Skip to main content

Governing for Food Security: A Cultural Perspective

  • 24 Accesses

Terms Definition: Key Concepts

  • Food system – all activities that permit to achieve food security that is providing access to sufficient, safe, nutritious food for healthy and active life.

  • Governance – the act to coordinate a multiplicity of public-private actors towards the achievement of positive outcomes.

  • Culture – the diverse norms and values that enable multiple parties to actualize their preferred form of organization.

  • Food sovereignty – an approach that put those who produce, distribute, and consume food at the heart of food systems and policies and this in order to not let food systems depend on the demands of markets and corporations.

Synonyms

Organization; Food security; Food governance; Policy design

Introduction

This entry deals with the governance of food systems. It exposes the problematic aspect of current global schemes by providing a picture, an interpretation of the context where the “risk of hunger” breeds and emerges, namely a governance network that functions as a...

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Beck, U. (1999). World risk society. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blay-Palmer, A., Santini, G., Halliday, J., Malec, R., Carey, J., Keller, L., … van Veenhuizen, R. (2021). City region food systems: Building resilience to COVID-19 and other shocks. Sustainability, 13(3), 1325.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carey, R., Murphy, M., & Alexandra, L. (2020). COVID-19 highlights the need to plan for healthy, equitable and resilient food systems. Cities & health, 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czarniawska, B. (2009). Organizing in the face of risks and threat. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czarniawska, B. (2004). Narratives in social science research. Sage.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas. (1987). How institution thinks. London: Routledge and Kegan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M., & Wildavsky, A. (1983). Risk and culture: An essay on the selection of technological and environmental dangers. London: University of California Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (1994). Risk and blame: Essay on cultural theory. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (2005). Grid and group, new development. Workshop on complexity and cultural theories in honour of Michael Thompson. London: LSE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (1999). The evolution of a parsimonious model. Geo Journal, 47, 411–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (1970). Natural symbols. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (2003). Being fair to Hierarchists. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 151(4), 1349–1370.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fabianski, C. J. C. (2017). Complex partnership for the delivery of urban rail infrastructure project (URIP): How culture matters for the treatment of risk and uncertainty (Doctoral dissertation, UCL (University College London)).

    Google Scholar 

  • Head, B. W. (2019). Forty years of wicked problems literature: Forging closer links to policy studies. Policy and Society, 38(2), 180–197.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Head, B. W., & Alford, J. (2015). Wicked problems: Implications for public policy and management. Administration & society, 47(6), 711–739.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C. (1998). The art of the state: Culture, rhetoric and public management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hospes, O., & Brons, A. (2016). Food system governance: A systematic literature review. Food Systems Governance, 13–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R. (1981). The dictionary of human geography. Oxford: Blackwell Reference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kickert, W., Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. (1997). Managing complex networks: Strategies for the public sector. London: Sage.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Klijn, E. H. (2008). Governance and governance networks in Europe: An assessment of ten years of research on the theme. Public Management Review, 10(4), 505–525.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. (2016). Governance network in the public sector. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. F. (2006). Institutional design: Changing institutional features of networks. Public Management Review, 8(1), 141–160.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Klijn, E. H., & Teisman, G. R. (2000). Managing public private partnership: Influencing processes and institutional context of public private partnership. In O. Van Heffen, W. J. M. Kickert, & J. J. A. Thomassen (Eds.), Governance in modern society: Effect, change and formation of government institutions. Springer: Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koc, M., & Dahlberg, K. A. (1999). The restructuring of food systems: Trends, research, and policy issues. Agriculture and Human Values, 16(2), 109–116.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman, J. (1993). Modern governance: New government-society interactions. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koppenjan, J. (2012). The new public governance in public service delivery.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz, C. F., & Snowden, D. J. (2003). The new dynamics of strategy: Sense-making in a complex and complicated world. IBM Systems Journal, 42(3), 462–483.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mousseau, F. (2021). People vs. agribusiness corporations: The battle over global food and agriculture governance. Policy brief. The Oakland Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olli, E. (1999). Rejection of cultural biases and effects on party preference. In M. Thompson, G. Grendstad, & P. Selle (Eds.), Science. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, S. P. (2006). The new public governance? Public Management Review, 8(3), 377–387.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrander. (2002). One-and two dimensional models of the distribution of beliefs in Douglas, M. (2002). Essays in the sociology of perception. Routledge: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel, R. (2009). Food sovereignty. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 36(3), 663–706.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. G. (2017). What is so wicked about wicked problems? A conceptual analysis and a research program. Policy and Society, 36(3), 385–396.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (2006). Governance, government and the state (pp. 209–222). The state: Theories and issues.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2000). Public management reform: A comparative analysis (Vol. 89). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. (1997). Understanding governance. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchey, T. (2013). Wicked problems. Acta morphologica generalis, 2(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittel, H. W., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research: Perspectives and practice. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tansey, J. (2004). Risk as politics, culture as power. Journal of Risk Research, 7(1), 17–32.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, M., Ellis, R., & Wildavsky, A. (1990). Cultural theory. Westview Press, Boulder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Bers, C., Delaney, A., Eakin, H., Cramer, L., Purdon, M., Oberlack, C., … Vasileiou, I. (2019). Advancing the research agenda on food systems governance and transformation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 39, 94–102.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Werveij, M., Douglas, M., Engel, C., Hendriks, F., Lohmann, S., Ney, S., Rayner, S., & Thompson, M. (2006). Clumpsy solution for a complex world: The case of climate change. Public Administration, 84(4), 817–843.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wettenhall, R. (2003). The rhetoric and reality of public-private partnership. Public 105 Organization Review, 3(1), 77–107.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Fabianski, C., Suppiah, S. (2022). Governing for Food Security: A Cultural Perspective. In: The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Urban and Regional Futures. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51812-7_114-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51812-7_114-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-51812-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-51812-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Earth & Environm. ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials Science