Skip to main content

Argumentation in Mathematics Education

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education

Definition

“Argumentation in mathematics education” can mean two things:

  1. 1.

    The mathematical arguments that students and teachers produce in mathematics classrooms

  2. 2.

    The arguments that mathematics education researchers produce regarding the nature of mathematics learning and the efficacy of mathematics teaching in various contexts.

This entry is about the first of these two interpretations.

Mathematics Classrooms and Argumentation

In the context of a mathematics classroom, we will take a “mathematical argument” to be a line of reasoning that intends to show or explain why a mathematical result is true. The mathematical result might be a general statement about some class of mathematical objects or it might simply be the solution to a mathematical problem that has been posed. Taken in this sense, a mathematical argument might be a formal or informal proof, an explanation of how a student or teacher came to make a particular conjecture, how a student or teacher reasoned through a...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 699.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Fawcett HP (1938) The nature of proof: a description and evaluation of certain procedures used in senior high school to develop an understanding of the nature of proof. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos I (1976) Proofs and refutations: the logic of mathematical discovery. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Polya G (1954) Patterns of plausible inference. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld AH (1985) Mathematical problem solving. Academic, Orlando

    Google Scholar 

  • Sriraman B (2003) Can mathematical discovery fill the existential void? The use of conjecture, proof and refutation in a high school classroom. Math Sch 32(2):2–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Sriraman B (2006) An Ode to Imre Lakatos: bridging the ideal and actual mathematics classrooms. Interchange Q Rev Educ 37(1&2):155–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Sriraman B, Vanspronsen H, Haverhals N (2010) Commentary on DNR based instruction in mathematics as a conceptual framework. In: Sriraman B, English L (eds) Theories of mathematics education: seeking new frontiers. Springer, Berlin, pp 369–378

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sriraman B (2017) Humanizing mathematics and its philosophy: essays celebrating the 90th birthday of Reuben Hersh. Birkhauser Basel. Springer

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bharath Sriraman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Sriraman, B., Umland, K. (2020). Argumentation in Mathematics Education. In: Lerman, S. (eds) Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics