Recruitment in social insects refers to explicit signals (as distinct from cues) that increase the number of workers at a particular place, usually leading workers to a resource. Recruitment is usually considered specific or directional, thus distinguishing it from non-specific upregulation of activity which may also result in an increase of workers at a resource. Recruitment is most common to resources such as food or nest sites, but can also take place to newly discovered territories, battle grounds, construction or excavation sites, displaced brood items, or anywhere where there is work to be done [1]. By recruiting to food, social insects can more effectively exploit resources in patchy environments, monopolize resources, and exploit an area much larger than that which a solitary insect can, or exploit food sources too large for an individual worker to handle. This effectively broadens the ecological niche of recruiting species. Recruitment to nest sites allows for cohesive and...
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Beekman, M., & Dussutour, A. (2009). How to tell your mates – Costs and benefits of different recruitment mechanisms. In S. Jarau & M. Hrncir (Eds.), Food exploitation by social insects: Ecological, behavioral, and theoretical approaches (pp. 115–134). Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Beekman, M., & Oldroyd, B. P. (2018). Different bees, different needs: How nest-site requirements have shaped the decision-making processes in homeless honeybees (Apis spp.). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373, 20170010.
Collett, M., Chittka, L., & Collett, T. S. (2013). Spatial memory in insect navigation. Current Biology, 23, R789–R800.
Czaczkes, T. J., Grüter, C., & Ratnieks, F. L. W. (2015). Trail pheromones: An integrative view of their role in colony organisation. Annual Review of Entomology, 60, 581–599.
Detrain, C., & Deneubourg, J.-L. (2008). Collective decision-making and foraging patterns in ants and honeybees. In S. J. Simpson (Ed.), Advances in insect physiology (Vol. 35, pp. 123–173). Amsterdam: Academic.
Franklin, E. L. (2014). The journey of tandem running: The twists, turns and what we have learned. Insectes Sociaux, 61, 1–8.
Franks, N. R., & Richardson, T. (2006). Teaching in tandem-running ants. Nature, 439, 153.
Grüter, C., & Leadbeater, E. (2014). Insights from insects about adaptive social information use. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 29, 177–184.
Guénard, B., & Silverman, J. (2011). Tandem carrying, a new foraging strategy in ants: Description, function, and adaptive significance relative to other described foraging strategies. Die Naturwissenschaften, 98, 651–659.
Hölldobler, B., & Wilson, E. O. (1990). The ants. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
Pfeffer, S. E., & Wittlinger, M. (2016). Optic flow odometry operates independently of stride integration in carried ants. Science, 353, 1155–1157.
Traniello, J. F. A. (1977). Recruitment behavior, orientation, and the organization of foraging in the carpenter ant Camponotus pennsylvanicus degeer (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology, 2, 61–79.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Czaczkes, T.J. (2021). Communication: Recruitment to Resources. In: Starr, C.K. (eds) Encyclopedia of Social Insects. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28102-1_144
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28102-1_144
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-28101-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-28102-1
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences