Abstract
This part looks at the work that public servants do beyond central government – focusing on people working to manage regional and local governments, and also those working as street-level bureaucrats at the frontline of public service. Co-production is an important theme in many of the chapters, highlighting the impetus to work differently with communities, and to shift power away from formal bureaucracies. The part highlights some of the distinctive challenges facing frontline workers, who seek to work in different ways with communities, but must also work with existing power structures established by peers and managers. There are also distinctive challenges relating to measures of success within local government and how public servants work with performance indicators and outcome measures to demonstrate success in the complex policy domains that operate in localities. The political aspect of local public service is also considered, recognizing the distinctive challenges facing elected officials in a context of resource constraint.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Baines, D. 2011. Resistance as emotional work: The Australian and Canadian non-profit social services. Industrial Relations Journal 42 (2): 139–156.
Bang, H. P. 2010. Everyday makers and expert citizens: active participants in the search for a new governance. Public management in the postmodern era challenges and prospects, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 163–191.
Berg, D.N. 2002. Bringing one’s self to work: A Jew reflects. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 38 (4): 397–415.
Barnett, N. J., Griggs, S., and Howarth, D. 2019. Whatever happened to Councillors? Problematising the deficiency narrative in English local politics. Political Studies, 67(3), 775–794.
Bolton, S.C. 2000. Who cares? Offering emotion work as a “gift” in the nursing labour process. Journal of Advanced Nursing 32 (3): 580–586.
Braithwaite, J., K. Churruca, J.C. Long, L.A. Ellis, and J. Herkes. 2018. When complexity science meets implementation science: A theoretical and empirical analysis of systems change. BMC Medicine 16: 63.
Clarke, J., and Newman, J. 1997. The managerial state: Power, politics and ideology in the remaking of social welfare. Sage.
Cottam, H. 2018. Radical help: How we can remake the relationships between us and revolutionise the welfare state. London: Hachette.
Dickinson, H., and H. Sullivan. 2014. Towards a general theory of collaborative performance: The importance of efficacy and agency. Public Administration 92 (1): 161–177.
Dickinson, H., C. Needham, C. Mangan, and H. Sullivan. 2019. Reimagining the future public service workforce. Singapore: Springer.
Drechsler, W. 2018. Beyond the western paradigm: Confucian public administration. In Public policy in the “Asian century”, ed. S. Bice, A. Poole, and H. Sullivan, 19–40. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dryzek, J. 1990. Discursive democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Durose, C. 2009. Front-line workers and “local knowledge”: Neighbourhood stories in contemporary UK local governance. Public Administration 87: 35–49.
———. 2011. Re-visiting Lipsky: Front line work in UK local governance. Political Studies 59 (4): 978–995.
Durose, C., C. Needham, C. Mangan, and J. Rees. 2017. Generating “good enough” evidence for co-production. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice 13 (1): 135–151.
Evans, T. 2010. Professionals, managers and discretion: Critiquing street-level bureaucracy. The British Journal of Social Work, 41(2), 368–386.
Ferguson, H. 2018. How social workers reflect in action and when and why they don’t: The possibilities and limits to reflective practice in social work. Social Work Education 37 (4): 415–427.
Fischer, F. 2009. Democracy and expertise: Reorienting public policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Flynn, R., Exworthy, M., and Halford, S. 1999. Professionals and the new managerialism in the public sector. in Flynn, R., Exworthy, M., and Halford, S. (eds) Managerialism, Professionalism and Quasi-markets, Open University Press, Buckingham, pp. 1–17.
Ford, L., and M. Green. 2012. New development: Making partnerships work: A local politicians guide to leadership. Public Money and Management 32 (4): 315–319.
Gofen, A. 2014. Mind the gap: Dimensions and influence of street-level divergence. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 24 (2): 473–493.
Hochschild, A.R. 1983. The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Lipsky, M. 2010. Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public service. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Maynard-Moody, S.W., and M.C. Musheno. 2003. Cops, teachers, counselors: Stories from the front lines of public service. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
McMullin, C., and C. Needham. 2018. Co-production in healthcare. In Co-production and co-creation, ed. T. Brandsen, T. Steen, and B. Verschuere, 151–160. New York: Routledge.
Needham, C., S. Mastracci, and C. Mangan. 2017. The emotional labour of boundary spanning. Journal of Integrated Care 25 (4): 288–300.
Richardson, L., and C. Durose. 2013. Who is accountable in localism? Findings from theory and practice. Birmingham: University of Birmingham.
Spicer, A. 2011. Guilty lives: The authenticity trap at work. Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization 11 (1): 46–62.
Sullivan, H. 2003. New forms of local accountability: Coming to terms with many hands. Policy and Politics 31 (3): 353–369.
Sullivan, H., and C. Skelcher. 2002. Working across boundaries: Collaboration in public services. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Tummers, L.L., V. Bekkers, E. Vink, and M. Musheno. 2015. Coping during public service delivery: A conceptualization and systematic review of the literature. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 25 (4): 1099–1126.
Van Hulst, M.J., L.J. de Graaf, and G.J.M. van den Brink. 2011. Exemplary practitioners: A review of actors who make a difference in governing. Administrative Theory and Praxis 33 (1): 120–142.
Williams, P. 2012. Collaboration in public policy and practice. Bristol: Policy Press.
———. 2019. Middle managers as agents of collaboration. Bristol: Policy Press.
Yanow, D. 1996. How does a policy mean? Interpreting policy and organizational actions. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Needham, C. (2021). Public Servants in the Wild: An Introduction. In: Sullivan, H., Dickinson, H., Henderson, H. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of the Public Servant. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29980-4_108
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29980-4_108
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-29979-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-29980-4
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences