Abstract
This paper considers arguments for specialized educational knowledge in teacher education and examines difficulties with achieving this, in the context of contemporary reforms to education systems and the production of educational knowledge. The pedagogization of knowledge is a core aspect of teachers’ work and this requires specialized educational knowledge complementary to subject knowledge. Moreover, knowledge of philosophical and sociological debates as to the purpose of education could be considered indispensable for making professional judgements about educational policies, curricula and pedagogic initiatives. However, the idea of a knowledge-rich teacher education is challenged by (i) fragmentation and contestation in the production of educational knowledge and (ii) processes of recontextualization of knowledge for the teacher education curriculum, which are influenced by various conceptions of teaching and the imperatives of educational reform. This is exemplified by brief reference to the English context and international comparative studies of teacher education.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
References
Alexander, R. (2004). Still no pedagogy? Principle, pragmatism and compliance in primary education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 34(1), 7–33.
Barrett, B., & Hordern, J. (2021). Rethinking the foundations: Towards powerful professional knowledge in teacher education in the USA and England. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 53(2), 153–165.
Beach, D., & Bagley, C. (2013). Changing professional discourses in teacher education policy back towards a training paradigm: A comparative study. European Journal of Teacher Education, 34, (4),379-392.
Bernstein, B. (1999). Vertical and horizontal discourse: An essay. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(2), 157–173.
Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity (2nd ed.). Rowman and Littlefield.
Biesta, G. (2010). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Paradigm.
Biesta, G. (2011). Disciplines and theory in the academic study of education: A comparative analysis of the Anglo-American and Continental construction of the field. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 19(2), 175–192.
Bridges, D. (2006). The disciplines and discipline of educational research. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 40(2), 259–272.
Collins, R. (1998). The sociology of philosophies: A global theory of intellectual change. Harvard University Press.
Deng, Z. (2018). Contemporary curriculum theorizing: Crisis and resolution. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 50(6), 691–710.
Deng, Z. (2021). Constructing ‘powerful’ curriculum theory. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 53(2), 179–196.
Department for Education (DfE). (2016). Educational excellence everywhere. DfE.
Department for Education (DfE). (2021). Initial teacher training (ITT): Criteria and supporting advice. DfE. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/initial-teacher-training-criteria/initial-teacher-training-itt-criteria-and-supporting-advice
Ellis, V., Mansell, W., & Steadman, S. (2021). A new political economy of teacher development: England’s Teaching and Leadership Innovation Fund. Journal of Education Policy, 36(5), 605–623.
Evetts, J. (2011). A new professionalism: Challenges and opportunities. Current Sociology, 59(4), 404–422.
Furlong, J. (2013). Education: An anatomy of the discipline. Rescuing the university project. Routledge.
Furlong, J., & Whitty, G. (2017). Knowledge traditions in the study of education. In G. Whitty & J. Furlong (Eds.), Knowledge and the study of education: An international exploration. Symposium.
Gamble, J. (2014). Approaching the sacred’: Directionality in the relation between curriculum and knowledge structure. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 35(1), 56–72.
Gove, M. (2010, June 16). Michael Gove to the National College Annual Conference, Birmingham. https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/michael-gove-to-the-national-college-annual-conference-birmingham
Grace, G. (2014). Professions, sacred and profane. In M. Young & J. Muller (Eds.), Knowledge, expertise and the professions (pp. 18–30). Routledge.
Hopmann, S. (2007). Restrained teaching: The common core of Didaktik. European Educational Research Journal, 6(2), 109–124.
Hordern, J. (2014). The logic and implications of school-based teacher formation. British Journal of Educational Studies, 62(3), 231–248.
Hordern, J. (2015). Teaching, teacher formation, and specialised professional practice. European Journal of Teacher Education, 38(4), 431–444.
Hordern, J. (2016a). Regions and their relations: Sustaining authoritative professional knowledge. Journal of Education and Work, 29(4), 427–449.
Hordern, J. (2016b). Grammaticality and educational research. British Journal of Educational Studies, 65(2), 201–217.
Hordern, J. (2017a). Bernstein’s sociology of knowledge and education (al) studies. In G. Whitty & J. Furlong (Eds.), Knowledge and the study of education: An international exploration (pp. 191–210). Symposium.
Hordern, J. (2017b). Recontextualisation and professionalising regions. In B. Barrett, U. Hoadley, & J. Morgan (Eds.), Knowledge, curriculum and equity: Social realist perspectives. Routledge.
Hordern, J. (2018). Is powerful educational knowledge possible? Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(6), 787–802.
Hordern, J. (2021). Specialised, systematic and powerful knowledge. London Review of Education, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.14324/LRE.19.1.06
Hordern, J., & Tatto, M. T. (2018). Conceptions of teaching and educational knowledge requirements. Oxford Review of Education, 44(6), 686–701.
Hordern, J., Muller, J., & Deng, Z. (2021). Towards powerful educational knowledge? Addressing the challenges facing educational foundations, curriculum theory and Didaktik. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 53(2), 143–152.
Hulme, M., & Menter, I. (2011). South and North – Teacher education policy in England and Scotland: A comparative textual analysis. Scottish Educational Review, 43(2), 70–90.
Kuhlee, D., & Winch, C. (2017). Teachers’ knowledge in England and Germany: The conceptual background. In G. Whitty & J. Furlong (Eds.), Knowledge and the study of education: An international exploration (pp. 231–254). Symposium.
Lawn, M., & Furlong, J. (2009). The disciplines of education in the UK: Between the ghost and the shadow. Oxford Review of Education, 35(5), 541–552.
Marshall, T. (2014). New teachers need access to powerful educational knowledge. British Journal of Educational Studies, 62(3), 265–279.
Mayer, D. & Mills, M. (2021) Professionalism and teacher education in Australia and England. European Journal of Teacher Education, 44(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1832987
McCulloch, G. (2017). Education: An applied multidisciplinary field? The English experience. In G. Whitty & J. Furlong (Eds.), Knowledge and the study of education: An international exploration (pp. 211–229). Symposium.
McKinsey and Company. (2007). How the world’s best performing school systems come out on top. McKinsey.
McNamara, M., & Fealy, G. (2014). Knowledge matters in nursing. In M. Young & J. Muller (Eds.), Knowledge, expertise and the professions (pp. 157–170). Routledge.
Morgan, J., & Lambert, D. (2017). For knowledge but what knowledge? Confronting social realism’s curriculum problem. In B. Barrett, U. Hoadley, & J. Morgan (Eds.), Knowledge, curriculum and equity: Social realist perspectives (pp. 33–44). Routledge.
Mourshed, M., Chijioke, C., & Barber, M. (2010). How the world’s most improved school systems keep getting better. McKinsey.
Muller, J. (2009). Forms of knowledge and curriculum coherence. Journal of Education and Work, 22(3), 205–226.
Muller, J., & Hoadley, U. (2017). Pedagogic modality and structure in the recontextualising field of curriculum studies. In B. Barrett, U. Hoadley, & J. Morgan (Eds.), Knowledge, curriculum and equity: Social realist perspectives (pp. 80–101). Abingdon.
Muller, J., & Hoadley, U. (2021). A pedagogic compact: Retrieving ‘powerful’ educational knowledge from Didaktik and curriculum studies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 53(2), 166–178.
O’Halloran, K. L. (2007). Mathematical and scientific forms of knowledge: A systemic functional multimodal grammatical approach. In F. Christie & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Language, knowledge and pedagogy: Functional linguistic and sociological perspectives (pp. 205–236). Continuum.
Rouse, J. (2007). Social practices and normativity. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 37(1), 46–56.
Schriewer, J. (2017). Between the philosophy of self-cultivation and empirical research: Educational studies in Germany. In G. Whitty & J. Furlong (Eds.), Knowledge and the study of education: An international exploration (pp. 75–99). Symposium.
Schriewer, J., & Keiner, E. (1992). Communication patterns and intellectual traditions in educational sciences: France and Germany. Comparative Education Review, 36(1), 25–51.
Shalem, Y. (2014). What binds professional judgement - The case of teaching. In M. Young & J. Muller (Eds.), Knowledge, expertise and the professions (pp. 93–105). Routledge.
Shalem, Y. (2017). Scripted lesson plans: What is visible and invisible in visible pedagogy? In B. Barrett, U. Hoadley, & J. Morgan (Eds.), Knowledge, curriculum and equity: Social realist perspectives (pp. 183–199). Abingdon.
Tatto, M. (2006). Education reform and the global regulation of teachers’ education, development and work: A cross-cultural analysis. International Journal of Educational Research, 45(4–5), 231–241.
Tatto, M., & Hordern, J. (2017). The configuration of teacher education as a professional field of practice. In G. Whitty & J. Furlong (Eds.), Knowledge and the study of education: An international exploration (pp. 255–274). Symposium.
Westbury, I., Hopmann, S., & Riquarts, K. (1999). Teaching as a reflective practice: The german didaktik tradition. Taylor and Francis.
Whiting, C., Whitty, G., Menter, I., Black, P., Hordern, J., Parfitt, A., & Sorensen, N. (2018). Diversity and complexity: Becoming a teacher in England in 2015–2016. Review of Education, 6(1), 69–96.
Whitty, G. (2006). Education (al) research and education policy making. Is conflict inevitable? British Educational Research Journal, 32(2), 159–176.
Whitty, G. (2014). Recent developments in teacher training and their consequences for the ‘University Project’ in education. Oxford Review of Education, 40(4), 466–481.
Whitty, G., & Furlong, J. (2017). Knowledge and the study of education: An international exploration. Symposium.
Winch, C. (2010). Dimensions of expertise: A conceptual exploration of vocational knowledge. Continuum.
Winch, C., Oancea, A., & Orchard, J. (2015). The contribution of educational research to teachers’ professional learning – Philosophical understandings. Oxford Review of Education, 41(2), 202–216.
Wright Mills, C. (1959). The Sociological Imagination. Oxford University Press.
Young, M., & Muller, J. (2013). On the powers of powerful knowledge. Review of Education, 1(3), 229–250.
Young, M., & Muller, J. (2014). Towards the sociology of professional knowledge. In M. Young & J. Muller (Eds.), Knowledge, expertise and the professions (pp. 3–17). Routledge.
Zierer, K., & Seel, N. M. (2012). General didactics and instructional design: Eyes like twins: A transatlantic dialogue about similarities and differences about the past and the future of two sciences of learning and teaching. Springerplus, 1(15), 2–22.
Zogla, I. (2017). Pedagogija and Educational Sciences: Competing traditions in the study of education in Latvia. In G. Whitty & J. Furlong (Eds.), Knowledge and the study of education: An international exploration (pp. 101–121). Symposium.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Hordern, J. (2022). Specialized Educational Knowledge and Its Role in Teacher Education. In: The Palgrave Handbook of Teacher Education Research . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59533-3_14-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59533-3_14-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-59533-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-59533-3
eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education