Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Dematerialization: Needs and Challenges

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Sustainability Science in the Future

Abstract

Dematerialization is one of the key strategies toward sustainable development, identified also in the U.N. Sustainable Development Goals. The ideal of dematerialization, with its multiple goals of reducing absolute materials consumption, reducing environmental impacts, by preserving or raising the quality and services provided to the public is a difficult target to hit. Not surprisingly, global dematerialization in absolute terms has not been achieved to date despite efforts and policies developed and enacted at national and regional levels. The current study summarizes dematerialization, available assessment methods, and its relation to development. One of the main goals of this study is to present challenges to dematerialization based on past attempts, to guide future studies or policies. There are several obstacles toward achieving intended gains through dematerialization which have been identified in this study. Among them, the rebound effect remains as the most persistent phenomenon counteracting most efforts and policies that have been implemented to date. Economic conditions of the times should also be included in studies that aim to assess dematerialization. While the most substantial gains in absolute material reductions have been obtained during economic downturns and recessions, it would be difficult to have continued public support to remain in a state of economic recession to reduce pressures on material consumption. A transition to a service-oriented economic model as compared to an ownership model is sometimes cited as a potential solution, but investigation of case studies indicates mixed results and warrant sectoral investigations. Likewise, discussions around product lifetime may be deemed inconclusive as impacts may go both ways depending on the specific product being analyzed, hence generalized statements should be avoided. Dematerialization at the industry scale may prove to be more effective than national or regional policies. Such policies must also be coupled with one or more assessment methods. A lack of careful measurement may hide real impacts and trends opening the way for unintended consequences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackay I, Kizys R (2018) Analysis of energy efficiency practices of SMEs in rural Ghana: an application of product generational dematerialization method. Energ Effic 11:1359–1374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akenji L, Bengtsson M, Bleischwitz R, Tukker A, Schandl H (2016) Ossified materialism: introduction to the special volume on absolute reductions in materials throughput and emissions. J Clean Prod 132:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aktas CB, Bilec MM (2012a) Service life prediction of residential interior finishes for life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17:362–371

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aktas CB, Bilec MM (2012b) Strategies to reduce disparity between design and service lifetimes of building products. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on sustainable enterprises of the future, Pittsburgh, PA, 18–19 April 2012

    Google Scholar 

  • Ausubel JH, Waggoner PE (2008) Dematerialization: variety, caution, and persistence. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105(35):12774–12779. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.0806099105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bringezu S, Schütz H, Steger S, Baudisch J (2004) International comparison of resource use and its relation to economic growth: the development of total material requirement, direct material inputs and hidden flows and the structure of TMR. Ecol Econ 51(1–2):97–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruckner M, Giljum S, Lutz C, Svenja K (2012) Materials embodied in international trade – global material extraction and consumption between 1995 and 2005. Glob Environ Chang 22:568–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrasqueiro S, Monteiro MH, Pereira R, Pereira C, Martins H (2018) Dematerialization of the medical certificate for driving license in Portugal: a case study of success factors of whole-of-Government e-Government initiatives. In: 11th international conference on theory and practice of electronic governance (ICEGOV2018), Galway, Republic of Ireland, 2–4 April 2018

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick MJ (1997) Industrial Ecocycles: rate adjustments and dematerialization. Philosophical Transactions: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 355(1728):1439–1447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarty D, Dasgupta S, Roy J (2013) Rebound effect: how much to worry? Current Opinions in Environmental Sustainability 5:216–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland CJ, Ruth M (1998) Indicators of dematerialization and the materials intensity of use. J Ind Ecol 2(3):15–50. https://doi.org/10.1162/jiec.1998.2.3.15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong F, Li J, Wang Y, Zhang X, Zhang S, Zhang S (2019) Drivers of the decoupling indicator between the economic growth and energy-related CO2 in China: a revisit from the perspectives of decomposition and spatiotemporal heterogeneity. Sci Total Environ 685:631–658

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fix B (2019) Dematerialization through services: evaluating the evidence. BioPhys Econ Resour Qual 4(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41247-019-0054-y

  • Griffiths J (2013) Dematerialization, pragmatism and the European copyright revolution. Oxf J Leg Stud 33(4):767–790. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqt017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadad S, Bratianu C (2019) Dematerialization of banking products and services in the digital era. Manage Mark Chall Knowl Soc 14(3):318–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiskanen E, Jalas M (2000) Dematerialization through services – a review and evaluation of the debate. Finnish Ministry of Environment, Environmental Protection Department, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA (2012) World energy outlook. The International Energy Agency, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Kallis G (2017) Radical dematerialization and degrowth. Philos Trans A 375(2095). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0383

  • Kander A (2005) Baumol’s disease and dematerialization of the economy. Ecol Econ 55:119–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magee CL, Devezas TC (2017) A simple extension of dematerialization theory: incorporation of technical progress and the rebound effect. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 117:196–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirabella N, Rigamonti L, Scalbi S (2013) Life cycle assessment of information and communication technology application: a case study of dematerialization in the Italian public administration. J Clean Prod 44:115–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2019) Global material resources outlook to 2060: economic drivers and environmental consequences. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264307452-en

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pavaskar M (2005) Perils of dematerialization of commodity futures. Econ Polit Wkly 40(31):3364–3368

    Google Scholar 

  • Polimeni JM, Polimeni RI (2006) Jevons’ paradox and the myth of technological liberation. Ecol Complex 3:344–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schandl H, Turner GM (2009) The dematerialization potential of the Australian economy. J Ind Ecol 13(6):863–880. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2009.00163.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao Q, Rao L (2018) The rebound effect of dematerialization and decoupling: a case of energy efficiency. Chin J Popul Resour Environ 16(4):299–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/10042857.2018.1544755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao Q, Schaffartzik A, Mayer A, Krausmann F (2017) The high ‘price’ of dematerialization: a dynamic panel data analysis of material use and economic recession. J Clean Prod 167:120–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi F, Huang T, Tanikawa H, Han J, Hashimoto S, Moriguchi Y (2012) Toward a low carbon-dematerialization society. J Ind Ecol 16:493–505

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smil V (2014) Making the modern world: materials and dematerialization. Wiley, Chichester, UK. ISBN 978-1-119-94253-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun JW, Meristo T (1999) Measurement of dematerialization/materialization: a case analysis of energy saving and decarbonization in OECD countries, 1960–95. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 60:275–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tapio P, Banister D, Luukkanen J, Vehmas J, Willamo R (2007) Energy and transport in comparison: immaterialisation, dematerialisation and decarbonisation in the EU15 between 1970 and 2000. Energy Policy 35:433–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN (2020) The sustainable development goals report 2020. United Nations. ISBN: 978-92-1-101425-9. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2020/The-Sustainable-Development-Goals-Report-2020.pdf

  • UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth. A report of the working group on decoupling to the international resource panel. In: Fischer-Kowalski M, Swilling M, von Weizsäcker EU, Ren Y, Moriguchi Y, Crane W, Krausmann F, Eisenmenger N, Giljum S, Hennicke P, Romero Lankao P, Siriban Manalang A

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (2016). Global material flows and resource productivity. An assessment study of the UNEP international resource panel. In: Schandl H, Fischer-Kowalski M, West J, Giljum S, Dittrich M, Eisenmenger N, Geschke A, Lieber M, Wieland HP, Schaffartzik A, Krausmann F, Gierlinger S, Hosking K, Lenzen M, Tanikawa H, Miatto A, Fishman T. United Nations Environment Programme, Paris. https://wedocs.unep.org/handle/20.500.11822/21557

  • Valero A, Valero A, Calvo G, Ortego A (2018) Material bottlenecks in the future development of green technologies. Renew Sust Energ Rev 93:178–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Voet E, van Oers L, Nikolic I (2005a) Dematerialization not just a matter of weight. J Ind Ecol 8(4):121–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Voet E, van Oers L, Moll S, Schütz H, Bringezu S, de Bruyn S, Sevenster M, Warringa G (2005b) Policy review on decoupling: development of indicators to assess decoupling of economic development and environmental pressure in the EU-25 and AC-3 countries. Institute of Environmental Sciences, Leiden University

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinzettel J, Kovanda J (2011) Structural decomposition analysis of raw material consumption. J Ind Ecol 15:893–907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziolkowska J, Ziolkowski B (2010) Generational dematerialisation of energy in the world economy: evaluation approach for sustainable management policy. JEAPM 12(3):291–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziolkowska JR, Ziolkowski B (2015) Energy efficiency in the transport sector in the EU-27: a dynamic dematerialization analysis. Energy Econ 51:21–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, TED University, Ankara, Turkey

    Can Baran Aktaş

Authors
  1. Can Baran Aktaş
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Can Baran Aktaş .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. FTZ-ALS, HAW Hamburg, Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

    Walter Leal Filho

  2. University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal

    Anabela Marisa Azul

  3. Department of Business and Law, University of Milano-Bicocca, MILANO, Milano, Italy

    Federica Doni

  4. University of Passo Fundo, Sao Jose, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

    Amanda Lange Salvia

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Aktaş, C.B. (2022). Dematerialization: Needs and Challenges. In: Leal Filho, W., Azul, A.M., Doni, F., Salvia, A.L. (eds) Handbook of Sustainability Science in the Future. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68074-9_4-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68074-9_4-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-68074-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-68074-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Earth and Environm. ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Earth and Environmental Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation