The ever-evolving digital technology is transforming us in unexpected ways. In the last few decades, almost any dimension of human life is being affected by these devices, from a global perspective (e.g., we can video chat immediately with someone being thousands of kilometers away) to the individual cognitive sphere. For instance, we no longer memorize telephone numbers or instructions to get to a given place; we just trust these artifacts and let them perform more and more actions we used to do by ourselves in the past. This new reality poses profound implications for human nature, particularly for cognitive architecture. There is a growing body of scientific literature highlighting the effects of digital technology over cognitive processes, such as attention, memory, or motivation. However, there is little evidence regarding to what extent technology is related with thinking and reasoning. Is the use of technology enhancing the way we think and reason, and thus making us smarter? Or is it the opposite, and they are taking away from us the cognitive effort we used to conduct ourselves, and thus making us cognitive lazier and brainless. Throughout this chapter, three goals are aimed, namely, (a) depicting the state of the art of the studies regarding the relationship between digital technology and cognition, especially possible changes in the way we think and reason; (b) reflecting about the future envisioned concerning how technology should be aligned with social needs (rather than social needs being deceived to meet the interests of giant companies behind technology design). In doing so, the normative way of thinking and reasoning will be discussed, that is, what is considered the right way to deploy them. Finally, (c) drawing some lines of action to raise awareness. Instead of waiting for a better technological design, specific actions at an individual level to take back control over technology can already be conducted. Social change is happening, it depends on us whether it will be the social change we wish, desire, and deserve, or not.
- Social change
- Thinking and reasoning
- Digital technology
- Cognitive processes
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
AlgoTransparency. (n.d.). https://www.algotransparency.org/
Anderson, D. R., & Subrahmanyam, K. (2017). Digital screen media and cognitive development. Pediatrics, 140(Supplement 2), S57–S61. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-1758C
Ayres, P. (2020). Something old, something new from cognitive load theory. Computers in Human Behaviour, 113(2020), 106503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106503
Baddeley, A. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255(5044), 556–559. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1736359
Baddeley, A. D., Scott, D., Drynan, R., & Smith, J. C. (1969). Short-term memory and the limited capacity hypothesis. British Journal of Psychology, 60(1), 51–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1969.tb01175.x
Barr, N., Pennycook, G., Stolz, J. A., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2015). The brain in your pocket: Evidence that smartphones are used to supplant thinking. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 473–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.029
Behar-Horenstein, L. S., & Niu, L. (2011). Teaching critical thinking skills in higher education: A review of the literature. Journal of College Teaching & Learning (TLC), 8(2), 10.19030/tlc.v8i2.3554.
Beuckels, E., Ye, G., Hudders, L., & Cauberghe, V. (2021). Media multitasking: A bibliometric approach and literature review. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 2322. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.623643
Bode, L., & Vraga, E. K. (2015). In related news, that was wrong: The correction of misinformation through related stories functionality in social media. Journal of Communication, 65(4), 619–638. https://doi.org/10.1111/JCOM.12166
Brady, W. J., Wills, J. A., Jost, J. T., Tucker, J. A., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2017). Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(28), 7313–7318. https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.1618923114
Brey, P. (2017). Ethics of emerging technologies. In S. O. Hansoon (Ed.), The ethics of technology: Methods and approaches (pp. 175–192). Rowman and Littlefield International.
Brey, P. (2018). The strategic role of technology in a good society. Technology in Society, 52, 39–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHSOC.2017.02.002
Bruns, A. (2019). Are filter bubbles real? Polity Press.
Center for Humane Technology [CHT]. (2021). https://www.humanetech.com/
Chen, L., Nath, R., & Tang, Z. (2020). Understanding the determinants of digital distraction: An automatic thinking behavior perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 106195. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2019.106195
Chernikova, O., Heitzmann, N., Stadler, M., Holzberger, D., Seidel, T., & Fischer, F. (2020). Simulation-based learning in higher education: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 90(4), 499–541. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320933544
Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7–19.
Cotton, M. (2014). Ethics and technology assessment: A participatory approach. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45088-4
Crockett, M. J. (2017). Moral outrage in the digital age. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(11), 769–771. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0213-3
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper & Row.
de Aldama, C. (2020). Cognitive enhancement or cognitive diminishing? Digital technologies and challenges for education from a situated perspective. Límite Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy & Psychology, 15, 21.
de Aldama, C., & Pozo, J. I. (2020). Do you want to learn physics? Please play angry birds (but with epistemic goals). Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633118823160
de Aldama, C., Martínez-Morán, M., García-Pérez, D., Aguirre, A., & González-Cuevas, G. (2020, October 28–30). If more technology (p)➔ better reasoning (q)? Understanding technology and deductive reasoning from the Extended Mind perspective [Conference session]. In 8th international congress of educational sciences and development, Pontevedra (Spain). https://www.educationcongress8.com/
De Freitas, S. (2018). Are games effective learning tools? A review of educational games. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(2), 74–84.
De Pablos Pons, J. (2010). Higher education and the knowledge society. Information and digital competencies. Revista de Universidad y Sociedad Del Conocimiento, 7(2), 6–15. https://doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v7i2.977
Duclos, J. Y., Esteban, J., & Ray, D. (2004). Polarization: Concepts, measurement, estimation. Econometrica, 72(6), 1737–1772. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2004.00552.x
Eppler, M. J., & Mengis, J. (2004). The concept of information overload: A review of literature from organization science, accounting, marketing, MIS, and related disciplines. The Information Society, 20, 325–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240490507974
European Commission. (2014). Responsible research and innovation. Europe’s ability to respond to societal challenges.
Evans, J. S. B. (1989). Bias in human reasoning: Causes and consequences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Evans, J. S. B., & Frankish, K. E. (2009). In two minds: Dual processes and beyond. Oxford University Press.
Evans, J. S. B., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612460685
Flaxman, S., Goel, S., & Rao, J. M. (2016). Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(S1), 298–320. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfw006
Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533005775196732
Frith, J., & Kalin, J. (2016). Here, I used to be: Mobile media and practices of place-based digital memory. Space and Culture, 19(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331215595730
Froschauer, J., Merkl, D., Arends, M., & Goldfarb, D. (2013). Art history concepts at play with ThIATRO. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, 6(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/2460376.2460378
Garzón, J., & Acevedo, J. (2019). Meta-analysis of the impact of augmented reality on students’ learning gains. Educational Research Review, 27, 244–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.04.001
Gigerenzer, G. (2007). Gut feelings: The intelligence of the unconscious. Viking.
González-Labra, M. J. (Ed.). (2019). Psicología del pensamiento. Sainz y Torres.
Govier, T. (2014). A practical study of argument (7th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Graafland, M., Schraagen, J. M., & Schijven, M. P. (2012). Systematic review of serious games for medical education and surgical skills training. Journal of British Surgery, 99(10), 1322–1330. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.8819
Hilbert, M. (2020). Digital technology and social change: The digital transformation of society from ahistorical perspective. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 22(2), 194. https://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2020.22.2/MHILBERT
Hilbert, M., & López, P. (2011). The world’s technological capacity to store, communicate, and compute information. Science, 332(6025), 60–65. https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.1200970
Holyoak, K. J., & Morrison, R. G. (Eds.). (2005). The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning. Cambridge University Press.
Hoskins, A. (2009). Digital network memory. In A. Erll & A. Rigney (Eds.), Mediation, remediation, and the dynamics of cultural memory (pp. 91–106). de Gruyter.
Jeong, S. H., & Hwang, Y. (2016). Media multitasking effects on cognitive vs. attitudinal outcomes: A meta-analysis. Human Communication Research, 42(4), 599–618. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12089
Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Prentice Hall.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Strauss, Giroux.
Kokoç, M., Ilgaz, H., & Akçay, A. (2021). How deeply does media and technology usage affect the sustained attention? International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1–12.
Kuhn, D. (2019). Critical thinking as discourse. Human Development, 62(3), 146–164. https://doi.org/10.1159/000500171
Kushlev, K., & Dunn, E. W. (2015). Checking email less frequently reduces stress. Computers in Human Behavior, 43, 220–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2014.11.005
Lazer, D. M. J., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., Metzger, M. J., Nyhan, B., Pennycook, G., Rothschild, D., Schudson, M., Sloman, S. A., Sunstein, C. R., Thorson, E. A., Watts, D. J., & Zittrain, J. L. (2018). The science of fake news: Addressing fake news requires a multidisciplinary effort. Science, 359(6380), 1094–1096. https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.AAO2998
Lee, J., Cho, B., Kim, Y., & Noh, J. (2015). Smartphone addiction in university students and its implication for learning. In Emerging issues in smart learning (pp. 297–305). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
Liu, W., Tan, L., Huang, D., Chen, N., & Liu, F. (2021). When preschoolers use tablets: The effect of educational serious games on Children’s attention development. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 37(3), 234–248.
Lyons, B. A. (2020). From code to discourse: Social media and linkage mechanisms in deliberative systems. Journal of Deliberative Democracy, 13(1), 10.16997/JDD.270.
Mahrt, M. (2020). Why we find little evidence of digital fragmentation, but should not stop researching it. In V. Gehray, A. Waldherr, & A. Scholl (Eds.), Integration durch Kommunikation (pp. 27–35). Jahrbuch der Publizistik- und Kommunikationswissenschaft.
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6
Medeiros-Ward, N., Watson, J. M., & Strayer, D. L. (2015). On supertaskers and the neural basis of efficient multitasking. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(3), 876–883. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0713-3
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magic number seven plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 91–97.
Miri, B., David, B. C., & Uri, Z. (2007). Purposely teaching for the promotion of higher-order thinking skills: A case of critical thinking. Research in Science Education, 37(4), 353–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9029-2
Mosleh, M., Pennycook, G., Arechar, A. A., & Rand, D. G. (2021). Cognitive reflection correlates with behavior on twitter. Nature Communications, 12(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20043-0
Mozilla Foundation. (2021). YouTube regrets. https://foundation.mozilla.org/es/campaigns/regrets-reporter/findings/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2021advocacy-es&utm_content=regretsfindingsES
Mynatt, C. R., Doherty, M. E., & Tweney, R. D. (1977). Confirmation bias in a simulated research environment: An experimental study of scientific inference. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29(1), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335557743000053
Näsi, M., & Koivusilta, L. (2013). Internet and everyday life: The perceived implications of internet use on memory and ability to concentrate. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 16(2), 88–93.
Nisbett, R., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Prentice Hall.
O’Neil, C. (2017). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Penguin Books.
Ophir, E., Nass, C., & Wagner, A. D. (2009). Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(37), 15583–15587. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0903620106
Özkul, D., & Humphreys, L. (2015). Record and remember: Memory and meaning-making practices through mobile media. Mobile Media & Communication, 3(3), 351–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157914565846
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2005). A guide for educators to critical thinking competency standards. Foundation for critical thinking.
Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2021). The psychology of fake news. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(5), 388–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.02.007
Peters, M. A. (2017). Education in a post-truth world. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49, 563–566. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2016.1264114
Pinker, S. (1997). How the mind works. W. W. Norton.
Robertson, R. E., Jiang, S., Joseph, K., Friedland, L., Lazer, D., & Wilson, C. (2018). Auditing partisan audience bias within Google search. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2(CSCW), 22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274417
Rowlands, M. (2009). Extended cognition and the mark of the cognitive. Philosophical Psychology, 22(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515080802703620
Schnabel, T., Amershi, S., Bennett, P. N., Bailey, P., & Joachims, T. (2020, July). The impact of more transparent interfaces on behavior in personalized recommendation. In Proceedings of the 43rd international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval (pp. 991–1000).
Shulman, E. P., Smith, A. R., Silva, K., Icenogle, G., Duell, N., Chein, J., & Steinberg, L. (2016). The dual systems model: Review, reappraisal, and reaffirmation. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 103–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2015.12.010
Sparrow, B., Liu, J., & Wegner, D. M. (2011). Google effects on memory: Cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips. Science, 333(6043), 776–778. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1207745
Stothart, C., Mitchum, A., & Yehnert, C. (2015). The attentional cost of receiving a cell phone notification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(4), 893. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000100
Styles, E. (2006). The psychology of attention. Psychology Press.
Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4(4), 295–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(94)90003-5
Talan, T. (2020). The effect of mobile learning on learning performance: A meta-analysis study. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 20(1), 79–103.
Toplak, M. E., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2011). The cognitive reflection test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks. Memory & Cognition, 39(7), 1275–1289. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-011-0104-1
Toplak, M. E., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2014). Assessing miserly information processing: An expansion of the cognitive reflection test. Thinking & Reasoning, 20(2), 147–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2013.844729
Trisolini, D. C., Petilli, M. A., & Daini, R. (2018). Is action video gaming related to sustained attention of adolescents? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(5), 1033–1039.
Tun, P. A., & Lachman, M. E. (2010). The association between computer use and cognition across adulthood: Use it so you won’t lose it? Psychology and Aging, 25(3), 560. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019543
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5(2), 207–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1983). Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychological Review, 90(4), 293. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.90.4.293
U.S. Department of Labor. (2020). National census of fatal occupational injuries in 2019. https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/cfoi.pdf
Uncapher, M. R., & Wagner, A. D. (2018). Minds and brains of media multitaskers: Current findings and future directions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(40), 9889–9896. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1611612115
Uncapher, M. R., Thieu, M. K., & Wagner, A. D. (2016). Media multitasking and memory: Differences in working memory and long-term memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 483–490. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0907-3
Van Gog, T., Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2010). Cognitive load theory: Advances in research on worked examples, animations, and cognitive load measurement. Educational Psychology Review, 22(4), 375–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9145-4
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146–1151. https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.AAP9559
Vraga, E. K., & Bode, L. (2017). I do not believe you: How providing a source corrects health misperceptions across social media platforms. Information, Communication & Society, 21(10), 1337–1353. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1313883
Vujic, A. (2017). Switching on or switching off? Everyday computer use as a predictor of sustained attention and cognitive reflection. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 152–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.040
Ward, A. F., Duke, K., Gneezy, A., & Bos, M. W. (2017). Brain drain: The mere presence of one’s own smartphone reduces available cognitive capacity. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 2(2), 140–154. https://doi.org/10.1086/691462
Wason, P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12(3), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470216008416717
Wilmer, H. H., Sherman, L. E., & Chein, J. M. (2017). Smartphones and cognition: A review of research exploring the links between mobile technology habits and cognitive functioning. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 605. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00605
Wright, D. (2010). A framework for the ethical impact assessment of information technology. Ethics and Information Technology, 13(3), 199–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10676-010-9242-6
Ziegler, D. A., Simon, A. J., Gallen, C. L., Skinner, S., Janowich, J. R., Volponi, J. J., Rolle, C. E., Mishra, J., Kornfield, J., Anguera, J. A., & Gazzaley, A. (2019). Closed-loop digital meditation improves sustained attention in young adults. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(7), 746–757. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0611-9
Rights and permissions
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
de Aldama, C., García-Pérez, D. (2023). Social Challenges and Actions for Thinking and Reasoning in the Digital Age. In: The Palgrave Handbook of Global Social Change. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87624-1_3-1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-87624-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-87624-1
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social Sciences