Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Peace and Conflict Studies pp 1–13Cite as

Palgrave Macmillan

Private Peacemaking and Dialogic Approach to Mediation

Introduction

Peace mediation (also referred to as conflict or international mediation) is customarily defined as a process that begins with the prospective mediator (a third party) being invited to work for a peaceful (re)solution of an armed conflict, (Wallensteen and Svensson (2016, p. 12)) presupposed to be “acceptable, impartial, and neutral” (Bercovitch 2007, p. 166; United Nations (UN 2012)). Broadly speaking, peace mediation can be understood as “a process of conflict management, related to but distinct from the parties’ own negotiations, where those in conflict seek the assistance of, or accept an offer of help from, an outsider (whether an individual, an organisation, a group, or a state) to change their perceptions or behavior, and do so without resorting to physical force or invoking the authority of law.” (Bercovitch 2007, p. 167). A conflict transformation perspective departs from a resolution and agreement-centric focus, and approaches peace mediation from a broad and...

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Aggestam, K., & Björkdahl, A. (2009). Introduction: War and peace in transition. In K. Aggestam & A. Björkdahl (Eds.), War and peace in transition: Changing roles of external actors (pp. 15–31). Lund: Nordic Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alert 2016! Report on conflicts, human rights and peacebuilding. Barcelona/Icaria: Escola de Cultura de Pau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bercovitch, J. (2002). Introduction. Putting mediation in context. In J. Bercovitch (Ed.), Studies in international mediation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bercovitch, J. (2007). Mediation in international conflicts: Theory, practice and developments. In I. William Zartman (Ed.), Peacemaking in international conflict: Methods and techniques, revised edition. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bercovitch, J., & Gartner, S. S. (2008). New approaches, methods and findings in the study of mediation. In International conflict mediation: New approaches and findings (Security and conflict management). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brusset, E., de Coning, C., & Hughes, B. (2016). Introduction. In E. Brusset, C. de Coning, & B. Hughes (Eds.), Complexity thinking for peacebuilding practice and evaluation (pp. 1–16). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cantekin, A. (2016). Ripeness and readiness theories in international conflict resolution. Journal of Mediation & Applied Conflict Analysis, 3(2), 75–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, J. (2016). The nonprofit world. Civil society and the rise of nonprofit sector. Boulder/London: Kumarian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, P. (2012). The value added of smaller states in peace mediation: Smart peace. In T. Piiparinen & V. Brummer (Eds.), Global networks of mediation: Prospects and avenues for Finland as a peacemaker. Helsinki: The Finnish Institute of International Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, C. A., Hampson, F. O., & Aall, P. (2002). Two’s company but is there a crowd? Some hypotheses about multiparty mediation. In J. Bercovitch (Ed.), Studies in international mediation. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, C. A., Fen O. H., & Pamela A. (2015). The Shifting Sands of Peacemaking: Challenges of Multiparty Mediation. International Negtiation, 20, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Coning, C. (2018). Adaptive peacebuilding. International Affairs, 94(2), 301–317.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • de Waal, A. (2014). Violence and peacemaking in the political marketplace. Legitimacy and peace processes. From coercion to consent. Accord an International Review of Peace Initiatives, 24, 17–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Destradi, S., & Vüllers, J. (2012). The consequences of failed mediation in civil wars: Assessing the Sri Lankan case (Working paper no. 202). German Institute of Global and Area Studies (GIGA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L. A., & Kriesberg, L. (2002). Mediating Intermediaries: Expanding Roles of Transnational Organizations. In J. Bercovitch (Ed.) Studies in International Mediation. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, M., & Kostić, R. (2013a). Peacemaking and peacebuilding: Two ends of a tail. In M. Eriksson & R. Kostić (Eds.), Mediation and Liberal peacebuilding: Peace from the ashes of war? (pp. 5–21). New York: Routledge.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, M., & Kostić, R. (2013b). Rethinking peacemaking: Peace at all costs? In M. Eriksson & R. Kostić (Eds.), Mediation and liberal peacebuilding: Peace from the ashes of war? (pp. 156–166). New York: Routledge.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Eronen, O. (2016). Organising artisans for peace: CMI on a learning curve. In E. Brusset, C. de Coning, & B. Hughes (Eds.), Complexity thinking for peacebuilding practice and evaluation (pp. 141–176). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fixdal, M. (2012). Introduction: Peacemaking in asymmetrical conflicts. In Fixdal (Ed.), Ways out of war: Peacemakers in the Middle East and Balkans. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Foley, C. (2010). The thin blue Line,how humanitarianism went to war. London/New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, D. (2002). People, peace, and power: Conflict transformation in action. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greig, J. M., & Diehl, P. F. (2012). International mediation: War and conflict in the modern world (1st ed.). Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höglund, K., & Svensson, I. (2009). Mediating between tigers and lions: Norwegian peace diplomacy in Sri Lanka’s civil war. Contemporary South Asia, 17(2), 175–191.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, M. (2006). New and old wars (2nd ed.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriesberg, L. (2015). Realizing peace. A constructive conflict approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehti, M. (2019). The era of private peacemakers. A new dialogic approach to mediation (Rethinking peace and conflict studies). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehti, M., Fèron, È., Rellitz, S., & Romashov, V. (2019). Cross-regional dialogues: Launching an informal platform of local peacebuilders. Vienna: OSCE Network of Think Thanks and Academic Institutions.

    Google Scholar 

  • MSN Mediation Support Network (MSN). Mediation and conflict transformation. Discussion Points of the Mediation Support Network (MSN) No. 5, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • MSN Mediation Support Network: Challenges to mediation support in hot wars: Learnings from Syria and Ukraine. Discussion Points of the Mediation Support Network (MSN) No. 7, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oslo Forum. (2015). Peace making in the new world disorder. Meeting report. Authored by P. Dziatkowiec, C. Buchhold, J. Harlander, and M. Verri.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oslo Forum. (2016). Adapting to a new conflict landscape. Meeting report. Authored by P. Dziatkowiec, C. Buchhold, J. Harlander, and T. Andriamasomanana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paffenholz, T., & Ross, N. (2015). Inclusive peace processes – An introduction. Development Dialogue, 63, 67–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pentikäinen, A. (2015). Reforming UN mediation through inclusion of traditional peacemakers. Development Dialogue, 63, 67–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piiparinen, T., & Brummer, V. (2012). Globalised peace mediation. In T. Piiparinen & V. Brummer (Eds.), Global networks of mediation: Prospects and avenues for Finland as a peacemaker. Helsinki: The Finnish Institute of International Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quandt, W. B. (2016). Camp David: Peacemaking and politics (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Bookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Régnier, P. (2011). The emerging concept of humanitarian diplomacy: Identification of a community of practice and prospects for international recognition. International Review of the Red Cross, 93(884), 1211–1237.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ropers, N. (1995). Peaceful intervention: Structures, processes, and strategies for the constructive regulation of Ethnopolitical conflicts (Berghof report no. 1). Berlin: Berghof Research Center for Constructive Conflict Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea, N. (2016). Nongovernment Organisations as mediators: Making peace in Aceh, Indonesia. Global Change, Peace and Security, 28(2), 177–196.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Siebert, H. (2014). National dialogues as catalyst of fundamental change. In C. Collén (Ed.), National dialogues and internal mediation processes: Perspectives on theory and practice (pp. 41–45). Helsinki: The Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strimling, A. (2006). Stepping out of the tracks: Cooperation between official diplomats and private facilitators. International Negotiation, 11(1), 91–127.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, I., & Wallensteen, P. (2010). The go-between: Jan Eliasson and the styles of mediation. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Mediation in the Syrian Crisis. (2016). From Kofi Annan to Lakhdar Brahimi. March: International Peace Institute IPI.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (UN). (2012). United Nations guidance for effective mediation. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Väyrynen, T., Lehti, M., Féron, É, & Koopman, S. Inclusive mediation and conflict prevention: The Finnish Model. Publication series of the Government’s analysis, assessment and research activities 16/2018. Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallensteen, P., & Svensson, I. (2016). Fredens Diplomater: Nordisk Medling från Bernadotte till Ahtisaari. Stockholm: Santerus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, J. (2012). Postscript: War and peace in a transnational age. In M. Fixdal (Ed.), Ways out of war: Peacemakers in the Middle East and Balkans. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarrow, C. H. M. (1978). Quaker Experiences in International Conciliation. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Tampere Peace Research Institute, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland

    Marko Lehti

Authors
  1. Marko Lehti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marko Lehti .

Section Editor information

  1. No affiliation provided

    Sandra Pogodda

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Lehti, M. (2021). Private Peacemaking and Dialogic Approach to Mediation. In: The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Peace and Conflict Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11795-5_53-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11795-5_53-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-11795-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-11795-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Political Science & International StudiesReference Module Humanities and Social Sciences

search

Navigation