Advertisement

Changing the Gameplay: Digitization and the Public Servant

Living reference work entry

Abstract

The advent of modern information and communication technologies has over the years been affecting the work life of public servants. Based on existing bodies of academic literature, this chapter addresses five relationships between the civil servant and the process of digitization: (a) citizens and customers, (b) the private sector, (c) work processes and organizational culture, (d) public values, and (e) data analytics and big data. Contrary to much speculation, the role of the civil servant in the relationships with a number of digitization themes is hardly as transformative as some practitioners, politicians, and academics want us to believe. Furthermore, digitization is often simplified as a panacea for all the challenges the public sector is encountering. While we have witnessed, and will see in the future, various improvements, it is important to bear in mind that there is always a trade-off between the public values involved.

Keywords

Digitisation E-government Civil servant Public Sector Public Values Information Polity 

References

  1. Baldwin, N., R. Gauld, and S. Goldfinch. 2012. What public servants really think of e-government. Public Management Review 14 (1): 105–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bannister, F., and R. Connolly. 2011. The trouble with transparency: A critical review of openness in E-government. Policy and Internet 3 (1): 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. ———. 2014. ICT, public values and transformative government: A framework and programme for research. Government Information Quarterly 31 (1): 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bélanger, F. and Hiller, J. 2006. A framework for e-government: privacy implications. Business Process Management Journal 12 (1): 48–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bellamy, C.A., and J.A. Taylor. 1992. Informatization and new public management: An alternative agenda for public administration. Public Policy and Administration 7 (3): 29–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bellamy, C., and J.A. Taylor. 1994. Reinventing government in the information age. Public Money and Management 14 (3): 59–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bellamy, C., and J. Taylor. 1997. Transformation by stealth. The case of the UK criminal justice system. In Beyond BPR in public administration, ed. J. Taylor, I.T.M. Snellen, and A. Zuurmond, 33–57. Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bellamy, C., and J.A. Taylor. 1998. Governing in the information age. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bennett, C. 2008. The privacy advocates: Resisting the spread of surveillance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bennett, C., and C. Raab. 2006. The governance of privacy. Policy instruments in global perspective. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  11. Björklund, F., and O. Svenonius. 2013. Video surveillance and social control in a comparative perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Bovens, M., and S. Zouridis. 2002. From street-level to system-level bureaucracies: How information and communication technology is transforming administrative discretion and constitutional control. Public Administration Review 62 (2): 174–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bozeman, B., and S. Bretschneider. 1986. Public management information systems: Theory and prescription. Public Administration Review 46: 475–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Burton-Jones, A. 2014. What have we learned from the smart machine? Information and Organisation 24 (2): 71–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Busch, P.A., and H.Z. Henriksen. 2018. Digital discretion: A systematic literature review of ICT and street-level discretion. Information Polity 23 (1): 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chadwick, A. 2006. Internet politics. States, citizens, and new communication technologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Considine, M., Lewis, J. and O’Sullivan, S. 2011. Quasi-markets and service delivery flexibility following a decade of employment assistance reform in Australia. Journal of Social Policy 40 (4): 811–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dalton, C., L. Taylor, and J. Thatcher. 2016. Critical data studies: A dialog on data and space. Big Data & Society 3 (1): 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dunleavy, P., H. Margetts, S. Bastow, and J. Tinkler. 2005. New public management is dead – Long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16: 467–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dunleavy, P., H. Margetts, S. Bastow and J. Tinkler. 2006. Digital Era Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fountain, J.E. 2001. Building the virtual state. Information technology and institutional change. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hall, P., and K. Löfgren. 2004. The rise and decline of a visionary policy: Swedish ICT-policy in retrospect. Information Polity 9 (3–4): 149–165.Google Scholar
  23. Homburg, V., and V. Bekkers. 2005. E-government and NPM: A perfect marriage? In The information ecology of e-government, ed. V. Bekkers and V. Homburg, 155–171. Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hood, C. 2006. Transparency in historical perspective. In Transparency, the Key to Better Governance, Proceedings of the British Academy, ed. C. Hood and D. Heald, 1–23. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Horrocks, I. 2009. Experts’ and E-government. Information, Communication & Society 12 (1): 110–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hudson, J. 1999. Informatization and public administration: a political science perspective. Information, Communication & Society 2 (3): 318–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Katsonis, M., and A. Botros. 2015. Digital government: A primer and professional perspectives. Australian Journal of Public Administration 74 (1): 42–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lafuente, G. 2015. The big data security challenge. Network Security 2015: 12–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Laney, D. 2001, February 6. 3-D data management: Controlling data volume, velocity and variety. Application Delivery Strategies by META Group Inc., 949.Google Scholar
  30. Linders, D. 2012. From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Government Information Quarterly 29 (4): 446–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lipsky, M. 1980. Street-level bureaucracy. New York: Russel Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Liu, J., J. Li, W. Li, and J. Wu. 2016. Rethinking big data: A review on the data quality and usage issues. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 115: 134–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Löfgren, K., and C.W.R. Webster. 2019. Big data in government: The case of ‘smart cities’. In Big data: Promise, application and pitfalls, ed. A. Wilkinson and J. Storm Pedersen. Edward Elgar: Basingstoke.Google Scholar
  34. Margetts, H. 2006. Transparency and digital government. In Transparency, The Key to Better Governance, Proceedings of the British Academy, ed. C. Hood and D. Heald, 197–207. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Mattioli, M. 2014. Disclosing big data. Minnesota Law Review 99 (2): 535–584.Google Scholar
  36. Meijer, A.J. 2007. Why don’t they listen to us? Reasserting the Role of ICT in Public Administration. Information Polity 12 (4): 233–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Meijer, A., and K. Löfgren. 2015. The neglect of Technology in Theories of policy change. International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age. 2 (1): 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mergel, I., R.K. Rethemeyer, and K. Isett. 2016. Big data in public affairs. Public Administration Review 76 (6): 918–937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Moser, C. 2001. How open is “open as possible”? Three different approaches to transparency and openness in regulating access to EU documents, HIS political science series. Vol. 80. Vienna: Institute for Advanced Studies.Google Scholar
  40. Negroponte, N. 1995. Being digital. London: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
  41. Norris, P. 2001. Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the internet worldwide. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. OECD [Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development]. 2009. Rethinking e-government services: user-centred approaches. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  43. Orlikowski, W.J. 1992. The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science 3 (2): 398–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. ———. 2000. Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science 11 (4): 404–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Orlikowski, W.J., and D. Robey. 1991. Information technology and the structuring of organizations. Information Systems Research 2 (2): 143–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Osborne, S. 2006. The new public governance? Public Management Review 8 (3): 377–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Peters, B. G. 2000. The Politics of Bureaucracy, 5th edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Peters, G.B., T. Erkkilā, and P. von Maravic. 2016. Public administration: Research, strategies, concepts and methods. New York/Abindgon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Pollitt, C. 2011. Mainstreaming technological change in the study of public management. Public Policy and Administration 26 (4): 377–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pratchett, L. 1998. Technological Bias in an information age: ICT policy making in local government. In Handbook in the information age, ed. I. Snellen and W. van de Donk. Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
  51. Reddick, C. 2005. Citizen interaction with E-government: From the streets to servers? Government Information Quarterly 22 (1): 38–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. ———. 2012. Public administration and information technology. Burlington: Jones & Bartlett Publishers.Google Scholar
  53. Rocheleau, B., and L. Wu. 2002. Public versus private information systems: Do they differ in important ways? A review and empirical test. The American Review of Public Administration 32 (4): 379–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Taylor, J.A. 1998. Informatization as X-ray: What is public administration for the information age? In Public administration in an Information age: A handbook, ed. I.Th.M. Snellen and W.B.H.J. Van de Donk, 21–32. Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
  55. Thatcher, J. 2014. Living on fumes: Digital footprints, data fumes, and the limitations of spatial big data. International Journal of Communication 8: 1765–1783.Google Scholar
  56. Toffler, A. 1980. The third wave: The classic study of tomorrow. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  57. van de Donk, W.B.H.J., and I.T.M. Snellen. 1998. Towards a theory of public administration in an information age? In Public administration in an information age. A handbook, ed. I.T.M. Snellen and W.B.H.J. van de Donk, 3–19. Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
  58. van de Donk, W., I.Th.M. Snellen, and P.W. Tops. 1995. Orwell in Athens: A perspective on Informatization and democracy. Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
  59. Ward, M.A., and S. Mitchell. 2004. A comparison of the strategic priorities of public and private sector information resource management executives. Government Information Quarterly 21 (2): 284–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Webster, C.W.R. 2009. CCTV policy in the UK: Reconsidering the evidence base. Surveillance Studies 6 (1): 10–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. West, D.M. 2004. E-government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes. Public Administration Review 64 (1): 15–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Yildiz, M. 2007. E-government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward. Government Information Quarterly 24 (3): 646–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. ———. 2012. Big questions of e-government research. Information Polity 17 (3–4): 343–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zuboff, S. 1988. In the age of the smart machine: The future of work and power. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  65. Zuurmond, A. 1998. From bureaucracy to infocracy, are democratic institutions lagging behind? In Handbook in the information age, ed. I. Snellen and W. van de Donk. Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of GovernmentVictoria University of WellingtonWellingtonNew Zealand

Section editors and affiliations

  • Gemma Carey
    • 1
  1. 1.University of New South WalesSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations