Abstract
This concluding chapter brings together the contributions in this part and makes the case that public servants are not only (re)constructed by public sector reform, but their beliefs, identities, dilemmas, and actions shape reform trajectories too. Notions of place, time, and perceptions emerged as pervasive contextual themes that public servants grapple with as part of the dynamics of reform. Drawing on the part contributions, public servants’ situated agency is examined in these contexts. It is argued the adaptations that occur from their dilemmas, hybridity on the macro public sector-scale and bricolage at the micro public servant scale, in turn alter reform developments. We also make the case that insights into and from public servants offer a more rounded account of whether reform agendas will be symbolic or substantive and enduring or short-lived.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Andrews, Rhys, James Downe, and Valeria Guarneros-Meza. 2013. Public sector reform in the UK: Views and experiences from senior executives, Country report as part of the COCOPS research project 46 p.
Ariely, Gal. 2011. Why people (dis)like the public service: Citizen perception of the public service and the NPM doctrine. Politics & Policy 39 (6): 997–1019. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2011.00329.x.
Bevir, Mark. 2002. A decentered theory of governance. Journal Des Economistes et Des Etudes Humaines 12 (4). https://doi.org/10.2202/1145-6396.1073.
———. 2004. Governance and interpretation: What are the implications of postfoundationalism? Public Administration 82 (3): 605–625. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-3298.2004.00409.x.
Brunsson, Nils. 2009. Reform as routine: Organizational change and stability in the modern world. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
Capano, Giliberto. 2003. Administrative traditions and policy change: When policy paradigms matter. The case of Italian administrative reform during the 1990s. Public Administration 81 (4): 781–801. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-3298.2003.00371.x.
Choi, Naomi. 2007. Situated agency. In Encyclopedia of governance, ed. Mark Bevir, vol. 1, 873–873. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Ciborra, Claudio. 2004. The labyrinths of information: Challenging the wisdom of systems. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000587.
Cresswell, Tim. 2004. Place: A short introduction. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Cunha, Miguel Pina E. 2005. Bricolage in organizations. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.882784.
Dickinson, Helen. 2016. From new public management to new public governance: The implications for a ‘new public service.’. In The three sector solution, ed. John Butcher and David Gilchrist, 1st ed. Canberra: ANU Press. https://doi.org/10.22459/TSS.07.2016.03.
Dickinson, Helen, and Helen Sullivan. 2014. Imagining the 21st century public service workforce. Melbourne: Melbourne School of Government, University of Melbourne. https://government.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/2654444/MSoG-21c-Draft2_2_.pdf.
Donovan, Claire. 2007. Decentered theory. In Encyclopedia of governance, ed. Mark Bevir, 195–196. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412952613.n122.
Drechsler, Wolfgang. 2013. Three paradigms of governance and administration: Chinese, Western and Islamic. Society and Economy 35 (3): 319–342. https://doi.org/10.1556/SocEc.35.2013.3.3.
Duit, Andreas, and Victor Galaz. 2008. Governance and complexity—Emerging issues for governance theory. Governance 21 (3): 311–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2008.00402.x.
Fuchs, Christian. 2007. Self-organizing system. In Encyclopedia of governance, 864–865. Thousand Oaks, CAa: SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412952613.
Gonzales, Laurence. 2003. Deep survival: Who lives, who dies, and why: True stories of miraculous endurance and sudden death. New york: W.W. Norton.
Greener, Ian. 2007. Path dependence. In Encyclopedia of governance, ed. Mark Bevir. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412952613.n385.
Lanzara, Giovan Francesco. 1998. Self-destructive processes in institution building and some modest countervailing mechanisms. European Journal of Political Research 33 (1): 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006850820973.
Light, Paul Charles. 1997. The tides of reform: Making government work, 1945–1995. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Meyer, Renate E., Isabell Egger-Peitler, Markus A. Höllerer, and Gerhard Hammerschmid. 2014. Of bureaucrats and passionate public managers: Institutional logics, executive identities, and public service motivation. Public Administration 92 (4): 861–885. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2012.02105.x.
Needham, Catherine, and Catherine Mangan. 2014. The 21st century public servant. Public Service Academy: University of Birmingham. https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/Documents/college-social-sciences/public-service-academy/news-events/2014/21-century-report-28-10-14.pdf.
OECD, Organization for Economic Development. 2017. Systems approaches to public sector challenges: Working with change. Paris: Organization for Economic Development.
O’Flynn, Janine. 2018. Lessons from the Australian experience of public sector reform. In UnEstado Para La Ciudadanía. Estudios Para Su Modernización [A state for citizenship: Studies in modernization]. Santiago, Chile. (Spanish): Centro de Estudios Públicos [Center for Public Studies. https://anzsog.sharepoint.com/sites/KnowledgeNexus/Shared%20Documents/Forms/AllItems.aspx?id=%2Fsites%2FKnowledgeNexus%2FShared%20Documents%2FJanine%20O%27Flynn%2FPalgrave%20Handbook%20of%20the%20Public%20Servant%2F2018%20OFlynn%20Australian%20reform%20distribution%20%2Epdf&parent=%2Fsites%2FKnowledgeNexus%2FShared%20Documents%2FJanine%20O%27Flynn%2FPalgrave%20Handbook%20of%20the%20Public%20Servant.
Pollitt, Christopher. 2008. Time, policy, management: Governing with the past. Oxford: OUP.
———. 2013. Context in public policy and management: The missing link? Cheltenham, UK/Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Reissner, Stefanie C. 2019. ‘We are this hybrid’: Members’ search for organizational identity in an institutionalized public–private partnership. Public Administration 97 (1): 48–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12333.
Rerup, Claus. 2001. ‘Houston we have a problem’: Anticipation and improvisation as sources of organizational resilience. Comportamento Organizacional e Gestão 7 (January): 21–44.
Rhodes, R.A.W., John Wanna, and Patrick Weller. 2008. Reinventing Westminster: How public executives reframe their world. Policy and Politics; London 36 (4): 461–479. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557308X313705.
Teisman, Geert R., and Erik-Hans Klijn. 2008. Complexity theory and public management: An introduction. Public Management Review 10 (3): 287–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030802002451.
True, James, Bryan Jones, and Frank Baumgartner. 2007. Punctuated equilibrium theory: Explaining stability and change in public policymaking. In Theories of the policy process, ed. Paul Sabatier, 2nd ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Ugyel, Lhawang. 2014. Explaining hybridity in public administration: An empirical case of Bhutan’s civil service. Public Administration and Development 34 (2): 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1685.
Urinboyev, Rustamjon. 2011. Law, social norms and welfare as means of public administration: Case study of Mahalla institutions in Uzbekistan. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 4 (1): 33–57. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10110-011-0002-8.
van Buuren, Arwin, and Lasse Gerrits. 2007. Complexity. In Encyclopedia of governance, ed. Mark Bevir. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412952613.n87.
Van de Walle, Steven, Steven Van Roosbroek, and Geert Bouckaert. 2008. Trust in the public sector: Is there any evidence for a long-term decline? International Review of Administrative Sciences 74 (1): 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852307085733.
Van der Wal, Zeger. 2017. The 21st century public manager. London, UK: Palgrave.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Lucas, P., O’Flynn, J., Poole, A. (2021). Trajectories of Reform: Where (and Who) Are the Public Servants. In: Sullivan, H., Dickinson, H., Henderson, H. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of the Public Servant. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29980-4_91
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29980-4_91
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-29979-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-29980-4
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences