Skip to main content

What Are the Key Components of Workplace Well-Being?: Examining Real-Life Experiences in Different Work Contexts

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Workplace Well-Being

Abstract

Debate among researchers and practitioners persists as to how to define a workplace well-being construct that measures people’s experienced well-being. Existing definitions often have a differing narrow focus on eudaimonic or hedonic aspects of well-being. An inductive approach to determining key features of workplace well-being through exploring real-life work experience might alleviate this issue as checking the meanings people assign to well-being would create further insight into key aspects of the workplace well-being concept. Further, the endeavor to understand how different people at work experience well-being is important as their understanding is likely to impact on how they maintain and enhance well-being, how they rate their well-being in occupational surveys, how they respond to interventions, and how they manage their own well-being. Therefore, this research explores through two studies of lay descriptions of workplace well-being and extends previous research by using an inductive framework of an occupationally heterogeneous sample. Different groups of employees in different work settings were given qualitative surveys and took part in interviews and focus groups in order to establish components of workplace well-being. Dominant components were established through thematic content analysis. Similarities and differences were found between lay and theoretical conceptualizations of well-being. Results indicate that a multicomponent measure of workplace well-being should go beyond hedonic and eudaimonic aspects by including an energy component and social and physical aspects of well-being at work. Further, the use of a context-specific definitions and resulting implications for designing workplace well-being interventions is also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bakker AB, Demerouti E (2007) The job demands-resources model: state of the art. J Manag Psychol 22(3):309–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker AB, Schaufeli WB, Demerouti E, Euwema M (2006) An organisational and social psychology perspective on burnout and work engagement. In: Hewstone M, Schut H, de Wit J, van den Bos K, Stroebe M (eds) The scope of social psychology: theory and applications. Psychology Press, Andover, pp 227–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo JT, Patrick W (2008) Loneliness. Human nature and the need for social connection. W. W. Norton & Company, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo JT, Hawkley LC, Ernst JM, Burleson M, Berntson GG, Nouriani B, Spiegel D (2006) Loneliness within a nomological net: an evolutionary perspective. J Res Pers 40(6):1054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright S, Cooper CL (2008) Oxford handbook of organisational well-being. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Csíkszentmihályi M (1992) Flow. The psychology of happiness. Rider, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dagenais-Desmarais V, Savoie A (2011) What is psychological well-being, really? A grassroots approach from the organisational sciences. J Happiness Stud 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-011-9285-3. Online first edition

  • Daniels K (2000) Measures of five aspects of affective well-being at work. Hum Relat 53(2):275–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels K (2011) Stress and well-being are still issues and something still needs to be done. Or why agency and interpretation are important for policy and practice. In: International review of industrial and organisational psychology. Wiley, Chichester, pp 1–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels K, Harris C (2000) Work, psychological well-being and performance. Occup Med 50(5):304–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danna K, Griffin RW (1999) Health and well-being in the workplace: a review and synthesis of the literature. J Manag 25(3):357–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Delle Fave A, Brdar I, Freire T, Vella-Brodrick D, Wissing MP (2011) The eudaimonic and hedonic components of happiness: qualitative and quantitative findings. Soc Indic Res 100:185–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9632-5

  • Dewe P, Cooper C (2012) Well-being and work. Towards a balanced agenda. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener E (1984) Subjective well-being. Psychol Bull 95(3):542–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener E (1994) Assessing subjective well-being: Progress and opportunities. Soc Indic Res 31:103–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener E (2009) Assessing subjective well-being: Progress and opportunities. In: Diener E (ed) Assessing well-being. The collected works of Ed Diener. Springer, London, pp 25–66

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Diener E, Derrick W, Tov W, Kim-Prieto C, Choi D-W, Oishi S, Biswas-Diener R (2009) New well-being measures: short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Soc Indic Res 97:143–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodge R, Daly A, Huyton J, Sanders L (2012) The challenge of defining wellbeing. Int J Wellbeing 2(3):222–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty M (2009) When the working day is through: the end of work as identity? Work Employ Soc 23(1):84–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher CD (2010) Happiness at work. Int J Manag Rev 12:384–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huppert FA (2009) Psychological well-being: evidence regarding its causes and consequences. Appl Psychol Health Well Being 1(2):137–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johns G (2006) The essential impact of context on organisational behavior. Acad Manag Rev 31(2):386–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juniper B, Bellamy P, White N (2011) Testing the performance of a new approach to measuring employee well-being. Leadersh Org Dev J 32(4):344–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karanika-Murray M, Biron C, Cooper CL (2012) Concluding comments. Distillng the elements of successful organisational intervention implementation. In: Karanika-Murray M, Biron C, Cooper CL (eds) Improving organisational interventions for stress and well-being: addressing process and context. Routledge, Hove, pp 353–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Karasek RA (1979) Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: implications for job redesign. Adm Sci Q 24:285–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keyes CLM (1998) Social well-being. Soc Psychol Q 61(2):121–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kopperud KH, Vitterso J (2008) Distinctions between hedonic and eudaimonic well-being: results from a day reconstruction study among Norwegian jobholders. J Posit Psychol 3(3):174–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger RA (1994) Focus groups. A practical guide for applied research. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • LaMontagne AD, Louie AM, Ostry A, Landsbergis PA (2007) Improving organisational interventions for stress and well-being. Addressing process and context. Int J Occup Environ Health 13:268–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langan-Fox J, Cooper C (2011) Handbook of stress in the occupations. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mannheim B, Baruch Y, Tal J (1997) Alternative models for antecedents and outcomes of work centrality and job satisfaction of high-tech personnel. Hum Relat 50(12):1537–1562

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayring P (2000) Qualitative content analysis. Forum Qual Soc Res 1(2):Art 20. http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1089/2386. Accessed 16 Feb 2018

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayring P (2010) Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken. Weinheim, Beltz Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzola JJ, Schonfeld IS, Spector PE (2011) What qualitative research has taught us about occupational stress. Stress Health 27:93–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMahan EA, Estes D (2011) Measuring lay conceptions of well-being: the beliefs about well-being scale. J Happiness Stud 12(2):267–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ménard J, Brunet L (2012) Authenticité et bien-être au travail: Une invitation à mieux comprendre les rapports entre le soi et son environnement de travail. [authenticity and well-being at work: a call to better understand the relationships between the self and one’s work setting]. Prat Psychol 18:89–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Munoz Sastre M (1999) Lay conceptions of well-being and rules used in well-being judgments among young, middle-aged, and elderly adults. Soc Indic Res 47(2):203–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page KM, Vella-Brodrick DA (2009) The ‘what’, ‘why’, and ‘how’ of employee well-being. A new model. Soc Indic Res 90:441–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • QSR (2012) NVivo. http://www.qsrinternational.com/products_nvivo.aspx. Accessed 16 Feb 2018

  • Randall R, Nielsen KM (2012) Does the intervention fit? An explanatory model of intervention success and failure in complex organisational environments. In: Biron C, Karanika-Murray M, Cooper C (eds) Improving organisational interventions for stress and well-being. Addressing process and context. Routledge, Hove, pp 120–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosso BD, Dekas KH, Wrzesniewski A (2010) On the meaning of work: a theoretical integration and review. Res Organ Behav 30(1):91–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau DM, Fried Y (2001) Location, location, location: contextualizing organisational research. J Organ Behav 22:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan RM, Deci EL (2001) On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annu Rev Psychol 52:141–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol 57:1069–1081. Retrieved from http://education.ucsb.edu/janeconoley/ed197/documents/ryffHappinessiseverythingorisit.pdf

  • Ryff CD (1995) Psychological well-being in adult life. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 4(4):99–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryff C, Keyes C (1995) The structure of psychological well-being revisited. J Pers Soc Psychol 69:719–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB (2010) Defining and measuring work engagement: bringing clarity to the concept. In: Bakker AB, Leiter MP (eds) Work engagement. A handbook of essential theory and research. Psychology Press, Hove/New York, pp 10–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaufeli WB, Salanova M, Gonzalez-Roma V, Bakker AB (2002) The measurement of burnout and engagement: a confirmatory factor analytic approach. J Happiness Stud 3:71–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schonfeld IS, Farrell E (2010) Qualitative methods can enrich quantitative research on occupational stress: an example from one occupational group. In: Perrewe PL, Ganster DC (eds) New developments in theoretical and conceptual approaches to job stress research in occupational stress and well being, vol 8. Emerald, Bingley, pp 137–197

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Seifert TA (2005) The Ryff scales of psychological well-being. Assessment Notes. http://www.liberalarts.wabash.edu/ryff-scales/. Accessed 16 Feb 2018

  • Seligman ME (2012) Flourish: a visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirom A (2003) Feeling vigorous at work? The construct of vigor and the study of positive affect in organisations. In: Perrewé PL, Ganster DC (eds) Emotional and physiological processes and positive intervention strategies, Research in occupational stress and well being, vol 3. Elsevier, Kidlington, pp 135–164

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shirom A (2011) Vigor as a positive affect at work: conceptualizing vigor, its relations with related constructs, and its antecedents and consequences. Rev Gen Psychol 15(1):50–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvester J (2008) Work and organisational psychology. In: Willig C, Stainton-Rogers W (eds) The sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology. Sage, London, pp 489–504

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sirgy MJ (2006) Developing a conceptual framework of employee well-being (EWB) by applying goal concepts and findings from personality-social psychology. Appl Res Qual Life 1(1):7–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector PE (1997) Job satisfaction. Application, assessment, causes and consequences. Sage, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vella-Brodrick D, Park N, Peterson C (2009) Three ways to be happy: pleasure, engagement, and meaning. Findings from Australian and US samples. Soc Indic Res 90(2):165–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warr P (2003) Well-being and the workplace. In: Kahnemann D, Diener E, Schwarz N (eds) Well-being. The foundations of hedonic psychology. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp 392–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright TA, Cropanzano R (2000) Psychological well-being and job satisfaction as predictors of job performance. J Occup Health Psychol 5(1):84–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xanthopoulou D, Bakker AB, Ilies R (2012) Everyday working life: explaining within-person fluctuations in employee well-being. Hum Relat 65(9):1051–1069

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caroline Rook .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendix 1 Second-Level Coding Results for Descriptions of High Well-Being

Category

Subcategory

Example

Frequency

Cognitive

Concentration

Focused

2

Motivation

Feel motivated

6

Stimulated, positively challenged

Everything seems possible, positively stretched

5

Feel positive, optimistic

Same as subcategory description

3

Absorption

Lost sense of time

1

Feeling of accomplishment

Same as subcategory description

2

Creativity

Sense of creativity

5

Mind/body

Energy

Feel energised

15

Centred

Sense of being centred, still centre

2

Feel well

Same as subcategory description

2

Vitality

Vitality, feel alive

2

Flow

Feeling of flow, feeling in the zone, being in the groove

5

Connected

Feel connected with the world

2

Emotional

Excited

Same as subcategory description

2

Content

Happy, warm emotional feeling, content

14

Enjoyment

Enjoyment & fun

1

Confident

Same as subcategory description

4

Relaxed

Same as subcategory description

1

Valued

Feel valued and useful

1

Enthusiastic

Feel elevated

1

Satisfied

Same as subcategory description

2

Social

Interaction

Interact with colleagues, extraversion

4

Communication

Communication and chatty

3

Exchange

Responsive to others, interaction and reaction

3

Relatedness

Relatedness, compassion

2

Supportive towards others

Support others, contribute to others success

2

Respect from and influence over others

Will be listened to attentively and with respect; will have the opportunity to influence

1

People appear content

Fewer complaint, fewer nastiness

2

Body

Physical symptoms

Absence of negative physical symptoms

1

Not tired

Same as subcategory description

1

Fit, healthy

Feeling good with own body, feeling fit, feeling healthy

3

Task related

Enjoyable

High level of job satisfaction, work is enjoyable

2

Rich

Work is rich

1

Engaged

Fully engaged with work, feeling engaged

3

Productive

Things get done easily, capacity to deliver more, growth

3

Contribution

Contribution to work, others success

4

Gets done easily

Solution found easily, work gets done easily

1

Same as subcategory description

Others

Success

Same as subcategory description

1

In control

Same as subcategory description

1

Not stressed

Same as subcategory description

2

Low absenteeism

Same as subcategory description

1

Want to be at work

Same as subcategory description

1

Purpose

Clear purpose, sense of purpose

2

Work-life balance

Work and life fit together, able to make decisions about balance

4

Open

Same as subcategory description

1

Things go well

Same as subcategory description

1

Appendix 2 Domains Referred to by Participants when Describing High Well-Beinga

Participant

Cognitive

Emotional

Mind/body

Physical

Social

Task-related

Others

No. of domains

1.

    

x

  

1

2.

x

 

x

x

x

  

4

3.

x

x

x

   

x

4

4.

x

   

x

x

x

4

5.

x

x

x

    

3

6.

x

x

     

2

7.

x

x

x

    

3

8.

  

x

    

1

9.

x

x

x

  

x

 

4

10.

     

x

 

1

11.

  

x

x

   

2

12.

     

x

 

1

13.

 

x

     

1

14.

 

x

x

 

x

  

3

15.

x

   

x

x

 

3

16.

 

x

x

   

x

3

17.

x

 

x

    

2

18.

x

x

     

2

19.

  

x

    

1

20.

x

 

x

    

2

21.

x

  

x

   

2

22.

x

x

  

x

 

x

4

23.

    

x

  

1

24.

  

x

    

1

25.

   

x

 

x

 

2

26.

      

x

1

27.

 

x

x

    

2

28.

x

x

     

2

29.

  

x

    

1

30.

  

x

    

1

31.

  

x

x

 

x

 

3

32.

 

x

  

x

  

2

33.

x

x

  

x

x

 

4

34.

x

 

x

    

2

35.

     

x

x

3

36.

 

x

   

x

x

3

37.

x

 

x

    

2

37.

 

x

     

1

38.

    

x

x

x

3

39.

      

x

1

40.

x

 

x

  

x

 

3

41.

 

x

  

x

 

x

3

42.

x

 

x

   

x

3

43.

 

x

 

x

   

2

Frequency of domain

19/44

43.18%

18/44

40.91%

21/44

47.73%

6/44

13.64%

11/44

25.00%

12/44

27.28%

11/44

25.00%

 
  1. aIf an individual used several indicators of the same domain to describe well-being, the domain was counted only once

Appendix 3 Number of Domains Mentioned Together in Descriptions of Own Well-Being

Number of domains

Frequency

Percentage (%)

1 (mentioned by itself)

13/44

29.54

2

13/44

29.54

3

12/44

27.28

4

6/44

13.64

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Rook, C., O’Brien, A., Adarves-Yorno, I. (2021). What Are the Key Components of Workplace Well-Being?: Examining Real-Life Experiences in Different Work Contexts. In: Dhiman, S.K. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Workplace Well-Being. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30025-8_68

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics