Skip to main content

Green Justification and Environmental Movements

  • 82 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter discusses the contribution of the economics and sociology of conventions (EC/SC) to the study of environmental movements. The first section briefly reviews how EC/SC has contributed to a renewal in the study of collective action by relating it to processes of social construction of public problems. An examination of how actors succeed in turning their “private troubles” into “public issues” reveals that the observable diversity of environmental movements can be explained by the diversity of ways in which (1) material dependencies matter to people and (2) people try to have these concerns legitimized. As illustrated by the debates on “green justification,” some arguments on the value of the environment relativize the political weight of the notion of justifiable social order in favor of the notions of ecosystem and biosphere and consequently challenge the “grammar of justification.” Ecological arguments can also highlight the importance of “familiar attachments” as a specific source of emplaced valuations. In contrast to reductive frameworks (e.g., the NIMBY, “not in my backyard,” syndrome), EC/SC takes into account not only how actors try to manage orders of worth, interest-based valuations, and familiar attachments in arguments about the value of the environment but also how they succeed or fail in having them recognized as publicly relevant. The final section discusses how EC/SC enables comparative and historical analyses of environmental movements, conflicts, and controversies and how it helps to shed light on the transformation of critique in an increasingly interconnected but still diverse world.

Keywords

  • Economics of convention
  • Environmental movements
  • Environmental conflicts
  • Sociology of conventions
  • Justification
  • Regimes of engagement
  • Valuation
  • Political cultures
  • Political ecology

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Batifoulier, Philippe, ed. 2001. Théorie des conventions. Paris: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgarten, Britta, Priska Daphi, and Peter Ullrich, eds. 2014. Conceptualizing culture in social movement research. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bessy, Christian, and Francis Chateauraynaud. 2019. The dynamics of authentication and counterfeits in markets. Historical Social Research 44 (1): 136–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blok, Anders. 2013. Pragmatic sociology as political ecology: On the many worths of nature(S). European Journal of Social Theory 16 (4): 492–510.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Blok, Anders, and Casper Bruun Jensen. 2019. The Anthropocene event in social theory: On ways of problematizing nonhuman materiality differently. The Sociological Review 67 (6): 1195–1211.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Blok, Anders, and Marie Leth Meilvang. 2014. Picturing urban green attachments: Civic activists moving between familiar and public engagements in the city. Sociology 49 (1): 19–37.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Blokker, Paul. 2011. Pragmatic sociology: Theoretical evolvement and empirical application. European Journal of Social Theory 14 (3): 251–261.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski, Luc, and Ève Chiapello. 2005. The new spirit of capitalism. London/New York: Verso.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski, Luc, and Laurent Thévenot. 2006. On justification. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Borghi, Vando. 2018. From knowledge to informational basis: Capability, capacity to aspire and research. Critical Sociology 44 (6): 899–920.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bouteloup, Claire. 2019. 40 ans après l’Amoco Cadiz: Science et militance. Natures Sciences Sociétés 27 (1): 82–88.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cefaï, Daniel. 2007. Pourquoi se mobilise-t-on. Les théories de l’action collective. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cefaï, Daniel, and Danny Trom, eds. 2001. Les formes de l’action collective. Mobilisations dans des arènes publiques. Paris: Editions de l’EHESS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centemeri, Laura. 2015. Investigating the “discrete memory” of the Seveso disaster in Italy. In Governing disasters. Beyond risk culture, ed. Sandrine Revet and Julien Langumier, 191–219. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. From public participation to place-based resistance. Environmental critique and modes of valuation in the struggles against the expansion of the Malpensa airport. Historical Social Research 42 (3): 97–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018. Commons and the new environmentalism of everyday life. Alternative value practices and multispecies commoning in the permaculture movement. Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia 64 (2): 289–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centemeri, Laura, and Gildas Renou. 2017. Jusqu’où l’économie écologique pense-t-elle l’inégalité environnementale ? Autour de l’œuvre de Joan Martinez-Alier. In Les inégalités environnementales, ed. Catherine Larrère, 53–72. Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centemeri, Laura, Sezin Topçu, and J. Peter Burgess, eds. 2022. Rethinking post-disaster recovery: Socio-anthropological perspectives on repairing environments. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chateauraynaud, Francis, and Josquin Debaz. 2017. Aux bords de l’irréversible. Sociologie pragmatique des transformations. Paris: Editions Petra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiapello, E. 2013. Capitalism and its criticisms. In New spirits of capitalism? Crises, justifications, and dynamics, ed. Paul Du Gay and Glenn Morgan, 60–81. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, Anette Gravgaard, Jakob Laage-Thomsen, and Anders Blok. 2019. Urban green communities: Towards a pragmatic sociology of civic commonality in sustainable city-making. In The role of non-state actors in the green transition, ed. Jens Hoff, Quentin Gausset, and Simon Lex, 114–135. London: Routledge.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Della Porta, Donatella, and Mario Diani. 1999. Social movements. An introduction. Malden/Oxford/Carlton: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaz-Bone, Rainer. 2011. The Methodological Standpoint of the Économie Des Conventions. Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung 36(4):43–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodier, Nicolas, and Janine Barbot. 2016. The force of dispositifs. Annales 71 (2): 291–317.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Doidy, Eric. 2008. Cultiver l’enracinement. Réappropriations militantes de l’attachement chez les éleveurs jurassiens. Politix 83 (3): 155–177.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Dubuisson-Quellier, Sophie. 2013. A market mediation strategy: How social movements seek to change firms’ practices by promoting new principles of product valuation. Organization Studies 34 (5–6): 683–703.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Eranti, Veikko. 2017. Re-visiting NIMBY: From conflicting interests to conflicting valuations. The Sociological Review 65 (2): 285–301.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1970. The order of things. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladarev, Boris, and Markku Lonkila. 2013. Justifying civic activism in Russia and Finland. Journal of Civil Society 9 (4): 375–390.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Granjou, Céline. 2015. Grandeurs de l’écologie. D’un écotron à l’autre. Politix 28 (111): 27–45.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, Tim. 2011. Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. London: Routledge.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Jobin, Paul. 2006. Maladies industrielles et renouveau syndical au Japon. Paris: Éditions de l’EHESS.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2021. Our ‘good neighbor’ Formosa plastics: Petrochemical damage(s) and the meanings of money. Environmental Sociology 7 (1): 40–53.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Koveneva, Olga. 2011. Les communautés politiques en France et en Russie. Regards croisés sur quelques modalités du “vivre ensemble”. Annales 66 (3): 787–817.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Laage-Thomsen, Jakob, and Anders Blok. 2020. Civic modes of greening the city? Urban natures in-between familiar engagement and green critique. Local Environment 25 (2): 162–178.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lafaye, Claudette, and Laurent Thévenot. 2017. An ecological justification? Conflicts in the development of nature. In Justification, evaluation and critique in the study of organizations, Research in the sociology of organizations, ed. Charlotte Cloutier and Jean-Pascal Gond, vol. 52, 273–300. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, Michèle, and Laurent Thévenot, eds. 2000. Rethinking comparative cultural sociology. Repertoires of evaluation in France and the United States. Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehtimäki, Tomi. 2018. Constructing common causes: Justifications for and against organic agriculture in the Finnish media. The International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food 25 (1): 9–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019. Making a difference. Constructing relations between organic and conventional agriculture in Finland in the emergence of organic agriculture. Sociologia Ruralis 59 (1): 113–136.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Luhtakallio, Eeva. 2012. Practicing democracy: Local activism and politics in France and Finland. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019. Group formation, styles, and grammars of commonality in local activism. The British Journal of Sociology 70: 1159–1178.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Luhtakallio, Eeva, and Iddo Tavory. 2018. Patterns of engagement: Identities and social movement organizations in Finland and Malawi. Theory and Society 47: 151–174.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Alier, Joan. 2002. The environmentalism of the poor. A study of ecological conflicts and valuation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melucci, Alberto. 1996. Challenging codes. Collective action in the information age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, Charles Wright. 1959. Sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mol, Annemarie. 1999. Ontological politics. A word and some questions. The Sociological Review, 47, special issue, Actor network theory and after (Edited by John Law and John Hassard), 74–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyberg, Daniel, and Christopher Wright. 2013. Corporate corruption of the environment: Sustainability as a process of compromise. British Journal of Sociology 64 (3): 405–424.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Richard-Ferroudji, Audrey. 2011. Limites du modèle délibératif. Composer avec différents formats de participation. Politix 96 (4): 161–181.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2020. Nouvelles formes de mise en valeur d’attachements spirituels à l’environnement en Inde. Cahiers d’Outre-Mer 73 (281): 105–127.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rootes, Christopher, and Robert Brulle. 2013. Environmental movements. In The Wiley-Blackwell encyclopedia of social and political movements, ed. David A. Snow, Porta della Donatella, Bert Klandermans, and Doug McAdam, 413–419. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlosberg, David, and Romand Coles. 2016. The new environmentalism of everyday life: Sustainability, material flows and movements. Contemporary Political Theory 15 (2): 160–181.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Silva-Castañeda, Laura. 2012. A forest of evidence: Third-party certification and multiple forms of proof. A case study on oil palm plantations in Indonesia. Agriculture and Human Values 29: 361–170.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Snow, David A., Burke E. Rochford, Steven Worden, and Robert Benford. 1986. Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review 51 (4): 464–481.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Thévenot, Laurent. 2007. The plurality of cognitive formats and engagements: Moving between the familiar and the public. European Journal of Social Theory 10 (3): 413–427.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2020. How does politics take closeness into account? Returns from Russia. International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society 33 (2): 221–250.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Thévenot, Laurent, Michael Moody, and Claudette Lafaye. 2000. Forms of valuing nature: Arguments and modes of justification in French and American environmental disputes. In Rethinking comparative cultural sociology: Repertoires of evaluation in France and the United States, ed. Michèle Lamont and Laurent Thévenot, 229–272. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Touraine, Alain, ed. 1980. La prophétie anti-nucléaire. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trom, Danny. 1999. De la réfutation de l’effet NIMBY considérée comme une pratique militante. Notes pour une approche pragmatique de l’activité revendicative. Revue française de science politique 49 (1): 31–50.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, Peter. 1999. After justification. Repertoires of evaluation and the sociology of modernity. European Journal of Social Theory 2 (3): 341–357.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ylä-Anttila, Tuomas, Juho Vesa, Veikko Eranti, Anna Kukkonen, Tomi Lehtimäki, Markku Lonkila, and Eeva Luhtakallio. 2018. Up with ecology, down with economy? The consolidation of the idea of climate change mitigation in the global public sphere. European Journal of Communication 33 (6): 587–603.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Centemeri .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Centemeri, L. (2022). Green Justification and Environmental Movements. In: Diaz Bone, R., de Larquier, G. (eds) Handbook of Economics and Sociology of Conventions. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52130-1_37-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52130-1_37-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-52130-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-52130-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social Sciences