Skip to main content

Theory of Mind

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible
  • 194 Accesses

Abstract

The theory of mind (ToM) refers to how people understand their own thoughts and feelings and those of other beings. It is a crucial cognitive mechanism for social interactions and communication. It helps us to predict, to explain, and to manipulate behaviors or mental states. Moreover, this skill is shared by almost all human beings beyond early childhood.

The literature presents different explicit false-belief tasks as a means of investigating ToM in children (e.g., one of the most famous is known as the Sally-Anne task). Although children younger than 4 years usually fail in these explicit tasks, it cannot be excluded that some less complex forms of understanding mental states develop earlier. So, in order to investigate the precursors that anticipate the emergence of a more mature representational system, many recent studies on infants’ beliefs have demonstrated, in the last decade, a very early sensitivity specifically to the false beliefs of others by using implicit looking-time tasks. This entry starts with the definition of the theory of mind and its history, before moving on to summarize developmental research in this area. Finally, it focuses on the relation between theory of mind and the possible with some reflections on how an increasing consciousness of the variety of situations that the possible presents to us could allow people to choose the best alternative for themselves and others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 899.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For the sake of brevity, the relation between ToM and various other pathologies has not been included in this entry; for example, the importance of the ToM’s deficits in autism has not been covered; see Baron-Cohen (2000), Fletcher-Watson and Happè (2019), Mitchell (1997).

References

  • Apperly, I. A., & Butterfill, S. A. (2009). Do humans have two systems to track beliefs and belief-like states? Psychological Review, 116, 953–970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astington, J. W., Harris, P. L., & Olson, D. R. (1988). Developing theories of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baillargeon, R., Scott, R. M., & He, Z. (2010). False-belief understanding in infants. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(3), 110–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S. (1991). Precursors to a theory of mind: Understanding attention in others. In A. Whiten (Ed.), Natural theories of mind: Evolution, development and simulation of everyday mindreading (pp. 233–251). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S. (2000). Theory of mind and autism: A fifteen year review. In S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg, & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Understanding other minds: Perspectives from developmental cognitive neuroscience (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”? Cognition, 21(1), 37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bretherton, I., McNew, S., & Beeghley-Smith, M. (1981). Early person knowledge as expressed in gestural and verbal communication: When do infants acquire a “theory of mind”? In M. E. Lamb & L. R. Sherrod (Eds.), Infant social cognition (pp. 333–373). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2008). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? 30 years later. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(5), 187–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callaghan, T., Rochat, P., Lillard, A., Claux, M. L., Odden, H., Itakura, S., … Singh, S. (2005). Synchrony in the onset of mental-state reasoning: Evidence from five cultures. Psychological Science, 16, 378–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, M. (2009). Theory of mind. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, M. G. (2007). The meaning of the future: Toward a more specific definition of possible selves. Review of General Psychology, 11(4), 348–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher-Watson, S., & Happè, F. (2019). Autism: A new introduction to psychological theory and current debate. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. A. (1978). Propositional attitudes. The Monist, 61, 501–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frye, D., & Moore, C. (1991). Children’s theories of mind. Mental states and social understanding. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glăveanu, V. P. (2018). The possible as a field of inquiry. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 14(3), 519–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heyes, C. (2014). False belief in infancy: A fresh look. Developmental Science, 17(5), 647–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovács, Á. M., Téglás, E., & Endress, A. D. (2010). The social sense: Susceptibility to others’ beliefs in human infants and adults. Science, 330, 1830–1834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C., & Mitchell, P. (Eds.) (1994). Children’s early understanding of mind: Origins and development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacNamara, J., Baker, E., & Olson, C. (1976). Four-year-olds’ understanding of pretend, forget, and know: Evidence for propositional operations. Child Development, 47, 62–70. https://doi.org/10.2307/1128283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, P. (1997). Introduction to theory of mind: Children, autism and apes. London: Edward Arnold Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, P., & Lacohée, H. (1991). Children’s early understanding of false belief. Cognition, 39, 107–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, C. (1996). Theories of mind in infancy. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 14, 19–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onishi, K. H., & Baillargeon, R. (2005). Do 15-month-old infants understand false beliefs? Science, 308(5719), 255–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rakoczy, H. (2012). Do infants have a theory of mind? British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 30, 59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rakoczy, H. (2017). Theory of mind. In B. Hopkins, E. Geangu, & S. Linkenauger (Eds.), The Cambridge encyclopedia of child development (pp. 505–512). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P., Railton, P., Baumeister, R. F., & Sripada, C. (2013). Navigating into the future or driven by the past. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(2), 119–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senju, A., Southgate, V., Snape, C., Leonard, M., & Csibra, G. (2011). Do 18-month-olds really attribute mental states to others? Psychological Science, 22(7), 878–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shultz, T. R., & Cloghesy, K. (1981). Development of recursive awareness of intention. Developmental Psychology, 17, 456–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shultz, T. R., Wells, D., & Sarda, M. (1980). The development of the ability to distinguish intended actions from mistakes, reflexes, and passive movements. British Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 19, 301–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, H., & Baillargeon, R. (2008). Infants’ reasoning about others’ false perceptions. Developmental Psychology, 44(6), 1789–1795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Southgate, V., Senju, A., & Csibra, G. (2007). Action anticipation through attribution of false belief by 2-year-olds. Psychological Science, 18(7), 587–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Surian, L., & Geraci, A. (2012). Where will the triangle look for it? Attributing false beliefs to a geometric shape at 17 months. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 30(1), 30–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Surian, L., Caldi, S., & Sperber, D. (2007). Attribution of beliefs by 13-month-old infants. Psychological Science, 18(7), 580–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, H. M. (2017). The development of theory of mind: Historical reflections. Child Development Perspectives, 11, 207–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, H. M., Cross, D., & Watson, J. (2001). Metaanalysis of theory-of-mind development: The truth about false belief. Child Development, 72, 655–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whiten, A. (1991). Natural theories of mind. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13(1), 103–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zittoun, T., & de Saint-Laurent, C. (2015). Life-creativity: Imagining one’s life. In V. P. Glăveanu, A. Gillespie, & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Rethinking creativity: Contributions from cultural psychology (pp. 58–75). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Franchin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Franchin, L. (2022). Theory of Mind. In: Glăveanu, V.P. (eds) The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90913-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics