Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Emergence of Greenpeace as a Global Eco-Advocate

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Global Sustainability

  • 28 Accesses

Abstract

Greenpeace is an international environmental organization, focusing their works on ecological advocacy. As a part of dynamic environmentalism, Greenpeace experiences changes and is innovating the tactics and strategies in pursuing global environmental movements. The present article highlights development trajectory of Greenpeace, including the discussion on the advanced achievements and transnational missions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ählström J, Sjöström E (2005) CSOs and business partnerships: strategies for interaction. Bus Strateg Environ 14(4):230–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alam M, Nilan P, Leahy T (2019) Learning from greenpeace: activist habitus in a local struggle. Electr Green J 1(42):1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakir V (2005) Greenpeace v. Shell: media exploitation and the social amplification of risk framework (SARF). J Risk Res 8(7–8):679–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakir V (2006) Policy agenda setting and risk communication: Greenpeace, Shell, and issues of trust. Harvard Int J Press/Polit 11(3):67–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behrens B (1996) Greenpeace international. In: Greenpeace (ed) Das Greenpeace Buch. Beck, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstorff A (1996) Global denken Global handeln: Eine Bilanz der GiftexportKampagne. In: Greenpeace e.V (ed) Das Greenpeace Buch. Beck, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Berube C (2021) MIWS_03 - Sea shepherd: the evolution of an eco-vigilante to legitimized maritime capacity builder. CIWAG Maritime Irregular Warfare Studies 3(0). https://digitalcommons.usnwc.edu/ciwag-case-studies/18/

  • Brömmling U (2010) Nonprofit-PR, 2nd edn. UVK Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, Konstanz

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunin LJ (1997) Reconceptualizing radical environmentalism: Greenpeace’s campaign to ban the burning of toxic waste at sea. New Polit Sci 19(3):75–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke DC (2021) The relationship between Kanngiqtugaapik/Clyde River and Greenpeace: an interview with mayor Jerry Natanine. Arctic 74(1):106–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhry S, Dotson M, Heiss A (2021) Who cares about crackdowns? Exploring the role of Trust in Individual Philanthropy. Global Pol 12:45–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connor L, Freeman S, Higginbotham N (2009) Not just a coalmine: shifting grounds of community opposition to coal mining in southeastern Australia. Ethnos 74(4):490–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad M, Oleart A (2020) Framing TTIP in the wake of the Greenpeace leaks: agonistic and deliberative perspectives on frame resonance and communicative power. J Eur Integr 42(4):527–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dann S (1997) Greenpeace and the Mururoa atoll campaign: not a case study in social marketing. Soc Mark Q 3(3–4):24–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis CB, Glantz M, Novak DR (2016) “You Can’t run your SUV on cute. Let’s go!”: internet memes as delegitimizing discourse. Environ Commun 10(1):62–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLuca KM (2009) Greenpeace international media analyst reflects on communicating climate change. Environ Commun 3(2):263–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle J (2007) Picturing the clima (c) tic: Greenpeace and the representational politics of climate change communication. Sci Cult 16(2):129–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eden S (2004) Greenpeace. New Polit Econ 9(4):595–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eilstrup-Sangiovanni M, Bondaroff TNP (2014) From advocacy to confrontation: direct enforcement by environmental NGOs. Int Stud Q 58(2):348–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eyerman R, Jamison A (1989) Environmental knowledge as an organizational weapon: the case of Greenpeace. Soc Sci Inf 28(1):99–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng H, Zhang Q (2018) Legitimization communication tactics of environmental NGOs in China: a case study of Greenpeace. Glob Media J 16(31):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich D (2008) Democratic aspiration meets political reality: participation of organized civil society in selected European policy processes. In: Civil society participation in European and global governance. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp 140–165

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • García MM (2011) Perception is truth: how US newspapers framed the “go green” conflict between BP and Greenpeace. Public Relat Rev 37(1):57–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomes MVP, Alves MA (2017) Greenpeace and the transnational governance of the Brazilian beef industry. In: Governance, resistance and the post-colonial state, Routledge, London, pp 145–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray TS, Gray MJ, Hague RA (1999) Sandeels, sailors, sandals and suits: the strategy of the environmental movement in relation to the fishing industry. Environ Polit 8(3):119–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gueterbock R (2004) Greenpeace campaign case study—StopEsso. J Consumer Behav Int Res Rev 3(3):265–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall NL, Taplin R (2007) Revolution or inch-by-inch? Campaign approaches on climate change by environmental groups. Environmentalist 27(1):95–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen PK, Lundholt MW (2021) “I thought Shell was the bad guy”: narrative and Fictionality in Greenpeace’s campaign against the LEGO-Shell Partnership. Narrative 29(1):29–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasdemir TA, Çetin S (2019) Ecological issues and public awareness in social media: greenpeace Mediterranean’s Turkey case. In: Environmental awareness and the role of social media. IGI Global, Machachussets, pp 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendry JR (2005) Stakeholder influence strategies: an empirical exploration. J Bus Ethics 61(1):79–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennink M, Hutter I, Bailey A (2011) Qualitative research methods. SAGE Publications Inc, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hestres LE (2015) Climate change advocacy online: theories of change, target audiences, and online strategy. Environ Polit 24(2):193–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann ML (2008) Mindbombs. Was Werbung und PR von Greenpeace & Co. lernen können, 1st edn. Wilhelm Fink Verlag, München

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ji Q, Harlow S, Cui D, Wang Z (2018) Discussing environmental issues in Chinese social media: an analysis of Greenpeace China’s Weibo posts and audience responses. J Soc Media Soc 7(1):37–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Karjaya LP, Satris R, Suspiati S (2019) Greenpeace, corporations and deforestation crimes: a case study of Hongkong Shanghai Bank Corporation (HSBC) in Indonesia. J Hubungan Int 8(2):203–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz-Kimchi M, Manosevitch I (2015) Mobilizing Facebook users against Facebook’s energy policy: the case of Greenpeace unfriend coal campaign. Environ Commun 9(2):248–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearins K, Pavlovich K (2002) The role of stakeholders in Sydney’s green games. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 9(3):157–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch S (2001) Öffentlicher Konflikt als Kern der Strategie – die Greenpeace-Methode als Tor zur Welt. In: Langen C, Albrecht W (eds) Zielgruppe: Gesellschaft – Kommunikationsstrategien für Nonprofit-Organisationen. Bertelsmann Stiftung, Gütersloh

    Google Scholar 

  • Krüger C (1996) Das Produkt Greenpeace. In: Greenpeace e.V (ed) Das Greenpeace Buch. Beck, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Kukkonen A, Ylä-Anttila T, Swarnakar P, Broadbent J, Lahsen M, Stoddart MC (2018) International organizations, advocacy coalitions, and domestication of global norms: debates on climate change in Canada, the US, Brazil, and India. Environ Sci Pol 81:54–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langen C (2001) Kommunikation mit Strategie. In: Langen C, Albrecht W (eds) Zielgruppe: Gesellschaft – Kommunikationsstrategien für Nonprofit-Organisationen. Bertelsmann Stiftung, Gütersloh

    Google Scholar 

  • Luxon EM, Wong WH (2017) Agenda-setting in Greenpeace and amnesty: the limits of centralisation in international NGOs. Glob Soc 31(4):479–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKay B, Munro I (2012) Information warfare and new organizational landscapes: an inquiry into the ExxonMobil–Greenpeace dispute over climate change. Organ Stud 33(11):1507–1536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell R, Miller T (2016) The propaganda machine behind the controversy over climate science: can you spot the lie in this title? Am Behav Sci 60(3):288–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motta R (2016) Global capitalism and the nation state in the struggles over GM crops in Brazil. J Agrar Chang 16(4):720–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munro L (2005) Strategies, action repertoires and DIY activism in the animal rights movement. Soc Mov Stud 4(1):75–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy P, Dee J (1992) Du Pont and Greenpeace: the dynamics of conflict between corporations and activist groups. J Public Relat Res 4(1):3–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortega-Egea JM, García-de-Frutos N (2019) Greenpeace’s detox campaign: towards a more sustainable textile industry. In: Case studies on social marketing. Springer, Cham, pp 37–47

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ostertag B (1991) Greenpeace takes over the world. Mother Jones 16(2):32–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Ott L, Theunissen P (2015) Reputations at risk: engagement during social media crises. Public Relat Rev 41(1):97–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary (2000) 6th edn, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Özdemir BP (2012) Social media as a tool for online advocacy campaigns: Greenpeace Mediterranean’s anti genetically engineered food campaign in Turkey. Glob Media J 5(2):23

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagé G (2004) Greenpeace’s campaign strategies. Peace Magaz 20(3):13

    Google Scholar 

  • Parameswari P (2016) Gerakan Transnasional dan Kebijakan: Strategi Advokasi Greenpeace Detox Campaign on Fashion di Tiongkok. Dauliyah J Islam Int Affairs 1(2):259–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Reber U (2021) Global climate change or national climate changes? An analysis of the performance of online issue publics in integrating global issues. Environ Commun 15(2):173–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards JP, Heard J (2005) European environmental NGOs: issues, resources and strategies in marine campaigns. Environ Polit 14(1):23–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rinscheid A, Pianta S, Weber EU (2021) What shapes public support for climate change mitigation policies? The role of descriptive social norms and elite cues. Behav Publ Policy 5(4):503–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roose M (2012) Greenpeace, social media, and the possibility of global deliberation on the environment. Ind J Global Legal Stud 19:347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rootes C (2009) More acted upon than acting? Campaigns against waste incinerators in England. Environ Polit 18(6):869–895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santese A (2020) Between pacifism and environmentalism: the history of Greenpeace. USAbroad–J Am Hist Polit 3(1S):107–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders C (2007) The national and the local: relationships among environmental movement organisations in London. Environ Polit 16(5):742–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaiko RG (1993) Greenpeace USA: something old, new, borrowed. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 528(1):88–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sluyterman K (2010) Royal Dutch Shell: company strategies for dealing with environmental issues. Bus Hist Rev 84(2):203–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith J (1998) Global civil society? Transnational social movement organizations and social capital. Am Behav Sci 42(1):93–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sneddon JN, Evers U, Lee JA (2020) Personal values and choice of charitable cause: an exploration of donors’ giving behavior. Nonprofit Volunt Sect Q 49(4):803–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soares-Filho B, Rajão R (2018) Traditional conservation strategies still the best option. Nat Sustainabil 1(11):608–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szerszynski B (1997) The varieties of ecological piety. Worldviews Global Relig Cult Ecol 1(1):37–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talukdar R (2018) Reigniting a debate on coal: case study on the Indian Government’s crackdown on Greenpeace. Cosmopolit Civil Soc Interdiscipl J 10(1):47–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrandardottir E, Mitra SG (2019) Who does Greenpeace India represent?: placing effective limits on the power of INGO s. Glob Govern Rev Multilateral Int Organ 25(4):587–619

    Google Scholar 

  • Tindale S (2002) Speech to Greenpeace business conference–October 2001. Corp Environ Strateg 9(3):236–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tropschuh PF, Biendl M, Petersik L (2017) AUDI AG: Crossmedialität der internen CR-Kommunikation. In: CSR und Interne Kommunikation. Springer Gabler, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 359–370

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas H (1999) David and Goliath in the risk society: making sense of the conflict between Shell and Greenpeace in the North Sea. Organization 6(3):499–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villo S, Halme M, Ritvala T (2020) Theorizing MNE-NGO conflicts in state-capitalist contexts: insights from the Greenpeace, Gazprom and the Russian state dispute in the Arctic. J World Bus 55(3):101068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virgy MA, Djuyandi Y, Darmawan WB (2020) Greenpeace Indonesia’s transnational advocacy network strategy regarding the issue of deforestation in Indonesia’s forests by Wilmar international. J Polit Issu 1(2):74–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldron TL, Navis C, Fisher G (2013) Explaining differences in firms’ responses to activism. Acad Manag Rev 38(3):397–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widyasari I (2020) Strategi Media Relations Greenpeace Indonesia Dalam Meningkatkan Citra Organisasi. Communication 11(2):143–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong CW, Wong CY, Boon-itt S, Tang AK (2021) Strategies for building environmental transparency and accountability. Sustainability 13(16):9116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zelko F (2017a) How to change the world. Environ Hist 22(2):340–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zelko F (2017b) Scaling Greenpeace: from local activism to global governance. Hist Soc Res 2:318–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Zietsma C, Winn MI (2008) Building chains and directing flows: strategies and tactics of mutual influence in stakeholder conflicts. Bus Soc 47(1):68–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sociology and Anthropology Department, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Gadong, Brunei

    Meredian Alam

Authors
  1. Meredian Alam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meredian Alam .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Alam, M. (2022). The Emergence of Greenpeace as a Global Eco-Advocate. In: The Palgrave Handbook of Global Sustainability. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38948-2_160-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38948-2_160-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-38948-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-38948-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Earth and Environm. ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Earth and Environmental Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation