Abstract
Spacepower theory is useful in describing, explaining, and predicting how individuals, groups, and states can best derive utility, balance investments, and reduce risks in their interactions with the cosmos. Spacepower theory should be more fully developed and become a source for critical insights as humanity wrestles with our most difficult and fundamental space challenges. This theory can help to guide us toward better ways to generate wealth in space, make tradeoffs between space investments and other important goals, reorder terrestrial security dynamics as space becomes increasingly militarized and potentially weaponized, and seize exploration and survival opportunities that only space can provide. This chapter reviews noteworthy efforts to develop spacepower theory and overviews recent changes in US organizational structures for spacepower. It then considers ways theory and structures could help to refine current US space policy and address some of the most significant challenges and issues surrounding space security, space commercialization, and environmental sustainability and survival.
The opinions expressed in this chapter are mine and do not imply endorsement by the Space Policy Institute, Falcon Research, or Department of Defense.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ambassador Mahley DA (2008) Remarks on the state of space security. In: The state of space security workshop, Space Policy Institute, George Washington University, Washington, DC
Baines PJ (2003) The prospects for ‘non-offensive’ defenses in space. In: Moltz JC (ed) New challenges in missile proliferation, missile defense, and space security. Center for Nonproliferation Studies occasional paper no 12. Monterey Institute of International Studies, Monterey, pp 31–48
Barrie D, Taverna MA (2006) Specious relationship. Aviat Week Space Technol 17:93–96
Center for Strategic and International Studies (2008) Briefing of the working group on the health of the U.S. space industrial base and the impact of export controls. Center for Strategic and International Studies, Washington, DC
Corbett JS (1988) In: Grove EJ (ed) Some principles of maritime strategy. Naval Institute Press, Annapolis (First published 1911)
Council of the European Union (2008) Council conclusions and draft Code of Conduct for outer space activity. Council of the European Union, Brussels
de Selding PB (2005) European satellite component maker says it is dropping U.S. components because of ITAR. Space News Business report, 13 June 2005
Dolman EC (2001) Astropolitik: classical geopolitics in the space age. Routledge, New York
Douhet G (1983) In: Kohn RH, Harahan JP (eds) The command of the air. Office of Air Force History, Washington, DC (First published 1921)
Garretson P (2009) Elements of a 21st century space policy. The Space Review, 3 August 2009. Downloaded from http://www.thespacereview.com/article/1433/1
Joseph DeSutter R (2006) Space control, diplomacy, and strategic integration. Space Def 1(1): 29–51
Klein JJ (2006) Space warfare: strategy, principles, and policy. Routledge, New York
Klein JJ (2019) Understanding space strategy: the art of war in space. Routledge, New York
Lutes CD, Hays PL, Manzo VA, Yambrick LM, Bunn ME (eds) (2011) Toward a theory of spacepower: selected essays. National Defense University Press, Washington, DC
MacDonald BW (2008) China, space weapons, and U.S. security. Council on Foreign Relations, New York, pp 34–38
Mahan AT (1890) The influence of sea power upon history, 1660–1783. Little, Brown, Boston
McGlade D (2007) Commentary: preserving the orbital environment. Space News, 19 February 2007, p 27
Meilinger PS (ed) (1997) The paths of heaven: the evolution of airpower theory. Air University Press, Maxwell
Mets DR (1999) The air campaign: John Warden and the classical airpower theorists. Air University Press, Maxwell
Mitchell W (1988) Winged defense: the development and possibilities of modern airpower – economic and military. Dover, New York (First published 1925)
NASA Orbital Debris Program Office (2009) Fengyun 1-C Debris: Two Years Later. Orbital Debris Quarterly News 13(1):2. Johnson Spaceflight Center: NASA Orbital Debris Program Office
National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) (2019) Conference report to accompany National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2020. The Space Force Act is Sections 951–61 of the fiscal year (FY) 2020. US Congress. Washington, DC. https://docs.house.gov/billsthisweek/20191209/CRPT-116hrpt333.pdf
National Defense Strategy (2018) Summary of the 2018 National Defense Strategy. Department of Defense, Washington, DC, p 6. https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/2018-National-Defense-Strategy-Summary.pdf
National Research Council (2009) Beyond “Fortress America”: national security controls on science and technology in a globalized world. National Academies Press, Washington, DC
National Security Strategy (2017) The White House, Washington, DC, p 31. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NSS-Final-12-18-2017-0905.pdf
National Strategy for Space (2018) The White House, Washington, DC, p 2. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/president-donald-j-trump-unveiling-america-first-national-space-strategy/
Oberg JE (1999) Space power theory. United States Space Command, Colorado Springs
Pillsbury MP (2007) An assessment of China’s anti-satellite and space warfare programs, policies, and doctrines. Report prepared for the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, p 48
Pollpeter K (2008) Building for the future: China’s progress in space technology during the tenth 5-year plan and the US response. Strategic Studies Institute, Carlisle Barracks, pp 48–50
Secretary of Defense and Director of National Intelligence (2011) National security space strategy: unclassified summary. Office of the Secretary of Defense and Office of the Director of National Intelligence, Washington, DC
Smith MV (2001) Ten propositions regarding spacepower. Air University Press, Maxwell
Sumida JT (1997) Inventing grand strategy and teaching command: the classic works of Alfred Thayer Mahan reconsidered. Woodrow Wilson Center Press, Washington, DC
United Nations General Assembly Resolution 62/217 (2008) International cooperation in the peaceful uses of outer space. UNGA, New York
Warden JA III (1988) The air campaign: planning for combat. National Defense University Press, Washington, DC
Weeden B (2009) The numbers game. The Space Review, 13 July 2009. Downloaded from http://www.thespacereview.com/article/1417/1
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Hays, P.L. (2020). Spacepower Theory and Organizational Structures. In: Schrogl, KU. (eds) Handbook of Space Security. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23210-8_52
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23210-8_52
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-23209-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-23210-8
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Chemistry, Materials and Physics