Skip to main content

NATO’s Approach to Peace Operations and Peacebuilding

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Peace and Conflict Studies

Introduction

Peace operations and peacebuilding are about policies and state and non-state actors that get involved in these policies. As a military alliance established to deter and defend against the Soviet Union during the Cold War, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) is not intuitively associated with the notions of peace operations and peacebuilding.

With the end of the Cold War though, NATO embraced a broad crisis management agenda that led the organization to run what it calls peace support operations, from the Balkans to Afghanistan and even Libya. Those missions have shed light on the Organization’s nature, combining a mix of a “liberal peace” aspiration with a more traditional Realpolitik agenda. Although NATO would not easily refer to those missions as being about peacebuilding, what peace support operations are supposed to do is largely about creating the security conditions for peace to be built.

In this context, the 2014 Russian aggression in Ukraine led NATO to...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Auerswald, D. P., & Saideman, S. M. (2014). NATO in Afghanistan: Fighting together, fighting alone. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Berti, B., & Diaz-Plaja, R.-E. (2018). Projecting stability. Change and continuity. In Hope, I. (Ed.), Projecting stability: Elixir or snake oil? (Research paper 1). Rome: NATO Defense College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carati, A. (2017). Responsibility to protect, NATO and the problem of who should intervene: Reassessing the intervention in Libya. Global Change, Peace & Security, 29(3), 293–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engelbrekt, K., Mohlin, M., & Wagnsson, C. (2015). The NATO intervention in Libya. Lessons learned from the campaign. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frantzen, H. (Ed.). (2004). NATO and peace support operations, 1991–1999: Policies and doctrines. London: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, H. (2018). NATO’s lessons in crisis. NATO’s lessons in crisis. Institutional memory in international organizations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hehir, A., & Murray, R. (Eds.). (2013). Libya, the responsibility to protect and the future of humanitarian intervention. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joint Analysis and Lessons Learned Centre. (2015, October). Comprehensive study on the strategic lessons learned from ISAF, Lisbon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, J. P. (2002). NATO and the former Yugoslavia: Crisis, conflict, and the Atlantic Alliance. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, P. (2017). Divided by geography? NATO’s internal debate about the eastern and southern flanks. In K. Friis (Ed.), NATO and collective defence in the 21st century. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koops, J., et al. (2015). The Oxford handbook of UN peacekeeping operations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbaum, M. (1999). A perfect failure: NATO’s war against Yugoslavia. Foreign Affairs, 78(5).

    Google Scholar 

  • McCalla, R. B. (1996). NATO’s persistence after the Cold War. International Organization, 50(3), 445–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mearsheimer, J. J. (1990). Back to the future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War. International Security, 15(1), 5–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, R., & Damon, C. (Eds.). (2017). NATO’s return to Europe: Engaging Ukraine, Russia, and beyond. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morelli, V., & Belkin, P. (2009). NATO in Afghanistan: A test of the transatlantic alliance. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulchinock, N. (2017). NATO and the Western Balkans. From Neutral Spectator to Proactive Peacemaker. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • NATO. (1999). The Alliance’s Strategic Concept Approved by the Heads of State and Government participating in the meeting of the North Atlantic Council, Washington, DC, 24 April.

    Google Scholar 

  • NATO. (2001, July). Peace support operations, AJP-3.4.1.

    Google Scholar 

  • NATO. (2010). “Active Engagement, Modern Defence”, Strategic Concept for the Defence and Security of the Members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, Adopted by Heads of State and Government at the NATO Summit in Lisbon,19-20 November.

    Google Scholar 

  • NATO. Warsaw summit final Communiqué, 8–9 July 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • NATO. Brussels summit declaration issued by the Heads of State and Government participating in the meeting of the North Atlantic Council in Brussels, 11–12 July 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • NATO website. (2019a). Operations and missions: Past and present. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_52060.htm

  • NATO website. (2019b). NATO strategic direction south. https://thesouthernhub.org/default

  • North Atlantic Council. Alliance’s new strategic concept agreed by the heads of state and government participating in the meeting of the North Atlantic Council, 8 November 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • North Atlantic Council. Wales summit declaration issued by the Heads of State and Government participating in the meeting of the North Atlantic Council in Wales, 5 September 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, A. (1999). NATO’s ‘Humanitarian War’ over Kosovo. Survival, 41(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rynning, S. (2012). NATO in Afghanistan: The liberal disconnect. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulte, G. L. (1997). Former Yugoslavia and the new NATO. Survival, 39, 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sloan, E. C. (2016). Modern military strategy: An introduction. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stoltenberg, J. Press conference, Estonia, 20 November 2014. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_114965.htm

  • Stoltenberg, J. Projecting stability: Charting NATO’s future. Speech to the Atlantic Council, Washington, DC, 6 April 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tardy, T., & Lindstrom, G. (2019). The scope of EU-NATO cooperation. In Lindstrom & Tardy (Eds.), NATO and the EU. The essential partners (NDC research report no. 5). Rome: NATO Defense College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weighill, R., & Gaub, F. (2018). The Cauldron: NATO’s campaign in Libya. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yost, D. S. (1998). The new NATO and collective security. Survival, 40(2), 135–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thierry Tardy .

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Tardy, T. (2020). NATO’s Approach to Peace Operations and Peacebuilding. In: The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Peace and Conflict Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11795-5_4-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11795-5_4-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-11795-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-11795-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Political Science and International StudiesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics