Governing Boards of postsecondary institutions and systems, the stakeholders with the most legal power and responsibility for institutions, do not have a strong record of contributing to equity work. The reality of Board detachment from the intricacies of equity work is compounded by too few scholars locating Boards in organizational equity research. Consequently, lasting institutional transformation remains elusive and the scholarship on Boards remains largely descriptive, raceless, and power-unaware. Accordingly, built on interrelated reviews of existing research and theory, the authors introduce the Equity X Governance (pronounced Equity by Governance) paradigm, which narrates for a shift in praxis toward postsecondary education governance and Boards. This paradigm offers insights for scholars interested in research with Boards or postsecondary governance more generally, from more critical and intersectional stances. We close the chapter with ideas for a research agenda that builds on these conceptual offerings and present emergent examples from practice, research, and teaching that provide insight into operationalizing the Equity X Governance paradigm.
- Critical race theory
- Governing boards
- Higher education
- Institutional policy
- Organizational theory
- Scientific paradigms
- Standpoint theory
- Social justice
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Throughout the manuscript we use the US-centric terminology of “GB(s),” “governing board(s),” “boards,” and “trustees” interchangeably. These terms encapsulate local variations such as Boards of “Curators,” “Governors,” “Regents,” or “Visitors.” Most often we are referring to institutional-level boards and state-level governing boards together – with the distinguishing characteristic that the Board has consequential decision-making authority for the entity and is understood as the institution or system’s fiduciary (as opposed to a University Foundation Board or an Alumni Board (Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges [AGB], 2021; Kezar, 2004; McGuinness, 2016). Further. we do not parcel out nuances between 2-year and 4-year or for-profit and non-profit institutions unless explicitly stated. In addition, when only referencing state-level governing boards, we make the distinction clear. Finally, our chapter is situated in the history, manifestation, and trajectory of US settler colonialism, patriarchy, white supremacy, ableism, anti-LGBTQ actions, and economic stratification (Nicolazzo, 2021; Patel, 2015; Patton, 2016). Our review is not designed to capture the rich comparative governance context and we point readers to resources of interest that informed our thinking from/about non-US contexts but do not land in our review (e.g., Gornitzka et al., 2017; Hartley & Ruby, 2017; Maassen, 2017; Stensaker & Vabø, 2013).
Adler, P., & Jermier, J. (2005). Developing a field with more soul: Standpoint theory and public policy research for management scholars. Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 941–944. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2005.19573091
Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy. Journal of Management, 43(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316678451
Ahmed, S. (2012). On being included: Racism and diversity in institutional life. Duke University Press.
Allen, B. J. (1996). Feminist standpoint theory: A black woman’s (re)view of organizational socialization. Communication Studies, 47(4), 257–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510979609368482
American Association of University Professors. (1966). Statement on government of colleges and universities. https://www.aaup.org/report/statement-government-colleges-and-universities
Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges. (2020). The AGB 2020 trustee index. https://agb.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/AGB_2020_Trustee_Index.pdf
Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges. (2021). Principles of trusteeship: How to become a highly effective board member for colleges, universities, and foundations. Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges.
Baker, D. J. (2019). Pathways to racial equity in higher education: Modeling the antecedents of state affirmative action bans. American Educational Research Journal, 56(5), 1861–1895. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831219833918
Baldridge, J. V. (1971). Power and conflict in the university. John Wiley & Sons.
Baldridge, J. V. (1980). Managerial innovation: Rules for successful implementation. The Journal of Higher Education, 51(2), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.2307/1981369
Barringer, S. N., & Riffe, K. A. (2018). Not just figureheads: Trustees as microfoundations of higher education institutions. Innovative Higher Education, 43(3), 155–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-018-9422-6
Barringer, S. N., Taylor, B. J., & Slaughter, S. (2019). Trustees in turbulent times: External affiliations and stratification among U.S. research universities, 1975–2015. Journal of Higher Education, 90(6), 884–914. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2019.1574695
Barringer, S. N., Taylor, B. J., Riffe, K. A., & Slaughter, S. (2020). How university leaders shape boundaries and behaviors: An empirical examination of trustee involvement at elite us research universities. Higher Education Policy, 2020, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1057/S41307-020-00193-Y
Bastedo, M. N. (2005). The making of an activist governing board. Review of Higher Education, 28(4), 551–570. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2005.0034
Bastedo, M. N. (2006). Tuition cuts: The political dynamics of higher education finance. Journal of Student Financial Aid, 36(2). https://ir.library.louisville.edu/jsfa/vol36/iss2/3/
Bastedo, M. N. (2009a). Conflicts, commitments, and cliques in the university: Moral seduction as a threat to trustee independence. American Educational Research Journal, 46(2), 354–386.
Bastedo, M. N. (2009b). Convergent institutional logics in public higher education: State policymaking and governing board activism. Review of Higher Education, 32(2), 209–234. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.0.0045
Bell, D. A. (1995). Who’s afraid of critical race theory. University of Illinois Law Review, 1995(4), 893–910.
Bensimon & Associates. (2022). Whiteness rules: Racial exclusion in becoming an American college president.
Bernstein, R., Aulgur, J., & Freiwirth, J. (2019). Racial equity, diversity, and inclusion in nonprofit governance: Case studies for use in the classroom and practitioner training. The Journal of Nonprofit Education and Leadership, 9(4), 378–418. https://doi.org/10.18666/JNEL-2019-V9-I4-10071
Bess, J. L., & Dee, J. R. (2014). Bridging the divide between faculty and administration: A guide to understanding conflict in the academy. Routledge.
Bird-Pollan, J. (2021). Taxing the ivory tower: Evaluating the excise tax on university endowments. Pepperdine Law Review, 48, 1055–1084.
Birnbaum, R. (1988). How colleges work: The cybernetics of academic organization and leadership. Jossey-Bass.
Birnbaum, R. (1989). The cybernetic institution: Toward an integration of governance theories. Higher Education, 18, 239–253.
Birnbaum, R. (1991). The latent organizational functions of the academic senate: Why senates do not work but will not go away. In M. W. Peterson, E. E. Chaffed, & T. H. White (Eds.), Organization and academic governance in higher education (4th ed., pp. 195–207). Ginned Press.
Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (2017). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice and leadership (6th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Bonilla-Silva, E. (2010). Racism without racists: Color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in America (3rd ed.). Rowman & Littlefield Publisher.
Brydon-Miller, M., & Maguire, P. (2009). Participatory action research: Contributions to the development of practitioner inquiry in education. Educational Action Research, 17(1), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790802667469
Bustillos, L. T., & Siqueiros, M. (2018). Left out: How exclusion in California’s colleges and universities hurts our values, our students, and our economy. Campaign for College Opportunity.
Cantwell, B. (2016). The new prudent man: Financial-academic capitalism and inequality in higher education. In S. Slaughter & B. Taylor (Eds.), Higher education, stratification, and workforce development: Competitive advantage in Europe, the US, and Canada (45th ed., pp. 173–192). Springer.
Caraballo, L., Lozenski, B. D., Lyiscott, J. J., & Morrell, E. (2017). YPAR and critical epistemologies: Rethinking education research. Review of Research in Education, 41(1), 311–336. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X16686948
Carpenter, M. A., & Westphal, J. D. (2001). The strategic context of external network ties: Examining the impact of director appointments on board involvement in strategic decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 639–660. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069408
Castagno, A. E., & Hausman, C. (2017). The tensions between shared governance and advancing educational equity. The Urban Review, 49(1), 96–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-016-0383-8
Chait, R. P., Ryan, W. P., & Taylor, B. E. (2005). Governance as leadership: Reframing the work of nonprofit boards. John Wiley & Sons, Inc..
Cho, K. S. (2018). The perception of progress: Conceptualizing institutional response to student protests and activism institutional accountability view project. Thought & Action, 34(1), 81–95. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336591731
Clauson, C., & McKnight, J. (2018). Welcome to campus: Planning for diversity, inclusion, and equity. Planning for Higher Education, 47(1), 39–48. https://www.scup.org/resource/welcome-to-campus/
Cole, E. R. (2020). The campus color line: College presidents and the struggle for black freedom. Princeton University Press.
Collins, P. H. (1997). Comment on Hekman’s “truth and method: Feminist standpoint theory revisited”: Where’s the power? Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 22(2), 375–381. https://doi.org/10.1086/495162
Collins, P. H. (2015). Intersectionality’s definitional dilemmas. Annual Review of Sociology, 41(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112142
Commodore, F. (2015). The tie that binds: Trusteeship, values, and the presidential selection process at AME affiliated HBCUs. In Publicly accessible Penn dissertations. University of Pennsylvania.
Commodore, F. (2018). The tie that binds: Trusteeship, values, and the decision-making process at AME-affiliated HBCUs. The Journal of Higher Education, 89(4), 397–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2017.1396949
Commodore, F., & Morgan, D. L. (2021, June 30). Trustees’ handling of Nikole Hannah-Jones’ tenure application shows how university boards often fail the accountability test. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/trustees-handling-of-nikole-hannah-jones-tenure-application-shows-how-university-boards-often-fail-the-accountability-test-161622
Commodore, F., Morgan, D. L., & Rall, R. M. (2020). Access denied: Alienation, governing boards, and the lack of inclusion of Black and Latinx persons at the highest level of university control.
Commodore, F., Rall, R. M., & Morgan, D. L. (2022). Equity as leadership: The role of higher education boards in advancing equity. In R. Johnson, U. Anya, & L. M. Garces (Eds.), Racial equity on college campuses: Connecting research and practice (pp. 61–82). SUNY.
Conner, T. W., & Rabovsky, T. M. (2011). Accountability, affordability, access: A review of the recent trends in higher education policy research. Policy Studies Journal, 39(Suppl. 1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00389_7.x
Corbally, J. E. (1970). Boards of trustees in the governance of higher education. Theory Into Practice, 9(4), 239–243.
Crenshaw, K. W. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989, 139–168.
Crenshaw, K. W. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.
Crenshaw, K. W. (2010). Twenty years of critical race theory: Looking back to move forward. Connecticut Law Review, 43(5), 1253–1354. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/conlr43&i=1271
Croom, N. N., & Patton Davis, L. (2012). The miner’s canary: A critical race perspective on the representation of black women full professors. Negro Educational Review, 62–63(1–4), 13–40.
Crumley-Effinger, M., & Torres-Olave, B. (2021). Kicking the habit: Rethinking academic hypermobility in the anthropocene. Journal of International Students, 11(S1), 86–107. https://doi.org/10.32674/JIS.V11IS1.3845
Dache-Gerbino, A., & White, J. A. (2016). College students or criminals? A postcolonial geographic analysis of the social field of whiteness at an urban community college branch campus and suburban main campus. Community College Review, 44(1), 49–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091552115616677
Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Ellstrand, A. E., & Johnson, J. L. (1998). Meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 19(3), 269–290. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199803)19:3<269::AID-SMJ950>3.0.CO;2-K
Davis, C. H. F., III, Morgan, D. L., & Cho, K. (2022). Activism and social movements in college: Actors, contexts, tactics, and strategies of postsecondary political engagement. In M. N. Bastedo, P. G. Altbach, & P. J. Gumport (Eds.), American higher education in the 21st century (5th ed., pp. 1–44). Johns Hopkins University Press.
Dee, J. R., & Leišytė, L. (2016). Organizational learning in higher education institutions: Theories, frameworks, and a potential research agenda. In M. Paulsen (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (31st ed., pp. 275–348). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26829-3_6
Delgado, R., & Stefancic, J. (2017). Critical race theory: An introduction (3rd ed.). New York University Press.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
Dominguez, J. I. (1971). To reign or to rule: A choice for university boards of trustees. Connecticut Law Review, 3(3), 375–405.
Eckel, P. D. (2000). The role of shared governance in institutional hard decisions: Enabler or antagonist? The Review of Higher Education, 24(1), 15–39. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2000.0022
Eckel, P. D. (2019). Why governing is so difficult: A synthesis of the (other) literature. Philadelphia, PA: Alliance for Higher Education and Democracy (Penn AHEAD), University of Pennsylvania Graduate School of Education.
Eckel, P. D., & Trower, C. A. (2018). Practical wisdom: Thinking differently about college and university governance. Stylus Publishing.
Ehrenberg, R. G., Jakubson, G. H., Martin, M. L., Main, J. B., & Eisenberg, T. (2012). Diversifying the faculty across gender lines: Do trustees and administrators matter? Economics of Education Review, 31(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.10.003
Elletson, G. (2017, September 7). IC board of trustees lacks gender and racial diversity. The Ithacan. https://theithacan.org/news/ic-board-of-trustees-lacks-gender-and-racial-diversity/
Felix, E. R., & Trinidad, A. (2019). The decentralization of race: Tracing the dilution of racial equity in educational policy, 33(4), 465–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2019.1681538
Fish, S. (2008). Save the world on your own time. Oxford University Press.
Ford-Eickhoff, K., Plowman, D. A., & McDaniel, R. R. (2011). Hospital boards and hospital strategic focus: The impact of board involvement in strategic decision making. Health Care Management Review, 36(2), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0b013e3182099f6e
Freedman, J. O. (2004). Presidents and trustees. In R. G. Ehrenberg (Ed.), Governing academia: Who is in charge at the modern university (pp. 9–27). Cornell University Press.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Seabury Press.
Freire, P. (1982). Creating alternative research methods: Learning to do it by doing it. In B. Hall, A. Gillette, & R. Tandon (Eds.), Creating knowledge: A monopoly (pp. 29–37). Society for Participatory Research in Asia.
Gándara, D. (2019). Does evidence matter? An analysis of evidence use in performance-funding policy design. Review of Higher Education, 42(3), 991–1022. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2019.0027
Gándara, D. (2020). How the sausage is made: An examination of a state funding model design process. Journal of Higher Education, 91(2), 192–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2019.1618782
Gándara, D., Rippner, J. A., & Ness, E. C. (2017). Exploring the ‘how’ in policy diffusion: National intermediary organizations’ roles in facilitating the spread of performance-based funding policies in the states. Journal of Higher Education, 88(5), 701–725. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2016.1272089
Garces, L. M. (2014). Aligning diversity, quality, and equity: The implications of legal and public policy developments for promoting racial diversity in graduate studies. American Journal of Education, 120(4), 457–480. https://doi.org/10.1086/676909
Garces, L. M., & Jayakumar, U. M. (2014). Dynamic diversity: Toward a contextual understanding of critical mass. Educational Researcher, 43(3), 115–124. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14529814
Garcia, G. A. (2017). Defined by outcomes or culture? Constructing an organizational identity for Hispanic-serving institutions. American Educational Research Journal, 54(1_Suppl), 111S–134S. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216669779
Garvey, J. C. (2019). Queer quantitative query: Sexual orientation in higher education surveys. Journal of College Student Development, 60(4), 495–501. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2019.0042
Gillborn, D. (1995). Racism, identity and modernity: pluralism, moral antiracism and plastic ethnicity. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 5(1), 3–23.
Gillborn, B. D. (2005). Education policy as an act of white supremacy: Whiteness, critical race theory and education reform. Journal of Education Policy, 20(4), 485–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930500132346
Gonzales, L. D. (2013). Faculty sensemaking and mission creep: Interrogating institutionalized ways of knowing and doing legitimacy. The Review of Higher Education, 36(2), 179–209. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2013.0000
Gonzales, L. D., & Griffin, K. A. (2020). Supporting faculty during & after COVID-19: Don’t let go of equity. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1WQrIG6LsR04jGASfF6Z8WVxl4RIRpsMj/view?usp=sharing
Gonzales, L. D., Kanhai, D., & Hall, K. (2018). Reimagining organizational theory for the critical study of higher education. In M. B. Paulsen (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 33, pp. 505–559). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72490-4_11
Gornitzka, Å., Maassen, P., & de Boer, H. (2017). Change in university governance structures in continental Europe. Higher Education Quarterly, 71(3), 274–289. https://doi.org/10.1111/HEQU.12127
Grummert, S. E., & Rall, R. M. (2020). Looking beyond the toxic triangle: Connecting sexual abuse to failed governance. Journal of Higher Education Athletics & Innovation, 8, 34–54. https://doi.org/10.15763/ISSN.2376-5267.2020.1.8.34-54
Harding, S. (2004). Introduction. In The feminist standpoint theory reader: Intellectual and political controversies. Routledge.
Harper, S. R. (2012). Race without racism: How higher education researchers minimize racist institutional norms. The Review of Higher Education, 36(1), 9–29. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2012.0047
Harris, J. C., & Patton, L. D. (2019). Un/doing intersectionality through higher education research. The Journal of Higher Education, 90(3), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2018.1536936
Hartley, M., & Ruby, A. (2017). Higher education reform and development: The case of Kazakhstan. Cambridge University Press.
Helfat, C. E., & Raubitschek, R. S. (2018). Dynamic and integrative capabilities for profiting from innovation in digital platform-based ecosystems. Research Policy, 47(8), 1391–1399. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESPOL.2018.01.019
Hendrickson, R. M., Lane, J. E., Harris, J. T., & Dorman, R. H. (2012). Academic leadership and governance of higher education: A guide for trustees, leaders, and aspiring leaders of two-and four-year institutions. Stylus Publishing.
Henwood, K., & Pidgeon, N. (1995). Remaking the link: Qualitative research and feminist standpoint theory. Feminism & Psychology, 5(1), 7–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353595051003
Hess, F. M., & Henig, J. R. (2015). The new education philanthropy: Politics, policy, and reform. Harvard Education Press.
Hill, M. L. (2016). Nobody: Casualties of America’s war on the vulnerable, from Ferguson to Flint and beyond. Simon and Schuster.
Hill, B., Green, M., & Eckel, P. D. (2001). Navigating the currents of change. Trusteeship Magazine, 28–32. https://repository.upenn.edu/gse_pubs/447
Hillman, A. J., Withers, M., & Collins, B. (2009). Resource dependence theory: A review. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1404–1427.
Holland, T. P., Chait, R. P., & Taylor, B. E. (1989). Board effectiveness: Identifying and measuring trustee competencies. Research in Higher Education, 30(4), 435–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992565
Hooks, B. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. Routledge.
Hooks, B. (2000). All about love: New visions. William Morrow and Company. Inc..
Huddy, L. (2001). From social to political identity. Political Psychology, 22(1), 127–156.
Hughes, C. E. (1992). A case for the formation of strategically focused consortia among HBCUs. The Journal of Negro Education, 61(4), 539–553. https://doi.org/10.2307/2295370
Hurtado, S., Alvarez, C. L., Guillermo-Wann, C., Cuellar, M., & Arellano, L. (2012). A model for diverse learning environments: The scholarship on creating and assessing conditions for student success. In J. C. Smart & M. B. Paulsen (Eds.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 27, pp. 41–122). Springer.
Jacoby, B. (2009). Civic engagement in higher education: Concepts and practices. Jossey-Bass.
Jayakumar, U. M., Garces, L. M., & Park, J. J. (2018). Reclaiming diversity: Advancing the next generation of diversity research toward racial equity. In M. B. Paulsen (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 11–79). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72490-4_2
Johnson, S. G., Schnatterly, K., & Hill, A. D. (2013). Board composition beyond independence: Social capital, human capital, and demographics. Journal of Management, 39(1), 232–262.
Jones, S. R., Torres, V., & Arminio, J. (2014). Negotiating the complexities of qualitative research in higher education: Fundamental elements and issues (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Jongbloed, B., Enders, J., & Salerno, C. (2008). Higher education and its communities: Interconnections, interdependencies and a research agenda. Higher Education, 56(3), 303–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9128-2
Jordan, W. J. (2010). Defining equity: Multiple perspectives to analyzing the performance of diverse learners. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 142–178. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X09352898
Kapoor, R. (2018). Ecosystems: Broadening the locus of value creation. Journal of Organization Design, 7(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/S41469-018-0035-4/TABLES/3
Kettl, D. F. (2020). States divided: The implications of American Federalism for COVID-19. Public Administration Review, 80(4), 595–602. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13243
Kezar, A. (2003). Transformational elite interviews: Principles and problems. Qualitative Inquiry, 9(3), 395–415. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403009003005
Kezar, A. (2004). What is more important to effective governance: Relationships, trust, and leadership, or structures and formal processes? New Directions for Higher Education, 2004(127), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/HE.154
Kezar, A. (2005). Consequences of radical change in governance: A grounded theory approach. The Journal of Higher Education, 76(6), 634–668. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2005.11772303
Kezar, A. (2006). Rethinking public higher education governing boards performance: Results of a national study of governing boards in the United States. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(6), 968–1008. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2006.0051
Kezar, A. (2011a). Grassroots leadership: Encounters with power dynamics and oppression. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 24(4), 471–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2010.529848
Kezar, A. (2011b). What is the best way to achieve broader reach of improved practices in higher education? Innovative Higher Education, 36(4), 235–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-011-9174-z
Kezar, A., & Dee, J. R. (2011). Conducting multi-paradigm inquiry in the study of higher education organization and governance: Transforming research perspectives on colleges and universities. In J. C. Smart & M. Paulsen (Eds.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (26th ed., pp. 265–315). Springer.
Kezar, A., & Eckel, P. D. (2004). Meeting today’s governance challenges: A synthesis of the literature and examination of a future agenda for scholarship. The Journal of Higher Education, 75(4), 371–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2004.11772264
Kezar, A., & Eckel, P. (2008). Advancing diversity agendas on campus: Examining transactional and transformational presidential leadership styles. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 11(4), 379–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603120802317891
Kezar, A., & Holcombe, E. M. (2020). Barriers to organizational learning in a multi-institutional initiative. Higher Education, 79(6), 1119–1138. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10734-019-00459-4
Kezar, A., Gallant, T. B., & Lester, J. (2011). Everyday people making a difference on college campuses: The tempered grassroots leadership tactics of faculty and staff. Studies in Higher Education, 36(2), 129–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903532304
Kezar, A., DePaola, T., & Scott, D. T. (2019). The gig academy: Mapping labor in the neoliberal university. John Hopkins University Press.
Kezar, A., Holcombe, E. M., Vigil, D., & Dizon, J. P. M. (2021). Shared equity leadership: Making equity everyone’s work. American Council of Education.
Kimball, E. W., Moore, A., Vaccaro, A., Troiano, P. F., & Newman, B. M. (2016). College students with disabilities redefine activism: Self-advocacy, storytelling, and collective action. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 9(3), 245–260. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/dhe0000031
Knott, J. H., & Payne, A. A. (2004). The impact of state governance structures on management and performance of public organizations: A study of higher education institutions. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23(1), 13–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.10176
Kokushkin, M. (2014). Standpoint theory is dead, long live standpoint theory! Why standpoint thinking should be embraced by scholars who do not identify as feminists? Journal of Arts and Humanities, 3(7), 8–20. https://doi.org/10.18533/JOURNAL.V3I7.520
Kronsell, A. (2005). Gendered practices in institutions of hegemonic masculinity: Reflections from feminist standpoint theory. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 7(2), 280–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616740500065170
Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J. H., & Whitt, E. J. (2010). Student success in college: Creating conditions that matter (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
Kutch, B. D. M., & Kutch, J. S. M. (2022). Innovation through diversity and inclusion: A roadmap for higher education information technology leaders. In Research anthology on changing dynamics of diversity and safety in the workforce (pp. 1811–1833). IGI Global.
Leon, R. A. (2014). The Chief Diversity Officer: An examination of CDO models and strategies. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 7(2), 77–91.
LePeau, L. A. (2015). A grounded theory of academic affairs and student affairs partnerships for diversity and inclusion aims. The Review of Higher Education, 39(1), 97–122. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2015.0044
LePeau, L. A. (2018). Examining the experiences and characteristics of academic affairs and student affairs leaders identifying as social gadflies. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 11(4), 402–417. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000072
LePeau, L. A., Hurtado, S. S., & Davis, R. J. (2018). What institutional websites reveal about diversity-related partnerships between academic and student affairs. Innovative Higher Education, 43(2), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-017-9412-0
LePeau, L. A., Hurtado, S. S., & Williams, L. (2019). Institutionalizing diversity agendas: Presidents’ councils for diversity as mechanisms for strategic change. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 56(2), 123–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/19496591.2018.1490306
Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1540-4560.1946.TB02295.X
López, N., & Morgan, D. L. (2021). Confronting the nameless-faceless: A duoethnography of navigating turnover and early career socialization. Journal of Organizational Ethnography, 10(3), 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOE-03-2021-0012
López, F., Johnson, R. M., Patterson, A. N., & Ward, L. W. M. (2022). How do education researchers contest the anti-critical race theory propaganda? Teachers College Record.
Lorde, A. (1983). The master’s tools will never dismantle the master’s house. In C. Moraga & G. Anzaldúa (Eds.), This bridge called my back: Writings by radical women of color (pp. 94–101). Kitchen Table Press.
Lynall, M. D., Golden, B. R., & Hillman, A. J. (2003). Board composition from adolescence to maturity: A multitheoretic view. The Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 416–431. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.10196743
Maassen, P. (2017). The university’s governance paradox. Higher Education Quarterly, 71(3), 290–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/HEQU.12125
Marginson, S. (2011). Higher education and public good. Higher Education Quarterly, 65(4), 411–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2273.2011.00496.x
Mayhew, M. J., Bowman, N. A., Rockenbach, A. B., Seifert, T., Wolniak, G. C., Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2016). How college affects students: 21st century evidence that higher education works (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
McClellan, G. S., & Stringer, J. (Eds.). (2016). The handbook of student affairs administration. John Wiley & Sons.
McClure, K. R. (2016). Building the innovative and entrepreneurial university: An institutional case study of administrative academic capitalism. The Journal of Higher Education, 87(4), 516–543. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2016.11777412
McClure, K. R., & McNaughtan, J. L. (2021). Proximity to power: The challenges and strategies of interviewing elites in higher education research. The Qualitative Report, 26(3), 974–992. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.4615
McGuinness, A. C. (2016). State policy leadership for the future: History of state coordination and governance and alternatives for the future. In Education commission of the states (Issue May, p. 60). https://www.ecs.org/wp-content/uploads/051616-State-Policy-Leadership-for-the-Future-KL-final4-1.pdf
McLendon, M. K. (2003). Setting the governmental agenda for state decentralization of higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 74(5), 479–515.
McLendon, M. K., & Hearn, J. C. (2006). Mandated openness in public higher education: A field study of state sunshine laws and institutional governance. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(4), 645–683. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2006.11772310
McLendon, M. K., & Ness, E. C. (2003). The politics of state higher education governance reform. Peabody Journal of Education, 78(4), 66–88. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327930PJE7804_05
McLendon, M. K., Deaton, R., & Hearn, J. C. (2007). The enactment of reforms in state governance of higher education: Testing the political instability hypothesis. The Journal of Higher Education, 78(6), 645–675.
McNair, T. B., Bensimon, E. M., & Malcom-Piqueux, L. (2019). From equity talk to equity walk: Expanding practitioner knowledge for racial justice in higher education. John Wiley & Sons.
Miller, G. N. S., & Morphew, C. C. (2017). Merchants of optimism: Agenda-setting organizations and the framing of performance-based funding for higher education. Journal of Higher Education, 88(5). https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2017.1313084
Minor, J. T. (2004). Introduction: Decision making in historically black colleges and universities: Defining the governance context. The Journal of Negro Education, 73(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.2307/3211258
Minor, J. T. (2005). Faculty governance at historically black colleges and universities. Academe. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ727551
Minor, J. T. (2006). A case of complex governance: A structural analysis of university decision-making. Journal of the Professoriate, 1(2), 22–37.
Minor, J. T., & Tierney, W. G. (2005). The danger of deference: A case of polite governance. Teachers College Record, 107(1), 137–156. https://senate.oregonstate.edu/sites/senate.oregonstate.edu/files/4.newdirections2.2004.pdf
Morgan, D. L. (2016). Revealing the role of higher education in a diverse democracy: A theory of college student political identity development. University of Pennsylvania.
Morgan, D. L., & Davis, C. H. F. (Eds.). (2019). Student activism, politics, and campus climate in higher education. Routledge.
Morgan, D. L., & López, N. (2022). Intensifying cracks in the bedrock of academic culture: Examining faculty’s connection to profession and community. In Promotion, Tenure, and Advancement through the Lens of 2020: Proceedings of a Workshop–in Brief (pp. 1–19). https://www.nap.edu/resource/26405/2_The_Impacts_of_2020_on_Faculty_Culture-Morgan_Lopez.pdf
Morgan, D. L., Rall, R. M., & Commodore, F. (2019). Building better boards [Infographic]. https://www.chegc.org/infographic-page
Morgan, D. L., LePeau, L. A., & Commodore, F. (2021a). Observable evidence and partnership possibilities for governing board involvement in diversity, equity, and inclusion: A content analysis. Research in Higher Education, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-021-09651-x
Morgan, D. L., Rall, R. M., Commodore, F., Fischer, R. A., & Bernstein, S. (2021b). Hiding in plain sight: The potential of state-level governing boards in postsecondary education policy agenda-setting. The Journal of Higher Education, 92(4), 570–595. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2020.1824885
Morphew, C. C., & Hartley, M. (2006). Mission statements: A thematic analysis of rhetoric across institutional type. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(3), 456–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2006.11778934
Mortimer, K. P., & McConnell, T. R. (1978). Sharing authority effectively: Participation, interaction, and discretion. Jossey-Bass.
Mott, C., & Cockayne, D. (2017). Citation matters: Mobilizing the politics of citation toward a practice of ‘conscientious engagement’. Gender, Place & Culture, 24(7), 954–973. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2017.1339022
Museus, S. D. (2014). The culturally engaging campus environments (CECE) model: A new theory of success among racially diverse college student populations. In M. B. Paulsen (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (29th ed., pp. 189–227). Springer Netherlands.
Museus, S. D., & Neville, K. M. (2012). Delineating the ways that key institutional agents provide racial minority students with access to social capital in college. Journal of College Student Development, 53(3), 436–452. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2012.0042
Ness, E. C., Tandberg, D. A., & McLendon, M. K. (2015). Interest groups and state policy for higher education: New conceptual understandings and future research directions. In M. B. Paulsen (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (30th ed., pp. 151–186). Springer.
Nicolazzo, Z. (2021). Imagining a trans* epistemology: What liberation thinks like in postsecondary education. Urban Education, 56(3), 511–536. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085917697203
Nienhüser, W. (2008). Resource dependence theory – How well does it explain behavior of organizations? Management Revue, 19(1/2), 9–32. https://doi.org/10.5771/0935-9915-2008-1-2-9
O’Meara, K., & Niehaus, E. (2009). Service-learning is... How faculty explain their practice. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 16(1), 17–32.
O’Meara, K., & Stromquist, N. P. (2015). Faculty peer networks: Role and relevance in advancing agency and gender equity, 27(3), 338–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2015.1027668
O’Meara, K., Lounder, A., & Campbell, C. M. (2014). To heaven or hell: Sensemaking about why faculty leave. The Journal of Higher Education, 85(5), 603–632. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2014.11777342
Odle, T. K. (2022). Free to spend? Institutional autonomy and expenditures on executive compensation, faculty salaries, and research activities. Research in Higher Education, 63(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11162-021-09642-Y/TABLES/5
Operario, D., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). Causes and consequences of stereotypes in organizations. In M. London (Ed.), How people evaluate others in organizations (pp. 45–62). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Opfer, V. D., Young, T. Y., & Fusarelli, L. D. (2008). Politics of interest: Interest groups and advocacy coalitions in American education. In B. S. Cooper, J. G. Cibulka, & L. D. Fusarelli (Eds.), Handbook of education politics and policy (pp. 195–216). Routledge.
Owens, L., & Commodore, F. (2018). Governing HBCUs for the future. Diverse: Issues in Higher Education. https://www.diverseeducation.com/institutions/hbcus/article/15103563/governing-hbcus-for-the-future
Paperson, l. (2017). A third university is possible. University of Minnesota Press.
Parker, K. (2019). Views of higher education divided by party. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/essay/the-growing-partisan-divide-in-views-of-higher-education/
Pasque, P. A., & Carducci, R. (2015). Critical advocacy perspectives on organization in higher education. In M. Paulsen (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 275–333). Springer.
Patel, L. (2015). Decolonizing educational research: From ownership to answerability. Routledge.
Patton, L. D. (2016). Disrupting postsecondary prose: Toward a critical race theory of higher education. Urban Education, 51(3), 315–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085915602542
Patton, L. D., Sánchez, B., Mac, J., & Stewart, D.-L. (2019). An inconvenient truth about “progress”: An analysis of the promises and perils of research on campus diversity initiatives. The Review of Higher Education, 42(5), 173–198. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2019.0049
Payette, D. L. (2001). Fiduciary responsibility of board trustees and officers in universities and colleges. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 1(4), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700110404306
Perna, L. W. (Ed.). (2018). Taking it to the streets: The role of scholarship in advocacy and advocacy in scholarship. John Hopkins University Press.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (2006). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Harper & Row.
Piscopo, J. M., & Clark Muntean, S. (2018). Corporate quotas and symbolic politics in advanced democracies. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 39(3), 285–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2018.1477396
Pope, M. L., & Miller, M. T. (1998). Faculty involvement in governance: An HBCU case analysis. ERIC.
Posselt, J. R., & Nuñez, A.-M. (2022). Learning in the wild: Fieldwork, gender, and the social construction of disciplinary culture. The Journal of Higher Education, 93(2), 163–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2021.1971505
Posselt, J. R., Hernandez, T. E., Villarreal, C. D., Rodgers, A. J., & Irwin, L. N. (2020). Evaluation and decision making in higher education. In Higher education: Handbook of theory & research (Vol. 35, pp. 1–63). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11743-6_8-1
Pusser, B. (2003). Beyond baldridge: Extending the political model of higher education organization and governance. Educational Policy, 17(1), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904802239289
Pusser, B., & Marginson, S. (2013). University rankings in critical perspective. Journal of Higher Education, 84(4), 544–568. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2013.0022
Pusser, B., Slaughter, S., & Thomas, S. L. (2006). Playing the board game: An empirical analysis of university trustee and corporate board interlocks. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(5), 747–775. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2006.11778943
Rall, R. M. (2014). Assuming the trusteeship: Studying the influence of learning and preparation on the decision-making practices of members of public multicampus boards of higher education. University of Southern California. https://digitallibrary.usc.edu/CS.aspx?VP3=DamView&VBID=2A3BXZ9G1WYH&SMLS=1&RW=904&RH=717&FR_=1&W=904&H=718
Rall, R. M. (2020). Governing boards should weigh in on racial issues but don’t know how (opinion). Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2020/10/22/governing-boards-should-weigh-racial-issues-dont-know-how-opinion
Rall, R. M. (2021a). Getting the boards involved: Challenges and opportunities for equity at the highest level of university governance. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED615826.pdf
Rall, R. M. (2021b). Modeling equity-minded leadership amid crises: The call for higher education governing boards to lead the way. Journal of Higher Education Management, 36(1), 25–31. https://issuu.com/aaua10/docs/twin_pandemics/s/11997049
Rall, R. M., & Maxey, D. B. (2020). “A steeper hill to climb”: The role and experience of student trustees in public higher education governing boards. Journal of Power, Politics & Governance, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.15640/JPPG.V8N2A2
Rall, R. M., & Orué, V. (2020). I, too, am a lead(her): The power and possibilities of women of color on governing boards of higher education in California. Journal of Higher Education Management, 35(1), 32–39. https://issuu.com/aaua10/docs/final_jhem_35_1 2020_
Rall, R. M., Morgan, D. L., & Commodore, F. (2018). Invisible injustice: Higher education boards and issues of diversity, equity, and inclusivity. In R. Jeffries (Ed.), Diversity, equity, and inclusivity in contemporary higher education (pp. 261–277). IGI Global.
Rall, R. M., Morgan, D. L., & Commodore, F. (2019). Responding to the call for equity: What every board member should know. Blog: Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges. https://www.agb.org/blog/2019/02/26/responding-to-the-call-for-equity-what-every-board-member-should-know
Rall, R. M., Morgan, D. L., & Commodore, F. (2020). Towards culturally sustaining governance: Best practices of theory, research, and practice. Journal of Education Human Resources, 38(1), 139–164. https://doi.org/10.3138/jehr.2019-0006
Rall, R. M., Morgan, D. L., & Commodore, F. (2021a). Bounded boards: A commentary on the limitations of knowledge and scope of research on boards of higher education. Innovative Higher Education, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-021-09582-6
Rall, R. M., Ramirez-Stapleton, M., & Galan, C. (2021b). A contrarian’s guide to the student trusteeship: Stories modeling purpose, persistence, and legacy on the UC board of regents. College Student Journal, 55(4), 440–456. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/prin/csj/2021/00000055/00000004/art00009
Rall, R. M., Dominguez, V., & Garcia, A. (2022a). What does it take to lead: The hidden curriculum of qualifications for service on public boards of higher education. Teachers College Record, 124(1), 191–226. https://www.tcrecord.org/LIBRARY/Issue.asp?volyear=2022&number=1&volume=124
Rall, R. M., Morgan, D. L., Commodore, F., Fischer, R. A., & Bernstein, S. (2022b). Introducing boards to the equity conversation: State-level governing boards and discourses of social justice. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000397
Ray, V. (2019). A theory of racialized organizations. American Sociological Review, 84(1), 26–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122418822335
Ray, V., & Purifoy, D. (2019). The colorblind organization. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 60, 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20190000060008
Renn, K. A. (2020a). Reimagining the study of higher education: Generous thinking, chaos, and order in a low consensus field. The Review of Higher Education, 43(4), 917–934. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2020.0025
Renn, K. A. (2020b). Success for LGBT college and university students. In G. Crimmins (Ed.), Strategies for supporting inclusion and diversity in the academy (pp. 183–200). Palgrave Macmillan.
Renz, D. O., & Anderson, F. O. (2014). Nonprofit governance: A review of the field. In C. Cornforth & W. A. Brown (Eds.), The governance of public and nonprofit organizations: Innovative perspectives and approaches (pp. 17–46). Routledge.
Rhoades, G. (2017). Bread and roses, and quality too? A new faculty majority negotiating the new academy. Journal of Higher Education, 88(5), 645–671. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2016.1257310
Rodriguez, A., Deane, K., & Davis, C. H. F., III. (2021). Toward a framework of racialized policymaking in higher education. In L. W. Perna (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 1–81). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66959-1_2-1
Rutherford, A., & Lozano, J. (2018). Top management turnover: The role of governing board structures. Public Administration Review, 78(1), 104–115.
Sablan, J. R. (2019). Can you really measure that? Combining critical race theory and quantitative methods. American Educational Research Journal, 56(1), 178–203. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218798325
Saltmarsh, J., & Hartley, M. (2011). “To serve a larger purpose”: Engagement for democracy and the transformation of higher education. Temple University Press.
Santos, D. (2015). Re-signifying participatory action research (PAR) in higher education: What does ‘P’ stand for in PAR?, 24(4), 635–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2015.1103658
Savin-Baden, M., & Wimpenny, K. (2007). Exploring and implementing participatory action research. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 31(2), 331–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260601065136
Schuster, J. H., Smith, D. G., Sund, K. C., Yamada, M. M., & Kathleen, A. (1994). Strategic governance: How to make big decisions better. Intellect Books.
Siqueiros, M. (2020). Left out: California’s higher education governing boards do not reflect the racial and gender diversity of California and its student body. Campaign for College Opportunity.
Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state, and higher education. The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Slaughter, S., Thomas, S. L., Johnson, D. R., & Barringer, S. N. (2014). Institutional conflict of interest: The role of interlocking directorates in the scientific relationships between universities and the corporate sector. The Journal of Higher Education, 85(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2014.11777317
Squire, D., Nicolazzo, Z., & Perez, R. J. (2019). Institutional response as non-performative: What university communications (don’t) say about movements toward justice. Review of Higher Education, 42(5), 109–133. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2019.0047
Stanley, C. A. (2007). When counter narratives meet master narratives in the journal editorial-review process. Educational Researcher, 36(1), 14–24.
Stanley, C. A., Watson, K. L., Reyes, J. M., & Varela, K. S. (2019). Organizational change and the chief diversity officer: A case study of institutionalizing a diversity plan. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 12(3), 255–265. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000099
Stensaker, B., & Vabø, A. (2013). Re-inventing shared governance: Implications for organisational culture and institutional leadership. Higher Education Quarterly, 67(3), 256–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/HEQU.12019
Stewart, D.-L., & Nicolazzo, Z. (2018). High impact of [whiteness] on trans* students in postsecondary education. Equity and Excellence in Education, 51(2), 132–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2018.1496046
Swigonski, M. E. (1994). The logic of feminist standpoint theory for social work research. Social Work, 39(4), 387–393. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/39.4.387
Tandberg, D. A. (2010). Interest groups and governmental institutions: The politics of state funding of public higher education. Educational Policy, 24(5), 735–778.
Tandberg, D. A. (2013). The conditioning role of state higher education governance structures. Journal of Higher Education, 84(4), 506–543. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2013.11777300
Taylor, M. (2013). Shared governance in the modern university. Higher Education Quarterly, 67(1), 80–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/HEQU.12003
Taylor, L. D. (2021). Toil and trouble: Contextualizing student success work at research universities. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2021.2010514
Taylor, J. S., & de Lourdes Machado, M. (2008). Governing boards in public higher education institutions: A perspective from the United States. Tertiary Education and Management, 14(3), 243–260.
Taylor, B. E., Chait, R. P., & Holland, T. P. (1991). Trustee motivation and board effectiveness. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 20(2), 207–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/089976409102000207
Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 801–843. https://doi.org/10.1086/210361
Tierney, W. G., & Rall, R. M. (2018). Lessons not yet learned: Culture, governance, and the Jerry Sandusky case. Journal of Higher Education Management, 33(2), 12–27. https://aaua.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/JHEM_2018_33-2.pdf
Toma, E. F. (1990). Board of trustees, agency problems, and university output. Public Choice, 67(1), 1–9. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30025320
Torchia, M., Calabrò, A., & Huse, M. (2011). Women directors on corporate boards: From tokenism to critical mass. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(2), 299–317.
Uggla, H., & Åsberg, P. (2010). The benefits and risks of strategic brand collaboration. IUP Journal of Brand Management, 7(3), 35–48.
van der Walt, N., & Ingley, C. (2003). Board dynamics and the influence of professional background, gender and ethnic diversity of directors. Corporate Governance, 11(3), 218–234. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00320
Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391875
Wheatle, K. I. E., & Commodore, F. (2019). Reaching back to move forward: The historic and contemporary role of student activism in the development and implementation of higher education policy. Review of Higher Education, 42(5), 5–35. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2019.0043
Wilkinson, A. M. (2019). Politics and pedagogy in the classroom: From rehearsal to performance. In D. L. Morgan & C. H. F. Davis III (Eds.), Student activism, politics, and campus climate in higher education (pp. 127–142). Routledge.
Woodward, A. R. (2009). Land-grant university governance: An analysis of board composition and corporate interlocks. Agriculture and Human Values, 26(1), 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-008-9174-5
Yosso, T. J. (2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8(1), 69–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/1361332052000341006
Zamudio-Suarez, F. (2021, July 20). These campuses wanted buildings renamed. Administrators opted to wait. Race on Campus. https://www.chronicle.com/newsletter/race-on-campus/2021-07-20
Zilvinskis, J., Taub, D. J., DeAngelis, B. J., Novi, A. M., & Wilson, K. E. (2021). Disaggregating the engagement of students of color with disabilities. Journal of Postsecondary Education & Disability, 34(2), 141–161. https://higherlogicdownload.s3.amazonaws.com/AHEAD/38b602f4-ec53-451c-9be0-5c0bf5d27c0a/UploadedImages/JPED/JPED_Vol_34/JPED_34_2.pdf
We would like to thank Tori Callais, Alaa Abdel Ghaffar, and Gabrielle Smith for their research assistance during this project. We also appreciate Adrianna Kezar, Norma López, Gina Garcia, and an unknown reviewer for their thoughtful and generative feedback.
Conflict of Interest
We have no conflicts of interests to disclose.
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Morgan, D.L., Rall, R.M., Commodore, F. (2023). “Getting to where we need to be”: (Re)Envisioning Postsecondary Education Through the Equity X Governance Paradigm. In: Perna, L.W. (eds) Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, vol 38. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94844-3_8-1
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-94844-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-94844-3
eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education