Abstract
Increasingly, economically developing countries are using large-scale assessments (LSAs) frequently to monitor progress toward the sustainable development goals for the 2030 education agenda. In this chapter, the two regional assessment programs, namely the Pacific Island Literacy and Numeracy Assessment (PILNA) and the South East Asia Primary Learning Metric (SEA-PLM), are discussed in terms of the key factors that contribute toward uptake of evidence from LSAs in the education policy-making cycle. The objective is to understand the applicability and usefulness of LSAs in these contexts.
References
Addey, C., Sellar, S., Steiner-Khamsi, G., Lingard, B., & Verger, A. (2017). The rise of international large-scale assessments and rationales for participation. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 47(3), 434–452.
Banks, G. (2010). Evidence-based policy making: What is it? How do we get it? In World scientific reference on Asia-pacific trade policies: 2: Agricultural and Manufacturing Protection in Australia (pp. 719–736).
Belisle, M., Cassity, E., Kacilala, R., Seniloli, M.T., & Taoi, T. (2016). Pacific Islands Literacy and Numeracy Assessment: Collaboration and innovation in reporting and dissemination. (Using assessment data in education policy and practice: Examples from the Asia Pacific; Issue 1) ACER/UNESCO. Retrieved from https://research.acer.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1023&context=ar_misc
Best, M., Knight, P., Lietz, P., Lockwood, C., Nugroho, D., & Tobin, M. (2013). The impact of national and international assessment programmes on education policy, particularly policies regarding resource allocation and teaching and learning practices in developing countries. Retrieved from Australian Council for Education Research website: https://research.acer.edu.au/ar_misc/16
Braun, H. I., & Singer, J. D. (2019). Assessment for monitoring of education systems: International comparisons. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 683(1), 75–92.
Breakespear, S. (2012). The policy impact of PISA: An exploration of the normative effects of international benchmarking in school system performance. OECD.
Buckley, H., Tonmyr, L., Lewig, K., & Jack, S. (2014). Factors influencing the uptake of research evidence in child welfare: A synthesis of findings from Australia, Canada and Ireland. Child Abuse Review, 23(1), 5–16.
Cherney, A., Povey, J., Head, B., Boreham, P., & Ferguson, M. (2012). What influences the utilisation of educational research by policy-makers and practitioners?: The perspectives of academic educational researchers. International Journal of Educational Research, 56, 23–34.
Cox, C., & Meckes, L. (2016). International large-scale assessment studies and educational policy-making in Chile: Contexts and dimensions of influence. Research Papers in Education, 31(5), 502–515.
Cresswell, J., Schwantner, U., & Waters, C. (2015). A review of international large-scale assessments in education: Assessing component skills and collecting contextual data, PISA, The World Bank, Washington, D.C. OECD Publishing.
Department for International Development (DFID). (2013). Education position paper: Improving learning, expanding opportunities. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/225715/Education_Position_Paper_July_2013.pdf
Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT). (2015). Strategy for Australia’s aid investments in education 2015–2020, September 2015. Retrieved from https://dfat.gov.au/about-us/publications/Pages/strategy-for-australias-aid-investments-in-education-2015-2020.aspx
Fischman, G. E., Topper, A. M., Silova, I., Holloway, J. L., & Goebel, J. (2017). An examination of the ınfluence of ınternational large scale assessments and global learning metrics on national school reform policies.
Gilmore, A. (2005). The impact of PIRLS (2001) and TIMSS (2003) in low- and middle-income countries. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).
Heyneman, S. P., & Lee, B. (2014). The impact of international studies of academic achievement on policy and research. In L. Rutkowski, M. von Davier, & D. Rutkowski (Eds.), Handbook of international large-scale assessment: Background, technical issues and methods of data analysis (pp. 37–72). Taylor and Francis Group.
Jones, H. (2012). Promoting evidence-based decision-making in development agencies. ODI Background Note, 1(1), 1–6.
Kamens, D. H. (2013). Globalization and the emergence of an audit culture: PISA and the search for ‘best practices’ and magic bullets. PISA, power and policy: The emergence of global educational governance, 117–140. https://books.google.com.au/books?hl=en&lr=&id=fqFwCQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA117&ots=Q-hHrXY0-b&sig=w2b5OLh3egcR_uDEBjjRJllbHcg#v=onepage&q&f=false
Kim, H. K., Lee, D. H., & Kim, S. (2016). Trends of science ability in the National Assessment of Educational Achievement (NAEA) of Korean ninth graders. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(7), 1781–1798.
Kvernbekk, T. (2015). Evidence-based practice in education: Functions of evidence and causal presuppositions. Routledge.
Lietz, P., Tobin, M., & Nugroho, D. (2016). Understanding PISA and its impact on policy initiative: A review of the evidence. In L. M. Thien, N. A. Razak, J. P. Keeves, & I. G. N. Darmawan (Eds.), What can PISA 2012 data tell us? Performance and Challenges in Five Participating Southeast Asian Countries. Sense Publishers.
Lockheed, M. (2012). Policies, performance and panaceas: The role of international large-scale assessments in developing countries. COMPARE: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 42(3), 509–545.
Lockheed, M. E., & Wagemaker, H. (2013). International large-scale assessments: Thermometers, whips or useful policy tools? Research in Comparative and International Education, 8(3), 296–306.
Mullis, I. V. S., & Martin, M. O. (Eds.). (2017). TIMSS 2019 assessment frameworks. Retrieved from Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center website: http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2019/frameworks/
OECD. (2019a). PISA 2018 assessment and analytical framework. PISA, OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2019b). Evaluation and assessment: Policy priorities and trends, 2008-19. In Education policy outlook 2019: Working together to help students achieve their potential. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/25806c6b-en
Oliver, K., Innvar, S., Lorenc, T., Woodman, J., & Thomas, J. (2014). A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers. BMC Health Services Research, 14(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-2
Orem, J. N., Mafigiri, D. K., Marchal, B., Ssengooba, F., Macq, J., & Criel, B. (2012). Research, evidence and policymaking: The perspectives of policy actors on improving uptake of evidence in health policy development and implementation in Uganda. BMC Public Health, 12(109), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-109
Pacific Community (SPC). (2019). Pacific Islands Literacy and Numeracy Assessment (PILNA) 2018 regional report. SPC.
Sanderson, I. (2003). Is it ‘what works’ that matters? Evaluation and evidence-based policy-making. Research Papers in Education, 18(4), 331–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267152032000176846
Schulz, W., Ainley, J., Fraillon, J., Losito, B., & Agrusti, G. (2016). IEA international civic and citizenship education study 2016: Assessment framework. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).
SEAMEO & UNICEF. (2019). Governance structure. Retrieved from https://www.seaplm.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=23&Itemid=224
Shamatov, D., & Sainazarov, K. (2010). The impact of standardized testing on education in Kyrgyzstan: The case of the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2006. International Perspectives on Education and Society, 13, 145–179.
Singer, J. D., & Braun, H. I. (2018). Testing international education assessments. Science, 360(6384), 38–40.
Sutcliffe, S., & Court, J. (2005). Evidence-based policymaking: What is it? How does it work? What relevance for developing countries? https://apo.org.au/node/311114.
Tobin, M., Lietz, P., Nugroho, D., Vivekanandan, R., & Nyamkhuu, T. (2015). Using large-scale assessments of students’ learning to inform education policy: Insights from the Asia-Pacific region. Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER). http://research.acer.edu.au/monitoring_learning/21
UNICEF & SEAMEO. (2017). SEA-PLM 2019 Assessment Framework (1st ed.). United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) & Southeast Asian Ministers of Education Organization (SEAMEO) – SEA-PLM Secretariat.
UNICEF & SEAMEO. (2018). SEA-PLM 2019 trial testing report. United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) & Southeast Asian Ministers of Education Organization (SEAMEO) – SEA-PLM Secretariat.
UNICEF & SEAMEO. (2019). The Southeast Asia primary learning metrics program: Thinking globally in a regional context. Australian Council for Educational Research.
UNICEF & SEAMEO. (2020). SEA-PLM 2019 main regional report, children’s learning in 6 Southeast Asian countries. United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) & South East Asian Ministers of Education Organization (SEAMEO) – SEA-PLM Secretariat.
United Nations. (2016) Sustainable development goals: Quality education. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/education/
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2015). Incheon declaration — education 2030: Towards inclusive and equitable quality education and lifelong learning for all. UNESCO.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2018). UNESCO pacific strategy 2018–2022. UNESCO.
United States Agency for International Development (USAID). (2019). Learning from experience. Retrieved from https://www.usaid.gov/project-starter/program-cycle/cdcs/learning-from-experience
Wagner, D. A., Lockheed, M., Mullis, I., Martin, M. O., Kanjee, A., Gove, A., & Dowd, A. J. (2012). The debate on learning assessments in developing countries. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 42(3), 509–545.
Willms, J. D. (2018). Learning divides: Using monitoring data to inform education policy. UNESCO Institute for Statistics.
Young, E., & Quinn, L. (2002). Writing effective public policy papers. Open Society Institute.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Ahmed, S.K., Belisle, M., Cassity, E., Friedman, T., Lietz, P., Spink, J. (2022). The Role of International Large-Scale Assessments (ILSAs) in Economically Developing Countries. In: Nilsen, T., Stancel-PiÄ…tak, A., Gustafsson, JE. (eds) International Handbook of Comparative Large-Scale Studies in Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38298-8_7-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38298-8_7-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-38298-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-38298-8
eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education