Skip to main content

A Mid-Career Faculty Agenda

A Review of Four Decades of Research and Practice

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research

Part of the book series: Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research ((HATR,volume 36))

Abstract

Described as the “bridge between faculty generations” (Baldwin and Chang, Liberal Education, 92(4), 28–35, 2006), mid-career faculty members play an important role in colleges and universities. Mid-career faculty members serve as mentors to early career colleagues and occupy critical leadership roles, formal and informal, on their respective campuses (Baker et al. Developing faculty in liberal arts colleges: Aligning individual needs and organizational goals. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2017a, 2018). Yet, mid-career faculty members often assume these roles with little to no support to be successful in these roles and often to the detriment of their own career advancement (Baker, Lunsford, Pifer; Ward and Wolf-Wendel, Academic motherhood: How faculty manage work and family. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2012). Despite the importance of mid-career faculty to a thriving academy, there is an opportunity for those tasked with faculty development responsibilities to better understand the experiences of their mid-career faculties, particularly women and other underrepresented academics, and to provide appropriate and adequate career-stage-specific supports. An important question arises: how can colleges and universities better support their mid-career faculty? This chapter presents a meta-synthesis of four decades of research and practice focused on mid-career faculty and offers an agenda moving forward to better serve this faculty population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4(2), 139–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, M. A., & Jovanovic, J. (2015). Starting at the crossroads: Intersectional approaches to institutionally supporting underrepresented minority women STEM faculty. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 21(2), 141–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, M. A., & Jovanovic, J. (2017). The intersectional matrix: Rethinking institutional change for URM women in STEM. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 10(3), 216–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, A. E. (2010). Supporting faculty members across their careers. In K. J. Gillespie & D. L. Robertson (Eds.), A guide to faculty development (pp. 363–378). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, A. E., & McDaniels, M. (2006). Preparing the professoriate of the future: Graduate student socialization for faculty roles. In Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research (Vol. 21, pp. 397–456). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, A. E., & Pilat, M. (1990). Tension, stress, and the tapestry of faculty lives. Academe, 76(1), 38–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, A. E., & Sorcinelli, M. D. (2013). The future of faculty development: Where are we going? New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2013(133), 85–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bair, C. R., & Haworth, J. G. (1999). Doctoral student attrition and persistence: A meta synthesis of research. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, San Antonio, TX. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 437 008).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bair, C. R., & Haworth, J. G. (2004). Doctoral student attrition and persistence: A meta-synthesis of research. In Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 481–534). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, V. L. (2020, March 25). How colleges can better help faculty during the pandemic. Inside HigherEd. https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2020/03/25/recommendations-how-colleges-can-better-support-their-faculty-during-covid-19.

  • Baker, V. L., Lunsford, L. G., & Pifer, M. J. (2015). Systems alignment for comprehensive faculty development in liberal arts colleges. To Improve the Academy, 34(1–2), 91–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, V. L., Lunsford, L. G., & Pifer, M. J. (2017a). Developing faculty in liberal arts colleges: Aligning individual needs and organizational goals. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, V. L., Terosky, A. L., & Martinez, E. (2017b). Faculty members’ scholarly learning across institutional types: ASHE Higher Education report. John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, V. L., Pifer, M. J., & Lunsford, L. G. (2018). Faculty development in liberal arts colleges: a look at divisional trends, preferences, and needs. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(7), 1336–1351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, V. L., Lunsford, L. G., Neisler, G., Pifer, M. J., & Terosky, A. L. (Eds.), (2019). Success after tenure: Supporting mid-career faculty. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, V. L., Lunsford, L. G., & Pifer, M. J. (2019a). Patching up the “leaking leadership pipeline”: Fostering mid-career faculty succession management. Research in Higher Education, 60(6), 823–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, V. L., Lunsford, L. G., & Pifer, M. J. (2019b). The academic leadership institute for mid-career faculty. In V. L. Baker, L. G. Lunsford, G. Neisler, A. L. Terosky, & M. J. Pifer (Eds.), Success after tenure: Supporting mid-career faculty (pp. 35–54). Sterling: Stylus Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, V. L., Lunsford, L. G., Neisler, G., & Pifer, M. J. (2019c). Introduction. In V. L. Baker, L. G. Lunsford, G. Neisler, A. L. Terosky, & M. J. Pifer (Eds.), Success after tenure: Supporting mid-career faculty (pp. 1–11). Sterling: Stylus Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker-Fletcher, K., Carr, D., Menn, E., & Ramsay, N. J. (2005). Taking stock at mid-career: Challenges and opportunities for faculty. Teaching Theology and Religion, 8(1), 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R. G. (1981). Expanding faculty options. Washington, D.C.: American Association for Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R. G., & Blackburn, R. T. (1981). The academic career as a developmental process: Implications for higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 52(6), 598–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R. G., & Chang, D. A. (2006). Reinforcing our “keystone” faculty: Strategies to support faculty in the middle years of academic life. Liberal Education, 92(4), 28–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R. G., Brakerman, L., Edgerton, R., Hagberg, J., & Maher, T. (1981). Expanding faculty options: Career development projects at colleges and universities. Washington, D. C: American Association for Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R. G., Lunceford, C. J., & Vanderlinden, K. E. (2005). Faculty in the middle years: Illuminating an overlooked phase of academic life. The Review of Higher Education, 29(1), 97–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R., DeZure, D., Shaw, A., & Moretto, K. (2008). Mapping the terrain of mid-career faculty at a research university: Implications for faculty and academic leaders. Change, 40(5), 46–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, E. J., Bisantz, A., Cao, C. G., Carayon, P., Cooke, N., & Pritchett, A. R. (2019, November). Moving forward from the mid-career: Path options and strategies for mid-career academics. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 484–487). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belker, J. S. (1985). The education of mid-career professors: Is it continuing? College Teaching, 33(2), 68–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, R., Laird, J., Pfirman, S., Mutter, J., Balstad, R., & Cane, M. (2005). An experiment in institutional transformation: The NSF ADVANCE Program for Women at the Earth Institute at Columbia University. Oceanography, 18(1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2005.67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berheide, C. W. (1986). Discussion and commentary on the academic profession in transition. Teaching Sociology, 14(1), 35–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bickel, J. (2016). Not too late to reinvigorate: How mid-career faculty can continue growing. Academic Medicine, 91(12), 1601–1605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blain, K. (2020, May 22). From associate to full professor. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/advice/2020/05/22/guidance-how-move-associate-full-professor-opinion?utm_source=Inside%20Higher%20Ed&utm_campaign=15b7f9faf8-DNU_2019_COPY_02&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_1fcbc04421-15b7f9faf8-197499405&mc_cid=15b7f9faf8&mc_eid=d7c23a94a2&fbclid=IwAR3zS_4WNsGkR6pEzyQQi4Ng8vRt8ANgkQkJStO2x8VFrjtaNf-ecWC584Y.

  • Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunch, K., Huet, Y., Rorrer, A., & Roberson, L. (2011). Removing barriers to full professor: A mentoring program for associate professors. Change, 43(6), 38–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caffarella, R. S., & Zinn, L. F. (1999). Professional development for faculty: A conceptual framework of barriers and supports. Innovative Higher Education, 23(4), 241–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caffarella, R. S., Armour, R. A., Fuhrmann, B. S., & Wergin, J. F. (1989). Mid-career faculty: Refocusing the perspective. The Review of Higher Education, 12(4), 403–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campion, M. W., Bhasin, R. M., Beaudette, D. J., Shann, M. H., & Benjamin, E. J. (2016). Mid-career faculty development in academic medicine: How does it impact faculty and institutional vitality? The Journal of Faculty Development, 30(3), 49–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canale, A. M., Herdklotz, C., & Wild, L. (2013). Mid-career faculty support: The middle years of the academic profession. Faculty Career Development Services, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, C. R., & Freeman, S., Jr. (2020). To be young, gifted, and Black: The relationship between age and race in earning full professorships. The Review of Higher Education, 43(3), 811–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, S. M., & Corcoran, M. E. (1989). Faculty renewal and change. New Directions for Institutional Research, 63(1), 19–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collaborative on Academic Careers in Higher Education (COACHE). Harvard Graduate School of Education. https://coache.gse.harvard.edu/.

  • Crawford, C. J. M. (2012). A qualitative study of the professional growth of mid-career community college faculty. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W., & Brown, M. L. (1992). How chairpersons enhance faculty research: A grounded theory study. The Review of Higher Education, 16(1), 41–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croom, N. N. (2017). Promotion beyond tenure: Unpacking racism and sexism in the experiences of Black womyn professors. The Review of Higher Education, 40(4), 557–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croom, N., & Patton, L. (2011). The miner’s canary: A critical race perspective on the representation of black women full professors. Negro Educational Review, 62-63(1–4), 13–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, A., & Palmer, E. (2009). Mentoring circles in higher education. Higher education research & development, 28(2), 125–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeFelippo, A., & Giles, D. (2015). Mid-career faculty and high levels of community engagement: Intentional reshaping of meaningful careers. International Journal of Research on Service-Learning and Community Engagement, 3(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • DeZure, D., Shaw, A., & Rojewski, J. (2014). Cultivating the next generation of academic leaders: Implications for administrators and faculty. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 46(1), 6–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edgerton, R. (1993). The re-examination of faculty priorities. Change, 25(4), 10–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellertson, S. (2004). Mid-career faculty involvement in learning communities: An exploration of outcomes and validity. Doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University, Ames.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E. (1950/1963). Childhood and society (2nd ed.). New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espinosa, L. L., Turk, J. M., Taylor, M., & Chessman, H. M. (2019). Race and ethnicity in higher education: A status report. American Council on Education. https://tacc.org/sites/default/files/documents/2019-03/race-and-ethnicity-in-higher-education.pdf.

  • Feldman, D. C., & Turnley, W. H. (2001). A field of study of adjunct faculty: The impact of career stage reactions to non-tenure-track jobs. Journal of Career Development, 28(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, J. J. (1996). Faculty vitality in higher education. In Integrating research on faculty: Seeking new ways to communicate about the academic life of faculty, 71–80. Conference report from the 1994 forum, National Center for Education Statistics, Association for Institutional Research, and American Association of State Colleges and Universities. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, NCES 96-849.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furniss, W. T. (1981). Reshaping faculty careers. Change, 13(7), 38–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gappa, J., Ausin, A., & Trice, A. (2007). Rethinking faculty work: Higher education’s strategic imperative. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, S. K., & Blackstone, A. (2013). “Putting in your time”: Faculty experiences in the process of promotion to professor. Innovative Higher Education, 38(5), 411–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, R. L. (1993). Research and relevant knowledge: American research universities since World War II. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, J. A. (1982). Faculty development and human resource management in the academic medical setting. Journal of Medical Education, 57, 860–865.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golembiewski, R. T. (1978). Midlife transition and mid-career crisis: A special case for individual development. Public Administration Review, 38(3), 215–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golper, T. A., & Feldman, H. I. (2008). New challenges and paradigms for mid-career faculty in academic medical centers: Key strategies for success for mid-career medical school faculty. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 3(6), 180–1874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant-Vallone, E. J., & Ensher, E. A. (2017). Re-crafting careers for mid-career faculty: A qualitative study. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 17(5), 10–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guglielmo, B. J., Edwards, D. J., Franks, A. S., Naughton, C. A., Schonder, K. S., Stamm, P., Thorton, P., & Popovich, N. G. (2011). A critical appraisal of and recommendations for faculty development. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 75(6), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, J. (2016). Dissecting a gendered organization: Implications for career trajectories for mid-career faculty women in STEM. The Journal of Higher Education, 87(5), 605–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heilig, J. V., Flores, I. W., Barros Souza, A. E., Barry, J. C., & Monroy, S. B. (2019). Considering the ethnoracial and gender diversity of faculty in United States college and university intellectual communities. Hispanic Journal of Law & Policy, 2, 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermanowicz, J. C. (2012). The sociology of academic careers: Problems and prospects. In J. C. Smart & M. B. Paulsen (Eds.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 207–248). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Higher Education Research Institute (HERI). University of California, Los Angeles. https://heri.ucla.edu/.

  • Hubbard, G. T., & Atkins, S. S. (1995). The professor as a person: The role of faculty well-being in faculty development. Innovative Higher Education, 20(2), 117–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huston, T., & Weaver, C. L. (2008). Peer coaching: Professional development for experienced faculty. Innovative Higher Education, 33, 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, A., Layne, M., & Terpheny, J. (2009). AC 2009-836: Empowering women as leaders and scholars: Advance leadership programs at a doctoral stem-dominant university. In American Society for Engineering Education (pp. 1–10).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalivoda, P., Sorrell, G. R., & Simpson, R. D. (1994). Nurturing faculty vitality by matching institutional interventions with career-stage needs. Innovative Higher Education, 18(4), 255–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, B., & Miller, M. T. (2000). Faculty development: Research findings, the literature base, and directions for future scholarship. US Department of Education, Washington, DC. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED446574).

    Google Scholar 

  • Karpiak, I. E. (1996). Ghosts in a wilderness: Problems and priorities of faculty at mid-career and midlife. The Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 26(3), 49–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karpiak, I. E. (1997). University professors at midlife: Being a part of… but feeling apart. To Improve the Academy, 16(1), 20–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazlauskas, E. J., & Maxwell, W. (1991). Faculty development and the community college LRC. Community & Junior College Libraries, 7(1), 81–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, D. K. (1990). Reviving the “deadwood”: How to create an institutional climate to encourage the professional growth and revitalization of mid-career faculty in the community college. Graduate seminar paper, Claremont College, Claremont, CA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 318 518).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, D. K. (1991). Linking faculty development with adult development: An individualized approach to professional growth and renewal. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED337103.

  • Kezar, A. (2014, January 7). The rise of adjunct faculty (M. Moss-Coane, Interviewer). Retrieved from https://whyy.org/episodes/the-rise-of-adjunct-faculty/.

  • Kezar, A., & Maxey, D. (2016). Recognizing the need for a new faculty model. In A. Kezar & D. Maxey (Eds.), Envisioning the faculty for the 21st century: Moving to a mission-oriented and learner-centered model (pp. 23–41). New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruse, E. J., & Albo, D. (2018). Mentorship for mid-career decisions: Aspirations for personal organizational leadership opportunities. In Surgical Mentorship and Leadership (pp. 91–102). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kulp, A. M., Wolf-Wendel, L. E., & Smith, D. G. (2019). The possibility of promotion: How race and gender predict promotion clarity for associate professors. Teachers College Record, 121(5), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz, J., & Proctor, T. M. (2011). Special issue: Engaging mid-career faculty. Chalk: Teaching & Faculty Development, 2(1), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamber, J., Ardizzone, T., Dworkin, T., Guskin, S., Olsen, D., Parnell, P., & Thelen, D. (1993). A “community of scholars?”: Conversations among mid-career faculty at a public research university. To Improve the Academy, 12(1), 13–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, L. M., Seipel, M. T., Shelley, M. C., Gahn, S. W., Ko, S. Y., Schenkenfelder, M., Rover, D. T., Schmittmann, B., & Heitmann, M. M. (2019). The academic environment and faculty well-being: The role of psychological needs. Journal of Career Assessment, 27(1), 167–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laursen, S. L., & Austin, A. E. (2014). StratEGIC toolkit: Strategies for effecting gender equity and institutional change. Boulder/East Lansing. www.strategictoolkit.org.

  • Laursen, S. L., & Austin, A. E. (in press). Building gender equity in the academy: Institutional strategies for change. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laursen, S., & Rocque, B. (2009). Faculty development for institutional change: Lessons from an advance project. Change, 41(2), 18–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lisnic, R., Zajicek, A., & Kerr, B. (2019). Work–family balance and tenure reasonableness: Gender differences in faculty assessment. Sociological Spectrum, 39(5), 340–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansbach, J., & Austin, A. E. (2018). Nuanced perspectives about online teaching: Mid-career and senior faculty voices reflecting on academic work in the digital age. Innovative Higher Education, 43(4), 257–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, K. R. (2014). Perspectives on midcareer faculty and advice for supporting them. COACHE, Harvard University, white paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, K. (2018). Growing our own: Cultivating faculty leadership. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 50(3–4), 88–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, K., & Benson, T. (2019). Evidence-based faculty development: The COACHE research-practice partnership. In V. L. Baker, L. G. Lunsford, G. Neisler, A. L. Terosky, & M. J. Pifer (Eds.), Success after tenure: Supporting mid-career faculty (pp. 35–54). Sterling: Stylus Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauksch, H. O. (1980). What are the obstacles to improving quality teaching? Current Issues in Higher Education, 2, 49–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarland, J., Hussar, B., Zhang, J., Wang, X., Wang, K., Hein, S. Diliberti, M., Forrest Cataldi, E., Mann, F. B., & Barmer, A. (2019). The condition of education. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_csc.asp.

  • Menges, R. J., Mathis, B. C., Halliburton, D., Marincovich, M., & Svinicki, M. (1988). Strengthening professional development: Lessons from the program for faculty renewal at Stanford. The Journal of Higher Education, 59(3), 291–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. L., Wadkins, T. A., & Davis, S. F. (2008). Contrasting perspectives on mentoring new faculty. The Journal of Faculty Development, 22(2), 135–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, N., & Malachowski, M. (1999). CUR Institutes: A new model for supporting research with undergraduates. Journal of Chemical Education, 76(10), 1320–1321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, L. V. (2004). Changing institutions and changing faculty. Innovative Higher Education, 29(1), 3–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munro-Stasiuk, M., Marcinkiewicz, J., Lightner, J., & Goar, C. (2019). Creating an effective mid-career faculty mentoring and coaching program. The Chronicle of Mentoring & Coaching, 2(1), 530–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). National survey of postsecondary faculty. https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/nsopf/.

  • Norman, B. (2019). Faculty leadership and institutional resilience: Indicators, promising practices, and key questions. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 51(4), 48–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Meara, K. A. (2004). Beliefs about post-tenure review: The influence of autonomy, collegiality, career stage, and institutional context. The Journal of Higher Education, 75(2), 178–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Meara, K. A., Kaufman, R. R., & Kuntz, A. M. (2003). Faculty work in challenging times: Trends, consequences, & implications. Liberal Education, 89(4), 16–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, D. (1992). Interviews with exiting faculty: Why do they leave? To Improve the Academy, 11(251), 35–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, D. D., & Patton, C. V. (1981). Mid-career change options in academe: Experience and possibilities. The Journal of Higher Education, 52(4), 378–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkes, M. C. (1971). Psycho-social transitions: A field for study. Social Science and Medicine, 5(2), 101–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pastore, D. (2013). Faculty perspectives on Baldwin and Chang’s mid-career faculty development model. The Journal of Faculty Development, 27(2), 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pastore, D. L., Dahlin, S., & Morton, J. (2019). Mid-career faculty development model: Sport management faculty perspectives. The Physical Educator, 76(4), 1102–1127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petter, S., Richardson, S., & Randolph, A. B. (2018). Stuck in the middle: Reflections from the AMCIS mid-career workshop. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 34(1), 557–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philipsen, M. I. (2010). Balancing personal and professional lives: Experiences of female faculty across the career span. Vitae Scholasticae, 27(2), 9–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plater, W. M. (2001). A profession at risk: Using post-tenure review to save tenure and create an intentional future for academic community. Change, 33(4), 52–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rees, A., & Shaw, K. (2014). Peer mentoring communities of practice for early and mid-career faculty: Broad benefits from a research-oriented female peer mentoring group. Journal of Faculty Development, 28(2), 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reybold, L. E., & Alamia, J. J. (2008). Academic transitions in education: A developmental perspective of women faculty experiences. Journal of Career Development, 35(2), 107–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, R. E. (1984). Being professional academically. To Improve the Academy, 5, 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, R. E. (1986). The academic profession in transition: Toward a new social fiction. Teaching Sociology, 14(1), 12–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, R. E., & Austin, A. E. (1988). High faculty morale: What exemplary colleges do right. Change, 20(2), 50–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, L. J. (1993). Mid-career faculty development awards in geriatrics: Does retraining work? Journal of American Geriatrics Society, 41(5), 570–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberson, L. (2014). UNC Charlotte mentor program supports mid-career faculty. Women in Higher Education, 20(6), 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romano, J. L., Hoesing, R., O’Donovan, K., & Weinsheimer, J. (2004). Faculty at mid-career: A program to enhance teaching and learning. Innovative Higher Education, 29(1), 21–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, C. (2015). Teaching renewal for mid-career faculty: Attending to the whole person. To Improve the Academy, 34(1–2), 270–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, J. H., & Bowen, H. R. (1985). The faculty at risk. Change, 17(5), 12–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherick, H. M. (2018). Work in progress: Coaching as a mid-career faculty development approach. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3dad/e9f8365e54b37edda061c1c293b0807511f2.pdf.

  • Sorcinelli, M. D. (1985). Faculty careers: Satisfactions and discontents. To Improve the Academy, 4(1), 44–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorcinelli, M. D., & Yun, J. (2007). From mentor to mentoring networks: Mentoring in the new academy. Change, 39(6), 58–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorcinelli, M. D., Austin, A. E., Eddy, P. L., & Beach, A. L. (2006). Creating the future of faculty development: Learning from the past, understanding the present. Bolton: Anker, 240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, A. J., & Valian, V. (2018). An inclusive academy: Achieving diversity and excellence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Strage, A., & Merdinger, J. (2015). Professional growth and renewal for mid-career faculty. The Journal of Faculty Development, 29(1), 41–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strage, A., Nelson, C., & Meyers, S. (2008). “Stayin’ alive:” Meeting faculty mid-career professional renewal needs. Metropolitan Universities, 19(1), 71–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szelényi, K., & Denson, N. (2019). Personal and institutional predictors of work-life balance among women and men faculty of color. The Review of Higher Education, 43(2), 633–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szybinski, D., & Jordan, T. (2010). Navigating the future of the professoriate. Peer Review, 12(3), 4–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tangney, S., & Flay-Petty, C. (2019). Developing early to mid-career academic staff in a changing university environment. AISHE-J: The All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 11(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Terosky, A. L., & Gonzales, L. D. (2016). Scholarly learning as vocation: A study of community and broad access liberal arts college faculty. Innovative Higher Education, 41(2), 105–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, W., & Rhoads, R. (1993). Enhancing promotion, tenure and beyond: Faculty socialization as a cultural process. Washington, D.C.: ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tighe, T. J. (2012). Who’s in charge of America’s research universities?: A blueprint for reform. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tosti-Vasey, J. L., & Willis, S. L. (1991). Professional currency among mid-career college faculty: Family and work factors. Research in Higher Education, 32(2), 123–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trotman, C. A., & Brown, B. E. (2005). Faculty recruitment and retention: Concerns of early and mid-career faculty. TIAA-CREF Institute Research Dialogue, 86, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, M. L. (1990). The relationship between aging and job satisfaction for humanities and social sciences faculty in the Virginia Community College System. Research report number 8-90. ERIC NO: ED327225.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education. Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. (2017). Digest of education statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/.

  • Walker, C. (2002). Faculty well-being review: An alternative to post-tenure review? In C. M. Licata & J. C. Morreale (Eds.), Post-tenure faculty review and renewal: Experienced voices (pp. 229–241). Merrifield: AAHE Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, K., & Wolf-Wendel, L. (2004). Academic motherhood: Managing complex roles in research universities. The Review of Higher Education, 27(2), 233–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, K., & Wolf-Wendel, L. (2012). Academic motherhood: How faculty manage work and family. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf-Wendel, L., & Ward, K. (2015). Academic mothers: Exploring disciplinary perspectives. Innovative Higher Education, 40(1), 19–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, K., & Wolf-Wendel, L. (2016). Academic motherhood: Mid-career perspectives and the ideal worker norm. New Directions for Higher Education, 2016(176), 11–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webber, K. L. (2019). Does the environment matter? Faculty satisfaction at 4-year colleges and universities in the USA. Higher Education, 78(2), 323–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weidman, J. C., Twale, D. J., & Stein, E. L. (2001). Socialization of graduate and professional students in higher education: A perilous passage? San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiland, S. (1994). Writing the academic life: Faculty careers in narrative perspective. The Review of Higher Education, 17(4), 395–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch, A. (2005). Challenge and change: The academic profession in uncertain times. In The professoriate (pp. 1–19). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Welch, A. G., Bolin, J., Reardon, D., & Stenger, R. (2019). Mid-career faculty: Trends, barriers, and possibilities. Journal of the Professoriate, 10(1), 22–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, E. L. (2012). What are you doing the rest of your life? Strategies for fostering faculty vitality and development mid-career. Journal of Learning in Higher Education, 8(1), 59–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, D. W. (1997). Mid-career and senior faculty: Maintaining vitality and productivity. Agronomy & Horticulture – Faculty Publications, 32(1), 44–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W. H. J. (1956). The organization man. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. (1999). Unbending gender: Why family and work conflict and what to do about it. New York: Oxford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, S. L., & Tosti-Vasey, J. (1988, November). Professional competence in mid-career college faculty. Paper presented at 1988 Annual Meeting of the Gerontological Society, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf-Wendel, L., & Ward, K. (2014). Academic mothers: Exploring disciplinary perspectives. Innovative Higher Education, 40, 19–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vicki L. Baker .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Baker, V.L., Manning, C.E.N. (2021). A Mid-Career Faculty Agenda. In: Perna, L.W. (eds) Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, vol 36. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44007-7_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics