Advertisement

Water Pollution

Living reference work entry

Abstract

All anthropogenic (man-made) chemicals and products made from them will make their way into the environment and pose a risk to water resources unless they are deliberately destroyed. A recent concern is from the profligate use of plastic that pollutes our waterways. Household and commercial laundry machines discharge a significant number of microfibers shed from textiles to sewage treatment plants which remove most but not all particles. Textile manufacturing is a major water polluting industry. Oil, natural gas, and mining industries pollute through accidental spills, legal surface water discharges, and through air emissions that also contaminate surface waters. Legacy contaminants, mainly organohalides used in pesticides, paper processing, electrical transformers, and fire retardants have long half-lives in the environment, are stored in aquatic sediments, and bioaccumulate in aquatic organisms which pose a risk to the food chain and to humans who eat them. Sewage and stormwater runoff carry pollutants such as fecal matter, pharmaceuticals and personal care products, road debris, and agricultural waste such as nutrients and pesticides. There is a cumulative effect to ecosystems and human health from chemical exposures. Solutions include effective water treatment, source water protection, water conservation, legislation, monitoring and enforcement with government, corporate and public stakeholder involvement. Nature has restorative processes such as weathering, photolysis, bioremediation, and biogeochemical cycling. Mankind can look to nature to develop sustainable methods of water recycling and purification.

Keywords

Water contamination Point and nonpoint source pollution CSOs and SSOs Eutrophication Best management practices (BMPs) 

References

  1. Alavanja MCR (2009) Pesticide use and exposure extensive worldwide. Rev Environ Health 24:303–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Azuka AI (2009) The influx of used electronics into Africa: a perilous trend. Law Environ Dev J 5/1:90. http://www.lead-journal.org/content/09090.pdfGoogle Scholar
  3. Beeson S (2018) Pollution discharge from Hurricane Florence: examining how North Carolina is impacted by modern day storms. Masters thesis, North Carolina State University. https://repository.lib.ncsu.edu/bitstream/handle/1840.20/36304/Beeson%2C%20Shane%20final.pdf
  4. Bonvoisin T, Utyasheva L, Knipe D, Gunnell, Eddleston M (2020) Suicide by pesticide poisoning in India: a review of pesticide regulations and their impact on suicide trends. BMC Public Health 20:251.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-02-8339-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brar SK, Verma M, Tyagi RD, Surampalli RY, Misra K (2019) Tannery wastes: trivalent chromium case. Int J Environ Health Sci (IJEHS) 1(1):15–33Google Scholar
  6. Browne MA, Crump P, Niven SJ, Teuten E, Tonkin A, Galloway T, Thompson R (2011) Accumulation of microplastic on shoreline worldwide: sources and sinks. Environ Sci Technol 45:9175–9179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. C&E News V97(26). 3M admits to unlawful release of PFAS in Alabama. June 25, 2019, by Cheryl HogueGoogle Scholar
  8. CDC (Centers for Disease Control) (2021) Waterborne disease & outbbreak surveillance reporting. CDC.org
  9. Chan CKM, Park C, Chan KM, Mak DCW, Fang JKH, Mitrano DM (2021) Microplastic fibre releases from industrial wastewater effluent: a textile wet-processing mill in China. Environ Chem. in press.  https://doi.org/10.1071/EN20143
  10. Chen Q, Zhang Q, Qi C, Fourie A, Xiao C (2018) Recycling phosphogypsum and construction demolition waste for cemented paste backfill and its environmental impact. J Clean Prod 186:418–429.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.131. ISSN 0959-6526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chu S, Letcher RJ, McGoldrick DJ, Backus SM (2016) Perfluorobutane sulfonamide in several fish species. Environ Sci Technol 50(2):669–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Code of Federal Regulations (2021) E-CFR Title 40 Protection of EnvironmentGoogle Scholar
  13. Drzyzga D, Lipok J (2018) Glyphosate dose modulates the uptake of inorganic phosphate by freshwater cyanobacteria. J Appl Phycol 30(1):299–309.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-017-1231-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. EPA [United States Environmental Protection Agency] (2002) Wastewater technology fact sheet: the living machine. EPA 832-F-02-025 October 2002Google Scholar
  15. Esler D et al (2018) Timelines and mechanisms of wildlife population recovery following the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Deep-Sea Res II Top Stud Oceanogr 147:36–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. European Parliament (2020) The impact of textile production and waste on the environment (infographic). Society, 29-12-2020-08:00. 20201208STO93327Google Scholar
  17. Fisher TR, Fox RJ, Gustafson AB et al (2021) Water quality improvement in the Choptank estuary, a tributary of Chesapeake Bay. Estuar Coasts.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-020-00872-4
  18. Giesy JP, Kannan K (2001) Global distribution of perfluorooctane sulfonate in wildlife. Environ Sci Technol 35(7):1339–1342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hayes TB, Khoury V, Narayan A, Nazir M, Park A, Brown T, Adame L, Chan E, Buchholz D, Stueve T, Gallipeau S (2010) Atrazine induces complete feminization and chemical castration in male African clawed frogs (Xenopus laevis). Proc Natl Acad Sci 107(10):4612–4617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ho SY-F, Xu SJ, Lee FW-F (2020) Citizen science: an alternative way for water monitoring in Hong Kong. PLoS ONE 15(9):e0238349.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ikehata K, Naghashkar NJ, El-Din MG (2006) Degradation of aqueous pharmaceuticals by ozonation and advanced oxidation processes: a review. Ozone Sci Eng 28(6):353–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Martin KL, Vose JM (2018) Terra incognita: the unknown risks to environmental quality posed by the spatial distribution and abundance of concentrated animal feeding operations. Sci Total Environ 642:887–893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. National Geographic (2019) Coal’s other dark side: toxic ash that can poison water and people. Nationalgeographic.com. February 19, 2019. Authors Joel Bourne, jr. and Maddie McGarvey
  24. NREL (2021) Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from solar photovoltaics. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy. http://www.nrel.gov. Accessed 4 Feb 2021
  25. Olds HT, Corsi SR, Dila DK, Halmo KM, Bootsma MJ, McLellan SL (2018) High levels of sewage contamination released from urban areas after storm events: a quantitative survey with sewage specific bacterial indicators. PLoSMed 15(7):e1002614.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Parron T, Hernandez AF, Villanueva E (1996) Increased risk of suicide with exposure to pesticides in an intensive agricultural area. A 12 year retrospective study. Forensic Sci Int 79:53–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Querfeld R, Schulz W, Neubohn J, Steinhauser G (2018) Anthropogenic radionuclides in water samples from the Chernobyl exclusion zone. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 318:423–428.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-018-6030-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ram J, Ritchie RP, Fang J, Gonzales FS, Selegean JP (2004) Sequence-based source tracking of Escherichia coli based on genetic diversity of beta-glucuronidase. J Environ Qual 33(3):1024–1032.  https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2004.1024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rumball NA, Mayer HC, McLellan SL (2020) Selective survival of Escherichia coli phylotypes in freshwater beach sand. Appl Environ Microbiol 87(4):e02473–e02420.  https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02473-20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Saadaoui E, Ghazel N, Romdhane CB, Massoudi N (2017) Phosphogypsum: potential uses and problems – a review. Int J Environ Stud 74(4):558–567.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00207233.2017.1330582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Saxton MA, Morrow EA, Bourbonniere RA, Wilhelm SW (2011) Glyphosate influence on phytoplankton community structure in Lake Erie. J Great Lakes Res 37(4):683–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sharma A, Kumar V, Shahzad B et al (2019) Worldwide pesticide usage and its impacts on ecosystem. SN Appl Sci 1:1446.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-1485-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sunderland EM, Hu XC, Dassuncao C, Tokranov AK, Wagner CC, Allen JG (2019) A review of the pathways of human exposure to poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) and present understanding of health effects. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 29:131–147.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-018-0094-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Thayer K, Houlihan J (2002) Perfluorinated chemicals: justification for inclusion of this chemical class in the national report on human exposure to environmental chemicals. Nomination of perfluorinated chemicals to CDC’s report Environmental Working Group. Environmental Working Group, Washington, DC, 2002Google Scholar
  35. The World Counts (2021). http://theworldcounts.com. Accessed 17 Feb 2021
  36. Tsoutsos T, Frantzeskaki N, Gekas V (2005) Environmental impacts from the solar energy technologies. Energy Policy 33:289–296Google Scholar
  37. Tüfekci N, Sivri N, Toroz I (2007) Pollutants of textile industry wastwewater and assessment of its discharge limits by water quality standards. Turk J Fish Aquat Sci 7:97–103Google Scholar
  38. Vymazal J, Březinová T (2015) The use of constructed wetlands for removal of pesticides from agricultural runoff and drainage: a review. Environ Int 75:11–20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2014.10.026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. World Information Service on Energy (2021). WISE Uranium Project (wise-uranium.org). Accessed 5 Feb 2021
  40. Wu L, Loo YY, Koe LC (2001) A pilot study of a biotrickling filter for the treatment of odorous sewage air. Water Sci Technol 44(9):295–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Southern University Agriculture and Extension CenterBaton RougeUSA

Personalised recommendations