Abstract
Regional planning typically refers to various activities aimed at steering spatial development at the subnational level, for example, through regional land-use plans, economic development programs, or the coordination of infrastructure investments. However, the scope and style of regional planning are subject to change and reform, as can be observed in many countries around the globe. While formal regional planning remains a consolidated element in some planning systems, it has been abolished in others and sometimes been replaced by new informal or strategic governance arrangements. In addition to subnational regions, new spatial delineations such as metropolitan regions or megaregions have gained importance as planning scales. To some extent, regional planning has also transformed from a policy focused on the reduction of socio-spatial disparities to a growth-oriented policy favoring innovation and competitiveness. This chapter discusses the challenging task of defining regions and introduces regional planning as a policy field. It also highlights how regional planning and regional perspectives more generally can play a crucial role in the strive for ecological, social, and economic sustainability.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Albrechts L, Healey P, Kunzmann KR (2003) Strategic spatial planning and regional governance in Europe. J Am Plan Assoc 69(2):113–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360308976301
Allmendinger P, Haughton G (2009) Soft spaces, fuzzy boundaries, and metagovernance: the new spatial planning in the Thames Gateway. Environ Plan A 41(3):617–633. https://doi.org/10.1068/a40208
Angelo H, Wachsmuth D (2020) Why does everyone think cities can save the planet? Urban Stud 57(11):2201–2221. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020919081
Bäcklund P, Häikiö L, Leino H, Kanninen V (2018) Bypassing publicity for getting things done: between informal and formal planning practices in Finland. Plan Pract Res 33(3):309–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2017.1378978
Brenner N (2002) Decoding the newest “Metropolitan regionalism” in the USA: a critical overview. Cities 19(1):3–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-2751(01)00042-7
Davoudi S (2008) Conceptions of the city-region: a critical review. Proc Institut Civil Eng Urban Des Plan 161(2):51–60. https://doi.org/10.1680/udap.2008.161.2.51
Deas I, Lord A (2006) From a new regionalism to an unusual regionalism? The emergence of non-standard regional spaces and lessons for the territorial reorganisation of the state. Urban Stud 43(10):1847–1877. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980600838143
Dijkstra L, Poelman H, Rodríguez-Pose A (2020) The geography of EU discontent. Reg Stud 54(6):737–753. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1654603
Friedmann J (1963) Regional planning as a field of study. J Am Plan Assoc 29(3):168–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366308978061
Friedmann J (1993) Toward a non-Euclidian mode of planning. J Am Plan Assoc 59(4):482–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369308975902
Friedmann J, Weaver C (1979) Territory and function. The evolution of regional planning. University of California Press
Galland D (2012) Is regional planning dead or just coping? The transformation of a state sociospatial project into growth-oriented strategies. Environ Plan C: Govern Pol 30(3):536–552. https://doi.org/10.1068/c11150
Granqvist K, Humer A, Mäntysalo R (2021) Tensions in city-regional spatial planning: the challenge of interpreting layered institutional rules. Reg Stud 55(5):844-856. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1707791
Häkli J, Kallio KP, Ruokolainen O (2020) A missing citizen? Issue based citizenship in city-regional planning. Int J Urban Reg Res 44(5):876–893. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12841
Hamilton DK (2004) Developing regional regimes: a comparison of two metropolitan areas. J Urban Aff 26(4):455–477. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0735-2166.2004.00210.x
Harrison J, Gu H (2021) Planning megaregional futures: spatial imaginaries and megaregion formation in China. Reg Stud 55(1):77–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1679362
Harrison J, Galland D, Tewdwr-Jones M (2021a) Regional planning is dead: long live planning regional futures. Reg Stud 55(1):6–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1750580
Harrison J, Galland D, Tewdwr-Jones M (2021b) Whither regional planning? Reg Stud 55(1):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1862412
Haughton G, Allmendinger P (2015) Fluid spatial imaginaries: evolving estuarial city-regional spaces. Int J Urban Reg Res 39(5):857–873. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12211
Humer A, Granqvist K (2020) The gradual city-ness and town-ness of public service locations: towards spatially sensitive sector policies. Geoforum 113:81–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.05.008
Knaap G, Lewis R (2011) Regional planning for sustainability and hegemony of metropolitan regionalism. In: Seltzer E, Carbonell A (eds) Regional planning in America: practice and prospect. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, pp 176–208
Macdonald S, Monstadt J, Friendly A (2020) Rethinking the governance and planning of a new generation of greenbelts. Reg Stud 55(5):804–817. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1747608
Mancha-Navarro T, Garrido-Yserte R (2008) Regional policy in the European Union: the cohesion-competitiveness dilemma. Reg Sci Policy Pract 1(1):47–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-7802.2008.00005.x
Mattila H, Purkarthofer E, Humer A (2020) Governing “places that don’t matter”: agonistic spatial planning practices in Finnish peripheral regions. Territ Politics Governan:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2020.1857824
Olesen K (2017) Talk to the hand: strategic spatial planning as persuasive storytelling of the Loop City. Eur Plan Stud 25(6):978–993. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1296936
Paasi A (2009) The resurgence of the ‘Region’ and ‘Regional Identity’: theoretical perspectives and empirical observations on regional dynamics in Europe. Rev Int Stud 35:121–146. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210509008456
Paasi A (2010) Regions are social constructs, but who or what “constructs” them? Agency in question. Environ Plan A 42(10):2296–2301. https://doi.org/10.1068/a42232
Paasi A, Zimmerbauer K (2016) Penumbral borders and planning paradoxes: relational thinking and the question of borders in spatial planning. Environ Plan A 48(1):75–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X15594805
Purkarthofer E (2018) Diminishing borders and conflating spaces: a storyline to promote soft planning scales. Eur Plan Stud 26(5):1008–1027. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1430750
Purkarthofer E, Granqvist K (2021) Soft spaces as a traveling planning idea: uncovering the origin and development of an academic concept on the rise. J Plan Lit 36(3):312–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412221992287
Purkarthofer E, Mattila H (2018) Integrating regional development and planning into “Spatial Planning” in Finland: the untapped potential of the Kainuu experiment. Admin Culture 18(2):149–174. https://doi.org/10.32994/ac.v18i2.166
Purkarthofer E, Schmitt P (2021) Spatial framing within EU Cohesion Policy and spatial planning: towards functional and soft spaces, yet on different paths. In: Rauhut D, Sielker F, Humer A (eds) EU Cohesion Policy and spatial governance. Territorial, social and economic challenges. Edward Elgar, pp 31–47
Purkarthofer E, Humer A, Mäntysalo R (2021a) Regional planning: an arena of interests, institutions and relations. Reg Stud 55(5):773–777. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1875128
Purkarthofer E, Humer A, Mattila H (2021b) Subnational and dynamic conceptualisations of planning culture: the culture of regional planning and regional planning cultures in Finland. Plan Theory Pract 22(2):244–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2021.1896772
Purkarthofer E, Sielker F, Stead D (2021c) Soft planning in macro-regions and megaregions: creating toothless spatial imaginaries or new forces for change? Int Plann Stud 27(2):120–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2021.1972796
Rittel HWJ, Webber MM (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4(2):155–169
Roberts P (1997) Strategies for the stateless nation: sustainable policies for the regions in Europe. Reg Stud 31(9):875–882. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343409750129995
Rodríguez-Pose A (2018) The revenge of the places that don’t matter (and what to do about it). Camb J Reg Econ Soc 11(1):189–209. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsx024
Roodbol-Mekkes PH, van den Brink A (2015) Rescaling spatial planning: spatial planning reforms in Denmark, England, and the Netherlands. Environ Plan C: Govern Pol 33(1):184–198. https://doi.org/10.1068/c12134
Sielker F, Rauhut D, Humer A (2021) EU Cohesion Policy and European spatial governance: an introduction to territorial, economic and social challenges. In: EU Cohesion Policy and spatial governance. Territorial, social and economic challenges. Edward Elgar, pp 1–16
Smas L, Schmitt P (2021) Positioning regional planning across Europe. Reg Stud 55(5):778–790. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1782879
Swanstrom T (1996) Ideas matter: reflections on the new regionalism. City 2(2):5–21
Taylor PJ (1994) The state as container: territoriality in the modern world-system. Prog Hum Geogr 18(2):151–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/030913259401800202
Turnhout E, Behagel J, Ferranti F, Beunen R (2015) The construction of legitimacy in European nature policy: expertise and participation in the service of cost-effectiveness. Environ Politics 24(3):461–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2015.1008260
Ward K, Jonas AEG (2004) Competitive city-regionalism as a politics of space: a critical reinterpretation of the new regionalism. Environ Plan A 36(12):2119–2139. https://doi.org/10.1068/a36223
Wheeler S (2002) The new regionalism: key characteristics of an emerging movement. J Am Plan Assoc 68(3):267–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360208976272
Wheeler S (2009) Regions, megaregions, and sustainability. Reg Stud 43(6):863–876. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400701861344
Zimmerbauer K, Paasi A (2013) When old and new regionalism collide: deinstitutionalization of regions and resistance identity in municipality amalgamations. J Rural Stud 30:31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2012.11.004
Zimmerbauer K, Paasi A (2020) Hard work with soft spaces (and vice versa): problematizing the transforming planning spaces. Eur Plan Stud 28(4):771–789. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1653827
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Purkarthofer, E. (2022). Regional Planning. In: The Palgrave Handbook of Global Sustainability. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38948-2_94-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38948-2_94-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-38948-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-38948-2
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Earth and Environm. ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Earth and Environmental Sciences