Skip to main content

Classical Posthumanism

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Palgrave Handbook of Critical Posthumanism
  • 188 Accesses

Abstract

Posthumanist approaches to Graeco-Roman literature and culture are increasingly relevant in the field of classics. Although Posthumanism is generally taken to be future-oriented, prefigurations of the posthuman can be traced back to classical antiquity. Classical posthumanism represents a vigilant critique of anthropocentrism and speciesism. By way of illustration, the first part of this chapter discusses several essays included in the first major reference volume on classics and posthumanism: Classical Literature and Posthumanism (2020), an edited collection that opens up and maps the posthumanist discourse within the discipline of classical studies. The selected chapters explore how foundational texts of classical literature configure the (human) self as inherently becoming-other: a hybrid made of nonhuman alterities. The second part introduces the reader to classical postanthropocentrism, outlining emerging trends in posthumanist research conducted in classical studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agamben, G. (2002). L’aperto. L’uomo e l’animale. Bollati e Boringhieri.

    Google Scholar 

  • Althusser, L. (1964). Marxisme et Humanisme. Cahiers de l’I.S.E.A, 20, 109–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badmington, N. (2000). Introduction – Approaching posthumanism. In N. Badmington (Ed.), Posthumanism (pp. 1–10). Palgrave.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bär, S., & Domouzi, A. (forthcoming). Artificial intelligence in Greek and Roman Epic. Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway. Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter. A political ecology of things. Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, L. R. (2011). The democracy of objects. Open Humanities Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Calame, C. (1996). Mythe et histoire dans l' Antiquité grecque. Les Belles Lettres.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calarco, M. (2015). Thinking through animals. Identity, difference, indistinction. Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chesi, G. M., & Spiegel, F. (Eds.). (2020). Classical literature and posthumanism. Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, B., & Rossini, M. (2017). Preface – Literature, posthumanism, and the posthuman. In B. Clarke & M. Rossini (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to literature and the posthuman (pp. xi–xxii). Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. J. (1996). Monster culture (seven theses). In J. J. Cohen (Ed.), Monster theory. Reading culture (pp. 3–25). University of Minnesota Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • de Romilly, J. (1975). Magic and rhetoric in ancient Greece. Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • DeLanda, M. (2002). Intensive science and virtual philosophy. Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). Mille plateaux. Capitalisme et schizophrénie. Les éditions de minuit. English edition: Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus. Capitalism and Schizophrenia (trans: Massumi, B). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Detienne, M., & Vernant, J. P. (1974). Les ruses de l’intelligence: la métis des Grecs. Flammarion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diels, H., & Kranz, W. (1956). Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. Weidmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duchemin, J. (1955). Pindare, poète et prophète. Les Belles Lettres.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabian, J. (1990). Presence and representation. The other and anthropological writing. Critical Inquiry, 16, 753–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farenga, V. (1977). Pindaric craft and the writing of Pythian IV. Helios, 5, 3–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrando, F. (2016). Il Postumanesimo filosofico e le sue alterità. Introduzione di Rosi Braidotti. Edizioni ETS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasser, U., & Almeida, V. A. F. (2017). A layered model for AI governance. IEEE Internet Computing, 21, 58–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grusin, R. (2015). Introduction. In R. Grusin (Ed.), The nonhuman turn (pp. vii–xxx). University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. J. (1997). Modest_Witness@Second_Millenium.FemaleMan@_Meets OncoMouseâ„¢: Feminism and Technoscience. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. J. (2016). A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. In I. D. J. Haraway (Ed.), Manifestly Haraway (pp. 5–90). University of Minnesota Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, I. (1977). Prometheus as performer: Toward a posthumanist culture? The Georgia Review, 31, 830–850.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. Chicago University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1956). Die Frage nach der Technik. In M. Heidegger (Ed.), Die Künste im technischer Zeitalter (pp. 48–72). Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. English edition: Heidegger, M. The Question concerning Technology. In M. Heidegger. 1977. The Question concerning Technology & Other Essays (pp. 3–35). Trans: Lovitt, V. Garland Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbrechter, S. (2012). Introduction – Shakespeare even after. In S. Herbrechter & I. Callus (Eds.), Posthumanist Shakespeares (pp. 1–19). Palgrave.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Herbrechter, S. (2013). Posthumanism. A critical analysis. Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hribal, J. (2010). Fear of the animal planet: The hidden history of animal resistance. CounterPunch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeanmaire, H. (1956). La naissance d’Athena et la royauté magique de Zeus. Revue Archéologique, 48, 12–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1993). Nous n’avons jamais été modernes. Paris: Éditions La Découverte. English edition: Latour, B. 1993. We have never been modern (trans. Porter, C). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liveley, G., & Thomas, S. (2020). Homer’s intelligent Machines. In S. Cave, K. Dihal, & S. Dillon (Eds.), AI narratives. A history of imaginative thinking about intelligent machines (pp. 25–48). Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mayor, A. (2018). Gods and robots. Myths, machines and ancient dreams of technology. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McGurl, M. (2012). The Posthuman comedy. Critical Inquiry, 38, 533–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miah, A. (2009). A critical history of posthumanism. In B. Gordijn & R. Chadwick (Eds.), Medical enhancement and posthumanity (pp. 71–94). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Næss, A. (1973). The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movement. Inquiry, 16, 95–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Næss, A. (1988). Self-realization. An ecological approach to being in the world. In J. Seed (Ed.), Thinking like a mountain (pp. 19–31). New Society Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nayar, P. K. (2014). Posthumanism. Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pepperell, R. (2005). The posthuman manifesto. Kritikos, 2, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Race, W. H. 1997. Pindar. Olympian odes. Pythian odes. Edited and translated by William H. Race. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rackham, H. (1932). Aristotle. Politics. Translated by H. Rackham. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan, T. (1983). The case for animal rights. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roden, D. (2015). Posthuman life. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, C. (1986). Pindar’s mythmaking: The fourth Pythian ode. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Seshadri, K. R. (2012). Humanimal: Race, law, language. University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weizenbaum, J. (1976). Computer power and human reason. From judgment to calculation. W.H. Freeman & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, C. (2003). Animal rites. Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giulia Maria Chesi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Chesi, G.M. (2022). Classical Posthumanism. In: Herbrechter, S., Callus, I., Rossini, M., Grech, M., de Bruin-Molé, M., John Müller, C. (eds) Palgrave Handbook of Critical Posthumanism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42681-1_30-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42681-1_30-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-42681-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-42681-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics