The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Peace and Conflict Studies

Living Edition
| Editors: Oliver Richmond (Editor-in-Chief), Gëzim Visoka (Editor-in-Chief)

Conflict, Memory, and Memory Activism: Dealing with Difficult Pasts

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11795-5_38-1

Synonyms

Description

This entry discusses the role of memory studies in the analysis of societies in and after conflict and in the study of processes of peacebuilding and peace formation (Richmond 2013) from below. It addresses the following questions: What are the ways in which the social organization of memory shape processes of post-conflict remembrance? What are the modes in which communities and groups preserve and remember the past, commemorate it, deny, or obliterate it? What is the role of memory activists and alternative commemorative events in processes of reconciliation? By discussing the dynamics of memory work and memory activism, and the tensions between state-sponsored and alternative counter-memories, this entry underlines the importance of the study of spaces of memory as an arena of political struggles. Memory regimes and mnemonic actors, state calendars, and commemorative...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Aguilar, P. (2002). Memory and amnesia: The role of the Spanish Civil War in the transition to democracy. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  2. Aguilar, P., & Ramirez-Barat, C. (2017). Amnesty and reparations without truth or justice in Spain. In N. Wouters (Ed.), Transitional justice and memory in Europe (1945–2013) (pp. 199–258). Cambridge, MA: Intersentia.Google Scholar
  3. Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Connerton, P. (1989). How societies Remember. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Connerton, P. (2009). How modernity forgets. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dević, A. (1997). Anti-war initiatives and the un-making of civic identities in the former Yugoslavia republics. Journal of Historical Sociology, 10(2), 119–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Duhaček, D. (2010). Breme Našeg Doba: Odgovornost I rasuđivanje u delu Hane Arent (The burden of our time: Responsibility and reasoning in Hannah Arendt). Belgrade: Circulus.Google Scholar
  8. Đureinović, J. (2018). (Trans)national Memories of the Common Past in the Post-Yugoslav Space. In S. Berger & C. Tekin (Eds.), History and belonging: Representations of the past in contemporary European politics (pp. 106–121). New York: Berghahn.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fridman, O. (2011). It was like fighting a war with our own people: Anti-war Activism in Serbia during the1990s. Nationalities Papers, 39, 507–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fridman, O. (2015). Alternative calendars and memory work in Serbia: Anti-war activism after Milošević. Memory Studies, 8, 212–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fridman, O. (2018). “Too young to remember determined not to forget”: Memory activists engaging with returning ICTY convicts. International Criminal Justice Review, 28, 423–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fridman, O. (2019). ‘Hashtag memory activism’: Online commemorations and online memory activism. A paper presented at the international conference: CEEISA-ISA 2019, Belgrade 17-19 June.Google Scholar
  13. Fridman, O., & Hercigonja, S. (2017). Protiv Nenormalnog: An analysis of the #protivdiktature. Protests in the context of memory politics of the 1990s in Serbia. Contemporary Southeastern Europe, 4, 12–25.Google Scholar
  14. Fridman, O., & Ristić, K. (forthcoming). Online transnational memory activism and commemoration: The case of the white armband day. In A. Sierp & J. Wüstenberg (Eds.), Agency in transnational memory politics. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  15. Gordy, E. (2013). Guilt, responsibility, and denial. The past at stake in post-Milošević Serbia. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  16. Gutman, Y. (2017). Memory activism: Reimagining the past for the future in Israel-Palestine. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Halbwachs, M. (1992). On collective memory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hoskins, A. (2018). The Restless Past: an introduction to digital memory and media. In Digital Memory Studies: Media Pasts in Transition, edited by Andrew Hoskins, 1–24. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
  19. Howard Ross, M. (2018). Slavery in the North: Forgetting history and recovering memory. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Irwin-Zarecka, I. (1994). Frames of remembrance: The dynamics of collective memory. New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar
  21. Jelin, E. (2003). State repression and the labors of memory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  22. Kubik, J., & Bernhard, M. (2014). A theory of the politics of memory. In M. Bernhard & J. Kubik (Eds.), Twenty years after communism. The politics of memory and commemoration (pp. 7–34). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kuljić, T. (2008). Istorijske, političke i herojske generacije: Nacrt okvira i primena (Historical, political and heroic generations: Draft framework and application). Filozofija i Društvo, 1, 69–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kuljić, T. (2009). Remembering crimes – Proposal and reactions. In D. Vujadinović & V. Goati (Eds.), Between authoritarianism and democracy (Serbia at the political crossroads) (Vol. III, pp. 197–212). Belgrade: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung and Centar for Democratic Transition.Google Scholar
  25. Lievrouw, L. A. (2011). Alternative and activist new media (Digital media and society series). Cambridge, UK/Malden: Polity.Google Scholar
  26. Mac Ginty, R., & Firchow, P. (2016). Top-down and bottom-up narratives of peace and conflict. Politics, 36(3), 308–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mac Ginty, R., & Richmond, O. P. (2013). The local turn in peace building: A critical agenda for peace. Third World Quarterly, 34(5), 763–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Moll, N. (2013). Fragmented memories in a fragmented country: Memory competition and political identity-building in today’s Bosnia and Herzegovina. Nationalities Papers, 41(6), 910–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nora, P. (1989). Between memory and history: Les Lieux de Mémoire. Representations, 26, 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Olick, J. K. (2007). The politics of regret: On historical memory and historical responsibility. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Olick, J., Vinitzky-Seroussi, V., & Levy, D. (2011). Introduction. In J. Olick, V. Vinitzky-Seroussi, & D. Levy (Eds.), The collective memory reader (pp. 3–62). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Papić, Ž. (2002). Europe after 1989: Ethnic wars, the fascistization of civil society and body politics in Serbia. In G. Griffin & R. Braidotti (Eds.), Thinking differently: A reader in European Women’s Studies (pp. 127–144). London/New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  33. Petrović, T. (2013). Serbia’s Quest for a Usable Past. Available at: http://www.iwm.at/read-listen-watch/transit-online/serbias-quest-for-a-usable-past/.
  34. Plamberger, M. (2016). How generations remember: Conflicting histories and shared memories in post-war Bosnia and Herzegovina. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Richmond, O. P. (2006). The problem of peace: Understanding the liberal peace. Conflict, Security and Development, 6(3), 291–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Richmond, O. P. (2013). Failed statebuilding versus peace formation. Cooperation and Conflict, 38(3), 378–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schwartz, B. (2001). Commemorative objects. In N. Smelser & P. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 2267–2272). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Simić, O., & Daly, K. (2011). “One Pair of Shoe, One Life”: Steps towards accountability for genocide in Srebrenica. The International Journal of Transitional Justice, 5, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Spasić, I. (2002). Overcoming the past. Politics and everyday life in Serbia after Milošević. Paper presented at the international conference “Études balkaniques: état des savoirs et pistes de recherché”, Paris.Google Scholar
  40. Stojanović, D. (2011). Revisions of the Second World War history in Serbia. In S. P. Ramet & O. Listhaug (Eds.), Serbia and the Serbs in World War Two (pp. 247–264). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tirosh, N. (2018). iNakba, mobile memory and society’s memory. Mobile Media and Communication, 6(3), 350–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vinitzky-Seroussi, V. (2009). Yitzhak Rabin’s assassination and the dilemmas of commemoration. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  43. Visoka, G. (2016). Arrested truth: Transitional justice and the politics of remembrance in Kosovo. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 8(1), 62–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Watson, B. R., & Chen, M. S. (2016). @TodayIn1963: Commemorative journalism, digital collective remembering, and the March on Washington. Journalism Studies, 17(8), 1010–1029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Winter, J. (2001). The generation of memory: Reflections on the “Memory Boom” in contemporary historical studies. Canadian Military History, 10(3), 57–66.Google Scholar
  46. Zerubavel, Y. (1995). Recovered roots: Collective memory and the making of Israeli National Tradition. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Zerubavel, E. (2003a). Calendars and history: A comparative study of the social organization of national memory. In J. Olick (Ed.), States of memory: Continuities, conflicts, and transformations in national retrospection (pp. 315–337). Durham: Duke University.Google Scholar
  48. Zerubavel, E. (2003b). Time maps: Collective memory and the social shape of the past. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Media and Communications (FMK), Singidunum UniversityBelgradeSerbia
  2. 2.School for International Training (SIT)BelgradeSerbia

Section editors and affiliations

  • Sandra Pogodda

There are no affiliations available