Skip to main content

Personhood and Sustainable Management

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Sustainable Management
  • 6 Accesses


Corporation, Personality


Legal personhood – recognition as having legally enforceable rights and responsibilities – is a building block of sustainable management. It is a status enjoyed by individuals, corporations, and polities (nation states and their constituent provinces): entities that can hold, acquire/dispose of assets, engage in litigation, and act in ways that transcend an individual’s life. Environmentalists and other activists are seeking to strengthen environmental sustainability and acknowledge First Nations peoples by recognizing rivers, forests, and other natural domains as legal persons under the stewardship of First Nations communities. Such a status might foster sustainable management of natural environments and strengthen the agency of communities that wish to minimize exploitation of resources by corporations and governments that prioritize immediate commercial benefit over sustainability for long-term community good. The personhood...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions


  • Abrams, F. (2010). Citizens united and its critics. Yale Law Journal Online, 120, 77–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, B. B. (2017). Is the Zombie my neighbour? The Zombie apocalypse as a lens for understanding legal personhood. Canberra Law Review, 14(1), 25–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, B. B. (2022). Signs of invisibility: Nonrecognition of natural environments as persons in international and domestic law. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 35(4), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonython, W. (2021). Tort law and climate change. University of Queensland Law Journal, 40(3), 421–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, D. (2017). Recognizing the rights of nature: Lofty rhetoric or legal revolution? Natural Resources & Environment, 32(4), 13–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesterman, S. (2020). Artificial intelligence and the limits of legal personality. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 69(4), 819–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colón-Ríos, J. (2015). Notes on the theory and practice of the rights of nature: The case of the Vilcabamba River. In P. Martin & Z. Bigdeli (Eds.), In search of environmental justice (pp. 120–134). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Coombes, B. (2020). Nature’s rights as indigenous rights? Mis/recognition through personhood for Te Urewera. Espace populations sociétés – Space populations societies, 1–2, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deere, C. (2009). The implementation game: The TRIPS agreement and the global politics of intellectual property reform in developing countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckstein, G., D’Andrea, A., Marshall, V., O’Donnell, E., Talbot-Jones, J., Curran, D., & O’Bryan, K. (2019). Conferring legal personality on the world’s rivers: A brief intellectual assessment. Water International, 44(6–7), 804–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, G. J. (2018). Environmental personhood. Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, 43(1), 50–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grear, A. (2007). Challenging corporate ‘humanity’: Legal disembodiment, embodiment and human rights. Human Rights Law Review, 7(3), 511–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison, A. (2014). The Whanganui river as a legal person. Alternative Law Journal, 39(3), 179–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Islam, M. S., & O’Donnell, E. (2020). Legal rights for the Turag: Rivers as living entities in Bangladesh. Asia Pacific Journal of Environmental Law, 23(2), 160–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L. (2012). Law and legal theory in the history of corporate responsibility: Corporate personhood. Seattle University Law Review, 35, 1121–1550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolly, S., & Roshan Menon, K. S. (2021). Of Ebbs and Flows: Understanding the legal consequences of granting personhood to natural entities in India. Transnational Environmental Law, 10(3), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kateb, G. (2014). Human dignity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kinkaid, E. (2019). ‘Rights of nature’ in translation: Assemblage geographies, boundary objects, and translocal social movements. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 44(3), 555–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magallanes, C. I. (2019). From rights to responsibilities using legal personhood and guardianship for Rivers. In B. Martin, L. Te Aho, & M. Humphries-Kil (Eds.), ResponsAbility: Law and governance for living well with the earth (pp. 216–239). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naffine, N. (2003). Who are law’s persons? From Cheshire cats to responsible subjects. Modern Law Review, 66(3), 346–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naffine, N. (2012). Legal personality and the natural world: On the persistence of the human measure of value. Journal of Human Rights and the Environment, 3, 68–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radin, M. (1982). Property and personhood. Stanford Law Review, 34(5), 957–1016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruru, J. (2014). Tühoe-crown settlement – Te Urewera act 2014. Maori Law Review, 16, 24–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheehy, B. (2004). Corporations and social costs: The Wal-Mart case study. Journal of Law & Commerce, 24(1), 1–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheehy, B. (2022). Sustainability, justice and corporate law: Redistributing corporate rights and duties to meet the challenge of sustainability. European Business Organisation Law Review, 23, 273–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheehy, B., & Farneti, F. (2021). Corporate social responsibility, sustainability, sustainable development and corporate sustainability: What is the difference, and does it matter? Sustainability, 13(11), 5965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, C. D. (1972). Should trees have standing? Toward legal rights for natural objects. Southern California Law Review, 45(20), 450–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stout, L. A. (2014). The corporation as a time machine: Intergenerational equity, intergenerational efficiency, and the corporate form. Seattle University Law Review, 38, 685–723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Studley, J., & Bleisch, W. (2018). Juristic personhood for sacred natural sites: A potential means for protecting nature. Parks, 24(1), 81–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tănăsescu, M. (2020). Rights of nature, legal personality, and indigenous philosophies. Transnational Environmental Law, 9(3), 429–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wesche, P. (2021). Rights of nature in practice: A case study on the impacts of the Colombian Atrato River decision. Journal of Environmental Law, 33(3), 531–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wise, S. (2013). Nonhuman rights to personhood. Pace Environmental Law Review, 30(3), 1270–1280.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruce Baer Arnold .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Arnold, B.B. (2023). Personhood and Sustainable Management. In: Idowu, S., Schmidpeter, R., Capaldi, N., Zu, L., Del Baldo, M., Abreu, R. (eds) Encyclopedia of Sustainable Management. Springer, Cham.

Download citation

  • DOI:

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-02006-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-02006-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Business and ManagementReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics