Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Concept Mapping Method

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Social Sciences and Global Public Health

  • 88 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter introduces group concept mapping and illustrates the merit of this methodology for global public health research. Group concept mapping is a mixed-methods participatory research approach that integrates qualitative conceptual data and rigorous multivariate statistical analysis, transforming abstract conceptual data into visual representations or “maps.” The participatory nature of group concept mapping as well as its fully integrated mixed-methodology makes it a particularly useful methodology for public health research. Group concept mapping is a collaborative group process that seeks to build consensus between disparate perspectives within a group. It provides researchers with actionable, participant-determined research outcomes. Group concept mapping has been applied in social research across a range of disciplines, including public health, yet remains underutilized by health researchers. This chapter offers a guide for conducting the methodology, detailing the six key steps in group concept mapping: planning, generation, structuring, analysis, interpretation, and utilization. To illustrate group concept mapping in action, the chapter presents a case study using this methodology to examine the sexual and reproductive health decision-making of migrant and refugee youth in Australia. This case study provides evidence of the utility of group concept mapping for examining the complex social issues of public health research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Napier-Raman et al. for further details on this study and research findings (forthcoming).

References

  • Ahmad F, Mahmood S, Pietkiewicz I, McDonald L, Ginsburg O (2011) Concept mapping with South Asian immigrant women: barriers to mammography and solutions. J Immigr Minor Health 14(2):242–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-011-9472-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albert SM, Burke JG (2014) Methods for community public health research: integrated and engaged approaches. Springer Publishing Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson LA, Slonim A (2017) Perspectives on the strategic uses of concept mapping to address public health challenges. Eval Program Plann 60:194–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.08.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barth MC (2004) A low-cost, post hoc method to rate overall site quality in a multi-site demonstration. Am J Eval 25(1):79–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/109821400402500106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum F, MacDougall C, Smith D (2006) Participatory action research. J Epidemiol Community Health (1979) 60(10):854–857. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2004.028662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg S, Cloutier LM, Bröring S (2018) Collective stakeholder representations and perceptions of drivers of novel biomass-based value chains. J Clean Prod 200:231–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke JG, O’Campo P, Peak GL, Gielen AC, McDonnell KA, Trochim WMK (2005) An introduction to concept mapping as a participatory public health research method. Qual Health Res 15(10):1392–1410. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305278876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corcoran K (2005) The Oregon mental health referral checklists: concept mapping the mental health needs of youth in the juvenile justice system. Brief Treat Crisis Interv 5(1):9–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/brief-treatment/mhi003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cossette P (2002) Analysing the thinking of F.W. Taylor using cognitive mapping. Manag Decis 40(2):168–182. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740210422848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL (2018) Designing and conducting mixed methods research, 3rd edn. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies M (2011) Concept mapping, mind mapping and argument mapping: what are the differences and do they matter? High Educ 62(3):279–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9387-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis MV, Cilenti D, Gunther-Mohr C, Baker EL (2012) On linkages; participatory research partnerships: addressing relevant public health system challenges. Public Health Rep (1974) 127(2):230–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/003335491212700214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halberg SE, Visek AJ, Blake EF, Essel KD, Sacheck J, Sylvetsky AC (2021) SODA MAPS: a framework for understanding caffeinated sugary drink consumption among children. Front Nutr 8:640531. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2021.640531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson WE, Creswell JW, Clark VL, Petska KS, Creswell JD (2005) Mixed methods research designs in counseling psychology. J Couns Psychol 52:224–235. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.224 

  • Haymovitz E, Houseal-Allport P, Lee RS, Svistova J (2018) Exploring the perceived benefits and limitations of a school-based social–emotional learning program: a concept map evaluation. Child Sch 40(1):45–54. https://doi.org/10.1093/cs/cdx029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hesse-Biber SN (2015) Introduction: navigating a turbulent research landscape: working the boundaries, tensions, diversity, and contradictions of multimethod and mixed methods inquiry. In: Hesse-Biber SN, Johnson RB (eds) The Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Howlett M (2022) Looking at the ‘field’ through a Zoom lens: methodological reflections on conducting online research during a global pandemic. Qual Res: QR 22(3):387–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794120985691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hydeman JA, Uwazurike OC, Adeyemi EI, Beaupin LK (2019) Survivorship needs of adolescent and young adult cancer survivors: a concept mapping analysis. J Cancer Surviv 13(1):34–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-018-0725-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IBM Corp (2020) IBM SPSS statistics for windows (version 27.0). IBM Corp, Armonk

    Google Scholar 

  • Israel BA, Eng E, Schulz AJ, Parker EA (2012) Introduction to methods for CBPR for health. In: Israel BA, Eng E, Schulz AJ, Parker EA (eds) Methods for community-based participatory research for health. Wiley, Somerset

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane M, Rosas S (2018) Conversations about group concept mapping: applications, examples, and enhancements. SAGE, Thousand Oaks

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kane M, Trochim WMK (2007) Concept mapping for planning and evaluation. SAGE, Thousand Oaks

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kane M, Trochim WM (2009) Concept mapping for applied social research. In: Rog D, Bickman L (eds) The SAGE handbook of applied social research methods, 2nd edn. SAGE Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, pp 435–474

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Keita AD, Whittaker S, Wynter J, Kidanu TW, Chhay C, Cardel M, Gans KM (2016) Applying concept mapping methodology to identify the perceptions of risk and protective factors for childhood obesity among Southeast Asian refugees. J Health Care Poor Underserved 27(4):1909–1933. https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2016.0171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leech NL, Onwuegbuzie AJ (2007) A typology of mixed methods research designs. Qual Quant 43(2):265–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-007-9105-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liamputtong P (2020) Qualitative research methods, 5th edn. Oxford University Press, South Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Liamputtong P, Rice ZS (2022) The science of words and the science of numbers: research methods in health. In: Liamputtong P (ed) Research methods and evidence-based practice, 4th edn. Oxford University Press, Docklands, pp 16–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdiarmid JI, Loe J, Douglas F, Ludbrook A, Comerford C, McNeill G (2010) Concept mapping: an approach for developing an evaluation framework and realistic outcome indicators for community-based nutrition interventions. Proc Nutr Soc 69(OCE1). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0029665109993053

  • Mackworth-Young CRS, Mavodza C, Nyamwanza R, Tshuma M, Nzombe P, Chikwari C.D, Bernays S (2022) “Other risks don’t stop”: adapting a youth sexual and reproductive health intervention in Zimbabwe during COVID-19. Sex Reprod Health Matters 30(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2022.2029338

  • Maheen H, Chalmers K, Khaw S, McMichael C (2021) Sexual and reproductive health service utilisation of adolescents and young people from migrant and refugee backgrounds in high-income settings: a qualitative evidence synthesis (QES). Sex Health 18(4):283–293. https://doi.org/10.1071/sh20112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBride KA, MacMillan F, George ES, Steiner GZ (2019) The use of mixed methods in research. In: Liamputtong P (ed) Handbook of research methods in health social sciences. Springer Singapore, Singapore, pp 695–713

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McFall SL, Ureda J, Byrd TL, Valdes A, Morales P, Scott DB et al (2008) What is needed for informed decisions about prostate cancer screening: perspectives of African-American and Hispanic men. Health Educ Res 24(2):280–291. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyn018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mengesha ZB, Dune T, Perz J (2016) Culturally and linguistically diverse women's views and experiences of accessing sexual and reproductive health care in Australia: a systematic review. Sex Health 13(4):299–310. https://doi.org/10.1071/sh15235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minh A, Patel S, Bruce-Barrett C, OʼCampo P (2015) Letting youths choose for themselves: concept mapping as a participatory approach for program and service planning. Fam Community Health 38(1):33–43. https://doi.org/10.1097/FCH.0000000000000060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minkler M, Wallerstein N (2008) Community-based participatory research for health: from process to outcomes, 2nd edn. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak JD, Cañas AJ (2011) Applying educational tools and ideas in the corporate world. In: Moon B, Hoffman RR, Novak JD, Cañas AJ (eds) Applied concept mapping: capturing, analyzing, and organizing knowledge. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak JD, Gowin BD, Johansen GT (1983) The use of concept mapping and knowledge vee mapping with junior high school science students. Sci Educ 67(5):625–645. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730670511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson BD, Jason LA (2015) Participatory mixed methods research. In: Hesse-Biber SN, Johnson RB (eds) The Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosas SR (2012) The utility of concept mapping for actualizing participatory research. Cuadernos Hispanoamericanos de Psicología 12(2):7–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosas SR (2016) Group concept mapping methodology: toward an epistemology of group conceptualization, complexity, and emergence. Qual Quant 51(3):1403–1416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0340-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosas SR, Kane M (2012) Quality and rigor of the concept mapping methodology: a pooled study analysis. Eval Program Plann 35(2):236–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Surowiecki J (2005) The wisdom of crowds. Anchor Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Teddlie C, Tashakkori A (2010) Overview of contemporary issues in mixed methods research. In: Tashakkori A, Teddlie C (eds) SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research, 2nd edn. SAGE Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • The Concept System® (2022) groupwisdom™. In (Build 2021.24.01 ed., pp. Web-based platform). Ithaca, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Trochim WMK (1989) An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Eval Program Plann 12(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7189(89)90016-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trochim WMK (2017) Hindsight is 20/20: reflections on the evolution of concept mapping. Eval Program Plann 60:176–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.08.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trochim WMK, Kane M (2005) Concept mapping: an introduction to structured conceptualization in health care. Int J Qual Health Care 17(3):187–191. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzi038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trochim WMK, Linton R (1986) Conceptualization for planning and evaluation. Eval Program Plann 9(4):289–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7189(86)90044-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trochim WMK, Milstein B, Wood BJ, Jackson S, Pressler V (2004) Setting objectives for community and systems change: an application of concept mapping for planning a statewide health improvement initiative. Health Promot Pract 5(1):8–19; discussion 10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839903258020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn LM, Jones JR, Booth E, Burke JG (2017) Concept mapping methodology and community-engaged research: a perfect pairing. Eval Program Plann 60:229–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.08.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villa-Torres L, Svanemyr J (2015) Ensuring youth’s right to participation and promotion of youth leadership in the development of sexual and reproductive health policies and programs. J Adolesc Health 56(1):S51–S57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.07.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker RE, Jones JR, Burke JG (2014) Concept mapping for community perceptions. In: Burke JG, Albert S (eds) Methods for community public health research: integrated and engaged approaches. Springer Publishing Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein N, Duran B (2010) Community-based participatory research contributions to intervention research: the intersection of science and practice to improve health equity. Am J Public Health 100:S40–S46

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

    Sharanya Napier-Raman, Syeda Zakia Hossain, Elias Mpofu & Mi-Joung Lee

  2. Concept Systems, Inc., Ithaca, NY, USA

    Scott Rosas

  3. Rehabilitation and Health Services, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, USA

    Elias Mpofu

  4. School of Human and Community Development, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

    Elias Mpofu

  5. College of Health Sciences, VinUniversity, Gia Lam District, Hanoi, Vietnam

    Pranee Liamputtong

  6. Transnational Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia

    Tinashe Dune & Virginia Mapedzahama

Authors
  1. Sharanya Napier-Raman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Scott Rosas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Syeda Zakia Hossain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Elias Mpofu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mi-Joung Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Pranee Liamputtong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Tinashe Dune
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Virginia Mapedzahama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sharanya Napier-Raman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, Camberwell, VIC, Australia

    Pranee Liamputtong

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Napier-Raman, S. et al. (2023). Concept Mapping Method. In: Liamputtong, P. (eds) Handbook of Social Sciences and Global Public Health. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96778-9_63-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96778-9_63-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-96778-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-96778-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation