Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Agility in the Supply Chain

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Supply Chain Management

Abstract

Today’s marketplace is characterized by intense competitive pressures as well as high levels of turbulence and uncertainty. Organizations require agility in their supply chains to better manage disruption risks, ensure uninterrupted service, and provide superior value to customers. A systematic cultivation of agility is required in all segments of the supply chain, with the ability to anticipate as well as respond rapidly, in a coordinated fashion, to supply and operational disruptions. Supply chain agility is thus of value for both risk mitigation and response. This chapter provides an updated perspective on agility, based on a summary of research conducted to date, along with current and emerging managerial and research concerns. Major gaps in the literature and shortfalls in practice are summarized, along with critical needs in both research and practice domains. The research literature on agility is covered under the categories of: (1) Supply chain disruption risk management; (2) Conceptualization and evolving definitions of agility; (3) Antecedents, drivers, and impacts of supply chain agility; (3) Current managerial concerns regarding the vulnerabilities of supply chains and major gaps in the literature; (4) Emergent concerns regarding both research and managerial practices on agility; and (5) Managerial implications and specific actions that may be pursued to enhance agility, followed by the conclusions. It is hoped that the material presented promotes convergence of research and managerial practices aimed at enhancing the robustness of global supply chains amidst increasing turbulence and volatility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agarwal, A., Shankar, R., & Tiwari, M. K. (2006). Modeling the metrics of lean, agile and leagile supply chain: An ANP-based approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 173(1), 211–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambulkar, S., Blackhurst, J., & Grawe, S. (2015). Firm’s resilience to supply chain disruptions: Scale development and empirical examination. Journal of Operations Management, 33–34(33–34), 111–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhamra, R., Dani, S., & Burnard, K. (2011). Resilience: The concept, a literature review and future directions. International Journal of Production Research, 49(18), 5375–5393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackhurst, J., Dunn, K., & Craighead, C. W. (2011). An empirically derived framework of global supply resiliency. Journal of Business Logistics, 32(4), 374–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blome, C., Schoenherr, T., & Rexhausen, D. (2013). Antecedents and enablers of supply chain agility and its effect on performance: A dynamic capabilities perspective. International Journal of Production Research, 51(4), 1295–1318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braunscheidel, M. J., & Suresh, N. C. (2009). The organizational antecedents of a firm’s supply chain agility for risk mitigation and response. Journal of Operations Management, 27(2), 119–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braunscheidel, M. J., Suresh, N. C., & Boisnier, A. D. (2010). Investigating the impact of organizational culture on supply chain integration. Human Resource Management, 49(5), 883–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarty, A., Grewal, R., & Sambamurthy, V. (2013). Information technology competencies, organizational agility, and firm performance: Enabling and facilitating roles. Information Systems Research., 24(4), 976–997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiang, C., Kocabasoglu-Hillmer, C., & Suresh, N. C. (2012). An empirical investigation of the impact of strategic sourcing and flexibility on firm’s supply chain agility. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 32(1), 49–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chopra, S., & Sodhi, M. S. (2004). Managing risk to avoid supply-chain breakdown. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(1), 53–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, M., & Towill, D. R. (2001). An integrated model for the design of agile supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 31(4), 235–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craighead, C. W., Blackhurst, J., Rungtusanatham, M. J., & Handfield, R. B. (2007). The severity of supply chain disruptions: Design characteristics and mitigation capabilities. Decision Sciences, 38(1), 131–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Souza, D. E., & Williams, F. P. (2000). Toward a taxonomy of manufacturing flexibility dimensions. Journal of Operations Management, 18, 577–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubey, R., Altay, N., Gunasekaran, A., Blome, C., Papadopoulos, T., & Childe, S. J. (2018). Supply chain agility, adaptability and alignment: Empirical evidence from the Indian auto components industry. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 38(1), 129–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckstein, D., Goellner, M., Blome, C., & Henke, M. (2015). The performance impact of supply chain agility and supply chain adaptability: The moderating effect of product complexity. International Journal of Production Research, 53(10), 3028–3046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fayezi, S., Zutshi, A., & O’Loughlin, A. (2015). How Australian manufacturing firms perceive and understand the concepts of agility and flexibility in the supply chain. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 35(2), 246–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiksel, J. (2006). Sustainability and resilience: Toward a systems approach. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 2(2), 14–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiksel, J., Polyviou, M., Croxton, K. L., & Pettit, T. J. (2015). From risk to resilience: Learning to deal with disruption. Sloan Management Review, 56(2), 79–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fliedner, G., & Vokurka, R. J. (1997). Agility: Competitive weapon of the 1990s and beyond? Production & Inventory Management Journal, 38(3), 19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasparro, A., Smith, J., & Kang, J. (2020). Grocers stopped stockpiling food. Then came the coronavirus. Wall Street Journal. Mar. 23. https://www.wsj.com/articles/grocers-stopped-stockpiling-food-then-came-coronavirus-11584982605

  • Gerwin, D. (1993). Manufacturing flexibility: A strategic perspective. Management Science, 39(4), 395–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gligor, D., Gligor, N., Holcomb, M., & Bozkurt, S. (2019). Distinguishing between the concepts of supply chain agility and resilience: A multi-disciplinary literature review. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 30(2), 467–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gligor, D. M., Esmark, C. L., & Holcomb, M. C. (2015). Performance outcomes of supply chain agility: When should you be agile? Journal of Operations Management, 33, 71–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gligor, D. M., Holcomb, M. C., & Feizabadi, J. (2016). An exploration of the strategic antecedents of firm supply chain agility: The role of a firm’s orientations. International Journal of Production Economics, 179(1), 24–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gligor, D. M., Holcomb, M. C., & Stank, T. P. (2013). A multidisciplinary approach to supply chain agility: Conceptualization and scale development. Journal of Business Logistics, 34(2), 94–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, D. (1993). On measurement and valuation of manufacturing flexibility. International Journal of Production Research, 31(12), 2947–2958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagen, E. W. (1980). Common-mode-common cause failure – A review. Nuclear Safety, 21(2), 184–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallikas, J., Karvonen, I., Pulkkinen, U., Virolainen, V.-M., & Tuominen, M. (2004). Risk management processes in supplier networks. International Journal of Production Economics, 90(1), 47–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, G., & Valikangas, L. (2003). The quest for resilience. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 52–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks, K. B., & Singhal, V. R. (2012). The effect of supply chain disruptions on corporate performance. In Handbook of integrated risk management in global supply chains, 51–78. Wiley handbooks in operations research and management science. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, W., Zheng, T., Yildiz, H., & Talluri, S. (2015). Supply chain risk management: A literature review. International Journal of Production Research, 53(16), 5031–5069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jahed, M. A., Quaddus, M., & Gurung, A. (2021). Towards a comprehensive model of SCM adoption and practice in the fast fashion apparel industry. International Journal of Information Systems and Supply Chain Management, 14(4), 72–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleindorfer, P. R., & Saad, G. H. (2005). Managing disruption risks in supply chains. Production and Operations Management, 14(1), 53–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knemeyer, A. M., Zinn, W., & Eroglu, C. (2009). Proactive planning for catastrophic events in supply chains. Journal of Operations Management, 27(2), 141–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koste, L. L., & Malhotra, M. K. (1999). A theoretical framework for analyzing the dimensions of manufacturing flexibility. Journal of Operations Management, 18, 75–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, D. M., Cooper, M. C., & Pagh, J. D. (1998). Supply chain management: Implementation issues and research opportunities. International Journal of Logistics Management, 9(2), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H., Ke, W., Wei, K. K., & Hua, Z. (2013). The impact of IT capabilities on firm performance: The mediating roles of absorptive capacity and supply chain agility. Decision Support Systems, 54(3), 1452–1462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, Y., & Ramamurthy, K. (2011). Understanding the link between information technology capability and organizational agility: An empirical examination. MIS Quarterly, 35(4), 931–954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackelprang, A. W., Robinson, J. L., Bernardes, E., & Webb, G. S. (2014). The relationship between strategic supply chain integration and performance: A meta-analytic evaluation and implications for supply chain management research. Journal of Business Logistics, 35(1), 71–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason-Jones, R., Naylor, B., & Towill, D. R. (2000). Engineering the leagile supply chain. International Journal of Agile Management Systems, 2(1), 54–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narasimhan, R., Swink, M., & Kim, S. W. (2006). Disentangling leanness and agility: An empirical investigation. Journal of Operations Management, 24(5), 440–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naylor, B., Naim, M. M., & Berry, D. (1999). Leagility: Integrating the lean and agile manufacturing paradigms in the total supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 62(1), 107–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overby, E., Bharadwaj, A., & Sambamurthy, V. (2006). Enterprise agility and the enabling role of information technology. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(2), 120–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, T. J., Croxton, K. L., & Fiksel, J. (2019). The evolution of resilience in supply chain management: A retrospective on ensuring supply chain resilience. Journal of Business Logistics, 40(1), 56–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qrunfleh, S., & Tarafdar, M. (2013). Lean and agile supply chain strategies and supply chain responsiveness: The role of strategic supplier partnership and postponement. Supply Chain Management, 18(6), 571–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, R. E., & Rohrbaugh, J. (1983). A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: Towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis. Management Science, 29(3), 363–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, J., & Caniato, F. (2003). Building a secure and resilient supply chain. Supply Chain Management Review, 7(5), 22–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, N., & Grover, V. (2012). Investigating firm's customer agility and firm performance: The importance of aligning sense and respond capabilities. Journal of Business Research, 65(5), 579–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, A. K., & Sethi, S. P. (1990). Flexibility in manufacturing: A survey. The International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems, 2, 289–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheffi, Y., & Rice, J. (2005). A supply chain view of the resilient enterprise. MIT Sloan Management Review, 47(1), 41–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slack, N. (1983). Flexibility as a manufacturing objective. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 3(3), 4–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slack, N. (1987). The flexibility of manufacturing systems. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 7(4), 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. (2020). Divided supply chains are challenging producers, retailers. Wall Street Journal. April 15. https://www.wsj.com/articles/divided-supply-chains-are-challenging-producers-retailers-11586974088

  • Suresh, N. C., Sanders, G. L., & Braunscheidel, M. J. (2020). Business continuity management for supply chains facing catastrophic events. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 48(3), 129–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swafford, P. M., Ghosh, S., & Murthy, N. (2006). The antecedents of supply chain agility of a firm: Scale development and model testing. Journal of Operations Management, 24(2), 170–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swafford, P. M., Ghosh, S., & Murthy, N. (2008). Achieving supply chain agility through IT integration and flexibility. International Journal of Production Economics, 116(2), 288–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, C. S. (2006). Perspectives in supply chain risk management. International Journal of Production Economics, 103(2), 451–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarafdar, M., & Qrunfleh, S. (2017). Agile supply chain strategy and supply chain performance: Complementary roles of supply chain practices and information systems capability for agility. International Journal of Production Research, 55(4), 925–938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomlin, B. (2006). On the value of mitigation and contingency strategies for managing supply chain disruption risks. Management Science, 52(5), 639–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Upton, D. M. (1997). Process range in manufacturing: An empirical study of flexibility. Management Science, 43(8), 1079–1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Mieghem, J. A. (2012). Risk management and operational hedging: An overview. In Handbook of integrated risk management in global supply chains, 13–49. Wiley handbooks in operations research and management science. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickery, S. K., Droge, C., Setia, P., & Sambamurthy, V. (2010). Supply chain information technologies and organisational initiatives: Complementary versus independent effects on agility and firm performance. International Journal of Production Research, 48(23), 7025–7042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vickery, S. K., Jayaram, J., Droge, C., & Calantone, R. (2003). The effects of an integrative supply chain strategy on customer service and financial performance: An analysis of direct versus indirect relationships. Journal of Operations Management, 21(5), 523–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vokurka, R. J., & O’Leary-Kelly, S. W. (2000). A review of empirical research on manufacturing flexibility. Journal of Operations Management, 18, 485–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Womack, J. P., Jones, D. T., & Roos, D. (1990). The machine that changed the world. Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, J. (2014). Supply chain agility: Securing performance for Chinese manufacturers. International Journal of Production Economics, 150, 104–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yusuf, Y. Y., Gunasekaran, A., Musa, A., Dauda, M., El-Berishy, N. M., & Cang, S. (2014). A relational study of supply chain agility, competitiveness and business performance in the oil and gas industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 147, 531–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, A., & Zaheer, S. (1997). Catching the wave: Alertness, responsiveness, and market influence in global electronic networks. Management Science, 43(11), 1493–1509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Q., Vonderembse, M. A., & Lim, J. (2003). Manufacturing flexibility: Defining and analyzing relationships among competence, capability, and customer satisfaction. Journal of Operations Management, 21(2), 173–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zsidisin, G., Melnyk, S., & Ragatz, G. (2005). An institutional theory perspective of business continuity planning for purchasing and supply management. International Journal of Production Research, 43, 3401–3420.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA

    Nallan C. Suresh

Authors
  1. Nallan C. Suresh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nallan C. Suresh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Business School, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, USA

    Joseph Sarkis

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Suresh, N.C. (2023). Agility in the Supply Chain. In: Sarkis, J. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Supply Chain Management. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89822-9_20-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89822-9_20-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-89822-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-89822-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Business and ManagementReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation