Skip to main content
  • 40 Accesses

Definition

An important focal point for the study of regulatory capture has long been the economic theory of regulation. In a nutshell, this theory posits that regulatory capture indicates regulatory output that deviates from the public interest because regulatory agencies are too dependent on the regulated industry. It is therefore in their interest to positively respond to industry demands for regulation that suits their narrow business interests rather than the public interest. Yet to validly designate a case of regulatory output as regulatory capture based on these frameworks, we need to establish several conditions to collectively hold. First, we should observe regulatory output that deviates from the public interest. Second, we should find evidence of regulatory lobbying aimed at influencing regulatory output in favor of a narrow set of business interests. Third, we should observe agency decisions driven by agency self-interest to positively respond to regulatory lobbying. This...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Braun, C. (2012). The captive or the broker? Explaining public agency-interest group interactions. Governance. An International Journal of Policy Administration and Institutions, 25(2), 291–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01567.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, C. (2013). The driving forces of stability. Exploring the nature of long-term bureaucracy-interest group interactions. Administration and Society, 45(7), 809–836. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399712438377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, C. (2016). On the size and kind of stakeholder communities in regulatory governance. In M. Lodge (Ed.), Regulation scholarship in crisis? (CARR discussion paper series, paper no. 84, pp. 8–14). London CARR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, D. P. (2004). Protection without capture: Product approval by a politically responsive, learning regulator. The American Political Science Review, 98, 613–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, D. P. (2014). Detecting and measuring capture. In D. Carpenter & D. A. Moss (Eds.), Preventing regulatory capture: Special interest influence and how to limit it (pp. 57–68). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, D. P., & Moss, D. A. (Eds.). (2014). Preventing regulatory capture: Special interest influence and how to limit it. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dal Bó, E. (2006). Regulatory capture: A review. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22(6), 203–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilad, S. (2008). Exchange without capture: The UK Financial Ombudsman Service’s struggle for accepted domain. Public Administration, 86, 907–924.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowery, D., Halpin, D., & Gray, V. (2015). The organization ecology of interest communities. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Overman, S., Busuioc, M., & Wood, M. (2020). A multidimensional reputational barometer for public agencies: A validated instrument. Public Administration Review, 80(3), 415–420. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, R. A. (1974). Theories of economic regulation. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 5(2), 335–358. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rex, J. (2020). Anatomy of agency capture: An organizational typology for diagnosing and remedying capture. Regulation & Governance, 14, 271–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, S. A. (2012). The complexity of regulatory capture: Diagnosis, causality, and remediation. Roger Williams University Law Review, 102(1):221–258. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2004521

  • Stigler, G. J. (1975). Citizen and the state: Essays on regulation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yackee, S. W. (2006). Sweet-talking the fourth branch: The influence of interest group comments on federal agency rulemaking. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16, 103–124. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caelesta Braun .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Braun, C. (2021). Regulatory Capture. In: Harris, P., Bitonti, A., Fleisher, C.S., Skorkjær Binderkrantz, A. (eds) The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Interest Groups, Lobbying and Public Affairs . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13895-0_54-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13895-0_54-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-13895-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-13895-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Political Science and International StudiesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics