Synonyms
Definition
Intersectionality refers to how multiple factors or systems of power and oppression – such as gender, race, class, age, and sexuality – intersect in defining the societal structures and people’s lived experiences. In conflict-affected societies, intersectionality helps in understanding not only the kinds of violence people might suffer but also the varied interests, needs, agencies, and views toward what constitutes inclusive and sustainable peace. This approach, however, has so far largely been absent in both peace research and peacebuilding practice.
Introduction
Originally coined by Kimberlé W. Crenshaw (1989), a US critical legal race scholar, intersectionality was deployed to bring to the fore the experiences of oppression of women of color and how these experiences were based on multiple intersecting axes of social division, in particular race, gender, and class. In her work, Crenshaw (1989, 1991) showed how women of color were...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Acosta, M., Castañeda, A., Garcíıa, D., Hernández, F., Muelas, D., & Santamaria, A. (2018). The Colombian transitional process: Comparative perspectives on violence against Indigenous women. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 12(1), 108–125.
Anzaldúa, G. E. (1987). Borderlands/La Frontera: The new mestiza. San Francisco: Aunt Lute Books.
Azarmandi, M. (2018). The racial silence within peace studies. Peace Review, 30(1), 69–77.
Basu, S., Kirby, P., & Shepherd, L. (2020). Women, peace & security: A critical cartography. In S. Basu, P. Kirby, & L. Shepherd (Eds.), New directions in women, peace and security (pp. 1–25). Bristol: Bristol University Press.
Berlowitz, M. J. (2002). Eurocentric contradictions in peace studies. Peace Review, 14(1), 61–65.
Bouvier, V. M. (2016). Gender and the role of women in Colombia’s peace process. New York: UN Women.
Brubaker, R. (2002). Ethnicity without croups. Archives Européennes de Sociologie, 43(2), 163–189.
Cho, S., Crenshaw, K., & McCall, L. (2013). Toward a field of intersectionality studies: Theory, application, and praxis. Signs, 38(4), 785–810.
Cohn, S. (2008). Mainstreaming gender in UN security policy: A path to political transformation? In S. Rai & G. Waylen (Eds.), Global governance: Feminist perspectives (pp. 185–206). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Collins, P. H. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge.
Collins, P. H., & Bilge, S. (2016). Intersectionality. Cambridge: Polity.
Combahee River Collective. (1977). The Combahee River collective statement. https://combaheerivercollective.weebly.com/the-combahee-river-collective-statement.html
Confortini, C. C. (2006). Galtung, violence, and gender: The case for a peace studies/feminism alliance. Peace and Change, 31(3), 333–367.
Crenshaw, K. W. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1(8), 138–167.
Crenshaw, K. W. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.
Davis, K. (2008). Intersectionality as buzzword: A sociology of science perspective on what makes a feminist theory successful. Feminist Theory, 9(1), 67–85.
Dhamoon, R. K. (2011). Considerations on mainstreaming intersectionality. Political Research Quarterly, 64(1), 230–243.
Fanon, F. (1963). The wretched of the Earth. New York: Grove Press.
Haastrup, T., & Hagen, J. (2020). Global racial hierarchies and the limits of localization via National Action Plans. In S. Basu, P. Kirby, & L. Shepherd (Eds.), New directions in women, peace and security (pp. 133–151). Bristol: Bristol University Press.
Hameiri, S., & Jones, L. (2018). Against hybridity in the study of peacebuilding and statebuilding. In J. Wallis, L. Kent, M. Forsyth, S. Dinnen, & S. Bose (Eds.), Hybridity on the ground in peacebuilding and development: Critical conversations (pp. 99–112). Acton: Australian National University Press.
hooks, b. (1981). Ain’t I a woman: Black women and feminism. Boston: South End Press.
Iñiguez de Heredia, M. (2018). The conspicuous absence of class and privilege in the study of resistance in peacebuilding contexts. International Peacekeeping, 25(3), 325–348.
Kappler, S. (2015). The dynamic local: Delocalisation and (re-)localisation in the search for peacebuilding identity. Third World Quarterly, 36(5), 875–889.
Mac Ginty, R. & Richmond, O.P. (2016). The fallacy of constructing hybrid political orders: a reappraisal of the hybrid turn in peacebuilding. International Peacekeeping, 23(2), 219–239.
Martin de Almagro, M. (2017). Producing participants: Gender, race, class, and women, peace and security. Global Society, 32(4), 395–414.
Mizzi, R. C., & Byrne, S. (2015). Queer theory and peace and conflict studies: Some critical reflections. In M. Flaherty, S. Byrne, H. Tuso, & T. Matyok (Eds.), Gender and peacebuilding: All hands required (pp. 357–374). New York: Lexington Books.
Mohanty, C. (1991). Under western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. In C. Mohanty, A. Russo, & L. Torres (Eds.), Third world women and the politics of feminism (pp. 51–80). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Moolakkattu, J. (2006). Feminism and peace studies: Taking stock of a quarter century of efforts. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 13(2), 137–162.
Moraga, C., & Anzaldúa, G. E. (Eds.). (1981). This bridge called my back: Writings by radical women of color. Watertown: Persephone Press.
Phoenix, A., & Pattynama, P. (2006). Editorial. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 13(3), 187–192.
Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books.
Shepherd, L. (2016). Victims of violence or agents of change: Representations of women in UN peacebuilding discourse. Peacebuilding, 4(2), 121–135.
Shroff, S. (2018). The peace professor: Decolonial, feminist, and queer futurities. In M. Groarke & E. Welty (Eds.), Peace and justice studies: Critical pedagogy (pp. 146–162). London: Routledge.
Smith, S. (2019). Gendering peace: UN peacebuilding in Timor-Leste. London: Routledge.
Staunæs, D. (2003). Where have all the subjects gone? Bringing together the concepts of intersectionality and subjectification. Nora, 11(2), 101–110.
Stavrevska, E. B. (2016). Space, class and peace: Spatial governmentality in postwar Bosnia and Herzegovina. In A. Björkdahl & S. Buckley-Zistel (Eds.), Spatializing peace and conflict: Mapping the production of places, sites and scales of violence (pp. 141–158). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Stavrevska, E. B. (2020). The impact of Colombia’s COVID-19 response on Indigenous inclusion in peace processes. Centre for Women, Peace and Security, London School of Economics and Political Science. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/wps/2020/05/20/the-impact-of-colombias-covid-19-response-on-indigenous-inclusion-in-peace-processes/
Valdes, F. (1997). Poised at the cusp: LatCrit theory, outsider jurisprudence, and Latina/o self-empowerment. Harvard Latino Law Review, 2(1), 1–59.
Yuval-Davis, N. (2006). Intersectionality and feminist politics. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 13(3), 193–210.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Stavrevska, E.B., Smith, S. (2020). Intersectionality and Peace. In: The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Peace and Conflict Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11795-5_120-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11795-5_120-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-11795-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-11795-5
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Political Science and International StudiesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences