Skip to main content

Communication: Recruitment to Resources

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Social Insects

Recruitment in social insects refers to explicit signals (as distinct from cues) that increase the number of workers at a particular place, usually leading workers to a resource. Recruitment is usually considered specific or directional, thus distinguishing it from non-specific upregulation of activity which may also result in an increase of workers at a resource. Recruitment is most common to resources such as food or nest sites, but can also take place to newly discovered territories, battle grounds, construction or excavation sites, displaced brood items, or anywhere where there is work to be done [1]. By recruiting to food, social insects can more effectively exploit resources in patchy environments, monopolize resources, and exploit an area much larger than that which a solitary insect can, or exploit food sources too large for an individual worker to handle. This effectively broadens the ecological niche of recruiting species. Recruitment to nest sites allows for cohesive and...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 649.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 699.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Beekman, M., & Dussutour, A. (2009). How to tell your mates – Costs and benefits of different recruitment mechanisms. In S. Jarau & M. Hrncir (Eds.), Food exploitation by social insects: Ecological, behavioral, and theoretical approaches (pp. 115–134). Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beekman, M., & Oldroyd, B. P. (2018). Different bees, different needs: How nest-site requirements have shaped the decision-making processes in homeless honeybees (Apis spp.). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373, 20170010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Collett, M., Chittka, L., & Collett, T. S. (2013). Spatial memory in insect navigation. Current Biology, 23, R789–R800.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Czaczkes, T. J., Grüter, C., & Ratnieks, F. L. W. (2015). Trail pheromones: An integrative view of their role in colony organisation. Annual Review of Entomology, 60, 581–599.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Detrain, C., & Deneubourg, J.-L. (2008). Collective decision-making and foraging patterns in ants and honeybees. In S. J. Simpson (Ed.), Advances in insect physiology (Vol. 35, pp. 123–173). Amsterdam: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Franklin, E. L. (2014). The journey of tandem running: The twists, turns and what we have learned. Insectes Sociaux, 61, 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Franks, N. R., & Richardson, T. (2006). Teaching in tandem-running ants. Nature, 439, 153.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Grüter, C., & Leadbeater, E. (2014). Insights from insects about adaptive social information use. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 29, 177–184.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Guénard, B., & Silverman, J. (2011). Tandem carrying, a new foraging strategy in ants: Description, function, and adaptive significance relative to other described foraging strategies. Die Naturwissenschaften, 98, 651–659.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hölldobler, B., & Wilson, E. O. (1990). The ants. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Pfeffer, S. E., & Wittlinger, M. (2016). Optic flow odometry operates independently of stride integration in carried ants. Science, 353, 1155–1157.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Traniello, J. F. A. (1977). Recruitment behavior, orientation, and the organization of foraging in the carpenter ant Camponotus pennsylvanicus degeer (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology, 2, 61–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomer J. Czaczkes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Czaczkes, T.J. (2021). Communication: Recruitment to Resources. In: Starr, C.K. (eds) Encyclopedia of Social Insects. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28102-1_144

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics