Skip to main content

A Convention Theorist Approach to Accounting

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Economics and Sociology of Conventions

Abstract

The word accounting mainly refers to a particular form of quantification aimed at producing quantified images of the economic activity of various entities (companies, public bodies, nations, etc.) for reporting to various stakeholders. Accounting can therefore be studied as a quantification technique, applying the tools of the sociology of quantification. However, there are special features that make accounting more than just one quantification technique among many. The economics and sociology of conventions (EC/SC) provide important analytical tools to analyze its essential role in the economy.

Accounting is in fact a very important source of coordination conventions that frame our economic exchanges. It is also a major source of economic valuation, as it is able to state economic worth and profits. This chapter highlights the different aspects that shape accounting practices and the power struggles around accounting figures. It also explains how these aspects have evolved historically in order to build the necessary trust in numbers that makes them useful: accounting conventions have been gradually regulated, and so has the accounting profession. These characteristics of accounting make it a very interesting vector for addressing both the microeconomic issues of coordination between economic agents and the particular economic institutions that shape economic regimes. Accounting conventions are indicators of what and who count in a political economy. It is then not surprising that reform projects are targeting accounting conventions in order to change the way the economy works.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amblard, Marc. 2004. Conventions et comptabilité: vers une approche sociologique du modèle. Comptabilité-Contrôle-Audit 10 (3): 47–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amblard, Marc, and Corine Eyraud. 2008. La réforme des entreprises d’État chinoises, une entrée par la comptabilité: 1993–2001. Comptabilité Contrôle Audit 14 (2): 27–42. https://doi.org/10.3917/cca.142.0027.

  • Annisette, Marcia, and Allan J. Richardson. 2011. Justification and accounting. Applying sociology of worth to accounting research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 24 (2): 229–249. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513571111100690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, Derek. 1995. Accounting in transition in the transitional economy. European Accounting Review 4 (4): 596–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardet, Fabrice. 2014. La contre-révolution comptable. Ces chiffres qui nous gouvernent. Paris: Les belles Lettres.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bessy, Christian, and Pierre-Marie Chauvin. 2013. The power of market intermediaries. From information to valuation processes. Valuation Studies 1 (1): 83–117. https://doi.org/10.3384/vs.2001-5992.131183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biondi, Yuri. 2012. Should business and non-business Accounting be different? A comparative perspective applied to the French central government accounting standards. International Journal of Public Administration 35 (9): 603–619. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2012.661186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biondi, Yuri, Arnaldo Canziani, and Thierry Kirat, eds. 2007. The firm as an entity. Implications for economics, accounting and the law. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourguignon, Annick, and Eve Chiapello. 2005. The role of criticism in the dynamics of performance evaluation systems. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 16 (6): 665–700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2003.08.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, Robert. 2007. Assessing the impact of fair value upon financial crises. Socio-Economic Review 5 (4): 779–807. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwm018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2022. Political economy of capitalisms. Cham: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bruno, Isabelle, Florence Jany-Catrice, and Béatrice Touchelay, eds. 2016. The social sciences of quantification. From politics of large numbers to target-driven policies. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryer, Robert. 2000. The history of accounting and the transition to capitalism in England. Part One: Theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society 25 (2): 131–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(99)00032-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiapello, Eve. 2005. Les normes comptables comme institution du capitalisme. Une analyse du passage aux IFRS en Europe à partir de 2005. Sociologie du travail 47 (3): 362–382. doi-org.inshs.bib.cnrs.fr/10.4000/sdt.26750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. Accounting at the heart of the performativity of economics. Economic Sociology- European Electronic Newsletter 10 (1): 12–15. hdl.handle.net/10419/155911.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Financialisation of valuation. Human Studies 38 (1): 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-014-9337-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. How IFRS contribute to financialisation of capitalism. In IFRS in a Global World, ed. Didier Bensadon and Nicolas Praquin, 71–84. Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chiapello, Eve, and Alain Desrosières. 2006. La quantification de l’économie et la recherche en sciences sociales: paradoxes, contradictions et omissions. Le cas exemplaire de la “Positive accounting theory”. In L’économie des conventions. Méthodes et résultats, Vol 1: Débats, ed. François Eymard-Duvernay, 297–310. Paris: La Découverte.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chiapello, Eve, and Patrick Gilbert. 2019. Management tools. A social sciences perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, Ronald. 1990. Accounting and the theory of the firm. Journal of Accounting and Economics 12 (1–3): 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(90)90038-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colasse, Bernard, and Peter Standish. 1998. State versus market. Contending interests in the struggle to control French accounting standardisation. Journal of Management and Governance 2: 107–147. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009933418444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colette, Christine, and Jacques Richard. 2000. Comptabilité générale. Les systèmes français et anglo-saxons. Paris: Dunod.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Lautour, Joannidès, Danture Wickramasinghe Vassili, and Nicolas Berland. 2020. From critical accounting to an account of critique: The case of cultural emancipators. Accounting Forum 44 (2): 132–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/01559982.2019.1588452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desrosières, Alain. 1998. The politics of large numbers: A history of statistical reasoning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. Managing the economy. The state, the market and statistics. In The Cambridge history of science Vol. 7: Modern social and behavioral sciences, ed. Theodore M. Porter and Dorothy Ross, 553–564. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. Du réalisme des objets de la comptabilité nationale. In Gouverner par les nombres. L’argument statistiques II, ed. A. Desrosières, 257–270. Paris: Presses de l’Ecole des Mines.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. The economics of convention and statistics: The paradox of origins. Historical Social Research 36 (4): 64–81. https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.36.2011.4.64-81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desrosières, Alain, and Laurent Thévenot. 1988. Les catégories socio-professionnelles. 5th ed. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaz-Bone, Rainer. 2016. Convention theory, classification and quantification. Historical Social Research 41 (2): 48–71. https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.41.2016.2.48-71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding, Yuan, Jacques Richard, and Hervé Stolowy. 2008. Towards an understanding of the phases of goodwill accounting in four Western capitalist countries. From stakeholder model to shareholder model. Accounting, Organizations and Society 33 (7–8): 18–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2007.07.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, John. 1997. Cannibals with forks. The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Oxford: Casptone Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espeland, Wendy, and Paul M. Hirsch. 1990. Ownership changes, accounting practice and the redefinition of the corporation. Accounting, Organizations and Society 15 (1–2): 77–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(90)90015-M.

  • Espeland, Wendy, and Mitchell L, Stevens. 1998. Commensuration as a social process. Annual Review of Sociology 24: 313–343. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.313.

  • Eymard-Duvernay, François. 1989. Conventions de qualité et formes de coordination. Revue économique 40 (2): 329–359. https://doi.org/10.2307/3502117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eyraud, Corine. 2013. Le capitalisme au cœur de l’État. Comptabilité privée et action publique. Vulaines-sur-Seine: Éditions du Croquant.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ezzamel, Mahmoud, Jason Zezhong Xiao, and Aixiang Pan. 2007. Political ideology and accounting regulation in China. Accounting, Organizations and Society 32 (7–8): 669–700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2006.09.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flamholtz, Eric. 1974. Human resource accounting. Encino: Dickenson Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadrey, Jean. 2006. Les conventions de richesse au cœur de la comptabilité nationale. Anciennes et nouvelles controverses. In L’économie des conventions. Méthodes et résultats. Vol 1: Débats, ed. François Eymard-Duvernay, 311–324. Paris: La Découverte.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hines, Ruth. 1988. Financial accounting. In communicating reality, we construct reality. Accounting, Organizations and Society 13 (3): 251–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(88)90003-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood, Anthony G. 1992. Accounting calculation and the shifting sphere of the economic. The European Accounting Review 1 (1): 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638189200000007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramarz, Francis. 1989. La comptabilité nationale à la maison. In Justesse et justice dans le travail, Cahiers du Centre d’Etude de l’Emploi 33, ed. Luc Boltanski and Laurent Thévenot, 219–245. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemarchand, Yannick, and Nicolas Praquin. 2005. Falsifications et manipulations comptables. La mesure du profit, un enjeu social (1856–1914). Comptabilité-Contrôle-Audit 11 (3): 15–33. https://doi.org/10.3917/cca.113.0015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, Jonathan. 2014. Accounting for profit and the history of capital. Crit Historical Stud 1 (2): 171–214. https://doi.org/10.1086/677977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, Bill. 2002. Anthropological and accounting knowledge in Islamic banking and finance. Rethinking critical accounts. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 8 (4): 645–667. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.00127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, George Oliver. 1955. Accounting conventions. Past, present and future. The Analysts Journal 11 (3): 27–31. https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v11.n3.27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mennicken, Andrea, and Wendy N. Espeland. 2019. What’s new with numbers? Sociological approaches to the study of quantification. Annual Review of Sociology 45 (1): 223–245. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073117-041343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mennicken, Andrea, and Robert Salais, eds. 2022. The new politics of numbers. Utopia, evidence and democracy. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78201-6.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Morales, Jeremy, Yves Gendron, and Henri Guénin-Paracini. 2014. State privatization and the unrelenting expansion of neoliberalism. The case of the Greek financial crisis. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 25 (6): 423–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2013.08.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orléan, André. 2014. The empire of value. A new foundation for economics. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Theodore M. 1995. Trust in numbers. The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Puxty, Anthony G., Hugh C. Willmott, David J. Cooper, and Tony Lowe. 1987. Modes of regulation in advanced capitalism: Locating accountancy in four countries. Accounting, Organizations and Society 12 (3): 273–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(87)90041-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rambaud, Alexandre, and Jacques Richard. 2015. The “Triple Depreciation Line” instead of the “Triple Bottom Line”. Towards a genuine integrated reporting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 33: 92–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2015.01.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richard, Jacques. 1995. The evolution of accounting chart models in Europe from 1900 to 1945. European Accounting Review 4 (1): 87–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638189500000004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. Les trois stades du capitalisme comptable. In Les nouvelles normes comptables internationales. Instruments du capitalisme financier, ed. Michel Capron, 89–120. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robson, Keith, Hugh Willmott, David Cooper, and Anthony G. Puxty. 1994. The ideology of professional regulation and the markets for accounting labour. Three episodes in the recent history of the UK accountancy profession. Accounting, Organizations and Society 19 (6): 527–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(94)90022-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salais, Robert, Nicolas Baverez, and Bénédicte Reynaud. 1999. L’invention du chômage. 2nd ed. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Touchelay, Béatrice. 2016. Private accounting, statistics and national accounting in France. A unique relationship (1920–1960s). In The Social sciences of quantification. From politics of large numbers to target-driven policies, ed. Isabelle Bruno, Florence Jany-Catrice, and Béatrice Touchelay, 139–160. Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, Ross L., and Jerold L. Zimmerman. 1979. The demand for and supply of accounting theories. The market for excuses. The Accounting Review 54 (2): 273–305. jstor.org/stable/245516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeff, Stephen A. 1971. Forging accounting principles in five countries. A history and an analysis of trends. Champaign: Stipes Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018. An introduction to corporate accounting standards. Detecting Paton's and Littleton's influences. Accounting Historians Journal 45 (1): 45–67. https://doi.org/10.2308/aahj-10578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eve Chiapello .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Chiapello, E. (2024). A Convention Theorist Approach to Accounting. In: Diaz-Bone, R., Larquier, G.d. (eds) Handbook of Economics and Sociology of Conventions. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52130-1_54-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52130-1_54-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-52130-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-52130-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics