Abstract
The chapter discusses the social construction of disability presenting the main elements in the debate on history, definition, and data on disability. It highlights the convergent international trend toward the definition firstly elaborated by the World Health Organization (ICF) and then by the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. The World Health Organization considers disability an umbrella term, and it has elaborated the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health to define and measure it. It combines the medical and social models developing a biopsychosocial perspective, defining disability as a limitation in a functional domain, and arising from the interaction between an individual’s intrinsic capacity and environmental and personal factors. The main international commitment concerning disability as a global issue is represented by the United Nation Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and its Optional Protocol, changing definition and attitudes on disability, from viewing persons with disabilities as an object of medical treatment, charity and social protection toward persons with rights, claiming those rights, and being the main actors of their lives, as well as active members of society. Nevertheless, the implementation of the IFC and of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities is a global epistemological challenge dealing with key aspects of social life since disability has been a cultural construct legitimizing social hierarchies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acemoglu, D., & Angrist, J. D. (2001). Consequences of employment protection? The case of the Americans with disabilities act. Journal of Political Economy, 109, 915–957.
ADA American Disability Act. (1990). Glossary. https://adata.org/glossary-terms
Areheart, B. A. (2011). Disability trouble. Yale Law & Policy Review, 29(2), 347–388.
Barnes, C., & Mercer, G. (2010). Exploring disability. Polity.
Baynton, D. C. (2013). Disability and the justification of inequality in American history. The Disability Studies Reader, 17(33), 57–55.
Bickenbach, J. E., Chatterji, S., Badley, E. M., & Üstün, T. B. (1999). Models of disablement, universalism and the international classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. Social Science & Medicine, 48(9), 1173–1187.
Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical reason: On the theory of action. Stunford University Press.
Conrad, P., & Barker, K. K. (2010). The social construction of illness: Key insights and policy implications. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 51(1_suppl), S67–S79.
DeJong, G. (1979). Independent living: From social movement to analytic paradigm. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 60, 435–446.
Dolnick, E. (1993). Deafness as culture. The Atlantic, 272(3), 37–53.
Douglas, M. (2002). Purity and danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. Routledge.
Genova, A., Scavarda, A., & Świątkiewicz-Mośny, M. (2023, in press). Disability welfare policy in Europe. Cognitive disability and the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic. Emerald.
Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma. Penguin.
Hacking, I. (1990). The normal state. In The taming of chance (pp. 161–188). Cambridge University Press.
Jones, S. R. (1996). Toward inclusive theory: Disability as social construction. NASPA Journal, 33(4), 347–354.
Kaplan, D. (2000). The definition of disability: Perspective of the disability community. Journal of Health Care Law & Policy, 3(2), 352–364.
Linton, S. (1998). Disability studies/not disability studies. Disability and Society, 13(4), 525–540.
Murphy, R. (1990). The body silent. W. W. Norton.
Nussbaum, M. (2001). Upheavals of thought: The intelligence of emotions.
Oliver, M. (1996a). Understanding disability: From theory to practice. McMillan.
Oliver, M. (1996b). A sociology of disability or a disablist sociology? In L. Barton (Ed.), Disability & society: Emerging issues and insights (pp. 18–42). Longman.
Oliver, M. (2004). The social model in action: If I had an hammer? In C. Barnes & G. Mercer (Eds.), Implementing the social model of disability: Theory and research (pp. 18–31). Disability Press.
Ravaud, J. F., & Stiker, H. J. (2000). Les modèles de l'inclusion et de l'exclusion à l'épreuve du handicap. 1re partie: les processus sociaux fondamentaux d'exclusion et d'inclusion. Handicap-Revue de sciences humaines et sociales, 86, 1–18.
Schianchi, M. (2012). Storia della disabilità : dal castigo degli dèi alla crisi del welfare. Carocci.
UN. (2006). United Nations Conventions on the rights of persons with disabilities. https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-rights-persons-disabilities
UN. (2020a). Disability statistics Joint report of the Secretary-General, the Washington Group on Disability Statistics and international agencies. https://unstats.un.org/unsd/statcom/51st-session/documents/2020-34-DisabilityStats-E.pdf
UN. (2020b). Policy brief: A disability-inclusive response to COVID-19. https://unsdg.un.org/sites/default/files/2020-05/Policy-Brief-A-Disability-Inclusive-Response-to-COVID-19.pdf
UN. (2022). https://www.washingtongroup-disability.com/question-sets/wg-short-set-on-functioning-wg-ss/
UN. (2019). Disability statistics Joint report of the Secretary-General, the Washington Group on Disability Statistics and international agencies. https://unstats.un.org/unsd/statcom/51st-session/documents/2020-34-DisabilityStats-E.pdf
UPIAS. (1976). Fundamental principles of disability. Union of the Physical Impaired Against Segregation.
UNICEF (United Nations Children’s Fund). (2021). Seen, counted, included: Using data to shed light on the well-being of children withdisabilities. UNICEF.
WHO. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health. Available at: http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/
WHO. (2011). World report on disability. https://www.who.int/disabilities/world_report/2011/report.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Genova, A. (2023). Disability. In: The Palgrave Handbook of Global Social Problems. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68127-2_71-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68127-2_71-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-68127-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-68127-2
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences