Skip to main content

Specialized Educational Knowledge and Its Role in Teacher Education

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 37 Accesses

Abstract

This paper considers arguments for specialized educational knowledge in teacher education and examines difficulties with achieving this, in the context of contemporary reforms to education systems and the production of educational knowledge. The pedagogization of knowledge is a core aspect of teachers’ work and this requires specialized educational knowledge complementary to subject knowledge. Moreover, knowledge of philosophical and sociological debates as to the purpose of education could be considered indispensable for making professional judgements about educational policies, curricula and pedagogic initiatives. However, the idea of a knowledge-rich teacher education is challenged by (i) fragmentation and contestation in the production of educational knowledge and (ii) processes of recontextualization of knowledge for the teacher education curriculum, which are influenced by various conceptions of teaching and the imperatives of educational reform. This is exemplified by brief reference to the English context and international comparative studies of teacher education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Alexander, R. (2004). Still no pedagogy? Principle, pragmatism and compliance in primary education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 34(1), 7–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, B., & Hordern, J. (2021). Rethinking the foundations: Towards powerful professional knowledge in teacher education in the USA and England. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 53(2), 153–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beach, D., & Bagley, C. (2013). Changing professional discourses in teacher education policy back towards a training paradigm: A comparative study. European Journal of Teacher Education, 34, (4),379-392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (1999). Vertical and horizontal discourse: An essay. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(2), 157–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity (2nd ed.). Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. (2010). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Paradigm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. (2011). Disciplines and theory in the academic study of education: A comparative analysis of the Anglo-American and Continental construction of the field. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 19(2), 175–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, D. (2006). The disciplines and discipline of educational research. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 40(2), 259–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. (1998). The sociology of philosophies: A global theory of intellectual change. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng, Z. (2018). Contemporary curriculum theorizing: Crisis and resolution. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 50(6), 691–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, Z. (2021). Constructing ‘powerful’ curriculum theory. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 53(2), 179–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education (DfE). (2016). Educational excellence everywhere. DfE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education (DfE). (2021). Initial teacher training (ITT): Criteria and supporting advice. DfE. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/initial-teacher-training-criteria/initial-teacher-training-itt-criteria-and-supporting-advice

  • Ellis, V., Mansell, W., & Steadman, S. (2021). A new political economy of teacher development: England’s Teaching and Leadership Innovation Fund. Journal of Education Policy, 36(5), 605–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evetts, J. (2011). A new professionalism: Challenges and opportunities. Current Sociology, 59(4), 404–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furlong, J. (2013). Education: An anatomy of the discipline. Rescuing the university project. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Furlong, J., & Whitty, G. (2017). Knowledge traditions in the study of education. In G. Whitty & J. Furlong (Eds.), Knowledge and the study of education: An international exploration. Symposium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamble, J. (2014). Approaching the sacred’: Directionality in the relation between curriculum and knowledge structure. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 35(1), 56–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gove, M. (2010, June 16). Michael Gove to the National College Annual Conference, Birmingham. https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/michael-gove-to-the-national-college-annual-conference-birmingham

  • Grace, G. (2014). Professions, sacred and profane. In M. Young & J. Muller (Eds.), Knowledge, expertise and the professions (pp. 18–30). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopmann, S. (2007). Restrained teaching: The common core of Didaktik. European Educational Research Journal, 6(2), 109–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hordern, J. (2014). The logic and implications of school-based teacher formation. British Journal of Educational Studies, 62(3), 231–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hordern, J. (2015). Teaching, teacher formation, and specialised professional practice. European Journal of Teacher Education, 38(4), 431–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hordern, J. (2016a). Regions and their relations: Sustaining authoritative professional knowledge. Journal of Education and Work, 29(4), 427–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hordern, J. (2016b). Grammaticality and educational research. British Journal of Educational Studies, 65(2), 201–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hordern, J. (2017a). Bernstein’s sociology of knowledge and education (al) studies. In G. Whitty & J. Furlong (Eds.), Knowledge and the study of education: An international exploration (pp. 191–210). Symposium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hordern, J. (2017b). Recontextualisation and professionalising regions. In B. Barrett, U. Hoadley, & J. Morgan (Eds.), Knowledge, curriculum and equity: Social realist perspectives. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hordern, J. (2018). Is powerful educational knowledge possible? Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(6), 787–802.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hordern, J. (2021). Specialised, systematic and powerful knowledge. London Review of Education, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.14324/LRE.19.1.06

  • Hordern, J., & Tatto, M. T. (2018). Conceptions of teaching and educational knowledge requirements. Oxford Review of Education, 44(6), 686–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hordern, J., Muller, J., & Deng, Z. (2021). Towards powerful educational knowledge? Addressing the challenges facing educational foundations, curriculum theory and Didaktik. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 53(2), 143–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulme, M., & Menter, I. (2011). South and North – Teacher education policy in England and Scotland: A comparative textual analysis. Scottish Educational Review, 43(2), 70–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlee, D., & Winch, C. (2017). Teachers’ knowledge in England and Germany: The conceptual background. In G. Whitty & J. Furlong (Eds.), Knowledge and the study of education: An international exploration (pp. 231–254). Symposium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawn, M., & Furlong, J. (2009). The disciplines of education in the UK: Between the ghost and the shadow. Oxford Review of Education, 35(5), 541–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, T. (2014). New teachers need access to powerful educational knowledge. British Journal of Educational Studies, 62(3), 265–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, D. & Mills, M. (2021) Professionalism and teacher education in Australia and England. European Journal of Teacher Education, 44(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1832987

  • McCulloch, G. (2017). Education: An applied multidisciplinary field? The English experience. In G. Whitty & J. Furlong (Eds.), Knowledge and the study of education: An international exploration (pp. 211–229). Symposium.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinsey and Company. (2007). How the world’s best performing school systems come out on top. McKinsey.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, M., & Fealy, G. (2014). Knowledge matters in nursing. In M. Young & J. Muller (Eds.), Knowledge, expertise and the professions (pp. 157–170). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, J., & Lambert, D. (2017). For knowledge but what knowledge? Confronting social realism’s curriculum problem. In B. Barrett, U. Hoadley, & J. Morgan (Eds.), Knowledge, curriculum and equity: Social realist perspectives (pp. 33–44). Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mourshed, M., Chijioke, C., & Barber, M. (2010). How the world’s most improved school systems keep getting better. McKinsey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, J. (2009). Forms of knowledge and curriculum coherence. Journal of Education and Work, 22(3), 205–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller, J., & Hoadley, U. (2017). Pedagogic modality and structure in the recontextualising field of curriculum studies. In B. Barrett, U. Hoadley, & J. Morgan (Eds.), Knowledge, curriculum and equity: Social realist perspectives (pp. 80–101). Abingdon.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Muller, J., & Hoadley, U. (2021). A pedagogic compact: Retrieving ‘powerful’ educational knowledge from Didaktik and curriculum studies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 53(2), 166–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Halloran, K. L. (2007). Mathematical and scientific forms of knowledge: A systemic functional multimodal grammatical approach. In F. Christie & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Language, knowledge and pedagogy: Functional linguistic and sociological perspectives (pp. 205–236). Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouse, J. (2007). Social practices and normativity. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 37(1), 46–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schriewer, J. (2017). Between the philosophy of self-cultivation and empirical research: Educational studies in Germany. In G. Whitty & J. Furlong (Eds.), Knowledge and the study of education: An international exploration (pp. 75–99). Symposium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schriewer, J., & Keiner, E. (1992). Communication patterns and intellectual traditions in educational sciences: France and Germany. Comparative Education Review, 36(1), 25–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shalem, Y. (2014). What binds professional judgement - The case of teaching. In M. Young & J. Muller (Eds.), Knowledge, expertise and the professions (pp. 93–105). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shalem, Y. (2017). Scripted lesson plans: What is visible and invisible in visible pedagogy? In B. Barrett, U. Hoadley, & J. Morgan (Eds.), Knowledge, curriculum and equity: Social realist perspectives (pp. 183–199). Abingdon.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tatto, M. (2006). Education reform and the global regulation of teachers’ education, development and work: A cross-cultural analysis. International Journal of Educational Research, 45(4–5), 231–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tatto, M., & Hordern, J. (2017). The configuration of teacher education as a professional field of practice. In G. Whitty & J. Furlong (Eds.), Knowledge and the study of education: An international exploration (pp. 255–274). Symposium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westbury, I., Hopmann, S., & Riquarts, K. (1999). Teaching as a reflective practice: The german didaktik tradition. Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiting, C., Whitty, G., Menter, I., Black, P., Hordern, J., Parfitt, A., & Sorensen, N. (2018). Diversity and complexity: Becoming a teacher in England in 2015–2016. Review of Education, 6(1), 69–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitty, G. (2006). Education (al) research and education policy making. Is conflict inevitable? British Educational Research Journal, 32(2), 159–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitty, G. (2014). Recent developments in teacher training and their consequences for the ‘University Project’ in education. Oxford Review of Education, 40(4), 466–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitty, G., & Furlong, J. (2017). Knowledge and the study of education: An international exploration. Symposium.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Winch, C. (2010). Dimensions of expertise: A conceptual exploration of vocational knowledge. Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winch, C., Oancea, A., & Orchard, J. (2015). The contribution of educational research to teachers’ professional learning – Philosophical understandings. Oxford Review of Education, 41(2), 202–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright Mills, C. (1959). The Sociological Imagination. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, M., & Muller, J. (2013). On the powers of powerful knowledge. Review of Education, 1(3), 229–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, M., & Muller, J. (2014). Towards the sociology of professional knowledge. In M. Young & J. Muller (Eds.), Knowledge, expertise and the professions (pp. 3–17). Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zierer, K., & Seel, N. M. (2012). General didactics and instructional design: Eyes like twins: A transatlantic dialogue about similarities and differences about the past and the future of two sciences of learning and teaching. Springerplus, 1(15), 2–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zogla, I. (2017). Pedagogija and Educational Sciences: Competing traditions in the study of education in Latvia. In G. Whitty & J. Furlong (Eds.), Knowledge and the study of education: An international exploration (pp. 101–121). Symposium.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jim Hordern .

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Hordern, J. (2022). Specialized Educational Knowledge and Its Role in Teacher Education. In: The Palgrave Handbook of Teacher Education Research . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59533-3_14-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59533-3_14-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-59533-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-59533-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics