Abstract
One of the reasons for the lack of agreement about the normative justification of toleration is the unclarity of the concept of toleration itself. The aim of this chapter is to try to distinguish it from its many cognate concepts with which it is often associated. Some of them are cognitive in character (skepticism, relativism); some are pragmatic (coexistence, compromise); and others are psychological (restraint, indulgence), moral (charity, considerateness), or political (state neutrality, value pluralism). Subjecting these closely associated concepts to the formal conditions of toleration (objection, power to intervene, accommodation, reason for restraint, suffering) demonstrates that none of these cognate concepts can be distinctly identified as toleration. This leaves us with a very restricted concept of toleration which is more moral than political, personal rather than impersonal, and supererogatory rather than a duty or a right.
Omnis determinatio est negatio
Spinoza
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bayle P (2003, first published 1686 as “De la tolérance”) The great contest of faith and reason, Sandberg K (ed). Frederick Ungar, New York
Benbaji H, Heyd D (2001) The charitable perspective: forgiveness and toleration as supererogatory. Can J Philos 31:567–586
Berlin I (1969) Two concepts of liberty. In: Four essays on liberty. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Bloom A (1987) The closing of the American mind. Chicago University Press, Chicago
Cohen AJ (2004) What toleration is? Ethics 15:68–95
Creppell I (2003) Toleration and identity. Routledge, New York
Forst R (2017) Toleration and its paradoxes. Philosophia 45:415–424
Galeotti AE (2002) Toleration as recognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Heyd D (2003) Education to toleration: some philosophical obstacles and their resolution. In: McKinnon C, Castiglione D (eds) The culture of toleration in diverse societies. Manchester University Press, Manchester
Heyd D (2008) Is toleration as political virtue? In: Williams M, Waldron J (eds) Toleration and its limits. New York University Press, New York, pp 171–194
Horton J (1994) Three (apparent) paradoxes of toleration. Synth Philos 17:7–20
Jones P (2013) Toleration. In: Gaus G, D’Agostino F (eds) The Routledge companion to social and political philosophy. Routledge, New York
Kant I (1963) Immanuel Kant, what is enlightenment? In: Beck LW (trans) Kant on history. Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis
Locke J (2003) A letter concerning toleration. In: Shapiro I (ed) John Locke. Yale University Press, New Haven
MacKinnon C (2006) Toleration: a critical introduction. Routledge, London
Newey G (1997) Against thin-property reductivism: toleration as supererogatory. J Value Inq 31:231–249
Newey G (2017) Modus vivendi, toleration and power. Philosophia 45:425–442
Paine T (1954) The rights of man. Dent, London
Proast J (2010 [1690]) The argument of the letter concerning toleration briefly considered and answered, Vernon P (ed). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Rawls J (1993) Political liberalism. Columbia University Press, New York
Raz J (1988) Autonomy, toleration, and the harm principle. In: Mendus S (ed) Justifying toleration. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 155–175
Waldron J (1988) Locke, toleration and the rationality of persecution. In: Mendus S (ed) Justifying toleration. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 61–86
Walzer M (1997) On toleration. Yale University Press, New Haven
Warnock M (1987) The limits of toleration. In: Mendus S, Edwards D (eds) On toleration. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Williams B (1996) Toleration: an impossible virtue? In: Heyd D (ed) Toleration: an elusive virtue. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 18–27
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Heyd, D. (2022). What Toleration Is Not. In: Sardoč, M. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Toleration. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42121-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42121-2_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-42120-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-42121-2
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences