Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Developing Industry 4 Systems with OPM ISO 19450 Augmented with MAXIM

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Model-Based Systems Engineering

  • 123 Accesses

Abstract

Industry 4.0 and the transition to digital engineering go hand-in-hand, mandating a paradigm shift for model-based systems engineering. In this chapter, we discuss what this new environment requires in terms of modeling capabilities, and why current languages are less than adequate for the task at hand. We then describe the basics of OPM ISO 19450 and its MAXIM extension. We explain why this combination of high-level conceptual modeling and detailed computational modeling, where hardware and software components are described consistently and seamlessly, is a solution to the problem that model-based systems engineering is facing as it is trying to adapt to the Industry 4.0 environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Böhm W, Henkler S, Houdek F, Vogelsang A, Weyer T (2014) Bridging the Gap between Systems and Software Engineering by Using the SPES Modeling Framework as a General Systems Engineering Philosophy. Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 28, pp. 187–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Builta J, Howell J, De Ambroggi L, Short M, Grossner C, Morelli B, Tait D, Hall T (2019) Digital Orbit – Tracking the development, impact, and disruption caused by transformative technologies across key industries. Available: https://cdn.ihs.com/www/pdf/0419/ihs-markit-digital-orbit-brochure.pdf. Accessed 14 Dec 2020.

  3. Cameron B, Adsit DM (2018) Model-Based Systems Engineering Uptake in Engineering Practice. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 67, 152–162. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2018.2863041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Christie AM (1999) Simulation: An Enabling Technology in Software Engineering CrossTalk. Available: https://resources.sei.cmu.edu/library/asset-view.cfm?assetid=29627. Accessed: Dec. 24, 2020.

  5. Dori D (2002) Why Significant Change in UML is Unlikely. Communications of the ACM, 11, pp. 82–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dori D (2002) Object-Process Methodology – A Holistic Systems Paradigm, Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 2002. eBook version: http://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-642-56209-9/page/1

  7. Dori D (2016) Model-Based Systems Engineering with OPM and SysML, Springer, New York, 2016. http://www.springer.com/gp/book/9781493932948

  8. Dori D and Goodman M (1996) On bridging the analysis-design and structure-behavior grand canyons with object paradigms. Rep. Object Anal. Des., vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 25–35.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dori D, Jbara A, Levi N, and Wengrowicz N (2018) Object-Process Methodology, OPM ISO 19450 – OPCloud and the Evolution of OPM Modeling Tools. Syst. Eng. Newsl. (PPI SyEN) 61, 6–17.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dori D, Kohen H, Jbara A, Wengrowicz N, Lavi R, Levi Soskin N, Bernstein K, and Shani U (2020) OPCloud: An OPM Integrated Conceptual-Executable Modeling Environment for Industry 4.0. In Kenneth R, Zonnenshain A, and Swarz RS (eds.) Systems Engineering in the Fourth Industrial Revolution: How Big Data and Novel Technologies Affect Modern Systems Engineering. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dori D, Renick A, and Wengrowicz N (2016) When quantitative meets qualitative: Enhancing OPM conceptual systems modeling with MATLAB computational capabilities. Res. Eng. Des. 27( 2) 141–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hampson K (2015) Technical evaluation of the Systems Modeling Language (SysML). Conference on Systems Engineering Research, Procedia Computer Science 44, 403–412.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hoheb A, Hale J (2019) Leading the Transformation of Model-Based Engineering: The Model-Based Capability Matrix. Available: https://www.incose.org/docs/default-source/default-document-library/leading-mbse-transformation_v5.pdf?sfvrsn=48e59bc6_0. Accessed: Dec. 14, 2020.

  14. ISO 19450 (2015) Automation systems and integration – Object-Process Methodology. Available: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:pas:19450:ed-1:v1:en. Accessed: Dec. 26, 2020.

  15. James L (2020) Model-based Systems Engineering at JPL. Presentation at CSER 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kohen H, Dori D (2021) Improving Conceptual Modeling with Object-Process Methodology Stereotypes. 2021, 11, 2301. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11052301.

  17. Levi Soskin N, Jbara A and Dori D (2020) The Model Fidelity Hierarchy: From Text to Conceptual, Computational, and Executable Model. IEEE Systems Journal, 2020. Early Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2020.3008857.

  18. Levi-Soskin N, Shaoul R, Kohen H, Jbara A, and Dori D (2019) Model-Based Diagnosis with FTTell: Assessing the Potential for Pediatric Failure to Thrive (FTT) During the Perinatal Stage. SIGSAND/PLAIS: 2019 EuroSymposium on Systems Analysis and Design – Information Systems: Research, Development, Applications, Education, Proc. 12th SIGSAND/PLAIS, Gdansk, Poland, September 19, 2019. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP), volume 359, pp. 37–47.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Madni AM, Sievers M (2018) Model-based systems engineering: Motivation, current status, and research opportunities. Syst. Eng. 21, 172–190. https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mayer RE (2003) The promise of multimedia learning: using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learn. Instr. 13(2) 125–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mayer RE and Moreno R (2003) Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educ. Psychol. 38(1) 43–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mellor SJ and Balcer MJ (2003) Executable and Translatable UML. Embed. Syst. Program., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 25–30.

    Google Scholar 

  23. McDermott T, Eileen Van Aken E (2020) Task Order WRT-1001: Digital Engineering Metrics. Technical Report SERC-2020-TR-002. Available: https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/AD1104591. Accessed: Dec. 14, 2020.

  24. McDermott TA, Hutchinson N, Clifford M, Van Aken E, Slado A, Henderson K (2020) Benchmarking the Benefits and Current Maturity of Model-Based Systems Engineering across the Enterprise.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Medvedev D, Shani U, Dori D (2021) Gaining Insights into Conceptual Models: A Graph-Theoretic Querying Approach. Applied Science 11 (766).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mordecai Y, Dori D (2017) Minding the Cyber-Physical Gap: Model-Based Analysis and Mitigation of Systemic Perception-Induced Failure, Sensors, 17(1644), 1644. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17071644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mordecai Y, de Weck LO, Crawley EF (2020) Towards an Enterprise Architecture for a Digital Systems Engineering Ecosystem. CSER 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mordecai Y, Orhof O, and Dori D (2016) Model-Based Interoperability Engineering in Systems-of-Systems and Civil Aviation. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Cybern. 1. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=7571127

  29. ODASDE (2017) Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (Systems Engineering) [ODASD (SE)], “DAU Glossary: Digital Engineering,” Defense Acquisition University (DAU), 2017. Available: https://www.dau.edu/glossary/Pages/GlossaryContent.aspx?itemid=27345. Accessed: Dec. 14, 2020.

  30. OMG SysML v2 (2017) OMG SysML v2: The next-generation systems modeling language. Available: https://www.omgsysml.org/SysML-2.htm. Accessed: Dec. 26, 2020.

  31. OMG SysML v2 (2017) Document – ad/17-12-02 (Systems Modeling Language (SysML) v2 RFP). Available: https://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?ad/17-12-02.pdf. Accessed.

  32. OMG SysML v2 SST (2020) Introduction to the SysML v2 Language Textual Notation. Available: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1iW2pVnsCxuhSadQhT0ut9yMJRDLvz29v/view?usp=sharing. Accessed: Dec. 26, 2020.

  33. Peleg M and Dori D (2000) The Model Multiplicity Problem: Experimenting with Real-Time Specification Methods. IEEE Transaction on Software Engineering, 26, 8, pp. 742–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Pyster A et al. (2015) “Exploring the Relationship between Systems Engineering and Software Engineering,” Procedia Comput. Sci. 44 708–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Seidewitz E (2014) UML with Meaning: Executable Modeling in Foundational UML and the Alf Action Language. Proc. 2014 ACM SIGAda Annual Conference on High Integrity Language Technology, New York: ACM, pp. 61–68.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  36. Selic B (2003) The pragmatics of model-driven development, IEEE Softw., vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 19–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Somekh J, Haimovich G, Guterman A, Dori D, and Choder M (2014) Conceptual Modeling of mRNA Decay Provokes New Hypotheses. PLoS ONE 9(9): e107085. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107085.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ustundag A, Cevikcan E (2018). Industry 4.0: Managing the Digital Transformation, Springer Series in Advanced Manufacturing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57870-5.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel

    D. Dori

Authors
  1. D. Dori
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Dori .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Azad M. Madni

  2. Lockheed Martin (United States), Bethesda, MD, USA

    Norman Augustine

  3. University of Southern California, Los Angelies, CA, USA

    Michael Sievers

Section Editor information

  1. General Motors, Detroit, USA

    Joseph D'Ambrosio

  2. Systems Architecting and Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Azad M. Madni

  3. University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Michael W. Sievers

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Dori, D. (2022). Developing Industry 4 Systems with OPM ISO 19450 Augmented with MAXIM. In: Madni, A.M., Augustine, N., Sievers, M. (eds) Handbook of Model-Based Systems Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27486-3_38-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27486-3_38-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-27486-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-27486-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsReference Module Computer Science and Engineering

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation