. Posselt (Eds.), Higher education administration for social justice and equity: Critical perspectives for leadership. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Conference of State Legislatures. (2015). Performance-based funding for higher education. Retrieved from http://www.ncsl.org/research/education/performance-funding.aspx

  • Ness E. C., Deupree M. M., Gándara D. (2015). Campus responses to outcomes-based funding in Tennessee: Robust, aligned, and contested. Tennessee Higher Education Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngo, F., Coyner, M., & Lough, N. (2022). The financial behaviors of chasing athletic prestige: Evidence from the NCAA cost of attendance policy. The Review of Higher Education, 45(3), 307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, C. (1988). The Collective Strategy Framework: An Application to Competing Predictions of Isomorphism. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(4), 543–561. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2392643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Meara, K. A. (2007). Striving for what? Exploring the pursuit of prestige. In J. D. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 22, pp. 121–179). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Meara, K., & Bloomgarden, A. (2011). The Pursuit of Prestige: The Experience of Institutional Striving from a Faculty Perspective. 35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orphan, C. M. (2018). Public purpose under pressure: Examining the effects of neoliberal public policy on the missions of regional comprehensive universities. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 22(2), 59–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orphan, C. M. (2020). Not all regional public universities strive for prestige: Examining and strengthening mission-centeredness within a vital sect. New Directions for Higher Education, 2020(190), 9–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orphan, C. M., & Miller, G. N. S. (2020). The company regional comprehensive universities desire to keep: Choosing institutional membership associations. The Journal of Higher Education, 91(2), 300–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, L. (2003). Critical Race Theory in Education: Possibilities and Problems. Counterpoints, 168, 184–198. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42977500

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, L. (2015). Critical Race Theory in Education and Qualitative Inquiry: What Each Has to Offer Each Other Now? Qualitative Inquiry, 21(3), 199–205. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800414557828

  • Parker, E. T., Tevis, T. L., Beatty, C. C., & Blockett, R. (2021, August). We’ve seen this movie before: The disingenuity of routine institutional responses to address anti-Black racism. ACPA Developments, 3. Retrieved from https://developments.myacpa.org/weve-seen-this-movie-before-the-disingenuity-of-routine-institutional-responses-to-address-anti-black-racism-parker-iii-tevis-beatty-blockett/

  • Passel, J. S., Lopez, M. H., & Cohn, D. (2022). U.S. Hispanic population continues geographic spread in the 2010s. Pew Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, L. D. (2016). Disrupting postsecondary prose: Towards a critical race theory of higher education. Urban Education, 51(3), 315–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton Davis, L., & Museus, S. D. (2019). What is deficit thinking? An analysis of conceptualizations of deficit thinking and implications for scholarly research. Currents, 1(1), 117–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton Davis, L., Shahjahan, R. A., & Osei-Kofi, N. (2010). Introduction to the emergent approaches to social justice in higher education special issue. Equity & Excellence in Education, 43(3), 265–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perdomo, R. (2019). Hispanic serving institutions, funding, adn prestige: Who engages with the Title V grant? (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Georgia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perna, L. W., & Finney, J. (2014). The attainment agenda: State policy leadership in higher education. Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Perna, L. W., Wright-Kim, J., & Brickfield, J. (2021). The implications of rankings for equity in higher education. In E. Hazelkorn & G. Mihut (Eds.), Research handbook on university rankings: Theory, methodology, influence, and impact (pp. 295–306). Elgar Handbooks in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G.R. (2003) The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. Stanford Business Books, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plewa, C., Ho, J., Conduit, J., & Karpen, I. O. (2016). Reputation in higher education: A fuzzy set analysis of resource configurations. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 3087–3095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, B. A., Gilleland, D. S., & Pearson, L. C. (2012). Expenditures, efficiency, and effectiveness in U.S. undergraduate higher education: A national benchmark model. The Journal of Higher Education, 83(1), 102–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabovsky, T. M. (2012). Accountability in Higher Education: Exploring Impacts on State Budgets and Institutional Spending Patterns. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(4), 675–700. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur069

  • Ray, V. (2019). A theory of racialized organizations. American Sociological Review, 84(1), 26–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoads, R. A. (2016). Student activism, diversity, and the struggle for a just society. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 9(3), 189–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riesman, D. (1956). Constraint and variety in American education. University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, A., & Camacho, S. (2022, July 13). Opinion: Why ‘test optional’ admissions are not a game-changer for equity after all. Hechinger Report. Retrieved from https://hechingerreport.org/opinion-why-test-optional-admissions-are-not-a-game-changer-for-equity-after-all/

  • Rutherford, A., & Rabovsky, T. (2014). Evaluating Impacts of Performance Funding Policies on Student Outcomes in Higher Education. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 655(1), 185–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716214541048

  • Scott, W. R. (1992). Institutions and organizations. Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (2013). Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities. SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selznick, P. (1957) Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation. Harper & Row, New York, 62, 67–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S., Slaughter, S. A., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic Capitalism and the New Economy: Markets, State, and Higher Education. JHU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2009). Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state and higher education. Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solorzano, D. G. (1998). Critical race theory, race and gender microaggressions, and the experience of Chicana and Chicano scholars. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 11(1), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/095183998236926

  • Solorzano, D., Ceja, M., & Yosso, T. (2000). Critical Race Theory, Racial Microaggressions, and Campus Racial Climate: The Experiences of African American College Students. The Journal of Negro Education, 69(1/2), 60–73. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2696265

    Google Scholar 

  • Solórzano, D. G., & Yosso, T. J. (2002a). Critical race methodology: Counter-storytelling as an analytical framework for education research. Qualitative Inquiry, 8(1), 23–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solórzano, D. J., & Yosso, T. J. (2002b). A critical race counterstory of race, racism, and affirmative action. Equity & Excellence in Education, 35(2), 155–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, M. (2000). Beer and circus: How big-time college sports is crippling undergraduate education. Henry Holt and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stage, F. K. (2007). Answering critical questions using quantitative data. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2007(133), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.200

  • Stensaker, B., Lee, J. J., Rhoades, G., Ghosh, S., Castiello-Gutiérrez, S., Vance, H., Çalıkoğlu, A., Kramer, V., Liu, S., Marei, M. S., O’Toole, L., Pavlyutkin, I., & Peel, C. (2019). Stratified University Strategies: The Shaping of Institutional Legitimacy in a Global Perspective. The Journal of Higher Education, 90(4), 539–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2018.1513306

  • Stocum, D. L. (2013). Killing Public Higher Education: The Arms Race for Research Prestige. Academic Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweitzer, K., Volkwein, J. F., & Kulikowich, J. M. (2009). Shifting reputations: Analyzing change over time in the U.S. News peer assessment rankings. Association for Institutional Research Forum, Atlanta, GA. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=abb360d7bf040f3d5751bf0461eeb70ed36ec188

    Google Scholar 

  • Tandberg, D., & Hillman, N. (2013). State performance funding for higher education: Silver bullet or red herring. WISCAPE Policy Brief, 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tandberg, D. A., & Hillman, N. W. (2014). State Higher Education Performance Funding: Data, Outcomes, and Policy Implications. Journal of Education Finance, 39(3), 222–243. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23597610

    Google Scholar 

  • Thelin, J. R. (2019). A History of American Higher Education. JHU Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (2008). Institutional logics. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 99–129). SAGE Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The Institutional logics Perspective: A new approach to culture, Structure, and Process (Vol. 15). Oxford University Press. https://www.cairn.info/revue-management-2012-5-page-583.htm

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Toma, J. D. (2003). Football U.: Spectator sports in the life of the American University. University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Toma, J. D., & Cross, M. E. (1998). Intercollegiate athletics and student college choice: Exploring the impact of championship seasons on undergraduate applications. Research in Higher Education, 39, 633–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres-Olave, B., Brown, A. M., Franco Carrera, L., & Ballinas, C. (2020). Not waving but striving: Research collaboration in the context of stratification, segmentation, and the quest for prestige. The Journal of Higher Education, 91(2), 275–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2019.1631074

  • Tsoukas, H. (2005). Complex Knowledge: Studies in Organizational Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas, H. (2019). Philosophical organization theory. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuchman, G. (2009). Wannabe U: Inside the Corporate University. University of Chicago Press. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/W/bo6130399.html

  • Umbricht, M. R., Fernandez, F., & Ortagus, J. C. (2017). An examination of the (un) intended consequences of performance funding in higher education. Educational Policy, 31(5), 643–673. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904815614398

  • UNESCO. (2015). Rethinking education: Towards a global common good? Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vargas, N. (2018). Racial expropriation in higher education: Are whiter Hispanic-Serving Institutions more likely to receive minority serving institution funds? Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 4, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Véliz, D., & Gardner, S. K. (2019). Generational perceptions of promotion and tenure expectations by faculty in a striving university: A quest for legitimacy? Higher Education Quarterly, 73(3), 359–373. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12195

  • Volkwein, J. F., & Sweitzer, K. V. (2006). Institutional Prestige and Reputation among Research Universities and Liberal Arts Colleges*. Research in Higher Education, 47(2), 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-005-8883-5

  • Warshaw, J. B., DeMonbrun, M., & McNaughtan, J. (2020). A field of striving or equity? Regional public universities and college access. New Directions for Higher Education, 2020(190), 25–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warshaw, J. B., McNaughtan, J., & DeMonbrun, M. (2021). Between two fields: US public master’s institutions – Striving for prestige or equity? Higher Education Policy, 34, 344–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warshaw, J. B., DeMonbrun, M., & McNaughtan, J. (2022). Suppressing racial diversity for prestige? The conflicting imperatives of public master’s institutions. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000394

  • Wells, R. S., & Stage, F. K. (2015). New scholarship in critical quantitative research–part 2: New populations, approaches, and challenges. New directions for institutional research (Vol. 2014, No. 163). Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkle-Wagner, R., Sulé, V. T., & Maramba, D. C. (2018). Analyzing policy critically: Using critical race theory to analyze college admissions policy discourse. In R. Winkle-Wagner, J. Lee-Johnson, & A. N. Gaskey (Eds.), Critical theory and qualitative data analysis in education. Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Yosso, T. J., Parker, L., Solórzano, D. G., & Lynn, M. (2004). From Jim Crow to affirmative action and back again: A critical race discussion of racialized rationales and access to higher education. Review of Research in Education, 28(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zajda, J., Majhanovich, S., & Rust, V. (Eds.). (2006). Education and social justice. Dordrecht. The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zemsky, R., Wegner, G. R., & Massy, W. F. (2005). Remaking the American university: Market-smart and mission-centered | Request PDF. Rutgers University Press. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/291751595_Remaking_the_American_university_Market-smart_and_mission-centered

  • Zerquera, D. (2016). Urban-serving research universities: Institutions for the public good. Higher Learning Research Communications, 6(2), 136–154. https://doi.org/10.18870/hlrc.v6i2.320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zerquera, D. (2018a). Prestige-seeking across urban-serving research universities. International Journal of Leadership and Change, 6(1), 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerquera, D. (2018b, November). Towards greater complexity in how we engage in the study of prestige seeking. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Tampa, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerquera, D. (2019). The problem with the prestige pursuit: The effects of striving on access for Black and Latino students at Urban-Serving Research Universities. Review of Higher Education, 42(5), 393–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zerquera, D. (2021). Complicating the study of prestige seeking among broad access institutions. In G. Crisp, K. R. McClure, & C. M. Orphan (Eds.), Unlocking opportunity through broadly accessible institutions. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerquera, D., & Torres, V. (2018, November). Do performance-based funding policies promote prestige ambitions? An interest-convergence analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Tampa, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerquera, D., & Ziskin, M. (2020). Implications of performance-based funding on equity-based missions in higher education. Higher Education Journal, 80, 1153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00535-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zerquera, D., Ballysingh, T. A., & Templeton, E. (2017). A critical look at perspectives of access and mission at diverse urban universities. Association of Mexican American Educators, 11(3), 199–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA

    Desiree D. Zerquera

Authors
  1. Desiree D. Zerquera
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Desiree D. Zerquera .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate School of Education, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    Laura W. Perna

Section Editor information

  1. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

    Laura W. Perna

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Zerquera, D.D. (2023). Still Striving, and for What? Centering Equity in the Study of Prestige Seeking in Higher Education. In: Perna, L.W. (eds) Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, vol 38. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06696-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation