As information technology develops, the control of privacy becomes practically more complicated day after day. The absence of efficient regulations and effective enforcement of laws can cause serious issues, for instance, as the Edward Snowden revelations have indicated. Privacy issues and concerns have increased after Snowden leaked secret information from the US National Secret Agency (NSA) that the USA has privately served a number of surveillance programs, even against supposed allies. Consequently, people have started to demand their rights to privacy and family life and to force their governments to protect their personal data from being disclosed or used without their consent. Accordingly, in EU, the General Data Protection Regulation came into force to provide efficient protection for privacy and personal data. Considering the General Data Protection Regulation, Turkey amended its Constitution, Civil Code, and Penal Code and has provided several specific regulations on rights to privacy and personal data protection. This work questions the Turkish Constitution, Civil Code, and Penal Code to analyze whether sufficient and robust regulation is in place to protect privacy and personal data, taking relevant social media and PTT (post, and telegraph organization) cases into account. It proposes that legislations guaranteeing the protection of privacy and personal data must be updated in line with the development of information technology.
- IT law
- Personal data
- Cyberspace law
- Social technological issues
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Aras, U. Y. (2010). National and international regulations of privacy right. Istanbul Bahcesehir University, LLM dissertation. http://libris.bahcesehir.edu.tr/dosyalar/Tez/083923C1.pdf
Aydin, V. (1998). The protection of privacy within the framework of the Turkish constitution of 1982. The Journal of Suleyman Demirel University, the Faculty of Economics, and Administrative Sciences, 3(3), 185–198. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/195219
Bauman, Z., Bigo, D., Esteves, P., Guild, E., Jabri, V., Lyon, D., & Walker, R. B. J. (2014). After Snowden: Rethinking the impact of surveillance. International Political Sociology, 8(2), 121–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/ips.12048
Cansel, E. (1992). The problems arising from the annulment decisions of the constitutional court. The Journal of Constitutional Jurisdiction, 9, 87–104. http://www.anayasa.gov.tr/files/pdf/anayasa_yargisi/anyarg9/cansel.pdf
Ciftcioglu, C. T. (2012). Right to live. Turkish Bar Association Journal., 103, 137–168. http://tbbdergisi.barobirlik.org.tr/m2013-103-1230
Cirakoglu, M. (2018). Blocking access to the internet under Law No 5651, and the access providers union. Adalet Press.
Clayton, R., & Tomlinson, H. (2009). The law of human rights. Oxford University Press.
Commission of the European Communities. (2004). Regular report on Turkey’s progress towards accession. Republic of Turkey Ministry for EU Affairs. Retrieved from http://www.ab.gov.tr/files/AB_Iliskileri/Tur_En_Realitons/Progress/Turkey_Progress_Report_2 004.pdf
Commission of the European Communities. (2012). Regular report on Turkey’s Progress towards accession. Republic of Turkey Ministry for EU Affairs. Retrieved from http://www.abgs.gov.tr/files/tr_rapport_2012_en.pdf
Dural, M., & Oguz, T. (2015). Turkish private law. Filiz.
Equality and Human Rights Commission. (2012). An assessment of how well public authorities protect human rights. Human Rights Review. http://www.equalityhumanrights.com/publication/human-rights-review-2012
Gellman, R. M. (1996). Can privacy be regulated effectively on a National Level – Thoughts on the possible need for international privacy rules. Villanova Law Review, 41(1), 129–172. https://www.digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/vlr/vol41/iss1/2
Gulmez, C. (2015). The comparison of EU legislation and regulation of Turkey with regards to protection of personal data. Prime Ministry Inspection Board.
Gumus, A. T. (2010). The individual’s right for promotion and protection of material and spiritual existence in the constitution of the Turkish Republic. Education Academy.
Gurkaynak, G., & Yilmaz, I. (2015). Turkey. In The privacy, data protection, and cybersecurity law review (pp. 334–346). Law Business Research Ltd..
Gursel, E., & Dugmeci, F. (2018). Structural evaluation of Turkey personal data protection institution. Research Studies Anatolia Journal, 1(2), 318–329. https://doi.org/10.33723/rs.430753
Hafizogullari, Z. (1997). Personal rights as human rights and the protection of personal rights. The Journal of Ankara University Law Faculty, 46(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1501/Hukfak_0000000655
Ilkiz, F., & Gunaydin, B. (2006). Personal rights – Media ethics and relevant judicial decisions. The Global Communication Journal, 2, 1–15. http://globalmediajournaltr.yeditepe.edu.tr/hakemli%20yazilar%20pdf/01Fikret%20%C4%B0L K%C4%B0Z%20ve%20Bar%C4%B1s%20G%C3%9CNAYDIN.pdf
Kang, J. (1998). Informational privacy in cyberspace transactions. Stanford Law Review, 50, 1192–1294. http://www.ntia.doc.gov/legacy/ntiahome/privacy/files/CPRIVACY.PDF
Kaya, M. B. (2021). The Internet law. On Iki Levha Press Corporation.
Kent, B. (2019). Blocking access to websites in Turkey. Adalet Press.
Kent, B. (2020). Regulating social networks in German Law, and the Network Enforcement Act of Germany. Digital Law Review, 2(1), 1–46.
Ketizmen, M., & Ulkuderner, C. (2007). Not protecting personal data in E-government applications. In The 12th conference of the Internet in Turkey (pp. 189–193).
KulularIbrahim, M. A. (2019). Justification regarding to consent, superior private, or public interest. Suleyman Demirel University Faculty of Law Review, 9(2), 305–333.
KulularIbrahim, M. A. (2021). Legal basis of modern technology in the Ottoman period: The case of telegraph. Adalet Press.
Lyon, D. (1994). The electronic eye: The rise of surveillance society. University of Minnesota Press.
Mills, J. L. (2008). Privacy: The lost right. Oxford University Press.
Mitchels, B., & Bond, T. (2010). Essential law for counsellors and psychotherapists. SAGE.
Newman, A. L. (2008). Building transnational civil liberties: Transgovernmental entrepreneurs and the European data privacy directive. International Organization, 62(1), 103–130. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818308080041
Omona, A. D. (2021). Securitization of Telecommunications Technology and Its Challenge to Civil Society Operation in Uganda. In: Baikady R., Sajid S., Przeperski J., Nadesan V., Rezaul I., Gao J. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Global Social Problems. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68127-2_21-1
Ozer Gundogan, C. (2013). Will Facebook remember you forever: The right to be forgotten on social networks within the privacy framework. University of Essex School of Law LLM dissertation. http://www.btk.gov.tr/File/?path=ROOT%2F1%2FDocuments%2FTez%2FCigdem_OZER_GU NDOGAN.pdf
Oztoprak, S. (2014). The postal services organization which has been reorganized by the law numbered 6475; “PTT Stock Corporation”. Ankara Bar Association Review, 72(2), 375–394. Ankara: Salmat.
Ozturk, H. (2020). Structure, and duties of the access providers union. Digital Law Review, 2(1), 115–140.
Scalia, J. (2003). Lawrence v. Texas (02-102) 539 U.S. 558. Cornell University Law School. Retrieved from https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/02-102.ZD.html
Sifry, M. L. (2011). Wikileaks and the age of transparency. OR Books.
Silverman, H. J. (2005). Withdrawal of feeding-tubes from incompetent patients: The Terri Schiavo case raises new issues regarding who decides in end-of-life decision making. Intensive Care Medicine, 31(3). http://link.springer.com.ezproxy.library.qmul.ac.uk/article/10.1007/s00134-004-2542-8/fulltext.html
Solove, D. J. (2008). Understanding privacy. Harvard University Press.
Stefanick, L. (2011). Controlling knowledge: Freedom of information and privacy protection in a networked world. University of Washington Press.
Stephen, K., & Lynette, M. (Eds.). (2003). Who goes there, authentication through the lens of privacy. The National Academies Press.
Swire, P. P., & Litan, R. E. (1998). None of your business: World data flows, electronic commerce, and the European privacy directive. Brookings Institution Press.
Tekin, N. (2014). An assessment of the Turkish draft law on protection of personal data in light of the EU. Human Rights Review, 4, 21–89. http://www.taa.gov.tr/yayin/etiket/draft-law-on-protection-of-personal-data/
The Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Turkey. (2014). The Principal No: 2013/84. The decision no: 2014/183. The Data Bank for Decisions. https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2015/03/20150313.pdf
The Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Turkey. (2014). The principal no: 2014/74, the decision no: 2014/201. The Data Bank for Decisions. http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2015/05/20150523-22.pdf
The Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Turkey. (2015). The application no: 2013/9660. The Data Bank for Decisions https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2015/06/20150603.pdf
The Decision of the Supreme Court of Appeals of Turkey. (2007). The Principal No: 2004/14189, The Decision No: 2005/12835, Kazanci – The Data Bank for Supreme Court Practice. http://www.kazanci.com/kho2/ibb/giris.htm
Yildirim Ozturk, M., & Ergün, C. E. (2011). Data privacy in Turkish law. Retrieved from http://www.cakmak.av.tr/articles/Telecoms_Media/Data%20Privacy%20in%20Turkish%20Law. pdf
Editors and Affiliations
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Kulularibrahim, M.A. (2022). Protection of Privacy Against IT. In: Baikady, R., Sajid, S., Przeperski, J., Nadesan, V., Rezaul, I., Gao, J. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Global Social Problems. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68127-2_261-1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-68127-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-68127-2
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social Sciences