Skip to main content

Nonvascular Emergencies

When to Call an Interventional Radiologist

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Atlas of Emergency Imaging from Head-to-Toe

Abstract

Nonvascular emergencies involving the abdomen are common and represent areas where interventional radiology (IR) can add value in patient care. Familiarity with the common emergency conditions which may require IR input related to intra-abdominal and visceral abscess drainage, biliary obstruction, urological obstruction, as well as large bowel obstruction stenting is essential given the radiologist may be the first physician to contact IR. Appreciation of the features of nonvascular procedure complications is also imperative. Clinicians will often contact radiologists with queries regarding tubes and catheters IRs have inserted; this chapter also serves to provide an overview to deal with such inquiries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 899.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 649.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Coleman DL, King RN, Andrade JD. The foreign body reaction: a chronic inflammatory response. J Biomed Mater Res. 1974;8(5):199–211.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Huang SY, Engstrom BI, Lungren MP, Kim CY. Management of dysfunctional catheters and tubes inserted by interventional radiology. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2015;32:67–77. Thieme Medical Publishers

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Sharma A, Mukewar S, Mara KC, Dierkhising RA, Kamath PS, Cummins N. Epidemiologic factors, clinical presentation, causes, and outcomes of liver abscess: A 35-year Olmsted County Study. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2018 Mar;2(1):16–25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Rahimian J, Wilson T, Oram V, Holzman RS. Pyogenic liver abscess: recent trends in etiology and mortality. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39(11):1654–9. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/cid/article-lookup/doi/10.1086/425616

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hadley GP. Intra-abdominal sepsis-epidemiology, aetiology and management. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2014;23(6):357–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pharaon KS, Trunkey DD. Abdominal abscess. In: Clinical infectious disease. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press; 2015. p. 366–9.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Heffner JE, Klein JS, Hampson C. Diagnostic utility and clinical application of imaging for pleural space infections [Internet]. 2010. Available from: www.chestjournal.org

  8. Dariushnia SR, Mitchell JW, Chaudry G, Hogan MJ. Society of interventional radiology quality improvement standards for image-guided percutaneous drainage and aspiration of abscesses and fluid collections. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020;31(4):662–666.e4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dulku G, Mohan G, Samuelson S, Ferguson J, Tibballs J. Percutaneous aspiration versus catheter drainage of liver abscess: a retrospective review. Australas Med J. 2015;8(1):7–18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Zerem E, Hadzic A. Sonographically guided percutaneous catheter drainage versus needle aspiration in the management of pyogenic liver abscess. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189(3)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cai YL, Xiong XZ, Lu J, Cheng Y, Yang C, Lin YX, et al. Percutaneous needle aspiration versus catheter drainage in the management of liver abscess: a systematic review and meta-analysis, vol. 17, HPB. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2015. p. 195–201.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wallace MJ, Chin KW, Fletcher TB, Bakal CW, Cardella JF, Grassi CJ, et al. Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous drainage/Aspiration of abscess and fluid collections. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010;21(4):431–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lorenz J, Thomas JL. Complications of percutaneous fluid drainage. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2006;23:194–204.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Stinton LM, Shaffer EA. Epidemiology of gallbladder disease: cholelithiasis and cancer. Edit Off Gut and Liver. 2012;6:172–87.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dadhwal US, Kumar V. Benign bile duct strictures. Med J Armed Forces India. 2012;68(3):299–303.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014 Jan;64(1):9–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Diagnostic approach to the adult with jaundice or asymptomatic hyperbilirubinemia – UpToDate [Internet]. 2020. Available from: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/diagnostic-approach-to-the-adult-with-jaundice-or-asymptomatic-hyperbilirubinemia#H2

  18. Shea JA, Berlin JA, Escarce JJ, Clarke JR, Kinosian BP, Cabana MD, et al. Revised estimates of diagnostic test sensitivity and specificity in suspected biliary tract disease. Arch Intern Med. 1994;154(22):2573–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Thomas S, Jahangir K. Noninvasive imaging of the biliary system relevant to percutaneous interventions. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2016;33(4):277–82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Fairchild AH, Hohenwalter EJ, Gipson MG, Al-Refaie WB, Braun AR, Cash BD, et al. ACR appropriateness criteria ® radiologic management of biliary obstruction. J Am Coll Radiol. 2019;16(5):S196–213.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ma MX, Jayasekeran V, Chong AK. Benign biliary strictures: prevalence, impact, and management strategies. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2019;12:83–92. Available from: https://www.dovepress.com/benign-biliary-strictures-prevalence-impact-and-management-strategies-peer-reviewed-article-CEG

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Loozen CS, Van Santvoort HC, Van Duijvendijk P, Besselink MG, Gouma DJ, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage for acute cholecystitis in high risk patients (CHOCOLATE): multicentre randomised clinical trial. BMJ. 2018;8:363.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hatjidakis AA, Karampekios S, Prassopoulos P, Xynos E, Raissaki M, Vasilakis SI, et al. Maturation of the tract after percutaneous cholecystostomy with regard to the access route. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1998;21(1):36–40. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s002709900208

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Loberant N, Notes Y, Eitan A, Yakir O, Bickel A. Comparison of early outcome from transperitoneal versus transhepatic percutaneous cholecystostomy. Hepatogastroenterology. 2010;57(97):12–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Saad WEA, Wallace MJ, Wojak JC, Kundu S, Cardella JF. Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography, biliary drainage, and percutaneous cholecystostomy. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010;21(6):789–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Collares FB, Faintuch S, Kim SK, Rabkin DJ. Reinsertion of accidentally dislodged catheters through the original track: what is the likelihood of success? J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010;21(6):861–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Preminger GM. Obstructive uropathy – genitourinary disorders – merck manuals professional edition [Internet]. 2020. Available from: https://www.merckmanuals.com/en-ca/professional/genitourinary-disorders/obstructive-uropathy/obstructive-uropathy?query=urinarytractobstruction

  28. Urinary Tract Obstruction – Brenner and Rector’s The Kidney, 8th ed [Internet]. 2020. Available from: https://doctorlib.info/nephrology/kidney/36.html

  29. Ellenbogen PH, Scheible FW, Talner LB, Leopold GR. Sensitivity of gray scale ultrasound in detecting urinary tract obstruction. Am J Roentgenol. 1978;130(4):731–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Craig WD, Wagner BJ, Travis MD. From the archives of the AFIP. Pyelonephritis: radiologic-pathologic review. Radiographics. 2008;28:255–76. Radiological Society of North America

    Google Scholar 

  31. Goodwin WE, Casey WC, Woolf W. Percutaneous trocar (needle) nephrostomy in hydronephrosis. J Am Med Assoc. 1955;157(11):891–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Pabon-Ramos WM, Dariushnia SR, Walker TG, Janne D’Othée B, Ganguli S, Midia M, et al. Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous nephrostomy. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016;27(3):410–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang CJ, Hsu C, Sen CHW, Chang CH, Tsai PC. Percutaneous nephrostomy versus ureteroscopic management of sepsis associated with ureteral stone impaction: a randomized controlled trial. Urolithiasis. 2016;44(5):415–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Patel U. Emergency percutaneous nephrostomy: results and complications. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1994;5(1):135–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Dyer RB, Regan JD, Kavanagh PV, Khatod EG, Chen MY, Zagoria RJ. Percutaneous nephrostomy with extensions of the technique: Step by step 1. Radiographics. 2002;22(3):503–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kaskarelis IS, Papadaki MG, Malliaraki NE, Robotis ED, Malagari KS, Piperopoulos PN. Complications of percutaneous nephrostomy, percutaneous insertion of ureteral endoprosthesis, and replacement procedures. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2001;24(4):224–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Lewis S, Patel U. Major complications after percutaneous nephrostomy – lessons from a department audit. Clin Radiol. 2004;59(2):171–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Van Hooft JE, Van Halsema EE, Vanbiervliet G, Beets-Tan RGH, Dewitt JM, Donnellan F, et al. Self-expandable metal stents for obstructing colonic and extracolonic cancer: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy. 2014;46(11):990–1002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Saida Y. Current status of colonic stent for obstructive colorectal cancer in Japan; a review of the literature. J Anus Rectum Colon. 2019;3(3):99–105.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sebastian Mafeld .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Alenezi, A.O., Patel, N.R., Mir-Rahimi, A., Jaberi, A., Mafeld, S. (2022). Nonvascular Emergencies. In: Patlas, M.N., Katz, D.S., Scaglione, M. (eds) Atlas of Emergency Imaging from Head-to-Toe. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92111-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92111-8_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-92110-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-92111-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics