Skip to main content

Public Space

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Urban and Regional Futures

Definition

Public space refers to an urban space that is freely accessible to all people. Accessibility here refers not only to the ability to physically enter public space, but also the ability to participate in, and take decisions about, the activities taken place in it (Carmona et al. 2003; Shaftoe 2008). Conventional categorizations of public space include urban parks, civic plazas, streets, markets, playgrounds, community open spaces, waterfronts, greenways, and indoor public venues.

Public space is a physical entity associated with the political concept of public sphere (Low and Smith 2006). It can also be referred to as public realm when the physical aspect and the political aspect coincide. Understandings of public space have recently moved away from the dichotomy of public and private, with public space being recognized as bearing various degrees of publicness. Dimensions of publicness are further discussed below.

Synonyms

Public realm; Public sphere; Urban open space

Introduction...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Akkar, M. (2005). The changing ‘publicness’ of contemporary public spaces: a case study of the Grey’s monument area, Newcastle upon Tyne. Urban Design International, 10(2), 95–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (2002). Cities: Reimagining the urban. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. (2011). The cosmopolitan canopy: Race and civility in everyday life. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (1998 [1958]). The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, G. J., & Voogd, H. (1990). Selling the city: Marketing approaches in public sector urban planning. London: Belhaven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, R. (1994). “An honest living”: Street vendors, municipal regulation and the black public sphere. The Yale Law Journal, 103, 2120–2131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, T. (2001). The future of public space: Beyond invented streets and reinvented places. Journal of the American Planning Association, 67(1), 9–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. (1976). The coming of post-industrial society. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, W. (1979). One-way street and other writings. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benn, S., & Gaus, G. (1983). Public and private in social life. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berwyn, E. (2013). Mind the gap: creating opportunities from empty space. Journal of Urban Regeneration & Renewal, 6(2), 148–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, P., & Williams, L. (2012). The temporary city. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blomley, N. (2007). How to turn a beggar into a bus stop: Law, traffic and the function of the place. Urban Studies, 44(9), 1697–1712.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bostic, R., Kim, A. M., & Valenzuela, A. (2016). Contesting the streets, vending and public space in global cities. Cityscape: A journal of Policy Development and Research, 18, 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, C. (1993). The City of illusion: New York’s public places. In P. L. Knox (Ed.), The restless urban landscape (pp. 111–126). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, C. M. (1996). CyberCities: Visual perception in the age of electronic communication. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burda, I., & Nyka, L. (2017). Providing public space continuities in post-industrial areas through remodelling land/water connections. Materials Science and Engineering, 245, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmona, M. (2014). The place-shaping continuum: A theory of urban design process. Journal of Urban Design, 19(1), 2–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmona, M., & Wunderlich, F. (2012). Capital spaces: The multiple complex public spaces of a global city (1st ed.). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203118856.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carmona, M., Heath, T., Oc, T., & Tiesdell, S. (2003). Public places urban spaces: The dimensions of urban design. London: Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase, J., Crawford, M., & Kaliski, J. (1999). Everyday urbanism. New York: Monacelli Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang, D., Pan, S., Li, Z., Yuan, T., Jiang, B., Gan, D., Sheng, B., Han, J., Wang, T., & Liu, Z. (2020). Large-scale public venues as medical emergency sites in disasters: Lessons from COVID-19 and the use of Fangcang shelter hospitals in Wuhan, China. BMJ Global Health, 5(6), e002815. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002815.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Franck, K., & Stevens, Q. (2006). Loose space: Possibility and diversity in urban life. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, 25(26), 56–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1963). Behaviour in public places. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goh, K., Loukaitou-Sideris, A., & Mukhija, V. (2022). Just urban design: the struggle for a public city. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gospodini, A. (2006). Portraying, classifying and understanding the emerging landscapes in the post-industrial city. Cities, 23(5), 311–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., & Marvin, S. (1997). Telecommunications and the city: Electronic spaces, urban places. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, D. (1995). The power of place: Urban landscapes as public history. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hee, L., Schrieffer, Su, N., & Li, Z. (2008). From post-industrial landscape to creative precincts: Emergent spaces in Chinese cities. International Development Planning Review, 30(1), 249–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hou, J. (2010). Insurgent public space. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kittler, F. A., & Griffin, M. (Trans.). (1996). The city is a medium. New Literary History, 27(4), 717–729.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koeck, R. (2013). Cine-scapes: Cinematic spaces in architecture and cities. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, M. (2004). Brave new neighbourhoods: The privatisation of public space. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (1968 [1996]). The right to the city. In E. Kofman & E. Lebas (Eds.), Writings on cities (pp. 147–159). Cambridge: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H., & Nicholson-Smith, D. (1991). The production of space (Vol. 142). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loukaitou-Sideris, A. (2020). Responsibilities and challenges of urban design in the 21st century. Journal of Urban Design, 25(1), 22–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loukaitou-Sideris, A., & Banerjee, T. (1998). Urban design downtown: Poetics and politics of form. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Low, S. (2000). On the plaza: The politics of public space and culture. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Low, S., & Iveson, K. (2016). Propositions for more just urban public spaces. City, 20(1), 10–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Low, S., & Smith, N. (Eds.). (2006). The politics of public space. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madanipour, A. (2003). Public and private spaces of the city. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madanipour, A. (2018). Temporary use of space: Urban processes between flexibility, opportunity and precarity. Urban Studies, 55(5), 1093–1110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse, P. (2004). The threat of terrorism and the right to the city. Fordham Urb. LJ, 32, 767.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M., Deas, I., & Hincks, S. (2019). The role of temporary use in urban regeneration: Ordinary and extraordinary approaches in Bristol and Liverpool. Planning Practice & Research, 34(5), 537–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minton, A. (2006). The privatisation of public space. London: RICS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, W. J. (1995). City of bits: Space, place, and the infobahn. Cambirdge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, D. (2003). The right to the city: Social justice and the fight for public space. New York: Guilford press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, L. (1961). The city in history: Its origins, its transformations, and its prospects. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munoz, L. (2019). Cultural gentrification: Gourmet and Latinx immigrant food trucks vendors in Los Angeles. Journal of Urban Cultural Studies, 6(1), 95–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, S. (2015). Urban theory and the urban experience: Encountering the city. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penz, F., & Lu, A. (Eds.). (2011). Urban cinematics understanding urban phenomena through the moving image. Bristol: Intellect Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadowy, K., & Lisiecki, A. (2019). Post-industrial, post-socialist or new productive city? Case study of the spatial and functional change of the chosen Warsaw industrial sites after 1989. City, Territory and Architecture, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40410-019-0103-2.

  • Sandercock, L. (2003). Cosmopolis II: Mongrel cities in the 21st century. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sennett, R. (1970). Uses of disorder. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaftoe, H. (2008). Convivial public spaces: Creating effective public places. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, M. (2011). Sentient city: Ubiquitous computing, architecture, and the future of urban space. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorkin, M. (1992). Variations on a Theme Park: The new American city and the end of public space. New York: Hill and Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele, J. (2013). How ‘meanwhile’ came to the high street. Journal of Urban Regeneration and Renewal, 6(2), 172–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thwaites, K., Porta, S., Romice, O., & Greaves, M. (Eds.). (2007). Urban sustainability through environmental design: Approaches to time-people-place responsive urban spaces. New York: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonkiss, F. (2013). Cities by design: The social life of urban form. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, A. M. (2013). Smart cities: Big data, civic hackers, and the quest for a new utopia. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varna, G., & Tiesdell, S. (2010). Assessing the publicness of public space: The star model of publicness. Journal of Urban Design, 15(4), 575–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2010.502350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virilio, P. (1991). translated by Moshenberg, D. The lost dimension. New York: Semiotext(e).

    Google Scholar 

  • Virilio, P. (1994 [1989]). translated by Rose, J. The vision machine. New York: Semiotext(e).

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, M. (2002). Publics and Counterpublics. Public Culture, 14(1), 49–90. https://www.muse.jhu.edu/article/26277

  • Whyte, W. H. (1988). City: Rediscovering the center. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigley, M. (2001). Network fever. Grey Room, 1(4), 82–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, P. (1959). Town and square: From the agora to the village green. New York: Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zukin, S. (1991). Landscapes of power: From Detroit to Disney world. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zukin, S. (1995). The cultures of cities. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fei Chen .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Chen, F., Piazzoni, F., Xi, J., Shun Kei, Y., Antonopoulou, A. (2021). Public Space. In: The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Urban and Regional Futures. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51812-7_172-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51812-7_172-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-51812-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-51812-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics