Skip to main content

Community of Practices

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 279 Accesses

Synonyms

Learning by interaction; Practitioner community; Professional community; Situated learning; Thinking together

Definition

“We all belong to communities of practice… in fact communities of practice are everywhere” (Wenger 1998, p. 6). A Community of Practice (CoP) is a group of people who share similar challenges, interact regularly, learn from and with each other, and improve their ability to address their challenges. The theory of CoP starts from the idea of situated learning and learning by interaction and studies how a CoP generates and diffuses knowledge among members and in the organization in which the CoP arises and grows. In this chapter, CoP is described, taking into consideration components, characteristics, relationships among members in the CoP and between the CoP and organizations, benefits and limitations in activating a CoP, and factors that enable or obstacle the success of a CoP. It emerges that CoP exist in many contexts and that the presence of...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Armanios, D. E. (2012). Sustainable development as a community of practice: Insights from Rural Water Projects in Egypt. Sustainable Development, 20, 42–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardon, T., & Borzillo, S. (2016). Communities of practice: Control or autonomy? Journal of Business Strategy, 37(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-02-2015-0018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borzillo, S., & Kaminska-Labbè, R. (2011). Step in or step out: Supporting innovation through communities of practice. Journal of Business Strategy, 32(3), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2008.05.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borzillo, S., Aznar, S., & Schmitt, A. (2011). A journey through communities of practice: How and why members move from the periphery to the core. European Management Journal, 29, 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2010.08.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, S., & Middlemiss, L. (2015). The role of learning in sustainable communities of practice. Local Environment, 20(7), 796–810. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2013.872091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cattaneo, C., Signori, S., & Acerbis, E. (2018). Potenzialita’ e limiti delle comunita’ di pratica in sanita’: un caso di studio. In S. Corbella, L. Marchi, & F. Rossignoli (Eds.), Nuove frontiere del reporting aziendale la comunicazione agli stakeholders tra vincoli normativi e attese informative (pp. 122–154). Milano: Franco Angeli editore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, M. (2006). Communities of practice: An alternative learning model for knowledge creation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(1), 143–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00486.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, A. (2005). What are communities of practice? A comparative review of four seminal works. Journal of Information Science, 31(6), 527–540. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551505057016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalkir, K. (2005). Knowledge management in theory and practice. Oxford: Elsevier-Butterworth Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, E., & Hall, H. (2002). Organizational knowledge and communities of practice. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36(1), 171–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunham, L., Freeman, R. E., & Liedtka, J. (2006). Enhancing stakeholder practice: A particularized exploration of community. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(1), 23–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, A., Donnelly, A., Jones, M., Klostermann, J., Groot, A., & Breil, M. (2011). Community of practice approach to developing urban sustainability indicators. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 13(4), 591–617. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1464333211004024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iyalomhe, F., Jensen, A., Critto, A., & Marcomini, A. (2013). The science–policy interface for climate change adaptation: The contribution of communities of practice theory. Environmental Policy and Governance, 23, 368–380. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerno, S. J. (2008). Limitations of communities of practice. A consideration of unresolved issues and difficulties in the approach. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 15(1), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051808317998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marr, B., Schiuma, G., & Neely, A. (2004). Intellectual capital – Defining key performance indicators for organizational knowledge assets. Business Process Management Journal, 10(5), 551–569. https://doi.org/10.1108/1463715041055922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohajan, H. K. (2017). Roles of communities of practice for the development of the society. Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, 6(3), 27–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2001). The well-being of nations: The role of human and social capital. Paris: OECD.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pattinson, S., Preece, D., & Dawson, P. (2016). In search of innovative capabilities of communities of practice: A systematic review and typology for future research. Management Learning, 47(5), 506–524. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507616646698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Probst, G., & Borzillo, S. (2008). Why communities of practice succeed and why they fail. European Management Journal, 26, 335–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2008.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyrko, I., Dörfler, V., & Eden, C. (2017). Thinking together: What makes communities of practice work? Human Relations, 70(4), 389–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726716661040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J. (2006). Limits to communities of practice. Journal of Management Studies, 43(3), 623–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, K., Analoui, B. D., Brooks, J., & Husain, S. F. (2018). Competitive communities of practice, knowledge sharing, and Machiavellian participation: A case study. International Journal of Training and Development, 22(3), 210–221. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijtd.12129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snowden, D. (2002). Complex acts of knowing: Paradox and descriptive self-awareness. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6(2), 100–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. C., & Snyder, W. M. (2000). Communities of practice: The organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review, 78, 139–145.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cristiana Cattaneo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Cattaneo, C. (2020). Community of Practices. In: Idowu, S., Schmidpeter, R., Capaldi, N., Zu, L., Del Baldo, M., Abreu, R. (eds) Encyclopedia of Sustainable Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02006-4_921-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02006-4_921-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-02006-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-02006-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Business and ManagementReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics