Skip to main content

Interest Groups, Public Opinion, and Political Representation

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Interest Groups, Lobbying and Public Affairs

Definition

This chapter sets out to introduce the literature tackling the interplay between interest groups, public opinion, and public policy. Even after nearly 60 years of political science research, there is still much controversy concerning the involvement of interest groups in public policymaking and how lobbying might affect policy congruence and responsiveness to public opinion. While interest group politics and public opinion have long been examined in separate scholarly communities, this changed in recent times. We first cover recent studies addressing (1) the alignment between interest groups and public opinion, next we discuss (2) the independent but simultaneous effects of interest groups and public opinion on public policy, and finally (3) we cover how the interaction between interest groups and public opinion affects public policymaking. We conclude by reflecting on the findings in current literature, discuss some of its analytical limitations, and propose possible...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agnone, J. (2007). Amplifying public opinion: The policy impact of the U.S. environmental movement. Social Forces, 85(4), 1593–1620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernardi, L., Bischof, D., & Wouters, R. (2021). The public, the protester, and the bill: Do legislative agendas respond to public opinion signals? Journal of European Public Policy, 28(2), 289–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevan, S., & Rasmussen, A. (2020). When does government listen to the public? Voluntary associations and dynamic agenda representation in the United States. Policy Studies Journal, 48(1), 111–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burstein, P. (2010). Public opinion, public policy and democracy. In K. T. Leicht & J. C. Jenkins (Eds.), Handbook of politics: State and society in global perspective. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burstein, P. (2014). American public opinion, advocacy and policy in congress. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burstein, P., & Freudenburg, W. (1978). Changing public policy: The impact of public opinion, antiwar demonstrations, and war costs on senate voting on Vietnam War motions. American Journal of Sociology, 84(1), 99–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Bruycker, I. (2020). Democratically deficient, yet responsive? How politicization facilitates responsiveness in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(6), 834–852.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bruycker, I., & Rasmussen, A. (2021). Blessing or curse for congruence? How interest mobilization affects congruence between citizens and elected representatives. Journal of Common Market Studies, 59(4), 909–928.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dür, A. (2019). How interest groups influence public opinion: Arguments matter more than the sources. European Journal of Political Research, 58(2), 514–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dür, A., & Mateo, G. (2014). Public opinion and interest group influence: How citizen groups derailed the anti-counterfeiting trade agreement. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(8), 1199–1217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flöthe, L., & Rasmussen, A. (2019). Public voices in the heavenly chorus? Group type bias and opinion representation. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(6), 824–842.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giger, N., & Klüver, H. (2016). Voting against your constituents? How lobbying affects representation. American Journal of Political Science, 60(1), 190–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilens, M. (2012). Affluence and influence: Economic power and political inequality in America. New York: Russell Sage Fondation and Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Giugni, M. (2007). Useless protest? A time-series analysis of the policy outcomes of ecology, antinuclear, and peace movements in the United States, 1977–1995. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 12(1), 53–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, V., Lowery, D., Fellowes, M., & McAtee, A. (2004). Public opinion, public policy, and organized interests in the American States. Political Research Quarterly, 57(3), 411–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanegraaff, M., & Poletti, A. (2019). Public opinion and interest groups’ concerns for organizational survival. European Political Science Review, 11(2), 125–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jungherr, A., Wuttke, A., Mader, M., & Schoen, H. (2021). A source like any other? Field and survey experiment evidence on how interest groups shape public opinion. Journal of Communication, 71(2), 276–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junk, W. M., & Rasmussen, A. (2020). Can we change their minds? A field experiment on the ability of interest groups to affect public opinion. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klüver, H. (2015). Interest groups in the German Bundestag: Exploring the issue linkage between citizens and Interest groups. German Politics, 24(2), 137–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klüver, H., & Pickup, M. (2019). Are they listening? Public opinion, interest groups and government responsiveness. West European Politics, 42(1), 91–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kollman, K. (1998). Outside lobbying: Public opinion and interest group strategies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lax, J. R., & Phillips, J. H. (2012). The democratic deficit in the States. American Journal of Political Science, 56(1), 148–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeper, T. L. (2013). Interest groups and political attitudes. Working paper. https://s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/tjl-sharing/assets/InterestGroupsAndPoliticalAttitudes.pdf.

  • McEntire, K. J., Leiby, M., & Krain, M. (2015). Human Rights Organizations as agents of change: An experimental examination of framing and micromobilization. American Political Science Review, 109(3), 407–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neddenriep, G., & Nownes, A. J. (2014). An experimental investigation of the effects of interest-group endorsements on poorly aligned partisans in the 2008 presidential election. Party Politics, 20(4), 617–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page, B. I., Shapiro, R. Y., & Dempsey, G. R. (1987). What moves public opinion? American Political Science Review, 81(1), 23–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, A., Binderkrantz, A. S., & Klüver, H. (2021). Organised interests in the media and policy congruence: The contingent impact of the status quo. European Journal of Political Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12434

  • Rasmussen, A., Carroll, B., & Lowery, D. (2014). Representatives of the Public? Public opinion and interest group activity. European Journal of Political Research, 53(2), 250–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, A., Mäder, L., & Reher, S. (2018). With a little help from the people? The role of public opinion in advocacy success. Comparative Political Studies, 51(2), 139–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, A., & Reher, S. (2019). Civil society engagement and policy representation in Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 52(11), 1648–1676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, A., Romeijn, J., & Toshkov, D. (2018). Dynamics of regulatory policymaking in Sweden: The role of media advocacy and public opinion. Scandinavian Political Studies, 41(1), 49–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soule, S. A., & Olzak, S. (2004). When do movements matter? The politics of contingency and the equal rights amendment. American Sociological Review, 69(4), 473–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willems, E. (2020). Politicized policy access: The effect of politicization on interest group access to advisory councils. Public Administration, 98(4), 865–872. 

    Google Scholar 

  • Willems, E. (2021). Walking a tightrope between representing organizational constituencies and the general public: Analyzing interest groups functioning as intermediaries between cititzens and public policymaking. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Antwerp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willems, E., & De Bruycker, I. (2020). Balancing constituency and congruence: How constituency involvement affects positional congruence between organized interests and the general public. Governance, 34(1), 107–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wouters, R. (2019). The persuasive power of protest. How protest wins public support. Social Forces, 98(1), 403–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne Rasmussen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Rasmussen, A., Willems, E. (2021). Interest Groups, Public Opinion, and Political Representation. In: Harris, P., Bitonti, A., Fleisher, C.S., Binderkrantz, A.S. (eds) The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Interest Groups, Lobbying and Public Affairs . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13895-0_55-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13895-0_55-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-13895-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-13895-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Political Science and International StudiesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics