Skip to main content

Brachiaria Grass for Sustainable Livestock Production in Rwanda under Climate Change

Abstract

Brachiaria grass is an important tropical forage of African origin. It produces high amount of palatable and nutritious biomass, tolerates abiotic and biotic stresses, improves soil fertility, increases livestock productivity, and reduces adversities of climate change. Since 2007, several improved Brachiaria grass cultivars (Brachiaria brizantha cvs. Marandú, MG4, Piatã, and Xaraés; B. decumbens cv. Basilisk; B. humidicola cvs. Humidicola and Llanero; Brachiaria hybrid cvs. Mulato, Mulato II, and Cayman; and other hybrid lines Bro2/0465, Bro2/1452, and Bro2/1485) have been introduced and evaluated in Rwanda for adaptation, biomass yields, animal nutrition, livestock productivity, and environmental qualities. Both on-farm and on-station evaluations of 13 improved Brachiaria grass cultivars and 2 checks – local Brachiaria grass and buffel grass at two different agroecological zones of Rwanda showed superior adaptation, higher biomass yields, and higher nutritive values of all Brachiaria grass cultivars compared to buffel grass. Subsequent study evaluating the impact of cutting regimes on agronomic and nutritional characteristics of improved Brachiaria cultivars and Napier grass showed forages harvested at 90 days after planting with high crude protein content (between 137 and 167 g/kg DM for Mulato II and Piatã, respectively) and high metabolizable energy (up to 9 MJ/kg DM for Piatã). These attributes have shown to increase animal production optimizing retention time of the particle phase of digesta in dairy cows which was shorter for Piatã (62.8 h) than Napier grass (83.1 h). Piatã had higher voluntary dry matter intake than Napier grass hence increased milk yield up to 50%. Furthermore, heifer fed on Mulato II had up to 54.7% more body weight and less enteric methane (14%) than heifers fed on Napier grass. These studies have shown Brachiaria grass as the most productive forage of high farmer preference due to its adaptation in low rainfall and acidic soils and the production of green foliage year-round. Therefore, improved Brachiaria grass has been promoted in 20 of 30 districts of Rwanda through various livestock development initiatives benefitting more than 4,800 farmers from South, Eastern, and Northern Provinces of Rwanda. In this chapter, we also discussed the prospects of Brachiaria grass in supporting the growing livestock sector in Rwanda and emerging challenges.

Keywords

  • Biomass yield
  • Enteric methane
  • Milk yield
  • Nutritional characteristics

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Chapman DF, Kenny SN, Beca D, Johnson IR (2008) Pasture and forage crop systems for non-irrigated dairy farms in southern Australia. 2. Inter-annual variation in forage supply, and business risk. Agric Syst 97:126–138

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • CIAT (2019) Forage suitability maps – current and future. https://ciatshare.ciat.cgiar.org/sites/climatesmartdairy/SitePages/Spatial%20Targeting.aspx

  • Ghimire S, Njarui D, Mutimura M, Cardoso J, Johnson L, Gichangi E, Teasdale S, Odokonyero K, Caradus J, Rao I, Djiken A (2015) Climate-smart Brachiaria for improving livestock production in East Africa: emerging opportunities. Proceedings of 23rd International Grassland Congress 2015-Keynote Lectures 361

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrero M, Thornton PK, Kruska R, Reid RS (2008) Systems dynamics and the spatial distribution of methane emissions from African domestic ruminants to 2030. Agric Ecosyst Environ 126:122–137

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jank L, Barrios SC, do Valle CB, Simeão RM, Alves GF (2014) The value of improved pastures to Brazilian beef production. Crop Pasture Sci 65:1132–1137

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kabirizi J, Muyekho F, Mulaa M, Msangi R, Pallangyo B, Kawube G, Zziwa E, Mugerwa S, Ajanga S, Lukwago G, Wamalwa NIE, Kariuki I, Mwesigwa R, Nannyeenya, Ntege W, Atuhairwe A, Awalla J, Namazzi C, Nampijja Z (2015) Napier grass feed resource: production, constraints, and implications for smallholder farmers in Eastern and Central Africa. Naivasha, Kenya, 159 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller-Grein G, Maass BL, Hanson J (1996) Natural variation in Brachiaria and existing germplasm collection. In: Miles JW, Maass BL, do Valle CB, Kumble V (eds) Brachiaria: biology, agronomy, and improvement. International Center for Tropical Agriculture, Cali, pp 16–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Kırkpınar F, Açıkgöz Z (2018) Feeding, Animal Husbandry and Nutrition, Banu Yücel and Turgay Taşkin, IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.78618. Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/books/animal-husbandry-and-nutrition/feeding. Accessed 7 Oct 2020

  • Leng RA (1990) Factors affecting the utilization of ‘poor-quality’ forages by ruminants particularly under tropical conditions. Nutr Res Rev 3:277–303

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald P, Edwards RA, Greenhalgh JFD, Morgan CA, Sinclair LA, Wilkinson RG (2011) Animal nutrition, 7th edn. Pearson Education Limited, Edinburgh Gate, Harlow. 692p

    Google Scholar 

  • Menke KH, Raab L, Salewski A, Steingass A, Fritz D, Scheinder W (1979) The estimation of digestibility and metabolisable energy contents of ruminant feedstuffs from gas production when they incubated with rumen fluid in vitro. J Agric Sci (Camb) 92:217–222

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • MINAGRI (Ministry of Agriculture and Animal Resources of Rwanda) (2018) Strategic Plan for Agriculture Transformation phase 4 (PSTA 4)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutimura M (2016) Ecological benefits of Brachiaria grasses in integrated crop-livestock production in Rwanda. PhD Thesis, University of KwaZulu-Natal, 196p

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutimura M, Everson TM (2012) On-farm evaluation of improved Brachiaria grasses in low rainfall and aluminium toxicity prone areas of Rwanda. Int J Biodivers Conserv 4:137–154

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mutimura M, Lussa AB, Myambi CB, Mutabazi J, Cyamweshi RA, Ebong C (2013) Status of animal feed resources in Rwanda. J Trop Grasslands 1(1):109–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutimura M, Ebong C, Rao IM, Nsahlai IV (2016) Change in growth performance of crossbred (Ankole × Jersey) dairy heifers fed on forage grass diets supplemented with commercial concentrates. Trop Anim Health Prod 48:741–746

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mutimura M, Ebong C, Rao IM, Nsahlai IV (2017) Effect of cutting time on agronomic and nutritional characteristics of nine commercial cultivars of Brachiaria grass compared with Napier grass during establishment under semi-arid conditions in Rwanda. Afr J Agric Res 12(35):2692–2703

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mutimura M, Ebong C, Rao IM, Nsahlai IV (2018) Effects of supplementation of Brachiaria brizantha cultivar Piatá and Napier grass with Desmodium distortum on feed intake, digesta kinetics and milk production by crossbred dairy cows. Animal Nutrition 4:222–227

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • NISR (National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda) (2019) Gross Domestic Product – National Accounts (Second Quarter 2019). NISR, Kigali, 13pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Njarui DMG, Gichangi EM, Ghimire SR, Muinga RW (2016) Climate Smart Brachiaria Grasses for Improving Livestock Production in East Africa – Kenya Experience. Proceedings of the workshop held in Naivasha, Kenya, 14–15 September 2016. Nairobi. 271pp

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell M, Young J, Kingwell R (2006) The economic value of saltland pastures in a mixed farming system in Western Australia. Agric Syst 89:371–389

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • RAB (Rwanda Agriculture and Animal Resources Development Board) (2017) Animal Resources department internal report. Kigali

    Google Scholar 

  • RAB (2019) Price for livestock related services, veterinary services and forage seeds. Kigali

    Google Scholar 

  • RARDA (Rwanda Animal Resources Development Authority) (2006) Annual report. Kigali

    Google Scholar 

  • RLSA (2017) (Rwanda Livestock Sector Analysis) consultancy report

    Google Scholar 

  • Roothaert R, Horne PM, Stür WW (2003) Integrating forage technologies on smallholder farms in the upland tropics. Trop Grasslands 37:295–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, BC, Larbi A, Tabo R, Dixon GO (2004) Trends in development of crop varieties for improved crop-livestock systems in West Africa. In: Williams TO, Tarawali SA, Hiernaux P, Fernandez-Rivera S (eds) Sustainable crop-livestock production for improved livelihoods and natural resource management in West Africa. Proceedings of an international conference held at the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Ibadan, 19–22nd November, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  • Subbarao GV, Nakahara K, Hurtado MP, Ono H, Moreta DE, Salcedo AF, Yoshihashi AT, Ishikawa T, Ishitani M, Ohnishi-Kameyama M, Yoshida M, Rondon M, Rao IM, Lascano CE, Berry WL, Ito O (2009) Evidence for biological nitrification inhibition in Brachiaria pastures. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106(41):17302–17307. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0903694106

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Uzayisenga, B, Mutimura M, Muthomi JW, Mwang’ombe AW, Ghimire SR (2020, in press) Disease surveillance and farmers’ knowledge of Brachiaria (Syn. Urochloa) grass diseases in Rwanda. Afr J Range Forage Sci. https://doi.org/10.2989/10220119.2020.1810774

Download references

Acknowledgments

Authors are grateful to the financial support from the Federal Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) for funding “Fighting drought and aluminum toxicity: Integrating functional genomics, phenotypic screening and participatory evaluation with women and small-scale farmers to develop stress-resistant common bean and Brachiaria for the tropics” project; the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) for Climate-Smart Dairy Project; the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida) for Climate-Smart Brachiaria Grass Program; and EU’s Horizon 2020 program for InnovAfrica project (Grant Agreement number 727201).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Mutimura, M., Ghimire, S. (2021). Brachiaria Grass for Sustainable Livestock Production in Rwanda under Climate Change. In: Leal Filho, W., Luetz, J., Ayal, D. (eds) Handbook of Climate Change Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22759-3_314-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22759-3_314-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-22759-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-22759-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Earth & Environm. ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials Science